Division of City Schools

North Fatima District

UPPER TAMBLER CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Fatima, General Santos City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name: of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
AVE. SCORE *
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T
Learning-Teaching Prepared daily lesson plans and daily logs • All daily lesson plans had the following objective,
Process of activities including appropriate, subject matter, procedures, evaluation and
adequate and updated instructional assignment
materials within the rating period • Each part had a full description of what to do with
an example
• Objective was specific, measurable, attainable,
result-oriented and time-bound
June-October • 100% and above developed high order thinking
10% 0.0 0.000
2015 skills
• Attained 100% and above of the desired learning
competencies
• 100% and above based on the budget of work
Facilitated learning in the school through
functional lessons plans, daily logs and
innovative teaching strategies
20%
Initiated discipline of students, monitored
attendance, diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating environment,
overall physical atmosphere, cleanliness
and orderliness of classrooms including
proper waste disposal daily
10%
• The teacher established challenging and
measureable goal/s for student learning that is
aligned with the (DepEd standards or Philippine
Elementary Learning Competencies (PELC) or the
Philippine Secondary Learning Competencies
(PSLC)) curriculum
• The goal reflected a range of student learner
needs.
• Has provided individual activities for a 100% and
above of the classes handled for the rating period
• Teaching methods and strategies elicited 100%
and above interaction from a class 0.0 0.000
• Inductive method/deductive method was 100% and
above used in teaching a lesson
• Cooperative learning strategies was 130% and
above effective when used
• ICT integration is100% and above evident
• Results of student observation/ appraisal are 100%
and above used as basis for follow-up
• Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets
and proper waste disposal were 100% and above
maintained
• Attendance checking was 100% and above
systematically carried out
• Evidences showed that the teacher purposely
plans assessments and varies assessment choices
to match the different students’ needs, abilities, and
learning styles.
• Class record reflected the bases of 100% and
above of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled
• Students’ portfolio contained 100% and above of
his accomplishment
• Table of Specifications is 100% and above
prepared for tests that require it
• Table of Specifications showed100% and above
congruence between content and skills tested 5 5 5 5.0 0.500
• Test questions were100% and above logically
sequenced
• Pretest and Post-test were 100% and above
administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade
level)
 • Pupils were 100% and above guided in the
observation of classroom rules and guidelines as
evidenced by descriptive rating in the report
card/journal

Monitored, evaluated and maintained ·      Evidences showed that the teacher purposely
pupils/ students’ progress and school plans assessments and varies assessment choices
records within the rating period to match the different students’ needs, abilities, and
learning styles.

·      Class record reflected the bases of 100% and

above of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas
handled

·      Students’ portfolio contained 100% and above of

his accomplishment
10% ·      Table of Specifications is 100% and above 5 5 5 5.0 0.500
prepared for tests that require it
·      Table of Specifications showed100% and above
Pupils/Students congruence between content and skills tested
Outcomes
·      Test questions were100% and above logically
sequenced
·      Pretest and Post-test were 100% and above
administered in all classes/subject area (supported
by analysis report on subject area per class/grade
level)

Conducted remediation/ enrichment ·   Remediation/ Enrichment Program is offered to

programs to improve performance 10% 100% and above of students who need it 0.0 0.000
indicators

Attained the required GSA for grade level ·   100% and above MPS/GSA
and learning areas 10% 0.0 0.000
 Conducted periodic PTA ·  100% and above accomplishment with set
meetings/conferences 5% agreements met 0.0 0.000

Visited parents of students needing ·   100% and above accomplishment of set visits
academic monitoring/follow-up within the 5% successful interventions 0.0 0.000
Community rating period
Involvement
Undertaken/initiated ·   100% and above project accomplishment with full
projects/events/activities with external documentation report on completion
funding/sponsorship within the target 5% 0.0 0.000
date

Conducted problem/classroom-based ·     3 Action Research conducted with full

Action Research 2.5% documentation on completion of interventions 0.0 0.000

Initiated/Participated in co- ·      Initiated at least 2 co-curricular/ school activities

curricular/school activities within the rating with documented results
period 5.0% 0.0 0.000

