Lampiran

OUTPUT HASIL PENGOLAHAN DATA PENELITIAN

ANALISIS UNIVARIAT

Distribusi Frekuensi Pengetahuan Ibu Tentang Kelas Ibu Hamil di UPTD

Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

kelasbumil
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Kurang 61 65.6 65.6 65.6
Valid
Baik 32 34.4 34.4 100.0
Total 93 100.0 100.0

Distribusi Frekuensi Pelayanan Antenatal di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu

Tahun 2018

antenatal
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Kurang 61 65.6 65.6 65.6
Baik 32 34.4 34.4 100.0
Total 93 100.0 100.0

Distribusi Frekuensi Peran Kader di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

kader
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Kurang 63 67.7 67.7 67.7
Baik 30 32.3 32.3 100.0
Total 93 100.0 100.0

Distribusi Frekuensi Pencegahan Komplikasi Kehamilan di UPTD

Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

komplikasi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Kurang 52 55.9 55.9 55.9
Baik 41 44.1 44.1 100.0
Total 93 100.0 100.0
ANALISIS BIVARIAT
Hubungan Kelas Ibu Hamil Dengan Pencegahan Komplikasi Kehamilan di
UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kelasbumil * komplikasi 93 100.0% 0 .0% 93 100.0%

kelasbumil * komplikasi Crosstabulation

komplikasi

1 2 Total
kelasbumil 1 Count 46 15 61
Expected Count 34.1 26.9 61.0
% within kelasbumil 75.4% 24.6% 100.0%
2 Count 6 26 32
Expected Count 17.9 14.1 32.0
% within kelasbumil 18.8% 81.2% 100.0%
Total Count 52 41 93
Expected Count 52.0 41.0 93.0
% within kelasbumil 55.9% 44.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27.335a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 25.085 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 28.686 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 27.042 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 93
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
 Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for kelasbumil (1 /
13.289 4.595 38.429
2)
For cohort komplikasi = 1 4.022 1.928 8.390
For cohort komplikasi = 2 .303 .189 .484
N of Valid Cases 93

Hubungan Pelayanan Antenatal Dengan Pencegahan Komplikasi Kehamilan

di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
antenatal * komplikasi 93 100.0% 0 .0% 93 100.0%

antenatal * komplikasi Crosstabulation

komplikasi

Kurang Baik Total

antenatal Kurang Count 45 16 61
Expected Count 34.1 26.9 61.0
% within antenatal 73.8% 26.2% 100.0%
Baik Count 7 25 32
Expected Count 17.9 14.1 32.0
% within antenatal 21.9% 78.1% 100.0%
Total Count 52 41 93
Expected Count 52.0 41.0 93.0
% within antenatal 55.9% 44.1% 100.0%
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 22.932a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 20.875 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 23.797 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 22.685 1 .000
b
N of Valid Cases 93
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for antenatal (1 / 2) 10.045 3.644 27.685
For cohort komplikasi = 1 3.372 1.723 6.601
For cohort komplikasi = 2 .336 .212 .531
N of Valid Cases 93

Hubungan Peran Kader Dengan Pencegahan Komplikasi Kehamilan di UPTD

Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kader * komplikasi 93 100.0% 0 .0% 93 100.0%

kader * komplikasi Crosstabulation

komplikasi

Kurang Baik Total

kader Kurang Count 45 18 63
Expected Count 35.2 27.8 63.0
% within kader 71.4% 28.6% 100.0%
Baik Count 7 23 30
Expected Count 16.8 13.2 30.0
% within kader 23.3% 76.7% 100.0%
Total Count 52 41 93
Expected Count 52.0 41.0 93.0
% within kader 55.9% 44.1% 100.0%
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 19.070a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 17.169 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 19.643 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 18.865 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 93
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for kader (1 / 2) 8.214 3.000 22.492
For cohort komplikasi = 1 3.061 1.571 5.965
For cohort komplikasi = 2 .373 .241 .577
N of Valid Cases 93

