PORTFOLIO AND RUBRICS ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR RPMS EVALUATION

FOR TEACHER I-III

KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Prepared daily  Daily lesson All daily lesson plans Had four of the five Had 3 of the five parts  Had 2 of the five parts Had 1 of the five parts
lesson plans and had the following: parts of the lesson plan
plan
 Objectives
daily logs of  List of  Subject Matter
activities including instructional  Procedures
appropriate, materials  Evaluation
adequate and used per  Assignment
updated rating period Each part had the full Each part had a partial Each part had the full Each part had the Each part had no
description of what to description of what to description without partial description description and
instructional  Lesson Guides
do with an example do with an example example without example without example
materials within
Objective was SMART Objective was stated Objective was stated Objective was stated Objective was stated
the rating period with 1 behavioral with 2 behavioral with 3 behavioral with 4 behavioral
indicator missing indicators missing indicators missing indicators missing
100% developed high 90-99% developed high 80-89% developed high 70-79% developed high 69% and below
order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills develop high order
thinking skills
Attained 100% of the Attained 90-99% and Attained 80-89% and Attained 70-79% and 69% and below attain
desired learning above of the desired above of the desired above of the desired the desired learning
competencies learning competencies learning competencies learning competencies competencies
100% based on the 90-99% based on 80-89% based on 70-79% based on 69% and below based
budget of work approved budget of approved budget of approved budget of on approved budget
work work work of work

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 1 of 16
 KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
2. Facilitated  Lesson Guides  The teacher  The teacher The teacher clearly The teacher did not The teacher did not
learning in the  Teaching established developed a communicated a have a clear focus have a clear focus for
school through Aids/Devices challenging and measureable goal focus fond is for the student student learning or
measureable goals for student learning aligned with the learning the objective is too
functional lesson  List of Innovative
for student learning that is aligned with DepEd standards or general to guide
plans, daily logs teaching strategies that is aligned with the DepEd K-12 Basic lesson planning or the
and innovative used in the class as the DepEd standards standards or K-12 Education objective is
teaching reflected on daily or K-12 Basic Basic Education Curriculum. inappropriate for
strategies Lesson Plan Education Curriculum. students.
 List of individual Curriculum.  The teacher
learning activities  The goal reflected a explained the
 Student Individual range of student importance of the
Learning Output learner needs goal and its
 Student appropriateness to
students.
Observation
Has provided activities Has provided Has provided Has provided Has provided
Output
for a 100% and above activities for 90-99% individual activities individual activities individual activities
 Cooperative of the classes handled of the classes handled for 80-89% of the for 70-79% of the for 69% and below of
Learning Outputs for the rating period for the rating period classes handled for classes handled for the classes handled
 List of Lesson the rating period the rating period for the rating period
where ICT was
integrated

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 2 of 16
KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Teaching methods and Teaching methods Teaching methods Teaching methods Teaching methods
strategies elicited and strategies elicited and strategies elicited and strategies elicited and strategies elicited
100%and above 90-99% participation 80-89% participation 70-79% participation 69% and below
participation from a from a class from a class from a class participation from a
class class
21st Century Teaching 21st Century Teaching 21st Century Teaching 21st Century Teaching 21st Century Teaching
methods/ strategies methods/ strategies methods/ strategies methods/ strategies methods/ strategies
were 100% used in were 90-99% used in were 80-89% used in were 70-79% used in were 60-69% used in
teaching a lesson (e.g. teaching a lesson teaching a lesson teaching a lesson teaching a lesson
constructivism inquiry,
problem-solving
experimentation)
Cooperative learning Cooperative learning Cooperative learning Cooperative learning Cooperative learning
strategies was 100% strategies was 90-99% strategies was 80-89% strategies was 70-79% strategies was never
effective when used effective when used effective when used effective when used 60-69% used
ICT integration is 100% ICT integration is 90- ICT integration is 80- ICT integration is 70- ICT integration is 60-
evident 99% evident 89% evident 79% evident 69% evident
Results of student Results of student Results of student Results of student Results of student
observation/appraisal observation/appraisal observation/appraisal observation/appraisal observation/appraisal
are 100% used as basis are 90-99% used as are 80-89% used as are 70-79% used as are not 60-69%used
for follow-up basis for follow-up basis for follow-up basis for follow-up as basis for follow-up

