Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

6TH ANNUAL SHIP-TO-

SHORE CRANE SURVEY
GLOBAL DELIVERIES 2016 (DS22)

This survey covers 2016 global and regional

delivery volumes and 2005-16 global and
regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore
container cranes.

Researched and authored exclusively for

PEMA by Brian Robinson.

Published April 2017

www.pema.org
 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 3

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 4

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

2 STS DELIVERIES IN 2016 8

3 STS DELIVERY TREND 2005-2016 14

4 STS SPECIFICATION TREND 2005-2016 20

5 ABOUT THE AUTHOR AND PEMA 26

Tables
1.1 Global STS deliveries 2016 by geographic region 7
2.1 Consolidated results of 2016 STS deliveries 8
3.1 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 14
4.1 Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift capacity 20
4.2 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift capacity 21
4.3 Global STS deliveries 2016 by outreach 22
4.4 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by outreach 23
4.5 Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift height 24
4.6 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift height 25

Figures
1.1 Global STS deliveries 2016 by geographic region 7
3.1 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 14
3.2 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by geographic region 15
3.3 China STS delivery trend 2005-2016 15
3.4 Other Asia STS delivery trend 2005-2016 16
3.5 Europe STS delivery trend 2005-2016 16
3.6 North America STS delivery trend 2005-2016 17
3.7 Latin America STS delivery trend 2005-2016 17
3.8 Mid East/Red Sea STS delivery trend 2005-2016 18
3.9 Africa STS delivery trend 2005-2016 18
3.10 Australasia STS delivery trend 2005-2016 19
4.1 Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift capacity 20
4.2 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift capacity 21
4.3 Global STS deliveries 2016 by outreach 22
4.4 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by outreach 23
4.5 Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift height 24
4.6 Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift height 25

© Port Equipment Manufacturers Association | Published April 2017

This document is designated DS22 in the PEMA series of global equipment delivery surveys
 4 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey
INTRODUCTION
This is the sixth global survey of
ship-to-shore (STS) container crane
deliveries to be published by PEMA,
the Port Equipment Manufacturers
Association.
OBJECTIVE METHODOLOGY
Based on original data gathered from port equipment
manufacturers around the world, the objective of the
annual survey is to determine market size and scope
by equipment delivery volumes for STS container
cranes. giving details of their crane deliveries in 2016.
For several years prior to 2010 this information was
published in the trade press. However, as a result
of magazine closure, precise delivery statistics for
a given calendar year, as provided in this survey,
ceased to be published. Other public journals still
provide comprehensive analysis of the global STS
market, covering units on order at a specific date in
time for delivery in future months.
Following the cessation of publication of the
earlier mentioned trade press report, STS crane
manufacturers were asked whether a survey of past
annual delivery numbers was useful information for
them. There was a resoundingly positive response.
PEMA is committed to promoting and supporting
the global role of port equipment and technology
and, in order to fill the gap in industry information,
commissioned its first global STS crane deliveries
survey in 2012, covering 2011 deliveries. This current
survey, covering 2016 deliveries, is the sixth in the
series.
For similar reasons, PEMA has also commissioned
a report on annual deliveries of yard cranes (RTGs,
www.pema.org
6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 5
RMGs and ASCs). These two additional surveys
together complement the well-established PEMA
Annual Global Survey on Mobile Port Equipment
Deliveries, covering reach stackers, lift trucks and
terminal tractors.
The survey research was conducted in the first two
months of 2017 and the results were collated in February
and March 2017. All known manufacturers of STS cranes
were contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire
Because PEMA is a trade association, somewhat
different rules apply with respect to data on individual
company activity that can be reported. As in previous
reports, this survey again follows much the same format
as has been published in the trade press previously, but
without details on the supplying manufacturer or the
name of any component suppliers.
The survey was conducted by Brian Robinson, an
independent container and transport consultant. Mr. SURVEY DISTRIBUTION Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the
Robinson has been the author of the surveys published The consolidated survey results will be released to information. However, neither the author, PEMA nor
in the trade press for the past several years and he is PEMA members and to all contributors to the survey any member company is responsible for any loss,
able to use historical data to provide valuable trend immediately upon publication. At a later date, the damage, costs or expenses incurred, whether or not in
information. report will be made available in the public domain. negligence, arising from reliance on or interpretation of
the data.
CONFIDENTIALITY DISCLAIMER
Mr. Robinson signed a confidentiality agreement with This survey is based on information provided directly
PEMA stating that individual company data would not by the equipment manufacturers. Data have not
be released by him to any other party, including any been independently verified. PEMA and the author
officer or member of PEMA, except in fully consolidated cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of the
and aggregated form. data provided. This document does not constitute
professional advice, nor is it an exhaustive summary
of the information available on the subject matter to
Furthermore, the release of any and all data must
which it refers.
comply with criteria established by outside counsel
and all source data will be destroyed within six months
of the survey results being released.
 6 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 7

