Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content 01

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

8TH thANNUAL
8 ANNUAL
SHIP-TO-SHORE
YARD CONTAINER
8TH ANNUAL
CRANE
CRANE SURVEY
SURVEY
SHIP-TO-SHORE
GLOBAL DELIVERIES 2019
CRANE SURVEY
GLOBAL DELIVERIES 2018

This survey
Thiscovers
survey 2019
coversglobal and regional
2018 global delivery
and regional volumes
delivery and
volumes 2006-19
and 2005-18
global and regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore container cranes.
global and regional delivery trends for Yard Container Crane.
GLOBAL
Researched and authored exclusively DELIVERIES
for PEMA 2018
by Brian Robinson.
Researched and authored exclusively for PEMA by Brian Robinson.

This survey covers 2018 global and regional delivery volumes and 2005-18
Published August
Published May2020
2019
global and regional delivery trends for ship-to-shore container cranes.

Researched and authored exclusively for PEMA by Brian Robinson.

Published May 2019

www.pema.org

www.pema.org
02 Content | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Content 03

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 04
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS 06
2. YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019 07
3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019 22
4. ABOUT THE AUTHOR 28

Tables
1.1 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 07
1.2 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 08
1.2.1 Global eRTG deliveries 2012 -2019 by geographic region 08
1.3 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 10
1.3.1 Global ASC deliveries 2013 – 2019 by geographic region 10
2. Consolidated results of 2019 yard crane deliveries 12
3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22
3.2 lobal yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 22
3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24
3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 24
3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26
3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 26

Figures
1.1 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 07
1.2 Global yard crane deliveries 2019 by geographic region 08
1.3 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 09
1.4 Global RTG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 09
1.5 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 10
1.6 Global RMG deliveries 2019 by geographic region 11
3.1 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 22
3.2 Global yard crane delivery trend 2005-2019 by region 23
3.3 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 24
3.4 Global RTG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 25
3.5 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 26
3.6 Global RMG delivery trend 2007-2019 by region 27
04 Introduction| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries
INTRODUCTION
Based on original data gathered from port
equipment manufacturers around the world, the
objective of the annual survey is to determine
market size and scope by equipment delivery
volumes for yard container gantry cranes, including:
• Rubber-tyred gantry cranes (RTGs)
• Electrified rubber-tyred gantry cranes (e-RTGs)
• Rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGs)
• Automated stacking cranes (ASCs)
Prior to 2011 this information had been published
in the trade press, but as a result of changes in
magazine publication this is no longer the case.
Information continues to be published in the
trade press for yard container cranes on order at a
specific date in time for delivery in future months.
However, there are no data readily available
for precise delivery numbers during a given
calendar year.
Following cessation of the earlier mentioned
trade press report, crane manufacturers were
asked whether a survey of past annual delivery
numbers was useful information for them and
there was a resoundingly positive response.
PEMA is committed to promoting and supporting
the global role of port equipment and technology
and in order to fill the gap in industry information
commissioned the survey of 2011 through 2018
deliveries and does so again this year.
For similar reasons, PEMA has also commissioned
a report on annual deliveries of ship-to-shore
container cranes. These two surveys for 2019
together complement the well-established PEMA
Annual Global Survey on Mobile Port Equipment
Deliveries, covering reach stackers, lift trucks and
terminal tractors.
www.pema.org
Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Introduction 05
METHODOLOGY SURVEY DISTRIBUTION accuracy of the data provided. This document
The survey research was conducted in February The consolidated survey results will be released does not constitute professional advice, nor is it an
until March 2020 and the results were collated in to PEMA members and to all contributors to the exhaustive summary of the information available
March 2020 survey immediately upon publication. At a later on the subject matter to which it refers.
date the report will be made available in the
All known manufacturers of yard cranes were public domain. Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the
contacted and asked to complete a questionnaire information, but neither the author, PEMA nor
giving details of their deliveries in 2019. They DISCLAIMER any member company is responsible for any loss,
were requested to separately identify RTGs, damage, costs or expenses incurred, whether
This survey is based on information provided
e-RTGs, RMGs and ASCs. Some manufacturers or not in negligence, arising from reliance on or
directly by the equipment manufacturers. Data
may not have separately identified RMGs and interpretation of the data.
have not been independently verified. PEMA and
ASCs and RTGs and eRTGs. The numbers shown in the author cannot accept responsibility for the
this report reflect those reported by contributors.
Because PEMA is a trade association, some
specific rules apply with respect to reporting
data on individual company activity. This report
follows much the same format as in past years
and as was previously published in the trade
press, but without details on the supplying
manufacturer and the name of component
suppliers.
The survey was conducted by Brian Robinson, an
independent container and transport consultant.
Mr. Robinson has been the author of the surveys
published in the trade press for the past several
years and he is able to use historical data to
provide valuable trend information.
CONFIDENTIALITY
Mr. Robinson signed a confidentiality agreement
with PEMA stating that individual company data
would not be released by him to any other party,
including any officer or member of PEMA, except
in fully consolidated and aggregated form.
Furthermore, the release of any and all data
must comply with criteria established by outside
counsel and all source data will be destroyed within
six months of the survey results being released.
06 Executive Summary | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 07

