You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/323240358

RESPONSE OF KHARIF PEARL MILLET CULTIVARS TO DIFFERENT SOWING


WINDOWS

Article · January 2018

CITATIONS READS

0 49

5 authors, including:

Prashant Balasaheb Pawar


Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
59 PUBLICATIONS   17 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology View project

Compain of Education Strengthening View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Prashant Balasaheb Pawar on 17 February 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Contemporary Research in India (ISSN 2231-2137): UGC Approved Journal No. 62441 - NAAS Score 2017: 3.23

RESPONSE OF KHARIF PEARL MILLET CULTIVARS TO


DIFFERENT SOWING WINDOWS
Wankhede S. Y., Jadhav, J. D., Pawar, P. B., Kharbade, S. B. and
Shaikh, A. A.

Abstract: The present invitation entitled “Studies on effect of kharif pearl millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.) cultivars on yield
attributes under different sowing windows” was carried out during kharif , 2015 at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Solapur,
Maharashtra State (India).The experiment was conducted in split plot design with three replications. Nine treatment combinations
were formed considering different cultivars viz., V1Shanti (RHRBH-9808),V2Mahyco Hybrid (MRB-204) and V3Dhanashakti
(ICTP-8203) and sowing windows viz., (S1) 26th MW (26th June – 01st July), (S2)- 30th MW (23rd July – 29th July) S3 – 34th
MW (20th Aug - 26th Aug). Among the three pearl millet cultivars, Shanti recorded significantly higher length of ear head (20.15
cm), girth of earhead (10.06cm), weight of earhead(32.35g), grain weight earhead-1 (23.59g) and 1000 grain weight (13.30g), days to
50 % flowering(61.59), days to maturity(95) and dry matter plant-1(52.11g).
Keywords: Kharif pearl millet, sowing windows, yield attributes, cultivars.