1 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hyundai Samho Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding (MES)

IMPSA Paceco España

2016 – A total of 235 STS cranes were North America took delivery of 14 cranes, down from
19 in 2015. Deliveries were to USWC, Florida and Gulf Kocks Ardelt Kranbau Terex
delivered in 2016, very much in line
Ports. Kalmar SANY
with delivery numbers for 2014 and
Konecranes
2015. Sumitomo Heavy Industry (SHI) / Mitsubishi Heavy Industry (MHI)

Latin America was the destination for 17 cranes down Liebherr ZPMC
Global delivery of STS cranes in 2016 was 235, two less from 39 the previous year but 2015 was a record for
Notes: 1. Doosan and IMPSA are no longer involved with the STS crane business. 2. Mitsubishi Heavy Industry has transferred
than delivered in 2015 and two more than delivered STS deliveries to Latin America. Deliveries in 2016 were
its port crane division to Sumitomo Heavy Industry although the joint venture with Anupam in India stays with MHI. 3. Officine
in 2014. to Mexico 5, Colombia 4 and Brazil 3.
Meccaniche Galileo S.r.l. went in to liquidation in 2016 and the container handling business unit was subsequently aquired
by Bedeschi S.p.A under the new name of OMG MGM CRANES SRL. Therefore, delivery figures from Officine Meccaniche
This is amazing consistency and is continuing evidence Mid East ports took delivery of 26 cranes up from 16 in
Galileo S.r.l. have not been included in the 2016 report and, going forward, the new business unit of OMG MGM CRANES SRL/
that terminal operators are continuing to prepare their 2015. Major deliveries in 2016 were to UAE and Saudi
Besdeschi will be asked to participate in future surveys.
business for trade growth changes, bigger ships and Arabia.
higher container volumes. Table 1.1: Global STS deliveries 2016 by geographic region
Africa had 21 deliveries in 2016 compared with 17 in
Region 2015 Percentage of global market
As large ships are displaced from major east-west lanes 2015 with 2016 deliveries to Namibia, Togo, Congo
by new mega-vessels they continue to trickle down to and Morocco. China 73 31%
other trade routes and terminals on these routes may
Other Asia 39 17%
not have cranes with sufficient lift height or outreach Australasia had 7 deliveries in 2016.
to handle them. Europe 38 16%

Nth America 14 6%
Later in this report, analysis is included of lift capacity,
China took delivery of 73 STS cranes in 2016, a sizable outreach and lift height for STS cranes delivered Latin America 17 7%
increase in the 28 deliveries in 2015 but way down on since 2005. It shows that 60-69 tonne lift capacity
the heady years of 2006, 2007 and 2008 when 130 or Mid East/Red Sea 26 11%
still dominates with 69% of all deliveries, the same
so cranes were delivered in China. percentage as last year. Africa 21 9%

Australia/Pacific 7 3%
Other Asia (which for the purpose of this report is In 2016 69% of cranes delivered had outreach of 60+
Total 235 100%
Asia excluding China) was the destination for 39 STS meters and of these 76 cranes had 70+meter outreach.
cranes, down from 70+ in the previous two years. Of
these 14 were delivered to India, 8 to Vietnam, 6 to Figure 1.1: Global STS deliveries 2015 by geographic region
There were 60 cranes delivered with a lift height of 50+
Malaysia and 5 to Japan.
meters.