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY FINDINGS 2. YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

In 2019 there were 670 Yard Crane deliveries Manufacturers were asked to specifically iden- Twelve (12) manufacturers were contacted and • Liebherr
compared with 636 in 2018. There were 526 RTG tify Automatic Stacking Cranes (ASCs). There asked for details of their 2019 deliveries. All of • Sumitomo Heavy Industry / Mitsubishi Heavy
deliveries and 144 RMGs compared with 393 were a total 68 ASCs reported deliveries in 2019 these have supplied cranes over recent years. Industry
RTG and 243 RMG in 2018. compared with 124 in 2018. Deliveries were • Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding
to Europe, North America, Mid East and Africa The 12 manufacturers contacted were: • Sany Marine Heavy Industry
The 34% increase in RTG deliveries compared (Morocco).
• Mitsubishi Loginext (Merging of Unicarriers
with 2018 occurred with increases in every • Baltkran and Nichiyu Mitsubishi)
geographic region with the exception of China Manufacturers were again also asked to identify • Hyundai Samho • ZPMC
and Australia Pacific. eRTGs. It may be that some did not, but of the • Kalmar
526 RTGs reported 53 cranes were identified as
• Kocks Krane Note: - Paceco Espana withdrew from port
Conversly RMG deliveries were down 40% from eRTGs,
• Konecranes crane manufacturing in 2018.
243 in 2018 to 144 in 2019. The biggest decline - Terex merged with Konecranes in 2017
• Kuenz
occuring in Other Asia (which for the purposes Important note:- It is possible that the number
of this report is Asia with the exception of China) of ASCs and eRTGs is understated because some
where 5 RMGs were delivered in 2019 compared manufacturers did not identify ASCs in their RMG
TABLE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION
with 79 in 2018 numbers or eRTGs in the RTG totals.
China 111 17%
Note: ASCs are included in RMGs in the numbers Other Asia 165 25%
above.
Europe 95 14%
Nth America 108 16%
Latin America 21 3%
Mid. East 63 9%
Africa 104 16%
Australasia 3 0%
Total 670 100%

FIGURE 1.1 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

21 3

63
165

China
Other Asia
95 Europe
Nth America
Latin America
Mid East
111 Africa
Australia/Pacific

104

108

www.pema.org
08 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 09

FIGURE 1.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION FIGURE 1.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION
21 3
31
160

China
Other Asia
72 Europe
Nth America
Latin America
Mid East
Africa
Australia/Pacific
74 83

