Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Name of Rater: Date of

Employee: LAQUIAO, ABEGAIL H. LILIAN C. MOLINA Review:
Position: Position: Rating
Teacher I MASTER TEACHER I Period:
Bureau/Center/Service
/Division: Deparment of Education-Division of Tabuk City
TO BE FILLED DURING
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

RATING

SCORE
(QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS) ACTUAL
TIME WEIGTH/
MFO

KRA’s OBJECTIVES RESULTS

FRAME KRA
5 4 3 2 1
Q E T A
QUALITY
Complete DLL/DLP of all the 1 to 2 times found with 3 times found with back 4 times found with back 5 times found with back
subjects taught back logs or no DLL/DLP logs or no DLL/DLP in any logs or no DLL/DLP in any logs or no DLL/DLP in
Prepared daily in any learning area during learning area during the learning area during the any of the learning area
lesson plans or the regular checking of regular checking of regular checking of during the regular
daily logs of DLL/DLP. DLL/DLP DLL/DLP checking of DLL/DLP
activities TIMELINESS
(5%) DLL/DLP were submitted on DLL/DLP were submitted DLL/DLP were submitted DLL/DLP are submitted DLL/DLP are submitted
time based on the agreed one day late based on the two days late based on the three days late based on four days late based on
regular checking of DLL/DLP agreed regular checking of agreed regular checking of the agreed regular the agreed regular
DLL/DLP DLL/DLP checking of DLL/DLP checking of DLL/DLP
QUALITY
Utilized appropriate IMs and Utilization of appropriate Utilization of appropriate Utilization of appropriate Utilization of appropriate
Teaching-
teaching strategies were IMs and teaching IMs and teaching strategies IMs and teaching IMs and teaching
Learning
evident if strategies were evident if were evident if strategies were evident if strategies were evident if
Process Utilized appropriate
75% to 100% of the learners 60% to 74% of the 45% to 59% of the learners 35% to 44% of the 34% and below of the
IMs and teaching
got 75% or above of the learners got 75% or above got 75% or above of the learners got 75% or above learners got 75% or
strategies
given formative or of the given formative or given formative or of the given formative or above of the given
(10%)
summative test as reflected summative test. summative test. summative test. formative or summative
in the class record. test.
EFFICIENCY
All prepared IMs could be All prepared IMs could be All prepared IMs could be All prepared IMs could be prepared IMs could be
used for two or more years used for one year used for six months used for three months used for once only
Facilitated learning QUALITY
through the use of Utilized varied learning Utilized varied learning Utilized varied learning Utilized varied learning Utilized varied learning
varied learning experiences/Activities that experiences/Activities that experiences/Activities that experiences/Activities that experiences/Activities
experiences caters to 5 MIs as reflected caters to 4 MIs as reflected caters to 3 MIs as reflected caters to 2 MIs as that caters to 1 MIs as
(10%) in the DLL/DLP in the DLL/DLP in the DLL/DLP reflected in the DLL/DLP reflected in the DLL/DLP
Set standards for QUALITY
 class discipline, 5 of the following were
rules, and individual observed
and group task. 1. Cleanliness and proper
(5%) waste disposal
2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to individual
and group task.
4. Compliance to school and
classroom policies.
5. Leadership
QUALITY:
Conducted assessment on
learners performance thru
written and at least 4
authentic assessment every
rating period supported by
the following evidences:
Monitored,
1. Table of Specification
evaluated and
2. Test Item bank
maintained pupils’
3. Learners Portfolio
progress
4. Rubrics on the different
(10%)
performance task.
5. Class Record/eclass
record
TIMELINESS:
Learners’ performances
Pupil/Student
were evaluated 1 week after were evaluated 10 days
Outcomes
every rating period.
(25%)
QUALITY:
Conducted at least 4
remediation/enrichment
program supported by the program supported by the
following evidences
1. formative and summative 1. formative and
Conducted
test analysis
remediation/enrichm
2. remediation/enrichment 2. remediation/enrichment
ent programs to
plan
improve learners’
3. IMs, Activity sheets
performance
4. ICT aided instruction
(5%)
EFFICIENCY
IMs, activity sheets, ICT
aided materials can be
utilized for at least two years. utilized for 1 year
TIMELINESS:
4 of the following were
observed
1. Cleanliness and proper
waste disposal
2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to
individual and group task.
4. Compliance to school
and classroom policies.
5. Leadership
. Conducted assessment
on learners performance
thru written and 3
authentic assessment
every rating period
supported by the following
evidences:
1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different
performance task.
5. Class Record/ eclass
record
Learners’ performances
after every rating period.
Conducted 3
remediation/enrichment
following evidences
summative test analysis
plan
3. IMs, Activity sheets
4. ICT aided instruction
IMs, activity sheets, ICT
aided materials can be
. .
3 of the following were 2 of the following were 1 of the following were
observed observed observed
1. Cleanliness and proper 1. Cleanliness and proper 1. Cleanliness and proper
