Republic of the Philippines

LEYTE NORMAL UNIVERSITY

Tacloban City

STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Unit Performance Commitment and Review (UPCR)

I, NAME OF RATEE of the DEPARTMENT NAME commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following TARGETS in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January
2015 to December 2015.

NAME OF RATEE
Academic Unit Chair

Reviewed by: Approved by:

NESTOR C. SEDANZA, D.M. JUDE A. DUARTE, DPA

Immediate Supervisor Date University President Date

Success Indicator Rating

Output
A. Core Function
MFO 1: Higher Education Services
1. Direct Instruction Function
a. Percentage of graduates in
mandated and priority programs
b. Percentage passing in Licensure
Exam
c. Percentage of graduates finishing
programs within the timeframe
2. Instructional-Related Function
a. Submission of syllabi for subjects
taught
Actual Accomplishments Remarks
(Target + Measure) Q E T Average
Shall turn out ____ % of graduates in 80.77% of graduates are in mandated and priority FPES-
mandated and priority programs within the programs IA
prescribed timeframe by managing learning
through teaching for independent learning,
knowledge of subject, commitment, and
professionalism
Shall turn out ___ % of board passers in the (Note: Accomplishment taken from PERF I-A rating) FPES
_______ exam by supplementing and IA-2.3
enriching course content with more current
library and internet sources
Shall turn out ___ % of graduates finishing (Note: Accomplishment taken from PERF I-A rating) FPES
programs within the timeframe assisting IA-2.1
students with their school-related concerns by
being available beyond official teaching hours
Shall have submitted to Academic Unit Chair
revised syllabi for all subjects taught at end of
the term
 Success Indicator Rating
Output Actual Accomplishments Remarks
(Target + Measure) Q E T Average
b. Submission of Test Questions with Shall have submitted to Academic Unit Chair
Table of Specifications (TOS) test questions with TOS taught at the end of
the term
c. Production of IMs Shall have produced quality and relevant
instructional materials for use in subjects
taught
d. Submission of Grades Shall have submitted to concerned offices the
grade sheets at the end of the term
e. Submission of list of students with Shall have submitted to the Academic Unit
deficiencies Head the list of students with deficiencies (with
corresponding list of the lacking requirements)
f. Submission of compiled Shall have submitted to the Academic Unit
certificates of Head the certificates of
training/conferences/seminars training/conferences/seminars attended one
attended by faculty week after the end of the year
g. Conservation of energy and Shall have fully supported the implementation
material resources of the energy and material conservation
policies of the University without lapses
3. Accreditation of undergraduate At least one of the programs shall have been
curricular programs (AACCUP/COPC) submitted for COPC/AACCUP Accreditation
as scheduled
MFO 2: Advance Education Services
1. Direct Instruction Function
a. Percentage of graduates in Shall turn out ____ % of graduates in 80.77% of graduates are in mandated and priority FPES-
mandated and priority programs mandated and priority programs within the programs IA
prescribed timeframe by managing learning
through teaching for independent learning,
knowledge of subject, commitment, and
professionalism
b. Percentage passing in Licensure Shall turn out ___ % of board passers in the (Note: Accomplishment taken from PERF I-A rating) FPES
Exam _______ exam by supplementing and IA-2.3
enriching course content with more current
library and internet sources
c. Percentage of graduates finishing Shall turn out ___ % of graduates finishing (Note: Accomplishment taken from PERF I-A rating) FPES
programs within the timeframe programs within the timeframe assisting IA-2.1
students with their school-related concerns by
being available beyond official teaching hours
2. Instructional-Related Function
a. Submission of syllabi for subjects Shall have submitted to Academic Unit Chair
taught revised syllabi for all subjects taught at end of
the term