Professional Growth
and Development Produced publications/ creative work for ·      Produced publication/ creative work published in
school paper/division publication within National Circulation/ DepEd Post/ CSC Newsletters
the target date 2.5% and similar publications 0.0 0.000

Received special
awards/citation/recognition for exemplary
performance

Performed academic functions for school

development 2.5% 0.0 0.000

Plus Factor
Produced a learning material adhering
learning-teaching process 2.5% 0.0 0.000
To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
Poor 0.500

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

 Division of City Schools
Labangal District
SAAVEDRA SAWAY CENTRAL CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Labangal, General Santos City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name: of Employee: VICSON C. OLIVERIO Name of Rater: JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Position: Principal In-Charge Position: CHIEF-CID
Review Period: January to June, 2015 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LABANGAL DISTRICT, GENERAL SANTOS CITY

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE
OUT
MAJOR FINAL KEY RESULT TIMELIN Weight Weight per INDICATORS RATING
OBJECTIVES PUT
OUTPUTS (MFO) AREAS (KRAS) E for KRA Objectives Efficien Timeles Efficien
Quality Score S Quality
cy s cy

Improved instructional leadership practices

among heads Year round 10% 3 3 3 0.300

District Instructional I. INSTRUCTIONAL Improved teaching-learning delivery Year round 10% 3 3 3 0.300
Management 30%
SUPERVISION
Identified strength and areas for
improvement of school heads and teachers Year round 10% 3 3 3 0.300

Submitted approved for school

improvement enhancement plan (SIP by January,
3% 4 4 4 0.120
January, 2016) 2016

January,
Submitted adjusted AIP based on SIP 3% 4 4 4 0.120
II. PROVISION OF 2016
TECHNICAL Submitted monthly reports on SIP/AIP
District Instructional ASSISTANCE ON Monthly 3% 3 3 3 0.090
implementation by all schools 15%
Management SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT Report on coaching and guidance reports
PLANNING on the implementation of AIP/PAPs/ Project Quarterly 3% 3 3 3 0.090
Proposal
Submitted accomplishment reports on Every end
implemented AIP/PAPs/Supervisory on TA of the 3% 3 3 3 0.090
plan month
 Reported on utilization and liquidation of Every end
SEF, MOOE and other funds based on of the 5% 3 3 3 0.150
standards month
District Instructional III. MOOE AND OTHER
Management 10%
FUNDS UTILIZATION Posted transparency board updated Every end
monthly of all schools of the 5% 3 3 3 0.150
month

First and
Reported quarterly on SBM level of
second 10% 3 3 3 0.300
practices of each and all schools
District Instructional IV. SBM semester
Management 20%
IMPLEMENTATION Reported on M & E results of private First and
schools per district on compliance to second 10% 3 3 3 0.300
standards as regards semester

* Permit to operate; * Renewal of Operation;

District Instructional V. PRIVATE * Permit for recognition; *GASTPE January
Management and August 5% 5% 1 1 1 0.050
SCHOOLS Implementation/ Accreditation

District Instructional VI. PARTNERSHIP OF Updated documentation of school Quarterly

Management SCHOOLS WITH accomplishments with stakeholders 10% 10% 3 3 3 0.300
STAKEHOLDERS cooperation

Acted as trainer in the Regional/ National

2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
level trainings
Conducted seminars in the Regional/
District Instructional 2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
National level 10%
Management VII. Plus Factor
Performed multiple higher function 2.5% 0 0 0 0.000

Chaired technical committee in the

2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
Regional/ National Level

OVERALL RATING 2.660

DESCRIPTIVE
RATING
To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Ratee JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Rater MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESE
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
LUATION

TING
SCORE *
Timeles
Score
s
 Division of City Schools
Labangal District
SAAVEDRA SAWAY CENTRAL CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Labangal, General Santos City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name: of Employee: VICSON C. OLIVERIO Name of Rater: JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Position: Principal In-Charge Position: CHIEF-CID
Review Period: July to December, 2015 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LABANGAL DISTRICT, GENERAL SANTOS CITY

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE
OUT
MAJOR FINAL KEY RESULT TIMELIN Weight Weight per INDICATORS RATING
OBJECTIVES PUT
OUTPUTS (MFO) AREAS (KRAS) E for KRA Objectives Efficien Timeles Efficien
Quality Score S Quality
cy s cy

