Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Air Volume For Drying
Air Volume For Drying
by
H. P. Harrison
Member CSAE
Deportment of Agricultural Engineering
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
tive) for the Edmonton station was locating the drying zone. The air flow AT t/
ing the dry bulb temperature (t) 10°, ically. The latter was determined by + THERMOCOUPLES
TRANSITION FROM
WET
GRAIN
drying could have taken place any addition, the moisture content was
time day or night from Aug. 1 to determined by twenty random DRYING
ZONE
November 27 and quite possibly the samples at the beginning and ending
year around. It is interesting to note of drying as a check on the water loss AIR
that the greatest wetting potential in determined above. PROBE DRY
GRAIN
November was only 2.2°F. The temp
erature rise to change t — tx positive Results ^
x*
in this instance was only 5.5°F. Figure 4 illustrates the typical pro
gression of the drying zone through
Tempering the air is accomplished the grain. It is interesting to note that
most conveniently with a propane the depth of the drying zone in
burner. In fact, there are a number creased with time. It also can be seen
of manufacturers offering fan-burner that the drying front barely reached
packages. If the source of power for the surface when drying was termin TRANSDUCER WEIGH SCALE
60
CANADIAN AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 11, No. 2, NOVEMBER 1969
~ 300 Tempering the air by as little as
5° to 19°F provides for drying under
u
adverse climatic conditions and/or
^ 200 on a 24-hour basis.
O
REFERENCES
100-
0£ 1. Moysey, E. B. and Wilde, D. H.
< 1965. Drying grain with unheated
J. air. Cdn. Agr. Eng. 7: 12-13.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2. Brooker, D. B. and McQuigg, J. D.
TIME (hours) 1960. Analysis of weather data
pertinent to grain drying* Trans.
Figure 5. Change in air flow
Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 3: 116-119.
TABLE II. RESULTS OF DRYING BARLEY
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION . . .
w
Aw T Q» (est.) Q (actual)
Trial Number
(lbs/lb grain) <°F) (hours) Uo3) (ft3 x 106) (ft3 x 106) QVQ continued from page S3
of California. First Annu. Rep.
1 .072 9.5
•4 3.1 1.3 1;4 .9 USAEPG Contract CA-36-039SC-
2 .075 9.0 95 3.4 1.5 1.1 1.4
80334, 74-107.
3 .060 11.4
•4 3.2 1.1 1.2 .9 11. Rijtema, P. E. 1959. Calculation
4 .063 11.6 51 2.9 1.0 .90
methods of potential evapotran
1.1
spiration.
Inst, for Land and
5 .071 10.2 83 3.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 Water Manage. Res. Tech. Bull
6 .056 10.7 51 3.2 .88 .75 1.2
7.
7 .067 9.0 66 3.3 1.4 .9 1.6 12. Stephens, J. C. and Stewart, E.
8 H. 1963. A comparison of pro
.069 7.6
'4 3.3 1.6 .9 1.8
cedures for computing evapora-
9 .063 7.5
>4 3.2 1.5 .9 1.7 t i o n and evapotranspiration.
I.A.S.H. Pub. 62: 123J33.
lation found between the water loss ient across the inlet duct was steep 13. Stern, W. R. and Fitzpatrick, E.
or moisture removal and the amount and a small change in position of the A. 1965. Calculated and observed
of air pumped through the grain. If air probe would alter the measured evaporation in a dry monsoonal
the drying period had been extended, air volume Q significantly. The pos environment J. of Hydro! No.
the rate would have been reduced sibility of values greater than one due 314: 297-311.
and become curvilinear after the dry to Q' seems remote. This would occur
ing front intercepted the grain sur only if the air picked up more mois 14. Suomi, V. E., Franssila, M. and
face. The water added (negative ture than that specified at equilib Islitzer, N. F. 1954. An improved
water loss) during the first few hours rium. In this regard, equilibrium was net radiation instrument. J. Met-
was due to the initial grain tempera close to the saturation curve. In view eorol. 11: 276-282.
ture being lower than the wet bulb of this, and the foregoing, reasonable
temperature. The drying period was 15. Tanner, C. B. and Pelton, W. L.
values of air flow apparently can be 1960. Potential evapotranspiration
considered to be the interval between estimated from the amount of mois
estimates by the approximate en
the time that the water loss was zero ture to be removed and the prevailing
(for the second time) until the grain, wet and dry bulb temperatures, pro ergy balance method of Penman,
was in the 13 to 14% moisture range. vided the air flow is not large. J. Geophys. Res. 65: 3391-3413.