Professional Documents
Culture Documents
g g
Hypertension: Defining the Barriers
to Control
Learning Objectives
Aggressively screen for and manage hypertension, using
evidence-based guidelines to help you and your patients
set treatment goals
g
1
Significance of Hypertension
•In the United States, hypertension affects approximately 50 million
individuals, and accounts for 35 million office visits per year. Worldwide,
about 1 billion people have hypertension.
•Only 33% of people who are receiving treatment for hypertension have
their blood pressure under control.
JNC 7
2
JNC 7: Are You Surprised?
30% of adults do not know they have
hypertension.
hypertension
40% of those who are hypertensive are not being
treated.
66% of those who are being treated have a blood
pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg.
3
JNC 7: Treatment Algorithm for Hypertension
Lifestyle modifications
Optimize dosages or add additional drugs until goal blood pressure is achieved.
Consider consultation with hypertension specialist.
4
Case Presentation #1
Vicki Struthers
36 y/o white female
PMH
− Recently returned to work
10 weeks after the birth of
first child
− Total cholesterol: 160
mg/dL
− HDL: 66 mg/dL
/
− LDL: 120 mg/dL
− Family history of diabetes
− No history of smoking
5
Vicki Struthers – by the numbers
Tests Ordered Before Your
Visit Today
ECG-normal
ECG l
Labs
Cr: 0.9 mg/dL; Na: 135 mmol/L;
glucose: 97 mg/dL; HCT: 35;
TSH: 2.1; K: 4.2 mmol/L
Vit l
Vitals
HR: 88 bpm, BP: 138/89mm/Hg,
BMI: 23
No Rx, NKDA
Treatment Alternatives
What do you recommend now?
6
Treatment Alternatives
Correct Answer
What do you recommend now?
1-week Follow-up
Vicki returns in a week. She’s begun a daily
exercise program and her BP on return is
138/88 mm H Hg. Wh
Whatt iis th
the correctt di
diagnosis?
i ?
A. Normal BP
B. Prehypertension
C. Stage 1 hypertension
D. Not sure
7
1-week Follow-up
Correct Answer
Vicki returns in a week. She’s begun a daily
exercise program and her BP on return is
138/88 mm H Hg. Wh
Whatt iis th
the correctt di
diagnosis?
i ?
A. Normal BP
B. Prehypertension
C. Stage 1 hypertension
D. Not sure
Treatment Alternatives
8
Treatment Alternatives
Correct Answer
BP: 118/70
9
Clinical Practice Recommendation
Strength of Evidence:
Three reviews of 50 observational studies found the risk of CV
disease was lowered in those who were physically active.
Conversely, a review of 43 epidemiological studies found that
physical inactivity was associated with a doubling of cardiovascular
disease.
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure - Complete Report. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Bethesda, 2004.
10
Case Presentation #2
Nate Biddleson
55 y/o African-American male presents for
follow-up after an Executive Physical.
11
When the First Drug Doesn’t Work
JNC 7 advocates for rapid progression to combination
therapy before fully exploring mono-therapy.
This approach is not an issue for those with Stage 2, but for
Stage 1. Different mechanisms may cause HTN in different
patients; and heterogeneous mechanisms from multiple class
of agents may be necessary.
12
What Should We Do Next?
Correct Answer
2-Week Follow-Up
13
2-Week Follow-Up
Correct Answer
Mr. Biddleson returns, having visited with the dietitian and is
trying
y g to implement his recommendations. He has started
walking daily. His BP at this visit is 136/84; 2hr postprandial
glucose is 126 mg/dL. What should we consider next?
1-Month Follow-Up
14
High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Require
Multiple Agents to Get to Goal
Achieved
Systolic BP
AASK1 (134 mm Hg)
ABCD2,3
23 (132 mm Hg)
1 2 3 4
Number of BP Medications
AASK=African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension; ABCD=Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in
Diabetes; ALLHAT=Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trials; HOT=Hypertensive
Optimal Treatment; IDNT=Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial; RENAAL=Reduction of Endpoints in Non-Insulin Diabetes
Mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartin; UKPDS=United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study.
1Wright JT et al. JAMA. 2002;288:2421-2431. 2Bakris GL. J Clin Hypertens. 1999;1:141-147.