82

FIGURE 1.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

TABLE 1.2 GLOBAL RTG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

China 83 16%
Other Asia 160 30%
Europe 72 14%
Nth America 82 16%
Latin America 21 4%
Mid. East 31 6%
Africa 74 14%
Australasia 3 0%
Total 526 100%

TABLE 1.2.1 GLOBAL eRTG DELIVERIES 2012 -2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China 41 10 2 8 4 4 6 0
Other Asia 18 22 34 48 42 34 22 12
Europe 7 27 61 63 31 32 24 19
Nth America       12 14   3 16
Latin America 30 0 24 9 30 6 2 0
Mid East 2 0 4 1 0   2 1
Africa       4 10     5
Global 98 59 125 145 131 76 59 53
Note : the eRTG delivery numbers shown in table 1.2.1 are included the RTG delivery numbers shown in Table 1.2
Some manufacturers did not specifically identify eRTGs it is therefore probable that the above eRTG numbers are understated

www.pema.org
10 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 11

TABLE 1.3: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION FIGURE 1.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS

China 28 19%
Other Asia 5 3%
Europe 23 16%
Nth America 26 18%
Latin America 0 0%
Mid. East 32 22%
Africa 30 21%
Australasia 0 0%
Total 144 100%

TABLE 1.3.1: GLOBAL ASC DELIVERIES 2013-2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION

Region 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

China         28 30 0
Other Asia     10   72 18 0
Europe 84 63 30 30 15 14 6
Nth. America 10 30 17 2 2 38 22
Mid. East 12 8 0 10 35 24 16
Africa             24
Australasia 12 20 6 22     0
Global 118 121 63 64 152 124 68
Note : The ASC delivery numbers shown in table 1.3.1 are included in the total RMG number in Table 1.3

FIGURE 1.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERIES 2019 BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, INCLUDING ASCS
5

32
23
China
Other Asia
Europe
Nth America
Mid East
26 Africa
30

28

www.pema.org
12 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 13

YARD CRANE DELIVERIES IN 2019

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

RTG/eRTG/RMG/ASC cranes
Speeds (m/min) Spreader
delivered in 2019 RTG/eRTG Number of Lift Lift Height Span
Country Quantity
Delivered is defined as ex-factory RMG/ASC wheels (if RTG) Capacity m m
Trolley Hoist Gantry Single/twin
to
DPW Djazair Algeria 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 135 Single
Exolgán S.A. Container Term.
Argentina 4 RTG 8 40 1o5 6+1 Single
Buenos Aires
Pacific National, Cairns Term. Australia 2 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single
Pacific National, Mackay Term. Australia 1 RTG 8 41 1o3 4+1 Single
Container Terminal Enns Austria/Enns 1 RMG 41 t 20 m 42,70 m 100 m/min 36 m/min 120 m/min Single
Chittagong Port Authority Bangladesh 6 RTG 40T 20.75 23.5 70 20/46 130
BEST Barcelona 6 ASC 40.6 18.1 29.1 60 45/90 270 Single
Brest Belarus 1 RTG 16 36t 5+1 26.5 70 23/46 30/135 Single
BTP Brazil 4 RTG 41T 21 25.93 70 22/50 135
GTC Vanterm Canada 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single
GTC Deltaport Canada 6 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 76 31/62 135 Single
Termont Canada 3 RTG 16 60 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single
Montreal Gateway Terminal
Canada 10 ERTG 16 40.6 18.1 23.1 70 28/57 135 Single
Partnership
Yidu Port Co.,Ltd. China 3 RMG 35/45 15.3 35 20/40 63 Single
Ganzhou Port China 1 RMG 40.5 12.5 35 15/30 50/70 Single
Hefei Paihe China 8 RMG 40.5 15.3 40 30/50 80 Single
Hefei Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 24 40.5 15.8 40/30 15 76 Single
Jinzhou Port, China China 1 RMG 35 15.7 50 22/35 70 Single
Jintang Port Co.,Ltd. China 2 RMG 40.5 12.5 40 40/80 120 Single
Wuhan Northern Rail Way Station China 1 RTG 40.5 12.5 35 20/40 100/120 Single
Gansu Guotong Logist Co., Ltd China 1 RTG 24 40.5 12.5 32 20/40 80/110 Single
Qingzhou Port Co., Ltd. China 4 RTG 41 18.1 23.47 25/52 70 Single
Zhuhai International Container
China 12 RTG 16 40 18.1 23.47 20/45 70 Single
Terminal
Fujian Jiangyin China 5 RTG 65LT 70 30.48 52 90/180 240
Shanghai Port YiDong Term China 3 RTG 40T 18.2 23.47 70 27/54 135
Ningbo Daxie Container Terminal
China 6 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 90
Co., Ltd. China
Yingkou Port China 6 RTG 40.5T 23.47 70 23/52 90
Ningbo Zhoushan China 24 RTG 40.6T 18.24 23.47 70 23/52 130