Output
b. Submission of Test Questions with Shall have submitted to Academic Unit Chair
Table of Specifications (TOS)
c. Production of IMs
d. Submission of Grades
e. Submission of list of students with Shall have submitted to the Academic Unit
deficiencies
f. Submission of compiled
certificates of
training/conferences/seminars
attended by graduate faculty
g. Conservation of energy and
material resources
MFO 3: Research Services
1. Research outputs
a. Number of research studies
completed
b. Research Terminal Report
2. Publication, Dissemination of Research
Outputs
a. Publication in a recognized refereed At least one research output shall have been
journal of the research output
(whether or not
copyrighted/submitted for copyright,
patented/submitted for patenting)
b. Dissemination of research findings At least one research finding shall have been
in research fora or conferences
MFO 4: Technical Advisory Extension
1. Beneficiaries served
a. Number of persons trained
(weighted by length of training)
b. Number of persons provided with
technical advice
Success Indicator Rating
Actual Accomplishments Remarks
(Target + Measure) Q E T Average
test questions with TOS taught at the end of
the term
Shall have produced quality and relevant
instructional materials for use in subjects
taught
Shall have submitted to concerned offices the
grade sheets at the end of the term
Head the list of students with deficiencies (with
corresponding list of the lacking requirements)
Shall have submitted to the Academic Unit
Head the certificates of
training/conferences/seminars attended one
week after the end of the year
Shall have fully supported the implementation
of the energy and material conservation
policies of the University without lapses
Four research studies completed within the
timeframe
Shall have compiled hard copies of terminal
reports two months after the completion of
research studies with minor revisions
published in a recognized refereed journal
within a year
disseminated in research fora or conferences
within a year
At least ____ persons shall have been
provided with relevant training within a year
At least ____ persons shall have been
provided with relevant technical advice within
a year

Output
2. Quality of technical advisory/extension
service
a. Satisfaction level of participants on
the training/seminar conducted
b. Satisfaction level of clients who
received the advisory services
3. Timeliness of service delivery
a. Percentage of requests for technical
advice responded to within 3 days
b. Percentage of recipients of training At least 80% of persons who received training
or advisory services rated “good” or or advisory services shall have rated
“better” on the timeliness of the
service delivery
4. Activity Report
B. Support to Operations
 Submission of necessary documents
a. SALN
b. DTR
c. APP/PPMP
d. Office Accomplishment Report(s) Shall have submitted to the Dean the Unit’s
e. Reports required by line agencies 100% of the required documents shall have
C. General Administration Support
Services
1. Budget Utilization Rate
Success Indicator Rating
Actual Accomplishments Remarks
(Target + Measure) Q E T Average
80% of trainees shall have rated the training N/A
course as “good” or “better”
80% of trainees shall have rated the advisory N/A
services as “good” or “better”
At least 90% of the requests for technical
advice shall have been appropriately
responded to within 3 days
N/A
timeliness of service delivery as “good” or
“better”
Shall have prepared and submitted an
accomplishment report three weeks after the
implementation of the extension activity
(training conducted, technical advisory service
provided, community outreach undertaken,
and the like) with minor corrections
100% of the fulltime faculty shall have
submitted SALN by February, 2015 without
error
80% of the fulltime faculty shall have
submitted DTR to the Academic Unit Chair (for
signature) on or before the 8th day of the
month without error
Shall have submitted to the Dean the Unit’s
APP/PPMP on or before due date without
errors
accomplishment report by December, 2015
without error
been submitted to requesting line agencies on
or before due date without error
N/A
N/A
N/A
 Success Indicator Rating
Output Actual Accomplishments Remarks
(Target + Measure) Q E T Average
2. Submission of Reports to COA, DBM N/A
and GPPB N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
Comments/ Recommendation for Development Purposes

I certify that I have discussed my assessment of the performance

with the employee

NAME OF RATEE NAME OF SUPERVISOR: JUDE A. DUARTE, DPA

Employee Date Immediate Supervisor Date University President Date
LEGEND * Categories Q – Quality E – Efficiency T – Timeliness
: ** Adjectival Rating 5 – Outstanding 4 – Very Satisfactory 3 – Satisfactory 2 – Unsatisfactory 1 - Poor