waste disposal waste disposal waste disposal
2. Friendly environment. 2. Friendly environment. 2. Friendly environment.
3. Responsible to individual 3. Responsible to 3. Responsible to
and group task. individual and group task. individual and group task.
4. Compliance to school 4. Compliance to school 4. Compliance to school
and classroom policies. and classroom policies. and classroom policies.
5. Leadership 5. Leadership 5. Leadership
Conducted assessment on Conducted assessment on Conducted assessment
learners performance thru learners performance thru on learners performance
written and 2 authentic written and 1 authentic thru written only every
assessment every rating assessment every rating rating period supported
period supported by the period supported by the by the following
following evidences: following evidences: evidences:
1. Table of Specification 1. Table of Specification 1. Table of Specification
2. Test Item bank 2. Test Item bank 2. Test Item bank
3. Learners Portfolio 3. Learners Portfolio 3. Learners Portfolio
4. Rubrics on the different 4. Rubrics on the different 4. Class Record/ eclass
performance task. performance task. record
5. Class Record/ eclass 5. Class Record/ eclass
record record
Learners’ performances Learners’ performances Learners’ performances
were evaluated 15 days were evaluated 20 days were evaluated 1month
after every rating period. after every rating period. after every rating period.
Conducted 2 Conducted 1 Conducted 1
remediation/enrichment remediation/enrichment remediation/enrichment
program supported by the program supported by the program without support
following evidences following evidences documents
1. formative and summative 1. formative and
test analysis summative test analysis
2. remediation/enrichment 2. remediation/enrichment
plan plan
3. IMs, Activity sheets 3. IMs, Activity sheets
4. ICT aided instruction 4. ICT aided instruction
IMs, activity sheets, ICT IMs, activity sheets, ICT IMs, activity sheets, ICT
aided materials can be aided materials can be aided materials can be
utilized for 1 semester only utilized for a month utilized for 1 session only.
. .
 Conducted the appropriate Conducted the appropriate Conducted the appropriate Conducted the Conducted the
interventions 2 days after interventions 3 days after interventions 4 days after appropriate appropriate interventions
determining learners needing determining learners determining learners interventions 5 days 6 days after determining
intervention. needing intervention needing intervention after determining learners needing
learners needing intervention
intervention
QUALITY:
All of the following records Found once any of the Found twice any of the Found thrice any of the Found 4 times any of the
were maintained and following records not following records not following records not following records not
updated. updated during regular updated during regular updated during regular updated during regular
checking of records. checking of records. checking of records checking of records.
(1) Form 1(class adviser) (1) Form 1(class adviser) (1) Form 1(class adviser) (1) Form 1(class adviser) (1) Form 1(class adviser)
Maintained updated (2) Form 2(class adviser) (2) Form 2(class adviser) (2) Form 2(class adviser) (2) Form 2(class adviser) (2) Form 2(class adviser)
pupils’ school (3) Form 3 (3) Form 3 (3) Form 3 (3) Form 3 (3) Form 3
records (4) Form 5(class adviser) (4) Form 5(class adviser) (4) Form 5(class adviser) (4) Form 5(class adviser) (4) Form 5(class adviser)
(5%) (5) Class Record/e-class (5) Class Record/e-class (5) Class Record/e-class (5) Class Record/e-class (5) Class Record/e-class
record record record record record
TIMELINESS:
Submitted updated records Submitted updated records Submitted updated records Submitted updated Submitted updated
on or before the set date for one day late of the set 2 days late of the set date records 3 days late of the records 4 days late of the
submission/checking date for submission/ for submission / checking set date for submission set date for submission /
checking /checking checking
QUALITY
Conducted at least 4 teacher Conducted 3 teacher Conducted 2 teacher parent Conducted 1 teacher Conducted teacher
parent conferences and parent conferences and conferences and home parent conferences and parent conferences and
home visitation to students home visitation to students visitation to students home visitation to students home visitation to
needing monitoring needing monitoring needing monitoring needing monitoring students needing
supported with the following supported with the supported with the following supported with the monitoring without
documents. following documents. documents. following documents. support document.
1. Anecdotal record of 1. Anecdotal record of 1. Anecdotal record of 1. Anecdotal record of
students. students. students. students.
Conducted teacher 2. Attendance during 2. Attendance during 2. Attendance during 2. Attendance during
parent conference conference conference conference conference
and home visitation 3. Agreement 3. Agreement 3. Agreement 3. Agreement
(5%) 4. referral slip duly signed by 4. referral slip duly signed 4. referral slip duly signed 4. referral slip duly signed
the guidance office or School by the guidance office or by the guidance office or by the guidance office or
head. School head. School head. School head.