Europe was slightly down on the previous year with 38

crane deliveries compared with 43 in 2015. There were
7 cranes delivered to UK, 5 to Belgium, 5 to Poland and
4 each to Italy and Turkey (all of which is included in
Europe in this report).
STS DELIVERIES IN 2016
The following manufacturers were contacted and
asked to supply details of their 2016 deliveries. All of
these have supplied STS cranes in past years:

www.pema.org
 8 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 9

2 | STS DELIVERIES IN 2016

Table 2.1: Consolidated results of 2016 STS deliveries (1 of 3) Alpha list by country and port/terminal operator, showing delivery batches as reported by contributors. Delivered is defined as ex-factory.

Delivery port / terminal / operator Country Quantity Lift capacity Outreach Gauge Lift height Backreach Hoist speed Trolley speed Spreader type
Single/twin/
Tonnes m m m m m/min m/min
tandem
ICCTSI VICTL Terminal Australia 2 60T 51.5 25.3 39+16 80/160 220
ICTSI VICTL Terminal,Australia Australia 3 60T 50 25.3 39+16 80/160 220
MPET, PSA Antwerp,Belgium Belgium 5 70T single 100T 70 30 50 90/180 240
Itapoa Terminal Port Authority Brazil 2 65T 65 30.48 50+18 90/180 250
Multi-Rio Operacoes Portuar S.A. Brazil 1 65T 62 18 42+18 70/140 210
Port Authority of Sihanoukville Cambodia 1 30.5 36 20 25 11 50/120 150 Single
Termont Terminals Canada 2 65 50.5 18.29 33.5 15.24 56 / 140 200 Twin
Puerto Central, San Antonio Chile 3 65 60 30.48 39.5 15 70 / 180 210 Twin
Chaozhou port development co. China 1 41T 32 16 30+16 60/130 180
Dandong Port Authority China 6 65T 65 30 38+18 75/150 240
Dongguan Humen Int'nl Cont. Term. China 3 65T 50 30.48 38+18 90/180 240
how to China 1 61T 35 16 28+16 50/130 150
Jiujiang port Jiangxi,China China 1 40.5 35 16 30/15 12 50/120 150 Single
Lianyungang New Oriental Cont Term China 2 41T 44 16 34 75/150 180
Ningbo Daxie Cont. Term. Co., Ltd. China 2 65T 70 35 49+20 90/180 240
Ningbo Port Authority China 2 65T 70 35 49+20 75/180 240
Ningbo yining port China 1 65T 70 35 49+20 90/180 240
Qingdao Automatic Cont. Term.l China 7 70T single 65T 70 35 50+22 90/180 240
Shanghai Hudong Contaienr Terminal China 1 61T 63 30 39+18 75/180 240
Shanghai Yangshan Shengdong Intnl. Cont. Term China 1 65T 65 30 43+19 75/180 240
Shanghai Yidong Int'nl Cont. Term. China 2 41T 40 16 33+15 50/120 150
Shenzhen yantian container Terminal China 4 70T 70 30 52 75/150 240
Taiwan International Ports Co.Ltd China 2 55T 54 24.381 41.5+17 80/160 210
Xiamen haitong Cont. Term.Co. Ltd. China 4 65T 70 35 50+20 90/180 240
Yangshan Port (Phase 4) China 3 65T 45 30 34+15.5 90/180 240
Yangshan Port (Phase 4) China 7 65T 70 30 49+19.5 90/180 240
Yantian Westport China 3 65T 56 30 43 75/150 210
Yingkou Port China 3 65T 65 30 42 70/180 240
zhoushan port China 2 65T 68 35 45+20 90/180 240
SPRB,Columbia Colombia 4 65T 65 30.5 45 90/180 240

www.pema.org
 10 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 11

Table 2.1: Consolidated results of 2016 STS deliveries (2 of 3) Alpha list by country and port/terminal operator, showing delivery batches as reported by contributors. Delivered is defined as ex-factory.

