Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/inoche
a
Departamento de Quı́mica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico – C.P. 19081, 81531-990 Curitiba, Parana, PR, Brasil
b
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5080, USA
c
Instituto de Quı́mica, Universidade de São Paulo, C.P. 26077, 05599-970 São Paulo, SP, Brasil
Abstract
Trinuclear oxo-centered acetate complexes have been solution. The method gives yields around 30% and the
extensively investigated as models of electronic and mag- product is not always pure, mostly contaminated with
netic extended interactions [1–4], as homogeneous catalysts sodium salts.
[5] and as important building blocks to supramolecular Herein we present new facile, high yield synthetic routes
chemistry [6]. to obtain homometallic and heterometallic acetate trinu-
The iron acetate cluster was first isolated in 1909 by clear clusters like [FeIII3O(CH3CO2)6(H2O)3]CH3COO,
Weinland and Gussmann [7] although at the time they were [FeIII2FeIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3], [FeIII2CoIIO(CH3COO)6
not able to propose the correct formula. The first examples (H2O)3], [FeIII2NiIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3], [VIII2FeIIO(CH3
of mixed metal trinuclear clusters were synthesized by COO)6(H2O)3] and [VIII2CoIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3.
Weinland and Holtmeier [8], but were not recognized at Glossary of compounds: [FeIII3O(CH3CO2)6(H2O)3]CH3
the time. Later, Blake and co-workers [9] showed by X- COO (1); [FeIII2FeIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (2); [FeIII2CoIIO
ray studies that the products from Weinlands procedures (CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (3); [FeIII2NiIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3]
were in fact trinuclear [FeIII2MIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] spe- (4); [VIII2FeIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (5); [VIII2CoIIO(CH3
cies (M = Co or Ni). COO)6(H2O)3 (6).
The classical method to obtain the trinuclear mixed All reagents were used as supplied by Aldrich Chemical
metal FeIII2MII (M = transition metal ion) clusters consists Co. When necessary, the operations were carried out under
in the reaction of a mixture of an iron(III) salt and a diva- an inert atmosphere with the use of standard Schlenk tech-
lent metal salt with sodium acetate in aqueous or alcoholic niques or inside a Vacuum Atmosphere glove box equip-
ment. Infrared spectra were obtained with a Biorad
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 41 33613180; fax: +55 41 33613186. Excalibur series spectrophotometer in the region 4000–
E-mail address: fsnunes@quimica.ufpr.br (F.S. Nunes). 400 cm1 in KBr pellets. Cyclic voltammetry experiments
1387-7003/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2005.10.023
H. Vrubel et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 9 (2006) 208–211 209
were carried out with a Microquı́mica Potentiostat model was recovered after two weeks, washed with methanol and
MQPG-01. A platinum disc electrode was employed for dried under vacuum. Yield was 0.91 g (32%). [VIII2CoIIO
the measurements at I = 0.1 mol L1 kept constant with (CH3COO)6 (H2O)3] (6). To a solution of [V3O(CH3
KCl. A Ag/AgCl (KCl 1 mol L1) and a platinum wire COO)6(CH3OH)3] CH3COO was added Co(CH3COO)2 Æ
were used as reference and auxiliary electrodes, respec- 4H2O (3.0 g–12 mmol) dissolved in 30 mL of water. In a
tively. Typical experiments were conducted with 3.0 · few minutes, a large amount of a green solid appeared
103 mol L1 aqueous solutions of the complexes at ambi- and was filtered, washed with water, then methanol and
ent temperature. Microanalyses were done under nitrogen dried under vacuum. Yield was 91% (2.61 g).