TIMELINESS
Teacher parent conferences
and home visitation
conducted 1 week after
quarterly examination.
Community Organize functional QUALITY
Teacher parent Teacher parent conferences Teacher parent Teacher parent
conferences and home and home visitation conferences and home conferences and home
visitation conducted 10 conducted 15 days after visitation conducted 20 visitation conducted 25
days after quarterly quarterly examination. days after quarterly days after quarterly
examination. examination. examination.
Involvement Homeroom PTA Organized functional One of the evidences not two of the evidences not three of the evidences not four of the evidences not
(10%) organization Homeroom PTA association satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied
(5% supported the following
evidences: .
1. List of officers
2. minutes of meetings
3 Project completion report
(project)
4. Parent support (Services)
5. Report on Parent teacher
conference.
TIMELINESS
Organized, conducted and Organized, conducted and Organized, conducted and Organized, conducted and Organized, conducted
submitted reports within the submitted reports one submitted reports two submitted reports three and submitted reports
target date week after the set target weeks after the set target weeks after the set target one month after the set
date date date target date
QUALITY
Chairman/Initiated of 2 Mermber of a committee of Chairman/Initiated of 1 Member of a committee of Proposed an activity/
project/event/ 2 project/event/ project/event/ 1 project/event/ event/ project.
activity supported with activity supported with activity supported with activity supported with
documpents like proposal, documpents like proposal, documpents like proposal, documpents like proposal,
terminal report, certificate of terminal report, certificate terminal report, certificate of terminal report, certificate
recognition, request, of recognition, request, recognition, request, of recognition, request,
invitation, etc. invitation, etc. invitation, etc. invitation, etc.
EFFICIENCY
Submitted project proposal Project proposal was Project proposal was Project proposal was Project proposal was
Initiated or chaired a
with no revision (Complete returned once with revision returned twice with revision returned more than thrice returned for major
committee of
parts/ documentation) based from DREC based from DREC with revision based from revision (total revision/
Community
*Request Letter to the suggestions, comments suggestions, comments and DREC suggestions, disapproved)
Involvement/
barangay/ Homeroom and recommendation recommendation comments and
projects/ events/
PTA Officers recommendation
Activities
*Approval from the
(5%)
Concerned barangay
official
*Approval Sheet
(School/ district/
DREC ) and
*Write-up
TIMELINESS
Implemented/served project, Implemented/served Implemented/served Implemented/served
event activity within the project, event activity one Implemented/served project, event activity two project, event activity
target date. week after the target date. project, event activity one months after the target three months after the
month after the target date. date. target date
Professional Conducted Action QUALITY:
Growth and Research Conducted 1 Action Conducted the action Approved research Submitted research Identified learning
Dev’t(25%) (10%) Research research and terminal proposal and in the process proposal for approval. problems and in the
 with complete report not completed. of implementation. process of writing the
documentation (approved proposal
proposal and approved
terminal report)
