You are on page 1of 35

2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

Effects of High Temperature


on the Design of Deepwater Risers

March 2003

2H Offshore Engineering
Outline of Talk
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Overview of Riser Systems


‹ What is “High Temperature”?
‹ High Temperature (HT) Developments
‹ Issues Relating to Steel
‹ Effect on Insulation Materials
‹ Problems with H2S, corrosion and fatigue issues
‹ Buoyancy Issues
‹ Pipe-In-Pipe Systems
‹ Use of Flexible Jumpers for COR™ & SLOR™
‹ Summary of HT Design Issues
‹ Alternative Options for Dealing with HP/HT
Riser Systems - Configurations
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

Catenary Risers
Free Standing Risers Flexible
Single line Steel
Bundled

Top Tensioned
Riser Systems - Pipe Options
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Flexible

‹ Steel Pipe Non Insulated

‹ Steel Pipe Insulated

‹ Steel Pipe in Pipe

‹ Bundled Steel Pipes


What is High Temperature?
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Typical production temperatures 40-80 deg C

‹ High temperature 80 deg C - 100 deg C

‹ Very high temperature 100 deg C +


Current 2H HT Project Involvement
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

Field Production Production Operator


Temperature Pressure

Tahiti, GoM Very High Very High ChevronTexaco


800m
Thunder Horse, Very High Very High bp
GoM, 1800m
Moho Bilondo, Very High High TFE
Congo,
600m
Steel - Effect of High Temperature
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Reduced yield strength at high temperature


‹ API derating for T > 120°C (250°F)
‹ 150°C = 4.5% strength reduction
‹ DNV derating for T > 50°C (120 °F)
‹ 150 °C = 30MPa strength reduction (5.5% on X80)

‹ Example:
‹ steel manufactured to X70
‹ Normal operating stress checks performed against
65ksi to account for steel derating at HT
‹ Stress checks for shut-down conditions checked
against 70ksi yield strength since no HT
Insulation Materials – Effect of HT
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Why would risers for HT wells need thermal insulation?


‹ Cool down times during shut-in must be long enough to prevent
hydrate formation
Insulation - Requirements
Meet thermal requirements
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Steady state conditions (U-value) and specific heat capacity

‹ Maintain temp. above critical value during shut-in (12-24hrs)

‹ Long-term hydrothermal stability


‹ Maintain material properties in the long-term (20years)

‹ Water depth dictates compressive strength and water absorption


rates
‹ Density
‹ Increases with increase water depth and temperature

‹ Increase in density increases thermal conductivity (k)

‹ Desire to keep riser weight and k-value low

‹ Increased tension, drag loading, fatigue


Insulation - Requirements
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Corrosion protection & adhesion


‹ FBE typically used – mechanically bonds insulation to pipe
‹ At high temperatures (>110 deg C) ordinary epoxy not suitable
and high temperature epoxy required
‹ Resist cathodic disbondment if insulation coating is damaged
‹ Dynamic service
‹ Resistant to cracking under fatigue loading
‹ Resist large strains during storm loading and installation (S-lay,
J-lay and reeling)
‹ Impact strength
‹ Resistant to crushing and mechanical strength during storage
and laying with tensioners and over stinger rollers
Insulation – Material Selection
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ 3 major types available for deep and ultra deepwater


riser application
‹ Epoxy based syntactic foams
‹ Polyurethane based syntactic foams
‹ Multi-layer polypropylene systems
‹ Selection influenced by:
‹ Design temperature
‹ Manufacturability of resulting insulation thickness based on
required U-value and cool down time (lower k-value gives
lower insulation thickness)
‹ Cost
Insulation - Epoxy Syntactic Foams
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Composite - fiberglass macro


spheres in an epoxy binder
‹ Cast directly onto pipe
‹ Low density (600 kg/m3 at 1200m)
‹ High thermal efficiency (k = 0.09
W/m.K at 1200m depth)
‹ Low cost
‹ Less flexible than PU or PP
(cracking concern in high fatigue
areas)
‹ Limited to 100 deg C service
‹ Used on 1000m GoM Shell King
C-Therm with macrospheres
(1999) with 6 miles of C-THERM for
6” OD flowlines (80 deg C design
temp.)
‹ Limited riser track record
Insulation - PU Syntactic Foams
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Polyurethane matrix loaded with gas