ANALISIS MULTIVAIAT

1. Seleksi Variabel

a. Analisis Bivariat Kelas Ibu Hamil Dengan Pencegahan Komplikasi

Kehamilan di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Logistic Regression
 Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
Overall Statistics 27.335 1 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 28.686 1 .000
Block 28.686 1 .000
Model 28.686 1 .000
 Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 98.935a .265 .356
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 46 6 88.5
2 15 26 63.4
Overall Percentage 77.4
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 2.587 .542 22.799 1 .000 13.289 4.595 38.429
Constant -3.708 .747 24.601 1 .000 .025
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil.

Dari hasil output, pada tampilan Block 1 didapatkan hasil omnibus test pada bagian
Block dengan p value 0,000 berarti variabel kelas ibu hamil p value nya < 0,25
sehingga variabel kelas ibu hamil dapat dilanjutkan ke analisis multivariat. Dari
tampilan SPSS nilai OR dapat diketahui dari kolom Exp(B) yaitu sebesar 11.846
(95%CI : 4,358 – 32.204).

b. Analisis Bivariat Pelayanan Antenatal Dengan Pencegahan

Komplikasi Kehamilan di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Logistic Regression
 Case Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables antenatal 22.932 1 .000
Overall Statistics 22.932 1 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 23.797 1 .000
Block 23.797 1 .000
Model 23.797 1 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 103.825a .226 .302
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 45 7 86.5
2 16 25 61.0
Overall Percentage 75.3
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a antenatal 2.307 .517 19.891 1 .000 10.045 3.644 27.685
Constant -3.341 .722 21.396 1 .000 .035
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: antenatal.

Dari hasil output, pada tampilan Block 1 didapatkan hasil omnibus test pada bagian
Block dengan p value 0,000 berarti variabel pelayanan antenatal p value nya <
0,25 sehingga variabel pelayanan antenatal dapat dilanjutkan ke analisis
multivariat. Dari tampilan SPSS nilai OR dapat diketahui dari kolom Exp(B) yaitu
sebesar 10.045 (95%CI : 3,644 - 27,685)
 c. Analisis Bivariat Peran Kader Dengan Pencegahan Komplikasi
Kehamilan di UPTD Puskesmas Cidahu Tahun 2018

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of
cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 19.070 1 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 19.643 1 .000
Block 19.643 1 .000
Model 19.643 1 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 107.978a .190 .255
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 45 7 86.5
2 18 23 56.1
Overall Percentage 73.1
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kader 2.106 .514 16.791 1 .000 8.214 3.000 22.492
Constant -3.022 .705 18.361 1 .000 .049
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kader.

Dari hasil output, pada tampilan Block 1 didapatkan hasil omnibus test pada bagian
Block dengan p value 0,000 berarti variabel peran kader p value nya < 0,25
sehingga variabel peran kader dapat dilanjutkan ke analisis multivariat. Dari
tampilan SPSS nilai OR dapat diketahui dari kolom Exp(B) yaitu sebesar 8.214
(95%CI : 3,000 - 22,492).
Hasil Seleksi Bivariat

Variabel p value
Kelas Obu Hamil 0.000
Pelayanan antenatal 0.000
Peran Kader 0.000

Sebelum membuat permodelan, maka terlebih dahulu menguji apakah data

yang dikumpulkan dalam penelitian ini sesuai dengan model regresi logistik
dilakukan goodness of fit test dengan uji Hosmer and Lemeshow test.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 8.255 4 .083

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

komplikasi = 1 komplikasi = 2

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 41 38.747 5 7.253 46
2 4 6.044 7 4.956 11
3 2 2.665 5 4.335 7
4 2 2.679 7 6.321 9
5 0 .872 6 5.128 6
6 3 .994 11 13.006 14

Dari output goodness of fit test dengan tes Hosmer dan Lemeshow menunjukkan
bahwa nilai p pada tahap I adalah 0,083 > 0,05 sehingga dapat diartikan bahwa
data fit dengan model regresi logistic.