Delivery port / terminal / operator Country Quantity Lift capacity Outreach Gauge Lift height Backreach Hoist speed Trolley speed Spreader type
Single/twin/
Tonnes m m m m m/min m/min
tandem
Pointe Noire,Congo Congo 2 65MT 62 30.48 42+20 90/180 240
Port Djibouti Djibouti 2 50T 40 20 36 50/110 180
CGSA Ecuador 1 55T 51.5 30.48 38+16 75/180 210
APMT Port Said Egypt 4 65T 72 30.48 52.5+19 90/180 240
Port Said Egypt 2 65 57.5 20 40 16 72 / 180 210 Twin
EUROFOS France 2 71 72 30.48 54 23 90/180 240 Twin lift
HHLA Germany 2 65 65 18 51.5 19 90 / 180 240 Twin
Grub TCB, Puerto Quetzal Guatemala 1 65 58.5 30.48 43 20 70 / 180 240 Twin
HongKong International Teminal Hong Kong 2 41 23 13.5 32/15 12 50/120 150 Single
Adani Ennore India 4 65T 62 30 45 75/150 240
Adani Mundra India 3 65T 65 35 45 90/180 240
Adani Mundra CT4 India 4 65T 65 35 45 90/180 240
APMT Pipavav India 3 65 53 30.5 48/15 15 90/180 240 Twin
DBGT Tuticorin India 3 60 47 23.47 38 15 75 / 175 180 Twin
New Priok Container Terminal 1 Indonesia 4 65 65 30 46 15 90/180 240 Single
ICTSI DMCC Iraq Iraq 2 41 42 30.5 32/18 10 60/120 150 Single
Haifa Port Company Ltd., Israel 2 65t 60 30.48 35 15 70 180 Twin
VTE Italy 4 65T 70 27 50 90/180 240
Osaka Port Corp. Japan 2 50 47.5 30.5 33 -2 70/160 210 Twin
Tokyo Port Terminal Co., Ltd. Japan 1 40.6 40 16 29 11 60/135 160 Single
Tokyo Port Terminal Co., Ltd. Japan 2 61 55 30 41 15 90/180 240 Twin
Ulsan Newport Cont. Term.l Co.,Ltd Korea 1 40.6T single 39 30.5 30+18 70/170 110
Westports　Malaysia Sdn Bhd Malaysia 6 65 67 30.48 52 22 90/180 240 Twin
APMT,Lazaro Mexico 2 65T 65 30.48 52.5+19 90/180 240
CMSA,Mexico Mexico 2 65T 65 30.48 48+19.5 90/180 220
IPM Mexico Mexico 1 65 58.3 16 40 19 56 / 140 200 Twin
Casablanca Port Morocco 3 65T 48 18 35 70/175 180
Walvis Bay Namibia 4 65T 61.5 30.48 43+16 80/160 210
APMT Rotterdam Netherlands 1 65 36 30.48 22 10 70 / 175 180 Twin

www.pema.org
 12 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 13

Table 2.1: Consolidated results of 2015 STS deliveries (3 of 3) Alpha list by country and port/terminal operator, showing delivery batches as reported by contributors. Delivered is defined as ex-factory.