filled glass micro spheres
‹ Applied by standard molding
techniques
‹ Higher density compared with epoxy
syntactic foams (800 kg/m3 at 1200m)
‹ Moderate thermal efficiency (k = 0.165
W/m.K at 1200m depth)
‹ Medium cost
‹ Limited to 90 deg C service
‹ Used on 1600m GoM BP King (2001)
with 59km of GSPU for 12” OD
flowlines (83 deg C design temp.) Glass Syntactic Polyurethane
(GSPU)
‹ Limited riser track record
Insulation - Multi-layer Polypropylene (PP)
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ 3-layer corrosion barrier plus PP foam


insulation and solid PP shield
‹ Applied by side or cross extrusion process
‹ Higher density (800 kg/m3 at 1200m)
‹ Moderate thermal efficiency (k = 0.13 to
0.22 W/m.K)
‹ Medium / highest cost
‹ High temp service up to 140 deg C
‹ Used on:
‹ 1500m GoM BP Nile (2000) with Thermotite
for 6” OD SCR (90 deg C design temp.)
‹ Asgard flowlines (140 deg C design temp.)
‹ Will be used for:
‹ GoM BP Thunder Horse production SCRs

5-layer Thermotite® System


Insulation - Field Joints System Quality
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Specialist joints made in factory for main


riser lengths but same quality also needed
for field joints
‹ If high quality field joint are not achieved:
‹ Water ingress
‹ Corrosion - pitting- fatigue
‹ Reduced insulation – cold spot
‹ Convection – cold spot
‹ Minimise number of field joints since
costly due to
‹ Speed of assembly
‹ Problems associated with working on the
vessel
Insulation - Material Qualification
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Little long-term data available for high temp. service


‹ Testing required for successful application
‹ Small scale hydrothermal ageing tests under pressure,
accelerated using an elevated temperature (least
expensive)
‹ Large scale pipe simulated service tests to determine
thermal performance and long-term degradation
(expensive)
‹ Mechanical tests (tensile, shear, bend, adhesion,
impact and fatigue)
‹ Cathodic disbondment
H2S – Effect on Fatigue Performance
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Recent tests at 60deg C indicate significant reduction in fatigue


performance if H2S present (Factor of 20 on life)
‹ Effects of HT are currently unknown
Corrosion – Effects at High Temperatures
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Rate of corrosion increases with increase in temp. due


to reduced efficiency of cathodic protection system
‹ Therefore require more anode mass and/or reduced
spacing of anodes
‹ Integrity of coating barriers also an issue at HT
‹ Therefore corrosion allowances must increase – thicker
walled pipes
‹ Impact on cost and weight
Corrosion – Effect on Stresses and Fatigue
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Calculation of stresses in riser need to take account of


potential wall thickness loss due to corrosion

‹ Corrosion allowances may lead to thick-walled pipes


and wall thickness correction factor must be applied
when assessing fatigue performance (DnV 2001 >
25mm)
Fatigue Life Enhancement
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Low fatigue lifes due to high corrosion levels etc. may


be improved by:
‹ Improve weld quality (double side weld)
‹ Reduce stresses using upset (thickened end) pipe
‹ Overlay of critical welds with corrosion resistance alloy (CRA)
‹ Reduce stresses using external sleeves
‹ Cost Increase
Buoyancy - Typical Properties
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Temperature tolerance
‹ Water ingress
Buoyancy/Insulation - Hot / Wet Issues
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Accelerated water permeation


‹ Loss of buoyancy
‹ Loss of insulation

‹ Solution
‹ Use of pure syntactics - no spheres- (heavy)
‹ Use of resistant materials – Amines (costly)
‹ Low permeability coatings polyethylene – (damage)
‹ Barrier insulation material temp. gradient – (complex)
‹ Bonding direct to pipe to prevent ‘hot/wet’ – (not
practical with bundles)
Buoyancy/Insulation - Conventional Bundle
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Hot/Wet interface
‹ Complex buoyancy profile
‹ Difficulty casting
‹ Number of pieces
‹ Assembly procedure
‹ Poor heat sharing
Buoyancy/Insulation - Internal Bundle
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

Buoyancy
Modules Encircling
Water

Carrier
Pipe Gel
Medium

Production Production
Flowlines Fluid
Buoyancy/Insulation - Internal Bundle Riser
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Lower buoyancy contact temperature