Improved instructional leadership practices

among heads Year round 10% 3 3 3 0.300

District Instructional I. INSTRUCTIONAL Improved teaching-learning delivery Year round 10% 3 3 3 0.300
Management 30%
SUPERVISION
Identified strength and areas for
improvement of school heads and teachers Year round 10% 4 4 4 0.400

Submitted approved for school

improvement enhancement plan (SIP by January,
3% 5 5 5 0.150
January, 2016) 2016

January,
Submitted adjusted AIP based on SIP 3% 5 5 5 0.150
II. PROVISION OF 2016
TECHNICAL Submitted monthly reports on SIP/AIP
District Instructional ASSISTANCE ON Monthly 3% 5 5 5 0.150
implementation by all schools 15%
Management SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT Report on coaching and guidance reports
PLANNING on the implementation of AIP/PAPs/ Project Quarterly 3% 4 4 4 0.120
Proposal
Submitted accomplishment reports on Every end
implemented AIP/PAPs/Supervisory on TA of the 3% 4 4 4 0.120
plan month
 Reported on utilization and liquidation of Every end
SEF, MOOE and other funds based on of the 5% 3 3 3 0.150
standards month
District Instructional III. MOOE AND OTHER
Management 10%
FUNDS UTILIZATION Posted transparency board updated Every end
monthly of all schools of the 5% 3 3 3 0.150
month

First and
Reported quarterly on SBM level of
second 10% 3 3 3 0.300
practices of each and all schools
District Instructional IV. SBM semester
Management 20%
IMPLEMENTATION Reported on M & E results of private First and
schools per district on compliance to second 10% 3 3 3 0.300
standards as regards semester

* Permit to operate; * Renewal of Operation;

District Instructional V. PRIVATE * Permit for recognition; *GASTPE January
Management and August 5% 5% 1 1 1 0.050
SCHOOLS Implementation/ Accreditation

District Instructional VI. PARTNERSHIP OF Updated documentation of school Quarterly

Management SCHOOLS WITH accomplishments with stakeholders 10% 10% 4 4 4 0.400
STAKEHOLDERS cooperation

Acted as trainer in the Regional/ National

2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
level trainings
Conducted seminars in the Regional/
District Instructional 2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
National level 10%
Management VII. Plus Factor
Performed multiple higher function 2.5% 0 0 0 0.000

Chaired technical committee in the

2.5% 0 0 0 0.000
Regional/ National Level

OVERALL RATING 3.040

DESCRIPTIVE
RATING
To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Ratee JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Rater MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESE
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
LUATION

TING
SCORE *
Timeles
Score
s
 Division of City Schools
Labangal District
SAAVEDRA SAWAY CENTRAL CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Labangal, General Santos City

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name: of Employee: SOCORRO B. GARCIA Name of Rater: MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESE
Position: Principal II Position: Assistand Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: GENERAL SANTOS CITY

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE KRA
AVE. SCORE *
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T
•Accounted for learnning outcomes of schools
and centers viz-a-viz goals and targets 0.0 0.000
Instructional June 2014-
Leadership •Performed instructional supervision to March 2016
0.0 0.000
•Achieve learning outcomes 0.0 0.000

•Provide technical assisstance to teachers on

matters pertaining to enhancement of
Human Resource classroom management, skills and instructional June 2015-
Management and competence and to non-teaching personnel for March 2016 0.0 0.000
Development support services within the RPMS cycle

•Established school and family and

Parents. Involment •community partnership for school June 2015-
and Community performance 0.0 0.000
March 2016
Partnership

•Performed school leadership, Management

School Leadership, and Operations functions
Mangement and 0.0 0.000
Operations
 0.0 0.000

Plus Factor
0.0 0.000

To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

#VALUE! ###

MARIO M. BERMUDEZ SOCORRO B. GARCIA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
 0 Poor
1.5 Unsatisfactory
2.5 Satisfactory
3.5 Very Satisfactory
4.5 Outstanding
 Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON
Rehiyon
SANGAY NG MGA PAARALANG LUNGSOD
DISTRITO NG LABANGAL
Lungsod ng Heneral Santos