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 3 of 16
 KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
3. Initiated discipline of Classroom rules Pupils were 100% Pupils were 90-99% Pupils were 80-89% Pupils were 70-79% Pupils were not
students including and Guidelines and guided in the and guided in the and guided in the and guided in the guided in the
classroom rules, observation of observation of observation of observation of observation of
guidelines and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules and classroom rules
individual and group guidelines as guidelines as guidelines as guidelines as and guidelines as
tasks within the rating evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
period descriptive rating in descriptive rating in descriptive rating in descriptive rating in descriptive rating
the report card/ the report card/ the report card/ the report card/ in the report
journal journal journal journal card/ journal
4. Monitored  Class size/ Safety, orderliness Safety, orderliness Safety, orderliness Safety, orderliness Safety,
attendance, diversity atmosphere and cleanliness of and cleanliness of and cleanliness of and cleanliness of orderliness and
appreciation, safe,  Classroom floors, toilets and floors, toilets and floors, toilets and floors, toilets and cleanliness of
positive and Beautification proper waste proper waste proper waste proper waste floors, toilets and
motivating  Design and disposal were 100% disposal were 90- disposal were 80- disposal were 70- proper waste
environment, overall Decors maintained 99% maintained 89% maintained 79% maintained disposal were
physical atmosphere,  Furniture and 69% and below
cleanliness and facilities consistently
orderliness of  Lesson Plan maintained
classroom s including
proper waste disposal
daily

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 4 of 16
 KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
100% of the 90-99% of the 80-89% of the 70-79% of the 69% and below
Instructional Instructional Instructional Instructional of the
Strategies promote Strategies promote Strategies promote Strategies promote Instructional
diversity diversity diversity diversity Strategies
appreciation was appreciation was appreciation was appreciation was promote
evident evident evident evident diversity
appreciation
was evident
Attendance Attendance Attendance Attendance Attendance
checking was 100% checking was 90- checking was 80- checking was 70- checking was
systematically 99% systematically 89% systematically 79% systematically 69% and below
carried out carried out carried out carried out consistently
maintained
5. Monitored and  Test notebook Evidences showed The teacher There is evidence of The teacher No evidence of
evaluated and with TOS that the teacher explains the various more than once planned student
maintained  Unit Test and purposely plans uses and limitations measure of student instructions without monitoring or
pupils/students’ Written works assessments and of the different performance but analyzing the evaluation of
progress within the  Student Portfolio varies assessment kinds of there is difficulty in student learning student progress
rating period  Pre-Test and choices to match assessments/ tests. analyzing data to data.
Post-Test Results the different Evidences showed inform institutional
 Initiated student needs, that student needs planning and
Intervention abilities and and avenues for delivery.
Program learning styles growth were clearly
 E-Class Record identified

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 5 of 16
KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
Class record Class record Class record Class record Class record
reflected the bases reflected the bases reflected the bases reflected the bases reflected the bases
of 100% of pupils’ of 90-99% of pupils’ of 80-89% of pupils’ of 70-79% of pupils’ of 69% and below
ratings in all ratings in all ratings in all ratings in all of pupils’ ratings in
classes/ subject classes/ subject classes/ subject classes/ subject all classes/ subject
areas handled areas handled areas handled areas handled areas handled
Students’ portfolio Students’ portfolio Students’ portfolio Students’ portfolio Students’ portfolio
contained 100% of contained 90-99% contained 80-89% contained 70-79% contained 69% and
his accomplishment of his of his of his below of his
accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
Table of Table of Table of Table of Table of
Specifications is Specifications is 90- Specifications is 80- Specifications is 70- Specifications is 60-
100% parallel to the 99% parallel to the 89% parallel to the 79% parallel to the 69% parallel to the
test test test test test
Table of Table of Table of Table of Table of
Specifications Specifications Specifications Specifications Specifications did
showed 100% showed 90-99% showed 80-89% showed 70-79% showed 60-69%
congruence congruence congruence congruence congruence
between content between content between content between content between content
and skills tested and skills tested and skills tested and skills tested and skills tested