www.pema.org
14 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 15

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Zhanjiang Port China 3 RTG 41T 18.24 23.47 70 25/54 90

Tianjin Port China 5 RTG 61T 15.24 23.47 70 18/52 90
Dongguan Humen Interenational
China 3 RTG 40.5T 18 23.47 70 25/50 130
Termianl
Ningbo Beilun China 9 RTG 40.6T 18.2 23.47 70 23/55 130
Guangzhou Contanier Terminal China 1 RTG 41T 18.1 23.47 70 25/55 100
Sout+A107:K115 Miami China 8 RMG 65T 33 120 40/80 150
Port of Guangzhou (Nansha).,
China 3 RMG 7T 21.1 31 91 40/60 47
China
Czech Republic/
Metrans A.S. 1 RMG 37 t 12,6 m 35,80 m 100 m/min 20 m/min 100 m/min Single
Prague
SGTD Djibouti 2 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135
SGTD Djibouti 8 RTG 41T 18.27 23.47 70 25/50 135
SGTD Djibouti 2 RMG 41T 10.1 20.8 120 30/60 90
DPW Posorja Ecuador 3 RTG 41T 18.2 26.4 70 25/50 135
Sokhna Egypt 8 RTG 16 41 18.2 23.47 70 28/56 135 Single
DCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 20/46 130
PSCCHC Egypt 6 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 27.5/55 120
DCHC Egypt 3 RTG 40T 18 26.5 70 26/52 120
Sokhna,DPW Egypt 2 RMG 41T 31.2 120 35/70 120
Compagnie Nationale du Rhône France/lyon 1 RMG 41 t 22,50 m 28 m 120 m/min 60 m/min 90 m/min Single
Tema,Ghana Ghana 20 RTG 41T 18.1 25.93 70 22/50 135
Terminal de Contenedores Quetzal Guatemala 2 RTG 16 41 18.1 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single
Metrans Koenener Raktarozo Es Hungary
1 RMG 37 t 12,60 m 40 m 100 m/min 40 m/min 100 m/min Single
Atrakodo KFT Budapest
Adani Mundra CT4 India 5 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135
Adani Hazira India 2 RTG 41T 18.2 26.5 70 25/50 135
Adani Mundra T2 India 3 RMG 65T 10.2 34 150 35/75 150
PT Graha Segara Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o6 6+1 Single
RAPP, Futong Port Indonesia 1 RTG 8 41 1o5 6+1 Single
Belawan Container Terminal Phase
Indonesia 12 ARTG/eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
2
Belawan Container Terminal Indonesia 5 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 30/60 130 Single
PT. Pelayaran Tempuran Emas Tbk. Indonesia 6 RTG 8 40.6 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single
New Priok Container Terminal Indonesia 4 RTG 41t 21.2 23.47 70 30/60 120
DSG, Dublin Ireland 1 RTG 16 40.6 21 25.95 70 28/56 130 Single
Conterm Ashdod Israel 1 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single