3Estacio RO et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:645-652. 4The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997.
5Hansson L et al. Lancet. 1998;351:1755-1762. 6Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860. 7Bakris GL et al. Arch
Intern Med. 2003;163:1555-1565. 8UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703-713.
15
ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines
Pyramid Approach to HF Stages
R f
Refractory
t
End-Stage HF
Marked symptoms at rest
D despite maximal
medical therapy*
HF with Current or Prior Symptoms
Known structural heart disease
C Shortness of breath and fatigue
Reduced exercise tolerance
Structural Heart Disease
Previous
P i MI
B LV systolic dysfunction
Asymptomatic valvular disease
High Risk for Developing HF
Hypertension
A CAD
Diabetes mellitus
Family history of cardiomyopathy
Case Presentation #3
16
Clark Galloway
42 y/o white male
17
Clark Galloway –Parasternal Long
Axis Echo
18
What Do You Recommend?
Correct Answer
A. Begin an ACEi or ARB
B St
B. Strongly
l recommend d dietary
di t and
d lifestyle
lif t l
modification, including low Na, low-fat diet and a
daily exercise program
C. Begin a statin and aspirin
D. Return visit in 2 weeks with recheck of fasting
blood glucose and blood pressure and consider
a BB at this juncture as an additional
medication.
E. All of the above
19
What Are Appropriate Actions
At This Visit?
A. Discuss the potential outcomes and risks of uncontrolled
hypertension with other factors such as elevated blood
glucose
l and
dddyslipidemia
li id i
B. Re-prescribe medications mentioned earlier
C. Cautiously add a prescription for metformin and a
nonspecific-BB in a short period of time.
D. Admit to the hospital
E. Choices A and B
F. Choices A, B and C
20
Clark Galloway 5 Years Later
Today his BP is
162/100 He is angry
162/100.
and significantly short of
breath at rest.
21
Post-Discharge
22
What’s Your Advice To Clark Today?
Correct Answer
A. If he does not follow his recommended regimen, his risk
of recurrent MI is almost certain, only the exact timing is
uncertain.
t i
B. Of all the actions that he can take to lower his risk, the
most important are to control his blood pressure and
take his clopidogrel/aspirin combination.
C. Dietary and lifestyle modification are important in
preventing further cardiovascular disease
D. All of the above
E. A & C only
23
Your Best Action Would Be To:
24
ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines
Pyramid Approach to HF Stages
R f
Refractory
t
End-Stage HF
Marked symptoms at rest
D despite maximal
medical therapy*
HF with Current or Prior Symptoms
Known structural heart disease
C Shortness of breath and fatigue
Reduced exercise tolerance
Structural Heart Disease
Previous
P i MI
B LV systolic dysfunction
Asymptomatic valvular disease
High Risk for Developing HF
Hypertension
A CAD
Diabetes mellitus
Family history of cardiomyopathy
1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics. Bethesda, MD: US
Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, 2005. Available at http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/index.htm.
Accessed Oct. 2006. 2. Hunt SA et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart
Failure in the Adult. Available at http://www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/guidelines/failure/update/index.pdf. Accessed Oct.
2006. 3. National Kidney Foundation. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines on
Hypertension and Antihypertensive Agents in Chronic Kidney Disease. Available at
http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_bp/guide_1.htm. Accessed Oct. 2006.
25
Chronic Kidney Disease
10
3.5
0
n=69 n=1,304 n=169 n=890
26
Causes of Death in Persons With
Diabetes, Based on US Studies
Cardiac Disease
Cerebrovascular
Disease
Diabetes
Malignant Neoplasms
Pneumonia/Influenza
All Other
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Deaths (%)
1990 US death certificates with mention of diabetes, all ages.
1990 US death certificates with mention of diabetes, age at death ≥45 years.
Moss SE et al. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1158-1162. Ochi JW et al. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:224-229. Kleinman JC et
al. Am J Epidemiol.1998;128:389-401. Bender AP et al. Diabetes Care.1986;9:343-350.