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Weight Weight per CATEGORY

KRAs Objectives RATING SCORE
per KRA Objectives Quality Efficiency Timeless
KRA I Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.300
Instructional 30% Objective 2 10% 3 3 3 3 0.300
Supervision Objective 3 3 3 3 3 0.300
Subtotal 0.900
KRA II Objective 1 4 4 4 4 0.120
Permission of Objective 2 4 4 4 4 0.120
Technical Assistance 15% Objective 3 3% 3 3 3 3 0.090
of School Objective 4 3 3 3 3 0.090
Improvement Objective 5 3 3 3 3 0.090
Planning Subtotal 0.510
KRA III Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.150
10% 5%
MOOE and Other Objective 2 3 3 3 3 0.150
Fund Utilization Subtotal 0.300
KRA IV Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.300
20% 10%
SBM Objective 2 3 3 3 3 0.300
Implementation Subtotal 0.600
KRA V 5% Objective 1 5% 1 1 1 1 0.050
Private Schools Subtotal 1.550
KRA VI
10% Objective 1 10%
Partnership of 3 3 3 3 0.300
Schools Subtotal 0.300
Objective 1 0 0 0 0 0.000
KRA VII Objective 2 0 0 0 0 0.000
10% 2.5%
Plus Factor Objective 3 0 0 0 0 0.000
Objective 4 0 0 0 0 0.000
Subtotal 0.000
OVERALL RATING 2.660
DESCRIPTIVE RATING

Ratee:
VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Principal In-Charge
Rater:
JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Chief, CID

Approved:

MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESE

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
15 21 24 27 29 32 37
 Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON
Rehiyon
SANGAY NG MGA PAARALANG LUNGSOD
DISTRITO NG LABANGAL
Lungsod ng Heneral Santos

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Weight Weight per CATEGORY

KRAs Objectives RATING SCORE
per KRA Objectives Quality Efficiency Timeless
KRA I Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.300
Instructional 30% Objective 2 10% 3 3 3 3 0.300
Supervision Objective 3 4 4 4 4 0.400
Subtotal 1.000
KRA II Objective 1 5 5 5 5 0.150
Permission of Objective 2 5 5 5 5 0.150
Technical Assistance 15% Objective 3 3% 5 5 5 5 0.150
of School Objective 4 4 4 4 4 0.120
Improvement Objective 5 4 4 4 4 0.120
Planning Subtotal 0.690
KRA III Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.150
10% 5%
MOOE and Other Objective 2 3 3 3 3 0.150
Fund Utilization Subtotal 0.300
KRA IV Objective 1 3 3 3 3 0.300
20% 10%
SBM Objective 2 3 3 3 3 0.300
Implementation Subtotal 0.600
KRA V 5% Objective 1 5% 1 1 1 1 0.050
Private Schools Subtotal 1.550
KRA VI
10% Objective 1 10%
Partnership of 4 4 4 4 0.400
Schools Subtotal 0.400
Objective 1 0 0 0 0 0.000
KRA VII Objective 2 0 0 0 0 0.000
10% 2.5%
Plus Factor Objective 3 0 0 0 0 0.000
Objective 4 0 0 0 0 0.000
Subtotal 0.000
OVERALL RATING 3.040
DESCRIPTIVE RATING

Ratee:
VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Principal In-Charge
Rater:
JULIET F. LASTIMOSA
Chief, CID

Approved:

MARIO M. BERMUDEZ, CESE

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
15 21 24 27 29 32 37
 Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON
Rehiyon XII
SANGAY NG MGA PAARALANG LUNGSOD
Distrito ng ____________
PAARALANG ELEMENTARYANG ___________________________
Lungsod ng _______________________

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(June 2016 -March 2017)