Delivery port / terminal / operator Country Quantity Lift capacity Outreach Gauge Lift height Backreach Hoist speed Trolley speed Spreader type
Single/twin/
Tonnes m m m m m/min m/min
tandem
Port of Tauranga New Zealand 2 60 48 30.48 26.9 15 70 / 175 220 Twin
OICT,Oman Oman 4 65T 68 30 53+18 90/180 240
DCT Gdansk Poland 5 65 72 35 46 15 70 / 175 240 Twin
Reunion Port Reunion 1 65T 56 30.48 45+18 90/180 240
SOCEP Romania 1 60 60 25.5 42 18 90/180 210 Twin lift
Yanbu port,saudi Saudi Arabia 2 60 53 20.25 40/20 18 90/180 240 Single
Luka Koper D.D. Slovenia 2 65 65 30 48 16 70 / 175 240 Twin
APM Terminals Valencia Spain 2 65 66 30.48 51 20 90/180 240 Twin lift
OOCL(Tai Wan)CO.LTD Taiwan 1 55T 65 30.48 45+15 90/180 240
Port of Keelung,Taiwan Intnl Ports Ltd Taiwan 1 55T 54 24.384 41.5+17 80/160 210
Tanzania International Container Terminal Services Tanzania 2 41 45 27.5 38/20 18 40/80 150 Single
Hutchison Laechabang Term. Ltd. Thailand 1 60T 61.5 30.48 40 70/140 210
TIL,LCT Togo 3 65T 67 30.48 50 90/180 240
PSA MIP Turkey 4 65T 70 30 49.5+18 90/180 240
Jebel Ali T1 Terminal,DPW UAE (Saudi Arabia)* 4 70T 68.2 30.48 41.5+19.5 75/150 210
Jebel Ali T2 Terminal,DPW UAE 3 70T Single 120 76 42 53+19.5 90/180 240
Jebel Ali T2 Terminal,DPW UAE 11 70T 71 30.48 46+19.5 75/150 210
Jebel Ali T3 Terminal,DPW UAE (Saudi Arabia)* 6 70T Single 100T 70 35 53+19.5 90/180 240
London Gateway,DPW UK 4 65T single 80T 70 35 49 90/180 240
ABP Hull UK 2 40 29.5 21 28 20 45 / 100 120 Single
ABP Immingham UK 1 40 29.5 21 28 0 45 / 100 120 Single
Golfport Mississippi,USA USA 3 65LT 48.8 30.5 38.1+13.7 90/180 245
Jaxport Authority USA 3 65LT 63 30.48 40+4 60/170 240
Port Tampa Bay,Florida USA 2 65LT 52.035 30.48 39.624+16.746 90/180 240
Cat Lai Logistics Vietnam 1 40t 36 18 30 16 120/50 150 Single
DaNang Port JSC Vietnam 1 40t 40 23.47 30 10.5 120/50 150 Single
ITC Vietnam 4 40t 36 18 30 16 120/50 150 Single
TanCang Construction JSC Vietnam 1 40t 36 18 30 16 120/50 150 Single
VIP Green Port Vietnam 1 40t 36 20 30 16 120/50 150 Single
235
* Reported as Saudia Arabia by the manufacturer

www.pema.org
 14 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 15

3 | STS DELIVERY TREND 2005-2016

Table 3.1: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 Figure 3.2: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by geographic region

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

China 84 135 130 121 43 50 26 54 34 35 28 73

Other Asia 44 60 35 60 89 24 50 50 25 71 76 39

Europe 49 69 64 75 61 57 11 24 42 48 43 38

Nth America 20 15 37 19 18 10 5 18 13 12 19 14

Latin America 8 21 19 15 33 25 27 35 22 32 39 17

Mid East/Red Sea 17 47 16 12 35 16 5 26 12 10 16 26

Africa 5 4 12 28 12 17 10 19 11 17 11 21

Australia/Pacific 4 11 8 0 1 0 0 12 8 8 5 7

Total 231 362 321 330 292 199 134 238 167 233 237 235

Figure 3.3: China STS delivery trend 2005-2016

Figure 3.1: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
China 84 135 130 121 43 50 26 54 34 35 28 73

www.pema.org
 16 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 17

Figure 3.4: Other Asia STS delivery trend 2005-2016 Figure 3.6: North America STS delivery trend 2005-2016
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Other Asia 44 60 35 60 89 24 50 50 25 71 76 39 North America 20 15 37 19 18 10 5 18 13 12 19 14

Figure 3.5: Europe STS delivery trend 2005-2016 Figure 3.7: Latin America STS delivery trend 2005-2016
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Europe 49 69 64 75 61 57 11 24 42 48 43 38 Latin America 8 21 19 15 33 25 27 35 22 32 39 17

www.pema.org
 18 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 19

Figure 3.8: Mid East / Red Sea STS delivery trend 2005-2016 Figure 3.10: Australia / Pacific STS delivery trend 2005-2016