EFFICIENCY:
The Action Research was The Action Research was The Action Research was The Action Research was The Action Research was
approved without revision returned once for minor returned twice for minor returned for revision of returned for complete
corrections corrections some revision
parts
TIMELINESS:
Completed the Action Completed the Action Completed the Action Did not complete the Did not attempt to
Research within the time Research a week after the Research a month after the Action Research within the complete the Action
frame planned time frame planned time frame rating period Research within the
rating period.
QUALITY
Served as coach/
Garnered an award at the Garnered 1 award at the Garnered I award at the Participated in 2 co- Participated in 1 co-
facilitator/Technical
regional level competition of division level competition district level competition of curricular activities curricular activities at
Officials in extra and
any curricular activities or of curricular activities or curricular activities for elem At the division level district level for
co-curricular
served as technical official in served as technical official and school level for sec. or elementary and division
activities.
1 co-curricular activities at in co-curricular activities served as technical official level for secondary
(5%)
the regional level. at the division level in 1 co-curricular activities
at the district or school level
Produced QUALITY
publication/ Produced 2 publications or Produced 1 publication or Produced 1 publication or Produced 1 publication Unpublished work
creative work for creative work published in a creative work published in creative work published in a or creative work produced
school paper/ community paper or a community paper or Division Paper published in a school
division composed any literary pieces composed any piece for paper
publication/Commun for contest purposes. contest purposes.
ity paper or
compose any
literary pieces for
contest purposes.
(5%)
QUALITY
Attended at least 5 Attended at least 4 Attended at least 3 Attended at least 2 Attended at least 1
Attended Trainings/
Trainings/workshops/semina Trainings/workshops/semi Trainings/workshops/semin Trainings/workshops/se Training/workshop/semin
Workshops/
rs conducted by the nars conducted by the ars or any training minars conducted by ar conducted by the
Seminars
Department of Education or Department of Education endorsed by deped the Department of Department of Education
(5%)
any training endorsed by or any training endorsed authorities Education
deped authorities by deped authorities
Maintained 0 drop 10% QUALITY:
Plus out rate(3%) Maintained 0 dropout rate 1 dropout 2 dropouts 3 dropouts 4 or more dropouts
Factor(10%)
Served as QUALITY:
 facilitators /working Served as facilitators
committee/lecturer /working committee/lecturer
during school/ during school/ community in
community at least 5 activities with the
activities(3%) following evidences:
a. certification
b. pictorials
c. programs/narrative report
Masters Degree(4%) Masters Degree holder
Served as facilitators Served as facilitators
/working committee/lecturer /working
during school/ community in committee/lecturer during
at least 5 activities school/ community in at
least 5 activities
QUALITY:
Completed academic Completed at least 21 to 32 Completed at least 15 to Planning to enroll in MA
requirements units of MA 18 units of MA

Ratee: ABEGAIL H. LAQUIAO Date: MARCH 2015

Teacher I

Rater: LILIAN C. MOLINA Date: MARCH 2015

Master Teacher I

Approved: HERMINIA F. DAPEG Date: MARCH 2015

Principal I