by Desert Analytics Laboratories, USA. Metal content The classic procedure current being used to prepare tri-
were determined by atomic absorption. nuclear-acetate-homometallic clusters [MIII3O(CH3CO2)6
The complexes were prepared as follows: [Fe3O(CH3 (L)3]+ (L = solvent or a neutral ligand, such as pyridine
CO2)6(H2O)3]CH3COO (1). Equimolar amounts of iro- or pyrazine) is to mix a M(III) salt, usually nitrate or chlo-
n(III) chloride and ammonium hydroxide were mixed. A ride in the presence of sodium acetate and acetic acid in
brown solid (Fe(OH)3) was filtered, thoroughly washed water/ethanol or water/methanol solutions [7–9]. Mixed-
with water and dried at 76 C under vacuum with an Abder- trinuclear acetate clusters [M2M 0 O(CH3COO)6L3] have
halden pistol. Fe(OH)3 (5.0 g–47 mmol) was suspended in a been isolated from a similar reaction between M(III) and
mixture of 25 mL acetic acid and 10 mL of water. It was M 0 (II) nitrates and sodium acetate. After workup the solid
kept under stirring and mild heating until complete dissolu- is frequently isolated with sodium salts impurities, decreas-
tion of the solid. After, the solution was filtered while still ing the yields to as low as 30%.
hot and the solvent removed to dryness under vacuum, Our new approach (Scheme 1) for the homo and hetero-
recovering a light-orange solid. The yield was 9.8 g (96%). metallic trinuclear compounds were successful showing
[FeIII2FeIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (2). This mixed valence yields as high as 96%, much higher when compared with
complex was prepared by the reaction between compound the classic method that gives several products (a mixture
1 (5.0 g–7.7 mmol, dissolved in 30 mL of nitrogen-saturated of M2M 0 , MM 0 2, M3 and M 0 3 complexes) and requires long
water) and 6.5 g (31 mmol) of Fe(CH3COO)2 Æ 2H2O dis- chromatographic separation procedures. The synthetic
solved in 20 mL of deaerated water. A brown-reddish solid pathway for the homometallic is a clean one-step acid–base
precipitated after 10 min, collected by filtration, washed reaction, producing only water and salt. The exchange
with water and dried under vacuum.Yield was 7.1 g reaction between the homometallic cluster [MIII3O(CH3
(89%). [FeIII2CoIIO(CH3OO)6(H2O)3] (3). This heterome- CO2)6(L)3]+ and the MII-acetate to produce the mixed
tallic cluster was prepared dissolving 2.0 g (3.1 mmol) of metal cluster is an innovative approach that minimizes
complex 1 in 15 mL of hot water and mixing it with 2.0 g the formation of by-products and in some way contributes
(7 mmol) of Co(CH3COO)2 Æ 4H2O dissolved in 15 mL of to a better understanding of self-assembly mechanisms.
water. The mixture was heated and stirred for 10 min while The elemental analysis (C, H, N and metal content) seen
most of the product precipitated. After reaching the room in Table 1 as well as spectroscopic and electrochemical
temperature a brown-reddish solid was recovered, washed (see below) behavior support the trinuclear formulation.
with ethanol and dried under vacuum. Yield was 2.3 g Infrared spectra of complexes 1–6 exhibited the same
(84%). [FeIII2NiIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (4). This light- pattern. A typical spectrum is shown in Fig. 1, with main
brown solid was isolated as described for complex 3. Yield bands at cm1: 1590 (masym COO), 1423 (msymCOO), 1350
was 2.1 g (77%). [VIII2FeIIO(CH3COO)6(H2O)3] (5). (sym bend CH3), 1034 (rock CH3), 662 and 618 (in plane
[V3O(CH3COO)6(CH3OH)3]CH3COO was prepared as and out-of-plane bend COO, respectively) and at 563
complex 1 in a mixture of 20 mL of acetic acid and 10 mL (mas M3O). The frequency difference between the antisym-
of methanol under dinitrogen atmosphere. After, it was metric and symmetric stretching modes of the carboxylate
mixed with a solution of Fe(CH3COO)2 Æ 2H2O (2 g– group is typical of acetate ligand bridging two metal ions
10 mmol) dissolved in 20 mL of methanol. A dark blue solid [10–12]. The redox behavior of the most soluble clusters
Table 1
Elemental analysis data for compounds 1-6
Complex %C %H %N %Fe %V %M
1 25.36 (25.83) 3.68 (4.18) 0.23 (0.0) 25.0 (25.74) – –
2 24.11 (24.35) 3.86 (4.10) 0.05 (0.0) 29.0 (28.3) – –
3 23.72 (24.22) 3.71 (4.06) 0.26 (0.0) 18.55 (18.77) – 9.80 (9.90)a
4 23.15 (24.23) 3.98 (4.01) 0.28 (0.0) 18.20 (18.78) – 9.67 (9.87)b
5 28.03 (28.87) 3.88 (4.85) 0.13 (0.0) 9.0 (9.87) 17.40 (18.00) –
6 25.34 (25.32) 3.82 (4.25) <0.05 (0.0) – 17.24 (17.90) 10.12 (10.35)a
Calculated values in parenthesis.