27
UKPDS: Blood Pressure Control Study in
Type 2 Diabetes Effect of Intensive BP Lowering on Micro-
and Macrovascular Complications Risk
Any
Diabetes- Diabetes-
related related Renal Vision
MI Endpoint Death Retinopathy Failure Stroke Deterioration HF
0
-10
Risk Reduction (%)
-20
−21
-30 P=.13 −24
P=.0046
−32 −34
-40 P=.019
P=.0038
−42
-50 P 29
P=.29 −44
44
P=.013 −47
P=.0036
-60 −56
P=.0043
Benefits of 144/82 vs 154/87
-70
1,148 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes were allocated to tight (144/82 mm Hg, n=758) or less tight
(154/87 mm Hg, n=390) and followed for a median of 8.4 years.
UKPDS Group. UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703-713.
20
HF Stroke MI Diabetic Death
Risk of Event (%)
0
+7
-9 -8
-12
-20
-21
-32
-40
40
-44
Glycemic control
-60 -56
ACEi or β-Blocker
28
Clinician Input
Strength of Evidence:
A Recommendation; There is robust evidence to recommend a
pattern of care.
29
Importance of Patient Education
50% of patients discontinue their anti-
hypertensive within one year of initiating
t t
treatment.
t
30
Lack of Adherence
• Causes 125,000 deaths a year - twice the
mortality rate from MVAs
• Direct cause of 30% of hospital admissions for
people over the age of 65
• Half of all prescriptions are taken incorrectly,
contributing to prolonged or additional illnesses.
• Increases with the number of meds and doses
per day; at 4 times a day, only 40% of patients
get it right.
31
Differences Between More and Less
Successful Providers
32
Causes of Resistant Hypertension
Improper Measurement
Volume Overload
Excess Sodium
Volume retention from Renal Disease
Inadequate Diuretic Therapy
Drug-Induced/Other Causes
Noncompliance Licorice
Inadequate Doses Ephedra
Inappropriate Combos ma haung
NSAIDS; COX 2 inhibitors Bitter Orange
Cocaine, amphetamines, other illicits Obesity
Sympathomimetics (decongestants etc.) EtOH Sleep Apnea
OCPs Steroids
Cyclosporine and tacrolimus Erythropoietin
Secondary Causes
Renal Artery Stenosis
Phenyl Chromocytoma
33
Strategies to Improve Management
of Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes
In-hospital Increasing
ACC/AHA HF Outpatient
Guidelines1 I iti ti 2,3
Initiation23
Compliance2,3
Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT): multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing propranolol vs placebo in 3837 patients
aged 30–69 years surviving acute MI. Patients 5–21 days post-MI were randomized to propranolol or placebo and were followed for an
average of 25 months. Adherence data were available for 2175 patients (1081 randomized to propranolol).
Compliance With Oral Mononitrates in Angina Pectoris Study (COMPASS): open, nonblinded, randomized, parallel-group study in 101
patients aged 40–75 years; compared patient compliance (using electronic measurement) and treatment effectiveness in patients with
stable angina pectoris treated with oral nitrates administered once daily vs twice daily.
1. Horwitz R et al. Lancet. 1990;336:542–545. 2. Kardas P et al. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:213–216.
34
Summary
70
References
• ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in
the Adult—Summary Article. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines
for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in Collaboration With the
A
American
i C
College
ll off Ch
Chestt Physicians
Ph i i and
d the
th IInternational
t ti lSSociety
i t ffor H
Heartt and
dLLung
Transplantation: Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2005;112:1825-1852.
• American Academy of Family Physicians Home Study Self-assessment Program. Hypertension
monograph #305. FP Essentials, 2004. AAFP; Kansas City, Mo.
• American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2004 Update. Dallas, Tex.:
American Heart Association; 2003.
• Bakris GL, Weir MR, Shanifar S, Zhang Z, Douglas J, van Dijk DJ, Brenner BM; RENAAL Study
Group. Effects of blood pressure level on progression of diabetic nephropathy: results from the
RENAAL study. Arch Intern Med 2003 Jul 14;163(13):1555-65.
• Bakris GL. Maximizing Cardiorenal Benefit in the Management of Hypertension: Achieve Blood
Pressure Goals. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 1999 Oct;1(2):141-147.