‹ Better heat sharing between prod. lines
‹ Ability to circulate cooler water
‹ Ability to circulate hot water
‹ Simpler buoyancy shapes
‹ Lower buoyancy material spec.
‹ Similar thermal expansion
PIP, TTR and COR - HT Issues
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ For pipe-in-pipe (PIP), top tensioned risers (TTR)


and concentric offset risers (COR)
‹ Different pipes are at different temperatures and
the relative thermal expansion of pipes must be
considered:
‹ Inner pipe expansion
‹ Buckling
Tension
‹ Centraliser design and spacing Friction
‹ Preloading
‹ Crushing of insulation Compression
‹ Cold spots

Centraliser Spacing
Flexible Jumpers - Free Standing Risers
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Difficult to design CORs /SLORs


for HT due to problems with
flexible jumpers
‹ Internal pressure sheath
‹ End fittings
‹ Stiffener design
Flexible Jumpers – Internal Pressure Sheath
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

Temp. Range Water Cut


Material Comments
(°C) (%)
High tensile and impact resistance
HDPE -50 to +60 0 - 100
at low temp and low pressure
Upper temperature limit reduces if
XLPE -50 to +90 0 – 100
pressure >2000psi
-20 to +100 0
Weak resistance to high water cut at
PA-11 -20 to +90 0–5
HT
-20 to +65 5 - 100

PVDF -20 to +130 0 – 100 Appropriate for HP/HT applications

‹ Maximum operating temperature is highly dependent on the


design life of the pipe
Flexible Jumpers – Internal Pressure Sheath
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Example using PA-11:


‹ Design life of 30-years – operating temperature 55°C
‹ Design life of 10-years - operating temperature 70°C
‹ Design life of 1-year – operating temperature 100°C
Flexible Jumpers – End Fitting Design
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ When PVDF used as internal pressure sheath:


‹ End-fitting design (crimping/sealing mechanism) is critical
‹ Potential for plasticizer loss is high – reduced seal efficiency
‹ PVDF has higher thermal expansion coefficient – cyclic
expansion/contraction – gradual pull-out of sheath from end
fitting
‹ Significant development by manufacturers mean these issues
are being addressed and continual improvements are made
Flexible Jumpers – Stiffener Design
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Stiffener at connection jumper/manifold is made from


structural polyurethane (PU)
‹ PU susceptible to aging at relatively low temp. (e.g. 50 ºC)
therefore need to accurately determine stiffener internal wall
temperature
‹ Temperatures can be reduced by using water circulation around
stiffener or active cooling
Flex Joint – Issues at HT
Design Issues
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Aging of rubber at HT
‹ Rapid decompression at HP
‹ Solution
‹ CRA Bellows (pressure balanced)
‹ Prevents direct contact of rubber
with hydrocarbons
‹ Produces temperature gradient
across bellows
‹ Reduces rubber temperature
‹ Impact
‹ Cost
‹ Additional stiffness
‹ Fatigue of bellows
Summary of Riser Design Issues at HT
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ HT wells result in additional complexity for riser


design
‹ Material performance – derating of steel yield strength
‹ Problems with buoyancy / insulation material at HT
‹ Potential issues with H2S (if present)
‹ Accelerated corrosion rates
‹ Knock on effects on riser wall thicknesses and fatigue
‹ Additional considerations for pipe-in-pipe systems
‹ Issues for flexible pipes
‹ Issue for key components such as flex-joint design
‹ These all results in significant increase in riser cost
due to higher spec. materials, increase weight etc.
Attention should be turned to finding alternative
ways of dealing with HP/HT problem………
Alternative Approach for HP/HT Risers
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ High Temperature
‹ Cooling loops or heat exchanges on seabed
‹ Potential problems with hydrates and wax in exchanger during
shut down – can be solved with chemicals
‹ Therefore high temperature issues with insulation/buoyancy,
steel etc. are no longer a problem
‹ This approach is yet to be implemented
‹ High Pressure
‹ High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS)
‹ Complex control and additional subsea valving/choking to
reduce pressure in riser system
‹ Issues relating to reliability and risk must be addressed
‹ Already implemented on a number of systems
Alternative Approach for HP/HT Risers
2H Offshore - deep water riser engineering

‹ Use both cooling loops and HIPPS to eliminate


problems with HP/HT risers. Benefits include:
‹ Reduce weight of riser

‹ Reduce vessel payload / buoyancy requirements

‹ Reduce insulation/buoyancy material issues

‹ Faster installation

‹ Reduced hydrodynamic drag

‹ Improved dynamic response

‹ Lower quality welding may be acceptable

You might also like