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Mid East/Red Sea 17 47 16 12 35 16 5 26 12 10 16 26 Australia/Pacific 4 11 8 0 1 0 0 12 8 8 5 7

Figure 3.9: Africa STS delivery trend 2005-2016

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Africa 5 4 12 28 12 17 10 19 11 17 11 21

www.pema.org
 20 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 21

4 | STS SPECIFICATION TREND 2005-2016

Table 4.2: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift capacity
PEMA’s latest analysis of lift capacity, outreach and 4.1 LIFT CAPACITY TRENDS
lift height specifications for STS cranes delivered In 2016, STS cranes in the 60-69 tonne category again
Lift capacity
since 2005 reveals that 60-69 tonne lift capacity still dominated, representing 69% of total deliveries, 161 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(tonnes)
dominates at 69% of all deliveries in 2016. Outreach of cranes. There were 14 deliveries of cranes with 100+t
70+ meters for 2016 deliveries accounts for 32% of the 30-39 1 1 0 4 3 2 3 3 5 3 5 1
lift capacity, these deliveries were to Jebel Ali and
total, while lift height of above 50 meters represented Antwerp. (Where single and duel lift capacities apply 40-49 38 39 32 25 26 18 11 18 7 11 25 24
26% of deliveries in 2016. the higher number is used for analysis purposes)
50-59 34 32 35 37 34 27 20 41 18 2 10 10

60-69 118 242 168 149 120 113 94 158 123 186 160 161

Table 4.1: Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift capacity 70-79 9 16 16 35 25 16 4 2 8 10 17 21

80+ 31 32 70 80 84 23 2 16 6 21 20 18
Lift capacity (tonnes) Quantity Percentage
Total 231 362 321 330 292 199 134 238 167 233 237 235
30 - 39 1 0
40 - 49 24 10%
50 - 59 10 4%
60 - 69 161 69% Figure 4.2: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift capacity
70 - 79 21 9%
80-90 4 2%
100+ 14 6%
Total 235 100%

Figure 4.1: Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift capacity

www.pema.org
 22 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 23

4.2 OUTREACH TRENDS

Serving vessels of 22 rows wide requires an outreach Since 2005, STS cranes with outreach of 60m+ have Table 4.4: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by outreach
of 60m+. A rule of thumb formula for converting rows been the largest single class. In 2016, 69% of deliveries
to meters is: number of rows x 2.5m plus 5m from had 60m+ outreach, 163 units, and 76 of these had
Outreach
crane to ship. outreach of 70m+. The 70m+ group represented 32% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
(metres)
of the total
Up to 39 20 17 20 76 35 19 11 21 6 11 16 18

40-49 34 48 39 30 21 24 18 45 26 18 29 28
Table 4.3: Global STS deliveries 2016 by outreach
50-59 70 67 65 67 79 54 53 47 39 21 37 26
Outreach (metres) Quantity Percentage 60+ 107 230 197 157 157 102 52 125 96 183 155 163
Up to 39 18 8%
Total 231 362 321 330 292 199 134 238 167 233 237 235
40-49 28 12%

50-59 26 11%

60+ 87 37%

70+ 76 32%
Figure 4.4: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by outreach
Total 235 100%

Figure 4.3: Global STS deliveries 2016 by outreach

www.pema.org
 24 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey | Global Deliveries 2016 25

4.3 LIFT HEIGHT TRENDS Table 4.6: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift height above the rail
The trend to larger vessels also has implications for For total above rail heights, figures given by
crane lift heights. To work vessels with stacks 8-high contributors show that 70% of all STS cranes delivered Lift height
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
on deck requires a lift height of around 45 meters from in 2016 (a total of 164 units) had a lift height of 40+ (metres)
the quay to the bottom of spreader at the top of hoist. meters and of these 70 units were between 45 Up to 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0
and 49 meters and 60 cranes exceeded 50 meters. 20-29 14 14 8 17 22 11 7 16 4 7 4 9
30-39 118 127 127 88 88 66 73 82 58 33 60 62
Table 4.5: Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift height above the rail 40+ 99 221 186 225 182 122 53 140 105 192 171 164