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 6 of 16
 KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING OUTCOMES (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) SATISFACTORY (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Test questions Test questions Test questions Test questions Test questions were 60-
were 100% were 90-99% were 80-89% were 70-79% 69% logically sequenced
logically logically logically logically sequenced
sequenced sequenced sequenced
Pretest and Post - Pretest and Post - Pretest and Post - Pretest and Post - Pretest and Post-test
test were 100% test were 90-99% test were 80-89% test were 70-79% were 60-69%
administered in all administered in administered in all administered in all administered
classes/ subject all classes/ classes/ subject classes/ subject
area (supported subject area area (supported area (supported by
by analysis report (supported by by analysis report analysis report on
on subject area analysis report on on subject area subject area per
per class/grade subject area per per class/grade class/grade level)
level) class/grade level) level)
6. Conducted Progress Report on Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/ Remediation/enrichment
remediation/ Remediation/Enrichment Enrichment Enrichment Enrichment Enrichment Program is offered to 60-
enrichment Program Program is offered Program is Program is Program is offered 69% of students who
programs to to 100% of offered to 90-99% offered to 80-9% to 70-79% of need it.
improve students who of students who of students who students who need
performance need it. need it. need it. it.
indicators

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 7 of 16
 KRA – I. TEACHING LEARNING OUTCOMES (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
7. Attained the Test Results per 81% and above 70-79% MPS 60-69% MPS 50-59% MPS 49% MPS
required MPS for Learning Area MPS
grade level and
learning areas

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 8 of 16
 KRA – II. PUPIL/STUDENT OUTCOME (40%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) SATISFACTORY (3) (2) (1)
(4)
Monitored and evaluated  Class Record A. Complete and accurate Performed A, B, C Performed A, B Performed A and B A only
and maintained utilizing the e- class records with at least and D only and C only only
pupils/students’ progress class record by 10 formative tests, 2
Doped chapter/unit tests, and 1
 Formative tests periodic test
 Unit/chapter
tests B. Utilized the e-class
 Periodic test record as prescribed by
 Grading sheets DepEd
 Pupils/students
portfolio C. Submitted class records
together with the grading
sheets

D. Checked and evaluated

pupils/students’ portfolio

E. Maintained files of
pupils/students records
within the rating period
Conducted Records of visits and A. Conducted visits and Performed A and Performed A and Performed A and B Performe
remediation/enrichment interventions interventions signed by B with 1 – 2 B with 3-4 with 5-6 students d A and B

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 9 of 16
programs to improve the parents/ guardians students who did students who who did not show with 7 or
performance indicators concerned and noted by not show did not show improvement more
head teachers/ master improvement improvement students
teachers who did
not show
B. Conducted remediation improve
by doing ICL showing 100 ment
% improvement on the
performance of the
students for grade level/
learning area
Maintained updated pupils/  Soft and hard A. Maintained an updated Did only 4 Did only 3 Did only 2 Did only 1
students school records copy of school required school forms
forms which include SFs
 Records on 1,2,3,4,5 and 6
attendance and
punctuality as B. Kept records of
well as home attendance and
visits and punctuality of learners
interventions
conducted C. Kept records of home
 Records on ICL visits and interventions
and conducted
corresponding
progress report D. Kept records of ICL and
corresponding progress
report

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 10 of 16
 E. Kept files of accurate
and complete reports
duly noted by the
MTs/HTs or Principal
Attained the required GSA Grading Sheets and 100% of the learners One (1) student Two (2) students Three (3) students Four (4)
for grade level and Report Cards passed the required GSA did not pass the did not pass the did not pass the or more
learning areas for the grade level/ required GSA required GSA required GSA students
learning areas did not
pass the
required
GSA