www.pema.org
16 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 17

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Fridenson Logistigs Services Israel 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 26/52 130 Single
VTE (Voltri Terminal Europa S.p.A.) Italy/Genova 2 RMG 45 t 10,50 m 27 m 120 m/min 40 m/min 120 m/min Single
Kamagumi Yokohama Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single
Tomakomai Port Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single
Toyo Futo (Kawasaki) Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.1 23.47 70 23/54 135 Single
Daito Corporation Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Daito Corporation Japan 1 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single
APM Terminals Japan. Co., Ltd. Japan 8 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Shosen Koun Co., Ltd. Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Daito Corporation Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18.3 23.47 70 23 90 Single
MITSUI-SOKO CO.Ltd. Japan 7 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single
NIPPON-EXPRESS CO.Ltd. Japan 4 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Utoc Corporation Japan 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.2 70 23 90 Single
Karaganda Kazakhstan 1 RMG 50t 3+1 32 36 8 33 Single
CRBC Kenya 2 RMG 40T 30 80 20/40 100
Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 4 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single
Klaipedos Smelte Lithuania 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
Klaipeda Container Terminal Lithuania 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 26/52 135 Single
Madagascar Interntl. Cont. Term Madagascar 3 RTG 41T 18.2 23.47 70 25/50 130
Bintulu Port Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40 1-over-6 6+1 72 23/52 130 Single
Penang Port Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 3 RTG 8 40 21 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Johor Port Berhad Malaysia 2 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Penang Port Malaysia 2 RMG 40T 40 100 35/70 60
Malta Freeport Terminal Malta 15 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 130 Single
CMSA,ICTSI Mexico 5 RTG 41T 20.65 23.47 70 25/50 90
ATP Mexico 3 RTG 41T 18.3 23.47 70 30/60 135
Eurogate Tanger S.A. Morocco 2 RTG 8 50 1o5 6+1 Single
APM Terminals MedPort Tangier Morocco/Taniger 24 ASC 41 t 17,90 m 33,70 m 72 m/min 84 m/min 210 m/min Single
Ministry of Transport and Comu-
Mozambique 6 RTG 8 41 18 23.5 70 23 90 Single
nications
RST Netherlands 2 RMG 41t 15 54 180 80 120 Single
Netherlands/
CTVrede Steinweg BV 1 RMG 41 t 18 m 48 m 100 m/min 60 m/min 100 m/min Single
Zaandam
OICT, HPH Oman 8 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135
SAPT, Pakistan,HPH Pakistan 5 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 24/55 90