• Bender AP, Sprafka JM, Jagger HG, Muckala KH, Martin CP, Edwards TR. Incidence, prevalence,
and mortality of diabetes mellitus in Wadena, Marshall, and Grand Rapids, Minnesota: the Three-
Three
City Study. Diabetes Care 1986;9:343-350.
• Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh
Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of
High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289(19):2560-72.
• Domenic A Sica MD (2007) Distinctions in Class: Considerations for the Use of β-Blockers in
Cardiovascular Disease. J Clin Hypertens 2007;9 (s4);2-3.
• Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, Biggerstaff SL, Gifford N, Schrier RW. The effect of nisoldipine
as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent
diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med 1998 Mar 5;338(10):645-52.
• Feldman R, Bacher M, Campbell N, Drover A, Chockalingam A. Adherence to pharmacologic
management of hypertension. Can J Pub Health 1998;89:I-16-I-18.
35
71
References, cont.
• Fonarow GC, Gawlinski A, Watson K. In-hospital Initiation of Cardiovascular Protective Therapies
to Improve Treatment Rates and Clinical Outcomes: The University of California-Los Angeles,
Cardiovascular Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program. Crit Path Cardiol
2003;2(2):61-703.
• H ff
Haffner SM,
SM Lehto
L ht S,S Rönnemaa
Rö T
T, P
Pyörälä
ö älä K
K, L
Laakso
k M M. MMortality
t lit ffrom coronary h
heartt di
disease iin
subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34.
• Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in
subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34.
• Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering and
low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal
Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. Lancet 1998;351:1755-1762.
• Herzog E, Varley C, Kukin M. Pathway for the Management of Acute Heart Failure. Crit Path
Cardiol 2005;4(1):37-42.
• Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Berkman L, et al. Treatment adherence and risk of death after a
myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990;336:542
1990;336:542–545.
545.
• Hunt SA et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic
heart failure in the adult—Summary Article: A report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to
update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure). J Am Coll Cardiol
2005 Sep 20; 46:1116-43.
72
References, cont.
• Khan O. Hypertension with updated guidelines from AAFP & JNC VII; 2006. University of
Pittsburgh School of Public Health; Pittsburgh, Penn.
http://www.publichealth.pitt.edu/supercourse/SupercoursePPT/22011-23001/22501.ppt accessed
April 13, 2008.
• Kl i
Kleinman JC
JC, Donahue
D h RP,
RP Harris
H i MI,
MI FiFinucane FF
FF, M
Madans
d JH
JH, BBrock
k DB
DB. M
Mortality
t lit among
diabetics in a national sample Am J Epidemiol 1988.128: 389-401.
• Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, et al; Collaborative Study Group.
Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with
nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001 Sep 20;345(12):851-60.
• Malmberg K, Rydén L, Hamstent A, Herlitz J, Waldenström A, Wedel H.; the DIGAMI study group.
Effects of insulin treatment on cause-specific one-year mortality and morbidity in diabetic patients
with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1996;17:1337-1344.
• Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Cause-specific mortality in a population-based study of diabetes. Am
J Public Health 1991;81:1158-1162.
• National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics.
Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, NIH, 2005. Available at
http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/index.htm. Accessed April 13, 2008.
36
73
References, cont.
• National Kidney Foundation. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Clinical
Practice Guidelines on Hypertension and Antihypertensive Agents in Chronic Kidney Disease.
Available at http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guidelines_bp/guide_1.htm. Accessed
April 13, 2008.
• O hi JW
Ochi JW, Melton
M lt LJ,LJ P
Palumbo
l b PJ PJ, Ch
Chu CP
CP. A population-based
l ti b d study
t d off di
diabetes
b t mortality.
t lit
Diabetes Care 1985;8:224-229.
• The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major
Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme
Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering
Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997.
• The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and
Treatment of High Blood Pressure - Complete Report. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
Bethesda, 2004.
• UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular
and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998 Sep
12;317(7160):703-13.
• Weber MA. The JNC 7 Report: Challenges and Dilemmas in Writing Guidelines. J Clin Hypertens
2003;5(4):282–286.
• Wright JT Jr, Bakris G, Greene T, Agodoa LY, Appel LJ, Charleston J, et al. Effect of blood
pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease:
results from the AASK trial. JAMA 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2421-31.
37