Pearl millet (Pennisetumglaucum[L.] R. Br.) Global production exceeds 10 MT a year. Pearl millet
formerly known as (P. americanum[L] Leeke) is a ranks third after wheat and rice in area in India.
variety of the millet family also known as pearl, Pearl millet, which accounts for about two-
bulrush, spiked or cat-tail millet. It is the staple food thirds of India's millet production, is grown in the
for drier parts of India, particularly the arid and semi- drier areas of the country, mainly in the states of
arid regions of India. It is generally grown under Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and
rainfedconditions in arid and semi-arid regions of the Haryana (FAO, 1996).
world. Sowing time dictates to a large degree how tall
In India, pearl millet is primary source of the plants will get and the potential impact of certain
dietary energy (360 K cal/kg) for rural population insects and diseases on the crop. It also determines
also a rich source of protein, calcium, phosphorous the size of the root system, which in turn determines
and iron. Pearl millet grain contains fairly high how much stored water the plant can utilize. Sowing
'amount of thiamine, riboflavin and niacin. time is the most important non-monetary input
Pearl millet grain are also used as a food for affecting yields of crop. Time of sowing varies with
poultry and green fodder or dry kadbi for cattle. Pearl the variety, agro climatic conditions and crop growing
millet straw is an important commodity and is used season. In fact, proper planting date is important for
by farmers as a building material and source of fuel. maximizing cereal grain yields (Witt, 1996) because
It is higher than sorghum in nutritive value but optimum seeding dates establish healthy and vigorous
inferior in feeding value. Pearl millet grain contains plants. A significant reduction in grain yield is
about 12.4% moisture, 11.6% protein, 5% fat, 67% associated with delayed seeding for a wide range of
carbohydrates and about 2.7% minerals. Pearl millet climatic conditions (Knapp and Knapp, 1978,
is also used as poultry feed and green fodder for Dahlkeet al. 1993). Lawn et al. (1993) found that
cattle. It is often referred as “The poor man’s food”. differences in development of cereals sown at
Today millet is a staple food for more than 500 different times may be explained by considering an
million people. Area under pearl millet is estimated as optimum temperature. Planting time
15 Mha annually in Africa and 14 Mha in Asia. recommendations for pearl millet and grain sorghum
are commonly made based on calendar day (day of
Special Issue: National Seminar “Recent Trends in Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research (PSAR- Jan., 2018) 242
Contemporary Research in India (ISSN 2231-2137): UGC Approved Journal No. 62441 - NAAS Score 2017: 3.23
the year) and/or soil temperature (Mick 1997 and and sowing windows viz. (S1) 26th MW (26th June –
Andrews et. al. 1998).It was reported that the drastic 01st July), (S2)- 30th MW (23rd July – 29th July) S3 –
reduction in yield under delayed sowing(Ramsheet 34th MW (20th Aug – 26th Aug).
al.1986). The soil comes under the vertisol (medium
It was stated that drought escape is a major black) medium black and clayey loam in texture and
mechanism in pearl millet, determining relative slightly alkaline (pH-7.4) in nature and having the
cultivar performance in individual stress uniform depth up to 90 cm.The altitude is about
environments, (Bidingeret al, 1982) 483.6 M above mean sea level. The highest
In order to bring out country as a whole to a temperature ever recorded was 46 0 C in May during
level on which other countries as standing as far as 1988. The monsoon lasts from June to the end of
agricultural production is concerned, it is very September, with moderate rainfall. It has an average
essential to emphasize on such aspects. Some of the rainfall of about of 545 mm per year. The annual
basic principle of factor contributing towards the maximum and minimum temperature ranged between
increase in per hectare yield of pearl millet crops as 25.0 to 43.20C and 7.3 to 27.10 C, respectively. During
suitable cultivars with required heritable potentiality, the kharif season, the maximum temperature ranged
proper sowing times and prevalence of congenial between 29.0 to 40.80C with an average of 34.70C,
weather conditions. Even in photo and thermo whereas, the minimum temperature ranged between
insensitive crop, it is critical input for higher yield. 18.0 to 26.20C. The pan evaporation ranged between
Climatechange may be a change in the mean of 1.8 to 12.8 mm with an average of 7.4 mm. The wind
the various climatic parameters such as temperature, speed ranged between 2.1 to 18.3 kmph with an
precipitation, relative humidity and composition of average of 9.7 kmph. In case of BSS which was
various at mosphericgases etc. and its properties ranged between 0.0 to 12.1 hrs with an average of 5.2
overalonger period of time andalarger geographical hrs. The morning RH ranged between 67 to 98 per
area. It canalso bereferred asany change in climate cent with an average of 80 per cent and the afternoon
overtime, whe ther due to natural variability or as RH ranged between 24 to 95 per cent during the crop
result of human activity. growing period.
Material and Methods The basal dose of fertilizer i.e. 50 kg N+25 kg
The present invitation entitled “Studies on P2O5 ha-1 was applied through urea and single super
effect of kharif pearl millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.) phosphate. However, 25 kg N and 25 kg P2O5 ha-1
cultivars on yield attributes under different sowing was applied as a basal dose and remaining 25 kg N ha-
windows” was carried during kharif , 2015 at Zonal 1 was applied at 30 DAS.
Agricultural Research Station, Solapur, Maharashtra The gross and net plot sizes were 15.0 x 6.3
State (India).The experiment was conducted in split m and10.0 x 4.5 m2, respectively. All the cultivars are
2

plot design with three replications. Nine treatment were dibbled as per different sowing windows
combinations were formed considering different ataspacing of45cm x20cm, during Kharif, 2015.
cultivars viz. V1Shanti (RHRBH-9808), V2Mahyco Thesoil was clayeyloamin texture and acidicin
Hybrid (MRB-204) and V3Dhanashakti (ICTP-8203) reaction(pH7.4)
Table 1: Meanyield contributing charactersas influenced by different treatments
Yield contributing characters
Treatments Length of ear Girth of Weight of Grain weight 1000 grain
head (cm) Earhead(cm) earhead (g) earhead-1 (g) Weight (g)
A. Sowing windows
S1 26 MW (26th June – 01st July) 19.15 8.62 27.42 21.61 9.31
S2 30 MW (23rd July – 29th July) 19.77 10.52 31.02 22.92 12.18
S3 34 MW (20th Aug – 26th Aug) 18.47 9.49 28.66 21.56 10.38
S.Em± 0.48 0.08 0.31 0.12 0.1
Special Issue: National Seminar “Recent Trends in Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research (PSAR- Jan., 2018) 243
Contemporary Research in India (ISSN 2231-2137): UGC Approved Journal No. 62441 - NAAS Score 2017: 3.23
C.D. at 5% NS 0.31 1.23 0.48 0.4
B. Cultivars
V1 Shanti (RHRBH-9808) 20.15 10.06 32.35 23.59 13.30
V2 Mahyco hybrid (MRB-204) 18.72 9.52 29.00 21.29 9.54
V3 Dhanashakti (ICTP-8203) 18.50 9.05 25.75 20.20 8.59
S.Em± 0.31 0.14 0.27 0.15 0.1
C.D. at 5% 0.95 0.44 0.83 0.47 0.4
C . Interaction
S.Em± 0.53 0.25 0.47 0.26 0.2
C.D. at 5% NS NS NS NS 0.76
General mean 19.13 9.54 29.03 22.30 10.56