PERMODELAN MULTIVARIAT
Memasukkan ketiga variabel (kelas ibu hamil, pelayanan antenatal, peran
kader) dengan pencegahan komplikasi kehamilan

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788
 Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
antenatal 22.932 1 .000
kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 36.394 3 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 40.644 3 .000
Block 40.644 3 .000
Model 40.644 3 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.978a .354 .474
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 8.255 4 .083

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

komplikasi = 1 komplikasi = 2

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 41 38.747 5 7.253 46
2 4 6.044 7 4.956 11
3 2 2.665 5 4.335 7
4 2 2.679 7 6.321 9
5 0 .872 6 5.128 6
6 3 .994 11 13.006 14
 Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 1.735 .671 6.689 1 .010 5.668 1.522 21.107
antenatal 1.713 .578 8.782 1 .003 5.545 1.786 17.217
kader .799 .675 1.404 1 .236 2.224 .593 8.345
Constant -5.923 1.128 27.559 1 .000 .003
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal, kader.

Dari hasil analisis terlihat ada 1 variabel yang p valuenya > 0,05 yaitu variabel
peran kader, sehingga pemodelan selanjutnya variabel peran kader dikeluarkan
dari model

Dikeluarkan variabel peran kader dari model, karena p value paling besar

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1
Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
antenatal 22.932 1 .000
Overall Statistics 35.296 2 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 39.276 2 .000
Block 39.276 2 .000
Model 39.276 2 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 88.345a .344 .461
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 2.606 2 .272
 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

komplikasi = 1 komplikasi = 2

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 42 40.679 7 8.321 49
2 4 5.321 8 6.679 12
3 3 4.321 9 7.679 12
4 3 1.679 17 18.321 20

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 2.162 .579 13.964 1 .000 8.690 2.796 27.009
antenatal 1.814 .572 10.078 1 .002 6.138 2.002 18.815
Constant -5.564 1.069 27.102 1 .000 .004
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal.

Setelah variabel peran kader dikeluarkan perubahan nilai OR untuk variabel kelas
ibu hamil dan pelayanan antenatal sebagai berikut :

Variabel OR peran OR peran kader Perubahan OR

kader ada tidak ada
Kelas ibu hamil 5.668 8.690 34.78%
Pelayanan antenatal 5.545 6.138 9.66%
Peran kader 2.224 - -

Dengan hasil perbandingan OR terlihat perubahan OR variabel kelas ibu hamil >
10%. Dengan demikian variabel peran kader dimasukkan kembali dalam model.

Selanjutnya variabel yang terbesar p valuenya adalah pelayanan antenatal,

dengan demikian dikeluarkan dari model dan hasilnya
Dikeluarkan variabel pelayanan antenatal, karena p value paling besar

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 29.486 2 .000
Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 31.547 2 .000
Block 31.547 2 .000
Model 31.547 2 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 96.074a .288 .385
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 5.349 2 .069

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

komplikasi = 1 komplikasi = 2

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 44 42.152 10 11.848 54
2 2 3.848 5 3.152 7
3 1 2.848 8 6.152 9
4 5 3.152 18 19.848 23

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 46 6 88.5
2 15 26 63.4
Overall Percentage 77.4
a. The cut value is .500
 Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 2.039 .612 11.091 1 .001 7.686 2.314 25.524
kader 1.070 .621 2.968 1 .085 2.915 .863 9.842
Constant -4.378 .886 24.404 1 .000 .013
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, kader.

Setelah variabel pelayanan antenatal dikeluarkan, cek lagi perubahan OR untuk

variabel yang masih aktif di model.