Lift height (metres) Quantity Percentage

Up to 19 0 0
Table 4.7: Detailed analysis of STS deliveries 2012-2016 by 40+ m lift height
20-29 9 4%
Lift height (metres) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
30-39 62 26%
40-44 103 53 63 64 34
40-44 34 14%
45-49 30 50 86 71 70
45-49 70 30%
50+ 7 2 43 36 60
50+ 60 26%

Total 235 100% Figure 4.6: Global STS delivery trend 2005-2016 by lift height

Figure 4.5: Global STS deliveries 2016 by lift height

www.pema.org
 26 Global Deliveries 2016 | 6th Annual Ship-to-Shore Crane Survey
5 | ABOUT THE AUTHOR AND PEMA
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
For the past 16 years, Brian Robinson has worked as a
freelance journalist and transport industry consultant.
His journalistic and consulting assignments have
covered all aspects of the transport, shipping, ports
and terminals industry, with special emphasis on
terminal handling equipment.
Mr. Robinson has conducted detailed annual industry
surveys of ship to shore (STS) cranes, RTG/RMG yard
cranes and mobile harbour cranes, which have been
published in the trade press and become industry
benchmarks. This year, he is also conducting surveys
of 2016 deliveries of mobile port handling equipment
and RTG/RMG/ASC cranes on behalf of PEMA.
For most of his career he was engaged in various
senior management positions in the container
leasing sector in Europe and the USA, covering
both field and HQ positions. Earlier he worked in
the rail, road and shipping industries. Mr. Robinson
was educated at London School of Economics and
Anglian Management School.
ABOUT PEMA
The mission of PEMA is to provide a forum and public
voice for the global port equipment and technology
sectors, reflecting their critical role in enabling safe,
secure, sustainable and productive ports, and
thereby supporting world maritime trade.
Chief among the aims of the Association is to provide
a forum for the exchange of views on trends in design,
manufacture and operation of port equipment and
technology worldwide. PEMA also promotes and
supports the equipment and technology industries
by raising awareness with the media, customers and
other stakeholders; forging relations with other port
industry associations and bodies; and contributing to
best practice initiatives.
www.pema.org
MEMBERSHIP
PEMA membership is open to companies involved
in the port equipment and technology markets,
regionally and globally. Please visit www.pema.org
for more information or email info@pema.org
CONSTITUTION AND OFFICES
PEMA was constituted by agreement dated 9 December
2004 as a non profit making international association
(association internationale sans but lucratif /internationale
vereniging zonder winstoogmerk).
The Association is governed by the Belgian Law of 27
June 1921 on “associations without a profit motive,
international associations without a profit motive and
institutions of public utility” (Articles 46 to 57). Company
Number/ Numéro d’entreprise/ Ondernemingsnummer
0873.895.962 RPM (Bruxelles).
Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building, Chaussée de la
Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170 Brussels, Belgium.
Management and Finance Offices: Via S. Balestra 27, CH-
6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Secretariat office: 10 Eagle Court, Britton Street, London,
EC1M 5QD, UK. +44 7766 228958 | info@pema.org
Full (voting) PEMA membership is currently open to:
• Manufacturers and suppliers of port and terminal
equipment
• Manufacturers and suppliers of components or
attachments for port equipment
• Suppliers of technology that interfaces with or
controls the operation of port equipment
• Consultants in port and equipment design,
specification and operations
Associate membership (non-voting observer status)
is open to individuals, corporate entities, academic
institutions, business associations, national, European or
international associations and other interested entities at
the discretion of the PEMA Board.
 www.pema.org - April 2017
PEMA – Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

Registered Office: p/a EIA, 44 Rue d’Arenberg, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

President & Finance Office: Via S. Balestra 27, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) c/o Tratos Ltd, 10 Eagle
Court, Britton Street, Farringdon, London EC1M 5QD, UK

Secretariat Contacts:

Fae Brennan
Head of Administration
Cell +44 776 622 8958
Email: fae.brennan@pema.org

info@pema.org

www.pema.org | @PEMASecretary