a
%Co.
b
%Ni.
was studied. The cyclic voltammograms of the The route is currently being tested in our laboratory with
heterometallic complexes FeCo and FeNi showed a two- second-row transition metals and it was successfully car-
electron reduction wave at 0.32 versus Ag/AgCl with the ried out with ruthenium acetate clusters.
probable breakage of the cluster structure (step (a) below)
and two irreversible mono-electronic oxidations of the Acknowledgments
resulting fragments at 0.06 and 0.51 V (steps (b) and (c))
(Fig. 2). A similar electrochemical behavior was observed Fundação Araucária and CNPq supported this work.
for the all-iron mixed valence complex [FeIII2FeIIO(CH3 H.V. and F.S.N. thanks the Brazilian Research Council
COO)6(H2O)3], suggesting that the electron-transfer pro- (CNPq) for research fellowships.
cesses is formally centered at the iron ion.
½FeIII FeIII MII þ 2e ! ½FeII þ ½FeII MII ðaÞ References
½FeII ! ½FeIII þ e ðbÞ [1] R.W. Wu, S.K.A. Koske, R.P. White, C.E. Anson, U.A. Jayasooriya,
II II III II R.D. Cannon, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1994) 1657–1658.
½Fe M ! ½Fe M þ e ðcÞ [2] T.C. Jovmir, C.I. Turta, S.G. Shova, Y.A. Simonov, M. Gdaniec, I.I.
The analytical and spectroscopic data supported the Bulgac, I.G. Cadelnic, F. Filoti, J. Struct. Chem. 40 (1999) 905–913.
[3] T. Nakamoto, M. Katada, H. Sano, Inorg. Chim. Acta 291 (1999)
new facile, high yield synthetic pathways to homo and het- 127–135.
erometallic trinuclear acetate compounds. The route [4] R.D. Cannon, R.P. White, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 36 (1988) 195–298.
proves to be possible to exchange one metal center from [5] S. Murata, M. Miura, M. Nomura, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
an already assembled homometallic cluster by another (1989) 617–621.
metal ion in a lower oxidation state. Classic methods to [6] H.E. Toma, K. Araki, A.D.P. Alexiou, S. Nikolau, S. Dovidauskas,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 219–221 (2001) 187–234.
prepare the clusters by mixing the metal salts make it diffi- [7] R. Weinland, E. Gussmann, Ber. Deut. Chemischen Ges. 42 (1909)
cult to rationalize any self-assembly mechanism. It is worth 2997–3018.
to mention that we were unable to exchange two MIII ions. [8] R. Weinland, H. Holtmeier, Z. Anorg. Chem. 173 (1928) 49–62.
H. Vrubel et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 9 (2006) 208–211 211
[9] A.B. Blake, A. Yavari, W. Hatfield, C.N. Sethulekshmi, J. Chem. [11] M.L. Johnson, D.B. Powell, R.D. Cannon, Spectrochim. Acta 37A
Soc., Dalton Trans. (1985) 2509–2520. (1981) 995–1006.
[10] K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and [12] C. Fernandes, E. Stadler, V. Drago, C.J. Cunha, I.H. Kuwabara,
Coordination Compounds, John Wiley, New York, 1997, p.60. Spectrochim. Acta 52A (1996) 1815–1821.