NAME OF SCHOOL

Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

SCHOOL
LEADERSHIP,
MANAGEMENT Shall have…
AND
OPERATIONS
1. Implemented three (3) 5 - Implemented completely
innovations in the school three (3) innovations that
program to achieve higher promote higher learning
learning outcomes align to outcomes
ESIP and AIP
4 - Implemented completely two
(2) innovations that promote
higher learning outcomes

3 - Implemented completely one

(1) innovations that promote
higher learning outcomes

2 - Implemented at least one

(1)program that involve parents
and other stakeholder to
promote learning but was not
completed

1 - Implemented completely one

(1) innovations that promote
higher learning outcomes but
was not implemented
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

2. Monitored and evaluated 5- Monitored and eveluated five

the implementation of five (5) PPAs
(5) programs (PPAs)
included in ESIP/AIP
4- Monitored and eveluated four
(4) PPAs

3- Monitored and eveluated

three (3) PPAs

2- Monitored and eveluated two

(2) PPAs

1- Monitored and eveluated one

(1) PPAs

3. Managed well school 5- Managed school resources

resources in accordance with very well by 100% utilization
DepEd policies and with the
accounting and auditing
rules and regulations and 4- Managed school resources
other pertinent guidelines as very well by 75-99% utilization
indicated by the 100%
liquidation/utilization of 3 - Managed school resources
funds very well by 65-74% utilization

2- Managed school resources

very well by 50-64-100%
utilization
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)
3. Managed well school
Name of Employee:
resources in accordance with Name of Rater:
Position: DepEd policies and with the Position:
accounting and auditing
Review Period: Date of Review:
rules and regulations and
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
other pertinent guidelines as
indicated by the 100%
liquidation/utilization of TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
funds
Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

1- Managed school resources

very well by 49% or below
utilization

INSTRUCTION
AL
LEADERSHIP
1. Conducted classroom 5-Conducted 100% classroom
observations utilizing observations utilizing classroom
classroom observation tool observation tool with provision
(COT-RPMS) with provision of of technical assistance.
technical assistance

4- Conducted 80% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance.

3- Conducted 75% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance.

2- Conducted 50% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance.
 technical assistance

NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

1- Conducted below 50%

classroom observations utilizing
classroom observation tool with
provision of technical
assistance.

2. Conducted ten (10) SLACs 5- Conducted ten (10) SLACs

that improve teaching that improve teaching practice
practice and learners and learners achievement
achievement

4- Conducted eight (8) SLACs

that improve teaching practice
and learners achievement

3- Conducted six (6) SLACs that

improve teaching practice and
learners achievement

2- Conducted four (4) SLACs

that improve teaching practice
and learners achievement

1- Conducted two (2) SLACs that

improve teaching practice and
learners achievement
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

3. Mentored teachers in 5- Developed ten (10)

developing ten (10) developmentally approriate and
developmentally approriate manipulative instructional
and manipulative materials
instructional materials

4-Developed eight (8)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials

3-Developed six (6)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials

2- Developed four (4)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials

1- Developed two (2)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials

LEARNING
ENVIRONMEN
T
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

1. Created and sustained a 5- Have a score of 35 points or

safe, orderly, nurturing, and higher in the Child Friendly
healthy environment as School Survey
reflected by a very
outstanding rating in the 4- Have a score of 30-34 points
Child Friendly School Survey in the Child Friendly School
Survey

3- Have a score of 25-29 points

in the Child Friendly School
Survey

2- Have a score of 20-24 points

in the Child Friendly School
Survey

1- Have a score of 15-19 points

in the Child Friendly School
Survey

2. Supported learners’ desire 5- Won five (5) or more

to pursue further learning by competition in the division,
winning five (5) in the regional and national level
division, regional and
national competition 4- Won four (4) competition in
the division, regional and
national level

3- Won three (3) competition in

the division, regional and
national level
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee:
2. Supported learners’ desire Name of Rater:
Position: to pursue further learning by Position:
Review Period: winning five (5) in the Date of Review:
division, regional and
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
national competition
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

2- Won two (2) competition in

the division, regional and
national level

1- Won one (1) competition in

the division, regional and
national level

3. Conducted one (1) 5- Conducted one (1)

Stakeholders Day to Stakeholders Day to recognize
recognize high performing high performing learners,
internal and external teachers, supportive parents,
stakeholders (learners, and LGUs
teachers, parents and LGUs)
4- Conducted one (1)
Stakeholders Day to recognize
high performing learners,
teachers and supportive parents