Table 2: Mean number of days to 50 % flowering, days tomaturity and dry matter plant-1as influenced by
different treatments
Treatments Days to 50 % flowering Days to maturity Dry matter plant-1at harvest
Sowing Window
S1 26 MW (26th June – 01stJuly) 60.14 88.2 46.18
S2 30 MW (23rd July – 29thJuly) 57.88 95.1 51.13
S3 34 MW (20th Aug – 26th Aug) 56.23 81.3 42.01
S.Em± 0.37 0.36 0.29
C.D. at 5% 1.46 1.23 1.16
Cultivars
V1 Shanti (RHRBH-9808) 61.59 95.0 52.11
V2 Mahyco hybrid(MRB-204) 57.49 89.2 45.92
V3 Dhanashakti(ICTP-8203) 55.18 80.1 41.29
S.Em± 0.53 0.38 0.35
C.D. at 5% 1.65 1.48 1.09
Interaction
S.Em± 0.93 0.31 0.61
C.D. at 5% NS NS NS
General mean 58.09 88.6 46.44
*Significantat5%level
**Significantat1%level

Results and Discussion days to maturity and dry matter accumulation plant-
ThedatapresentedinTable1 revealedthat the 1(g)were 58.09 days , 88 days and 46.44, respectively.

important yield contributing characters viz., earhead Effect of sowing windows


length and girth, earhead weight plant-1, grain weight The important yield contributing characters viz.,
earhead-1 and 1000 grain weight are presented in Table earhead length and girth, earhead weight plant-1, grain
1. weight earhead-1 and 1000 grain weight were
The mean values of important yield significantly increased when crop was sown in 30th MW
contributing characters viz., earhead length and girth, followed by sowing of crop during 34thand 26th MW
earheadweight plant-1, grain weight earhead-1 and 1000 during the period of experimentation.
grain weight were 19.13 cm, 9.54 cm, 29.03 g, 22.30 g The crop sown in 30th MW exposed to
and 10.56 g during the crop growingseason, respectively congenial microclimate viz., significantly more
(Table 1). absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)
ThedatapresentedinTable1revealedthat the resulted in higher light use efficiency (LUE) ultimately
important yield contributing characters viz., days to 50% increasing photosynthetic rate and significant
flowering, days to maturity and dry matter accumulation improvement in important growth attributes viz., plant
plant-1 height, number of effective tillers, leaf area and dry
The mean values of important yield matter production plant-1. Whereas, adverse situation
contributing characterws viz., days to 50% flowering, of all these parameters were experienced by delayed
Special Issue: National Seminar “Recent Trends in Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research (PSAR- Jan., 2018) 244
Contemporary Research in India (ISSN 2231-2137): UGC Approved Journal No. 62441 - NAAS Score 2017: 3.23
sown crop in 34th and early sowing 26th MW resulted in The important growth attributes viz., plant
decreased values of these yield contributing height, number of effective tillers, leaf area and dry
characters.Similar findings were reported by Kaushik matter production plant-1 resulted in significant
and Gautam (1984), (Siddiget.al. 2013) and (Maiti and improvement in yield contributing characters in Shanti
Soto, 1990). cultivar. However, the Mahyco hybrid and Dhanashakti
The days to 50 per cent flowering and days to cultivar exposed to moisture stress conditions
maturity were significantly decreased with delay in resultedin important growth attributes viz., plant height,
sowing on 34th MW during the period of number of effective tillers, leaf area and dry matter
experimentation.because delayed sown crop exposed to production plant-1 thus, decreased important yield
higher temperatures particularly during different active contributing characters. The result were collaborated
crop growth period and grain development stage with finding of Bashiret. al. 2014 and Uzomaet. al. 2010.
resulted in shortening growing period. Effect of interaction
Effect of cultivar Important yield contributing characters viz.,
Important yield contributing characters earhead earhead length and girth, earhead weight plant-1, grain
length and girth, earhead weight plant-1, grain weight weight earhead-1 and 1000 grain weight were not
earhead-1 and 1000 grain weight significantly the highest significantly influenced due to interaction effects
in the Shanti cultivarfollowed by Mahyco hybrid and between different sowing windows and cultivar during
Dhanashakti during the period of experimentation. the period of experimentation.