Variabel OR pelayanan OR pelayanan Perubahan OR

antenatal antenatal tidak
ada ada
Kelas ibu hamil 5.668 7.686 26.26%
Pelayanan antenatal 5.545 - -
Peran kader 2.224 2.915 23,71%

Dengan hasil perbandingan OR terlihat perubahan OR variabel kelas ibu hamil dan
peran kader > 10%. Dengan demikian variabel pelayanan antenatal dimasukkan
kembali dalam model.

Akhirnya model yang dihasilkan adalah sebagai berikut :

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 1.735 .671 6.689 1 .010 5.668 1.522 21.107
antenatal 1.713 .578 8.782 1 .003 5.545 1.786 17.217
kader .799 .675 1.404 1 .236 2.224 .593 8.345
Constant -5.923 1.128 27.559 1 .000 .003
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal, kader.
UJI INTERAKSI

Uji interaksi dilakukan pada variabel yang diduga secara substansi ada interaksi.
Dalam penelitian ini yang diduga ada interaksi antara variabel kelas ibu hamil
dengan variabel pelayanan antenatal dan variabel kelas ibu hamil dengan peran
kader.

1. Uji interaksi : kelas ibu hamil*pelayananan antenatal

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of
cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788
 Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
antenatal 22.932 1 .000
kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 36.394 3 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 40.644 3 .000
Block 40.644 3 .000
Model 40.644 3 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.978a .354 .474
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 1.735 .671 6.689 1 .010 5.668 1.522 21.107
antenatal 1.713 .578 8.782 1 .003 5.545 1.786 17.217
kader .799 .675 1.404 1 .236 2.224 .593 8.345
Constant -5.923 1.128 27.559 1 .000 .003
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal, kader.
Block 2: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 1.905 1 .168
Block 1.905 1 .168
Model 42.548 4 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 85.073a .367 .492
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 4.144 1.906 4.728 1 .030 63.068 1.505 2.643E3
antenatal 3.998 1.776 5.068 1 .024 54.471 1.677 1.769E3
kader .627 .692 .820 1 .365 1.872 .482 7.271
antenatal by kelasbumil -1.659 1.198 1.917 1 .166 .190 .018 1.992
Constant -8.948 2.531 12.496 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: antenatal * kelasbumil .

Pada output bagian Block 2:Methode=Enter, hasil uji omnibusnya memperlihatkan

p value = 0,168 (bagian step) berarti lebih besar dari 0,05, berarti : tidak ada
interaksi antara kelas ibu hamil dengan pelayanan antenatal.
2. Uji interaksi : kelas ibu hamil*pelayananan antenatal

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
antenatal 22.932 1 .000
kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 36.394 3 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 40.644 3 .000
Block 40.644 3 .000
Model 40.644 3 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.978a .354 .474
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 1.735 .671 6.689 1 .010 5.668 1.522 21.107
antenatal 1.713 .578 8.782 1 .003 5.545 1.786 17.217
kader .799 .675 1.404 1 .236 2.224 .593 8.345
Constant -5.923 1.128 27.559 1 .000 .003
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal, kader.

Block 2: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 3.478 1 .062
Block 3.478 1 .062
Model 44.122 4 .000
 Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 83.500a .378 .506
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 44 8 84.6
2 10 31 75.6
Overall Percentage 80.6
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 5.787 2.535 5.212 1 .022 325.946 2.268 4.685E4
antenatal 1.571 .597 6.913 1 .009 4.811 1.492 15.515
kader 4.676 2.282 4.197 1 .040 107.359 1.225 9.411E3
kader by
-2.721 1.554 3.068 1 .080 .066 .003 1.382
kelasbumil
Constant -11.122 3.262 11.624 1 .001 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kader * kelasbumil .

