You are on page 1of 2

Running head: ARTICLE 1: A RETROSPECTIVE EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS 1

Article 1: A retrospective Exploratory Analysis

Student’s Name

Institution
ARTICLE 1: A RETROSPECTIVE EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS 2

Article 1: A retrospective Exploratory Analysis

Summary (6pts)

The summary is more than two paragraphs long; in addition, the paper fails to represent ideas
presented by the original article.

Prioritized Indicators (7.5pts)

As much as the students effectively organize the indicators, the paper remains modest in the
logical aspect.

Problem statement (7.5)

Elements of the syllabus are presented but the paper fails to logically analyze the author’s ideas

Theory and application (6pts)

Some ideas presented by the paper remain inapplicable and unsubstantiated for instance the
paper states that “the authors' succeeded in that ...new information that was not otherwise
known...” the student does not substantiate this statement with evidence from the article

Solution (6pts)

The ideas presented remain unclear and the student lacks a sustainable solution to the problem
presented

Grammar, spelling, writing mechanics (8pts)

There are occasional grammatical and sentence structure errors in the paper

Length (10pts)

The paper is 6 pages long

APA format (10pts)

The paper effectively utilize the APA in-text citation and referencing format

Overall impression (15pts)

The paper is well written but fails to critically analyze the article in terms of ethical and logical
component.

TOTAL (76 pts)

You might also like