www.pema.org
18 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 19

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

SAPT, HPH Pakistan 11 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 135

Internatinal Container Terminal
Philippines 16 RTG 8 40.6 18.2 23.47 70 23 90 Single
Services Inc.
DCT Poland 3 RMG 41t 9.55 32 120 56 150 Single
Sibur Russia 1 RMG 42t 2+1 35 48 12 37 Single
Kharovsk Russia 1 RMG 32t 2+1 32 20 8 30 Single
Kaliningrad Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single
Nizhnekamsk Russia 1 RMG 45t 3+1 25 40 24 60 Single
King Abdullah Port Saudi Arabia 20 RTG 16 40.6 21 26.45 70 28/56 130 Single
Koper Slovenia 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-5 7+1 70 31/62 135 Single
SAGT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 20.75 22.7 70 22/50 135
CICT Sri Lanka 6 RTG 41T 21.2 23.47 70 23/52 90
Hutchison Laemchabang Terminal
Thailand 10 RTG 41T 20.75 23.47 70 30/60 134
Limited
Lomé Container Terminal Togo 5 eRTG 16 40 1-over-6 7+1 70 30/60 135 Single
Yilport Holding Inc. Turkey 4 RTG 8 41 21 26.5 70 26 90 Single
Kumport Turkey 8 RTG 40T 21.22 26.18 70 26/52 130
Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 12 RMG 41T 18.1 34 90 45/90 240
Khalifa Port Abu Dhabi U.A.E. 4 RMG 9T 4.5 34 90 45/90 120
Abu Dhabi Terminals U.A.E. 16 ASC 40.6 21 29 60 45/90 240 Single
Felixstowe Dock and Railway
UK 8 RTG 41T 21.818 27.1 70 30/60 135
Company
Zero Emission
Belfast Container Terminal UK 8 16 40 1o5 9+1 Single
AutoRTG
ABP, Immingham UK 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o6 7+1 Single
Norfolk Southern, Landers Term.
USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single
Chicago
Norfolk Southern, Rossville Term.
USA 2 RTG 8 31 1o4 6+1 Single
Memphis
CSX Intermodal, Syracuse Term.
USA 2 RTG 16 45 1o5 7+1 Single
New York
South Florida Container Term.
USA 6 Zero Emission RTG 16 41 1o5 6+1 Single
Miami
Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
Georgia Ports Authority USA 10 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 82 31/61 137 Single
South Carolina Port Authority USA 2 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
South Carolina Port Authority USA 24 RTG 16 50 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
Kansas City Southem Rail (KCSM) USA 2 RTG 16 45 1-over-3 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
Massport USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-6 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single

www.pema.org
20 Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Yard Crane Deliveries in 2019 21

TABLE 2 CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF 2019 YARD CRANE DELIVERIES

Georgia Ports Authority USA 2 RTG 16 40 1-over-5 6+1 70 31/62 135 Single
Global Container Terminal (GCT)
USA 2 RMG 50.8 12.2 47.5 150 40/80 120 Twin
Bayonne
Virginia International Terminals Inc
USA 2 RMG 40.6 12.2 25.3 150 45/90 180 Single
(VIG)
Norfolk International Terminal
USA 22 ASC 40.6 18.1 29 72 45/90 300 Single
(NIT)
CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 2 RTG 16 40.6 12.3 22.9 70 28/56 130 Single
CSX Intermodal Terminals USA 1 RTG 8 40.6 12 21.64 50 18/50 130 Single
Haiphong International Container
Vietnam 24 RTG 8 40.6 18 23.47 70 26 90 Single
Terminal
TCIT Vietnam 2 RTG 41T 23.47 70 23/54 130
670

Notes:
1 | ASC = Automated stacking crane RMG = rail mounted gantry crane RTG = rubber tyred gantry crane
eRTG = electrified rubber tyred gantry crane
2 | Some manufacturers express crane height and span in terms of number of containers rather than
as an absolute measurement.
There maybe a variance between suppliers, but the following conversion may be useful.

Equivalent in one over x

Lift height (m)
containers
12.3 1 over 3 (3+1)
15.3 1 over 4 (4+1)
18.1 1 over 5 (5+1)
21.0 1 over 6 (6+1)
Gantry span (m) Equivalent in rows + truck lane
20.8 5+1
23.6 6+1
26.5 7+1

www.pema.org
22 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 23

3. GLOBAL DELIVERY TRENDS 2005-2019 FIGURE 3.2: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

TABLE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Quantity 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

FIGURE 3.1: GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019

TABLE 3.2 GLOBAL YARD CRANE DELIVERY TREND 2005-2019 BY REGION

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
China 270 347 275 257 215 87 82 135 68 89 142 170 117 150 111
Other Asia 184 227 124 194 274 71 153 212 158 263 197 149 253 214 165
Europe 64 174 130 189 135 140 62 85 186 179 145 126 72 91 95
North Am. 91 96 93 38 16 43 7 35 68 44 48 67 36 75 108
Latin Am. 23 94 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 101 38 62 55 19 21
Mid East 67 76 53 68 91 49 44 51 53 42 73 34 72 45 63
Africa 12 19 27 66 77 91 22 32 67 52 25 74 21 38 104
Australasia 0 6 3 0 0 1 4 0 12 20 10 22 4 4 3
 Global 711 1039 794 877 856 529 455 690 728 790 678 704 630 636 670

www.pema.org
24 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 25

TABLE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 FIGURE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Quantity 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

