Areas of Evaluation of the Draft of Chapter 2

1 Syntactic structures with the inclusion of the aspect of grammaticality

2 Depth of the content of the cited articles integrated to a sharp and comprehensive analysis
3 Strong usage of simple formal English in the context of writing
4 Theoretical inclinations that journalize the problem of the study
5 Conceptual Paradigm and its corresponding authenticity
6 Structure of the hypothetical statement is statistically and semantically bounded along the
research parameters
7 Variables are defined in brevity of words but of substantiality in characterizing its functions
8 Intact coherence to the desired rationale and set niches of the research study
9 Variations of the literatures in a well – discussed manner of logical reasoning
10 Consistency of the format, language, thought surfacing the research

Areas of Evaluation of the Draft of Chapter 3

1 Research design reflects the structured title as well as the compounding areas covered

2 Locality of the research launches a clear description of the setting of the methodological
approaches concerned

3 Sampling procedures are elaborated in an articulate and measurable system of consistency and
specificity
4 Instruments exemplify academic standards

5 Instruments are regarded as products of a well- versed association of research and responsibility

6 Data gathering procedure indicates the familiarity of the persons involved in the research to the
overall context and themes of the study they are conducting

7 Data gathering procedure is fundamentally described in details completely

8 Justifiable usage of statistical treatment had been properly elaborated specifically its linkage to
the aspect of the study9

9 Organization of ideas is presented in diversified systems of transmitting school of thoughts

10 Strong basis of grammaticality is observed

 Areas of Evaluation for Validation Letter

1 Format

2 Reasoning

3 Grammar

4 Content

5 Organization
6 Relevance
7 Tone
8 Addressability
9 Comprehensiveness
10 Courtesy

Areas of Evaluation for Instrument and Proposal

Language of Thought

Organization of Ideas

Sense of Direction

Completeness

Measurability

Point of Accuracy

Relevance of Context

Format

Content

Methodological Standard and Ethical Consideration

10 is the highest possible score that can be given in each category for each area.
likewise, if the aspect of the category, has not been seen by the evaluator, he will not give point
for it .

By : Mr.Mina

©2019

It should not be printed nor reproduced in the same way

It is made in a referential aspect as a guide