References
Andrews, D.J., Rajewski, J.F. and Mason, S.C. 1998. Grain pearl millet: A new crop being developed at UNL. Ext.
Visions. 2(1): 2-6.
Bashir, M.M.H., Yagoub, S.O. and Ahmed Mohammed, S. A.2015. Effect of different sowing dates on growth and yield
of three pearl millet (Pennisetumglaucum(L.)R. Br) cultivars in West Darfur Sudan.International J. Pl. & Soil
Sci.5(4):191-200.
Bidinger, F.R., Mahalakshmi, V., Talukdar, B.S., and Alagarswamy, G. 1982. Improvement of drought resistance in pearl
millet.Vol, issue 357-375.
Dahlke, B.J., Oplinger, E.S., Gaska, J.M. and Martinka, M.J. 1993. Influence of planting date and seedling rate on winter
wheat grain yield and yield components. J. Prod. Agric. 6: 408-414.
FAO. 1996. The world sorghum and millet economies: facts trends and outlook. FAO Document Repository W1808/E.
Kaushik, S.K. and Gautam, R.C. 1984. Effect of varying dates of planting and row spacing on yield of pearl millet
varieties under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agron. 29 (3): 480-484.
Knapp, W.R. and Knapp, J. S. 1978.Response of winter wheat to date of planting and fall fertilization.Agron. J. 70: 1048-
1053.
Lawn, R.J., Summerfield, R.J., Ellis, R.H., Roberts, E.H., Chay, P.M., Brouwer, J.B., Rose, J.L. and Yeates, S.J.
1993.Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. VI. Applications in crop
improvement. Exptt. Agric., 31: 89-108.
Maiti R.K., Soto G.G., Effect of four sowing date environments on growth, development and yield potentials of 15
pearl millet cultivars (PennisetumamericanumL Leeke) during autumn winter seasons in Marin, N.L., Mexico.Arpn.
J. 1999;3(3):30-37.
Mick, J. 1997. Best management practices for sorghum seeding date. Sorghum management guide.Pioneer Hi-Bred Int.,
Des Moines, IA. 21-28.
Ramshe, D.G., Patil, B.R. and Umrani, N.K. 1986. Effects of planting time and nitrogen on yield of pearl millet
varieties.J. Maharashtra agric. Univ., 11(2): 162-163.
Siddig AMA, Adam KlI, Bahar AH, Hassan ThA.Effect of sowing date and variety on growth and yield of pearl millet
(Pennisetumglaucuml.) grown on two soil types under rain - fed condition at Zalingei Area in Sudan.Journal of Science
and Technology. 2013;3(4).
Uzoma AO, Eze PC, Alabi M, Mgbonu K, Aboje JE, Osunde AO. The effect of variety and planting date on the growth
and yield of pearl millet in the Southern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria.Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary
Sciences. 2010;2:122-127.
Witt, M.D. 1996. Delayed planting opportunities with winter wheat in the central great plains. J. Prod. Agric. 9: 74-78.

Special Issue: National Seminar “Recent Trends in Plant Sciences and Agricultural Research (PSAR- Jan., 2018) 245

View publication stats

You might also like