FIGURE 3.3: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

TABLE 3.4: GLOBAL RTG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
China 242 225 151 59 65 126 65 71 133 111 55 108 83
Other Asia 122 152 211 67 111 203 153 173 127 146 174 135 160
Europe 89 128 104 82 35 37 75 80 94 67 48 57 72
North Am. 63 30 11 38 7 28 20 10 23 48 26 26 82
Latin Am. 89 65 48 47 81 140 116 91 38 52 51 19 21
Mid East 35 48 71 37 12 48 38 32 40 9 37 13 31
Africa 27 66 75 91 22 28 63 50 25 70 21 31 74
Australasia 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 10 0 4 4 3
 Global 670 714 671 422 337 610 530 507 490 503 416 393 526

www.pema.org
26 Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019| Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Global Delivery Trends 2005-2019 27

TABLE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 FIGURE 3.6: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Quantity 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

FIGURE 3.5: GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019

TABLE 3.6 GLOBAL RMG DELIVERY TREND 2007-2019 BY REGION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
China 33 32 64 28 17 9 3 18 9 59 62 42 28
Other Asia 2 42 63 4 42 9 5 90 70 3 79 79 5
Europe 41 61 31 58 27 48 111 99 51 59 24 34 23
North Am. 30 8 5 5 0 7 48 34 25 19 10 49 26
Latin Am. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 4 0 0
Mid East 18 20 20 12 32 3 15 10 33 25 35 32 32
Africa 0 0 2 0 0 4 4 2 0 4 0 7 30
Australasia 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20 0 22 0 0 0
 Global 124 163 185 107 118 80 198 283 188 201 214 243 144

www.pema.org
28 About the Author | Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries Final Report 2019 Yard Container Crane Deliveries| Contact 29

5. ABOUT THE AUTHOR PEMA – PORT EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

For the past 19 years, Brian Robinson has worked Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building,
as a freelance journalist and transport industry Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170 Brussels, Belgium
consultant. His journalistic and consulting assign- President & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, Switzerland
ments have covered all aspects of the transport,
Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA)
shipping and the ports and terminals industry, 15-17 St. Cross St. London EC1N 8UW, United Kingdom
with special emphasis on terminal handling
equipment. Secretariat Contacts:
Petar Karaivanov
Mr. Robinson has conducted detailed annual
Head of Administration
industry surveys of ship to shore (STS) and RTG/
Mobile: +44 7766 228 958
RMG yard cranes, which have been published in
Email: petar.karaivanov@pema.org
the trade press and become industry benchmarks.
Over recent years he has conducted similar
surveys on behalf of PEMA along with surveys of
annual delivery of mobile handling equipment.

For most of his career he was engaged in various

senior management positions in the container
leasing sector in Europe and USA, covering both
field and HQ positions. Earlier he worked in the
rail, road and shipping industries. Mr. Robinson
was educated at London School of Economics
and Anglian Management School.

www.pema.org
 – August 2020
April 2019
www.pema.org -pema.org
PEMA – Port Equipment Manufacturers Association

Registered Office: p/a Glaverbel Building, Chaussée de la Hulpe 166 Terhulpsesteenweg, B-1170
Brussels, Belgium
President & Finance Office: Paradiso-TI, CH-6900, Switzerland
Secretariat Office: Port Equipment Manufacturers Association (PEMA) 15-17 St. Cross St. London
EC1N 8UW, United Kingdom

Secretariat Contacts:
Petar Karaivanov
Head of Administration
Mobile: +44 7766 228 958
Email: petar.karaivanov@pema.org

www.pema.org | @PEMASecretary

www.pema.org