Pada output bagian Block 2:Methode=Enter, hasil uji omnibusnya memperlihatkan

p value = 0,062 (bagian step) berarti lebih besar dari 0,05, berarti : tidak ada
interaksi antara kelas ibu hamil dengan peran kader.
MODEL TERAKHIR
Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 93 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 93 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value
1 0
2 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 0 komplikasi 1 52 0 100.0
2 41 0 .0
Overall Percentage 55.9
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.238 .209 1.295 1 .255 .788

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables kelasbumil 27.335 1 .000
antenatal 22.932 1 .000
kader 19.070 1 .000
Overall Statistics 36.394 3 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

 Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 40.644 3 .000
Block 40.644 3 .000
Model 40.644 3 .000

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.978a .354 .474
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter
estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 8.255 4 .083

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

komplikasi = 1 komplikasi = 2

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total

Step 1 1 41 38.747 5 7.253 46
2 4 6.044 7 4.956 11
3 2 2.665 5 4.335 7
4 2 2.679 7 6.321 9
5 0 .872 6 5.128 6
6 3 .994 11 13.006 14

Classification Tablea

Predicted

komplikasi
Percentage
Observed 1 2 Correct
Step 1 komplikasi 1 42 10 80.8
2 7 34 82.9
Overall Percentage 81.7
a. The cut value is .500
 Variables in the Equation
95.0% C.I.for
EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

Step 1a kelasbumil 1.735 .671 6.689 1 .010 5.668 1.522 21.107
antenatal 1.713 .578 8.782 1 .003 5.545 1.786 17.217
kader .799 .675 1.404 1 .236 2.224 .593 8.345
Constant -5.923 1.128 27.559 1 .000 .003
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: kelasbumil, antenatal, kader.

Dari analisis multivariat ternyata variabel yang berhubungan bermakna dengan

pencegahan komplikasi kehamilan adalah variabel kelas ibu hamil dan variabel
pelayanan antenatal, sedangkan variabel peran kader sebagai variabel
confounding (variabel pengganggu).
Hasil analisis didapatkan Odds Ratio (OR) variabel kelas ibu hamil adalah 5,668
artinya ibu hamil yang mempunyai pengetahuan tentang kelas ibu hamil kurang
baik mempunyai peluang 6 kali menyebabkan pencegahan komplikasi
kehamilannya kurang baik dibanding ibu hamil yang memiliki pengetahuan tentang
kelas ibu hamil baik setelah dikontrol variabel pelayanan antenatal dan peran
kader.
Hasil analisis didapatkan Odds Ratio (OR) variabel pelayanan antenatal adalah
5,545 artinya ibu hamil yang mendapatkan pelayanan antenatal kurang baik
mempunyai peluang 6 kali menyebabkan pencegahan komplikasi kehamilannya
kurang baik dibanding ibu hamil yang mendapatkan pelayanan anetanatal baik
setelah dikontrol variabel kelas ibu hamil dan peran kader.
Hasil analisis didapatkan Odds Ratio (OR) variabel peran kader adalah 2,224
artinya ibu hamil yang beranggapan peran kader kurang mempunyai peluang 2
kali menyebabkan pencegahan komplikasi kehamilannya kurang baik sebesar 2 kali
lebih tinggi dibanding ibu hamil yang beranggapan peran kader baik setelah
dikontrol variabel kelas ibu hamil dan pelayanan antenatal.

Untuk melihat variabel mana yang paling besar pengaruhnya terhadap variabel
dependen, dilihat dari exp (B) untuk variabel yang signifikan, semakin besar nilai
exp (B) berarti semakin besar pengaruhnya terhadap variabel dependen yang
dianalisis. Dalam hasil penelitian ini berarti kelas ibu hamil yang paling besar
pengaruhnya terhadap pencegahan komplikasi kehamilan (nilai Exp (B) = 5,668)

Persamaan Regresi Logistik yang dihasilkan adalah :

Logit = -5,704 + 1,735 kelas ibu hamil + 1,713

(pencegahan pelayanan antenatal + 0,719 peran kader
komplikasi kehamilan)