3- Conducted one (1)

Stakeholders Day to recognize
high performing learners and
teachers

2- Conducted one (1)

Stakeholders Day to recognize
high performing learners.
 recognize high performing
internal and external
stakeholders (learners,
teachers, parents and LGUs)

NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

1- Did not conduct Stakeholders

Day

HRD AND
DEVELOPMEN
TAL PLANS
AND
PROGRAMS
1. Supervised the planning 5 - Supervised the planning and
and implementation of a implementation of the
Comprehensive Professional Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development Learning and Development
Program for all teaching Program for 90-100% of all
personnel teaching personnel

4 - Supervised the planning and

implementation of the
Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development
Program for 80-89% of all
teaching personnel

3 - Supervised the planning and

implementation of the
Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development
Program for 70-79% of all
teaching personnel
 Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development
Program for all teaching
personnel
NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

2 - Supervised the planning and

implementation of the
Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development
Program for 60-69% of all
teaching personnel at the end
of S.Y. 2019-2020.

1 - Supervised the planning and

implementation of the
Comprehensive Professional
Learning and Development
Program for 50-59% of all
teaching personnel

2. Ensured the provision of 5- Ensured provision of at least

training for all teaching 2 school initiated training to 90
personnel based on the to 100% of the teaching and
result of school TNA and staf
aligned with HRD Plan 4-Ensured provision of at least 2
school initiated training to 80 to
89% of the teaching eaching
staf
3- Ensured provision of at least
2 school initiated training to 70-
79% of the teaching staf

2- Ensured provision of at least

2 school initiated training to 60-
69% of the teaching staf
 2. Ensured the provision of NAME OF SCHOOL
training for all teaching Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)
personnel based on the
Name of Employee:
result of school TNA and Name of Rater:
Position: aligned with HRD Plan Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

1- Ensured provision of at least

2 school initiated training to 50-
59% of the teaching staf

3. Monitored and Evaluated 5- Monitored and evaluated

performance of teaching performance of 100% teaching
personnel vis-à-vis targets personnel.

4- Monitored and evaluated

performance of 90% teaching
personnel.

3- Monitored and evaluated

performance of 80 to 89%
teaching personnel.

2- Monitored and evaluated

performance of 70 to 79%
teaching personnel.

1- Monitored and evaluated

performance of 60 to 69%
teaching personnel.

PARENTS'
AND
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMEN
T 1. Implemented at least 5 - Implemented completely
three (3) programs that three (3) programs that involve
involve parents and other parents and other stakeholder
stakeholder to promote to promote learning
learning
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

1. Implemented at least
three (3)OBJECTIVES
programs that Weight
KRAs TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
involve parents and other per KRA
stakeholder to promote
learning Quality

4 - Implemented completely
two (2) programs that involve
parents and other stakeholder
to promote learning

3 - Implemented completely one

(1)program that involve parents
and other stakeholder to
promote learning

2 - Implemented at least one

(1)program that involve parents
and other stakeholder to
promote learning but was not
completed

1 - Planned at least one (1)

program that involve parents
and other stakeholder to
promote learning but was not
implemented

2. Established 5- Accepted 100% of grants,

linkages/partnership with donations, bequests and other
other sectors, agencies and forms of assistance from various
NGOs by accepting grants donors and
and donations, bequests, benefactors with duly approved
and other form ofs of MOAs / MOUs / Deeds of
assistance from various Donation
donors and benefactors of
basic education with
approved MOA/MOU/Deeds
of Donation
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
2. Established
linkages/partnership with TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
other sectors, agencies and
NGOs by accepting grants Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES
and donations, bequests, TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA
and other form ofs of
assistance from various
donors and benefactors of Quality
basic education with
approved MOA/MOU/Deeds 4- Accepted 90 to 99% of
of Donation grants, donations, bequests and
other forms of assistance from
various donors and
benefactors with duly approved
MOAs / MOUs / Deeds of
Donation

3- Accepted 80 to 89% of
grants, donations, bequests and
other forms of assistance from
various donors and
benefactors with duly approved
MOAs / MOUs

2- Accepted 70 to 79% of
grants, donations, bequests and
other forms of assistance from
various donors and
benefactors with duly approved
MOAs / MOUs / Deeds of
Donation

1- Accepted 60 to 69% of
grants, donations, bequests and
other forms of assistance from
various donors and
benefactors with duly approved
MOAs / MOUs / Deeds of
Donation
 NAME OF SCHOOL
Sindalan, City of San Fernando (P)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICA
per KRA