Weight Weight per CATEGORY

KRAs Objectives RATING SCORE
per KRA Objectives Quality Efficiency Timeless
KRA I Objective 1 10% 5 5 5 5 0.500
Learning- Objective 2 15% 5 5 5 5 0.750
35%
Teaching Objective 3 3% 5 5 5 5 0.150
Process Objective 4 7% 5 4 5 4.6 0.322
Subtotal 1.722
KRA II Objective 1 20% 5 5 4 4.6 0.920
Pupils/Students 35% Objective 2 10% 5 5 5 5 0.500
Outcomes Objective 3 5% 5 5 4 4.6 0.233
Subtotal 1.653
KRA III Objective 1 3% 4 4 3 3.6 0.109
Community 15% Objective 2 7% 5 5 4 4.6 0.322
Involvement Objective 3 5% 5 5 5 5 0.250
Subtotal 0.681
KRA IV Objective 1 4% 3 3 3 3.0 0.120
Professional Growth 10% Objective 2 3% 5 5 5 5.0 0.150
and Development Objective 3 3% 1 1 1 1.0 0.030
Subtotal 0.300
KRA VII Objective 1 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
5%
Plus Factor Objective 2 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
Subtotal 0.250
OVERALL RATING 4.606
DESCRIPTIVE RATING O
Ratee:

Teacher I

Rater:
_______________________
Master Teacher I

Approved:

________________________
Principal I
 Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON
Rehiyon XII
SANGAY NG MGA PAARALANG LUNGSOD
Distrito ng Labangal
PAARALANG ELEMENTARYANG SENTRAL NG SAAVEDRA SAWAY
Lungsod ng Heneral Santos

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(January-October, 2015)

Weight Weight per CATEGORY

KRAs Objectives RATING SCORE
per KRA Objectives Quality Efficiency Timeless
KRA I Objective 1 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Instructional Objective 2 10% 4 4 4 4.0 0.400
40%
Competence Objective 3 10% 5 5 5 5.0 0.500
Objective 4 5% 3 3 3 3.0 0.150
Subtotal 1.800
KRA II Objective 1 2.5% 2 2 2 2.0 0.050
Professional Growth Objective 2 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
10%
and Development Objective 3 2.5% 1 1 1 1.0 0.025
Objective 4 2.5% 2 2 2 2.0 0.050
Subtotal 0.250
KRA IV Objective 1 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Instructional 40% Objective 2 10% 4 4 4 4.0 0.400
Supervision Objective 3 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Subtotal 1.900
KRA VII Objective 1 2.5% 1 1 1 1.0 0.025
Objective 2 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
10%
Plus Factor Objective 3 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
Objective 4 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
Subtotal 0.150
OVERALL RATING 4.100
DESCRIPTIVE RATING

Ratee:
Rater:
SOCORRO B. GARCIA
Principall II

Approved:

VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Principal In-Charge
29 32 37
 Republika ng Pilipinas
KAGAWARAN NG EDUKASYON
Rehiyon XII
SANGAY NG MGA PAARALANG LUNGSOD
Distrito ng Labangal
PAARALANG ELEMENTARYANG SENTRAL NG SAAVEDRA SAWAY
Lungsod ng Heneral Santos

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(January-October, 2015)

Weight Weight per CATEGORY

KRAs Objectives RATING SCORE
per KRA Objectives Quality Efficiency Timeless
KRA I Objective 1 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Instructional Objective 2 10% 4 4 4 4.0 0.400
40%
Competence Objective 3 10% 5 5 5 5.0 0.500
Objective 4 5% 3 3 3 3.0 0.150
Subtotal 1.800
KRA II Objective 1 2.5% 2 2 2 2.0 0.050
Professional Growth Objective 2 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
10%
and Development Objective 3 2.5% 1 1 1 1.0 0.025
Objective 4 2.5% 2 2 2 2.0 0.050
Subtotal 0.250
KRA IV Objective 1 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Instructional 40% Objective 2 10% 4 4 4 4.0 0.400
Supervision Objective 3 15% 5 5 5 5.0 0.750
Subtotal 1.900
KRA VII Objective 1 2.5% 1 1 1 1.0 0.025
Objective 2 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
10%
Plus Factor Objective 3 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
Objective 4 2.5% 5 5 5 5.0 0.125
Subtotal 0.150
OVERALL RATING 4.100
DESCRIPTIVE RATING VS

Ratee:
LIGAYA C. TAOTAO
Master Teacher I

Rater:
SOCORRO B. GARCIA
Principall II

Approved:

VICSON C. OLIVERIO
Principal In-Charge
29 32 37