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 11 of 16
 KRA – III. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (10%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF VERIFICATION OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Conducted  HRPTA Matrix of Conducted/ Conducted/ Conducted / Conducted/ 69% and below of
regular PTA Activities Organized Organized 90 to Organized 80 to Organized 70 to 79 planned meetings
meetings/  Organized HRPTA  two (2) PTA 99% of planned 89% of planned % of planned and conferences
conferences Meetings/ Conferences meetings and meetings and meetings and meetings and with no
 Minutes of Meetings  four (4) conferences with conferences with conferences with accomplished
 Attendance conferences set of agreements set of agreements minimal results reports
 Accomplishment Report for four rating and accomplished and accomplished
periods with reports reports
sets of
agreement
met with
accomplished
reports
2. Visited parents  Academic Monitoring 100% 90 to 99% 80 to 89% 70 to 79% 69% and below
of students report accomplishment of accomplishment of accomplishment of accomplishment of accomplishment
needing  Home Visit Report set visits with visits with partial visits with visits with planned with no
academic  Accomplishment report successful success in the suggested planned interventions interventions
monitoring/  Intervention report intervention and implementation of interventions
follow-up within  Log Book accomplishment interventions
the rating period  Parent-Teacher
Agreement

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 12 of 16
 KRA – III. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT(10%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
3. Undertaken/  List of Projects/ 100% 90 to 99% 80 to 89% 70 to 79% No project/no
Initiated projects/ events/ accomplishment of accomplished with accomplished accomplished event initiated
events/ activities activities/ projects/events/ documentation and projects with partial projects only with
with external initiated or activities with full report completion completion report no completion
funding/ undertaken documentation and report
sponsorship within  Accomplishment report on
the target date reports completion
 List of Donors

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 13 of 16
 KRA – IV. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT (10%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. Conducted Action Action Research Conducted at least 1 Conducted at least 1 Conducted at least 1 Identified classroom Only Classroom
Research action research with action research with action research with learning problems learning
full documentation full documentation full documentation with research problems/issues
on completion of on completion of on completion of proposal identified
intervention and intervention and intervention and
utilized in the utilized in the utilized in the school
division level district level
2. Initiated/ Participation on co- Initiated and Initiated and Participated in most Participation only No participation in
Participated in co- curricular school participated at least participated at least co-curricular school without school activities
curricular school activities with 2 co-curricular 1 co-curricular activities with documented results
activities within the documented school activities with school activities with documented results
rating period results documented results documented results
3. Produced Published Work Produced Produced Produced Produced No work has been
publication/ publication/creative publication/creative publication/creative publication/creative published
Creative work for work in DepEd post work in NCR Gazette work in Educourier work in school
school paper/ Pasay or any national
educourier/ DepEd circulation
post or any national
circulation within
the target date

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 14 of 16
 KRA – IV. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT (10%)

OBJECTIVES MEANS OF OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

VERIFICATION (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
4. Received special Certificate/ Received Special Received Special Received Special Received Special Received Special
award/citation/ Trophy/ Plaque award recognition award recognition award recognition award recognition award recognition
recognition for for exemplary for exemplary for exemplary for exemplary for exemplary
exemplary performance in the performance in the performance in the performance in the performance in the
performance national level and or NCR level and or division level and or district level and /or school level and /or
award giving body award giving body award giving body award giving body award giving body
authorized/ authorized/ authorized/ authorized/ authorized/
sanctioned by sanctioned by sanctioned by sanctioned by the sanctioned by the
DepEd Central Office DepEd NCR. DepEd Pasay PSDS school

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 15 of 16
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR EFFICIENCY

OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

(5)
Achieve 10% above the
target/result with minimal
financial, material resources
and time
(4)
Achieve 5% above the
target/result with minimal
financial, material resources
and time
(3)
Achieve the target/result
with minimal financial,
material resources and time
(2)
Achieve below the
target/result with minimal
financial, material resources
and time
( 1)
Did not achieve the target
time, materials and financial
resources.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR TIMELINESS

OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR

(5) (4) (3) (2) ( 1)
Task undertaken and Accomplished goals 2 days in Accomplished goals on time Accomplished goals 2 to 5 Consistently late in
achieved goals 5 days ahead advance of the expected days after the given due date accomplishing goals
of the expected time time

DCS-Pasay, 10/16/2015
Page 16 of 16