Quality

3. Promoted the image of 5 - Promoted the image of the

the school through school school through five (5) or more
summit, State of the School of the indicated means in the
Address (SOSA), School objective
Report Card (SRC), cultural
shows, learners' project and 4 - Promoted the image of the
exhibits school through four (4) of the
indicated means in the
objective

3 - Promoted the image of the

school through three (3) of the
indicated means in the
objective

2 - Promoted the image of the

school through two (2) of the
indicated means in the
objective

1 - Promoted the image of the

school through one (1) of the
indicated means in the
objective
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective on the

the approved working budget target date

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective three

utilizing an additional 5% (3) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective one

utilizing an additional 10% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 15% (2) weeks after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 20% (2) weeks or more after the
supplementary fund of the target date
approved working budget
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

5 - Completed the target within 5- Monitored and eveluated five

the approved working budget (5) PPAs across the four
quarters

4 - Completed the target 4- Monitored and eveluated four

utilizing an additional 5% (4) PPAs across the three
supplementary fund of the quarters
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Monitored and eveluated

utilizing an additional 10% three (3) PPAs across the two
supplementary fund of the quarters
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Monitored and eveluated two

utilizing an additional 15% (2) PPAs across the one quarter
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

1 - Completed the target 1- No acceptable evidence was

utilizing an additional 20% shown
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget 5- Submitted twelve (12)
liquidation reports on time

4- Submitted ten (10)

liquidation reports on time
3- Submitted eight (8)
liquidation reports on time

2- Submitted six (6) liquidation

reports on time
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

1- Submitted four (4) or bvelow

liquidation reports on time

5-Conducted 100% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance as
scheduled

4-Conducted 80% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance as
scheduled

3-Conducted 75% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance as
scheduled

2-Conducted 50% classroom

observations utilizing classroom
observation tool with provision
of technical assistance as
scheduled
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

1-Conducted below 50%

classroom observations utilizing
classroom observation tool with
provision of technical assistance
as scheduled.

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective on the

the approved working budget target date

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective three

utilizing an additional 5% (3) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective one

utilizing an additional 10% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 15% (2) weeks after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 20% (2) weeks or more after the
supplementary fund of the target date
approved working budget
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

5- Developed ten (10)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials across the four
quarters

4- Developed eight (8)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials across the three
quarters

3- Developed six (6)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials across the two
quarters

2- Developed four (4)

developmentally approriate and
manipulative instructional
materials across the one
quarter

1- No acceptable evidence was

shown
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective on the

the approved working budget target date

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective three

utilizing an additional 5% (3) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective one

utilizing an additional 10% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 15% (2) weeks after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 20% (2) weeks or more after the
supplementary fund of the target date
approved working budget

5- Attained the objective 1

week before the target date

4- Attained the objective three

(3) days before the target date

3- Attained the objective on the

target date
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

2- Attained the objective two

(2) days after the target date

1- Attained the objective one

(1) week after the target date

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective one

the approved working budget (1) week before the target date

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective four

utilizing an additional 5% (4) days before the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective on the
utilizing an additional 10% target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective two
utilizing an additional 15% (2) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective one

utilizing an additional 20% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective one
the approved working budget (1) week before the target date

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective three

utilizing an additional 5% (3) days before the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective on the
utilizing an additional 10% target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective three
utilizing an additional 15% (3) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget
1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective one
utilizing an additional 20% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective on the

the approved working budget target date
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective three

utilizing an additional 5% (3) days after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective one

utilizing an additional 10% (1) week after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 15% (2) weeks after the target date
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

1 - Completed the target 1- Attained the objective two

utilizing an additional 20% (2) weeks or more after the
supplementary fund of the target date
approved working budget
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness
OOL Version __ Revision 00
ernando (P)
Effectivity Date: 01 JANUARY 2019

TO BE FILLED DURING
NNING
EVALUATION
ACTUAL
CE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
RESULTS Average
SCORE
Rating
Q E T
Efficiency Timeliness

5 - Completed the target within 5- Attained the objective across

the approved working budget the four (4) quarters

4 - Completed the target 4- Attained the objective across

utilizing an additional 5% the three (3) quarters
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

3 - Completed the target 3- Attained the objective across

utilizing an additional 10% the two (2) quarters
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

2 - Completed the target 2- Attained the objective across

utilizing an additional 15% the one (1) quarter
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget

1 - Completed the target 1- No acceptable evidence was

utilizing an additional 20% shown
supplementary fund of the
approved working budget