Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I-
2 lo
WORK INKY ROD MILL and the work index is found by multiplying Wt by
Fig. 1-Work indexes computed from rod and ball mill d m . Then
grindabilities.
size P is found by plotting the grindability for the
various mesh sizes tested. If the grindability is
available at only one size near the product size, a
line is drawn through the plotted grindability paral-
lel to the plotted percent passing size distribution
line, to its intersection with the product size.
Impact Crushing Tests: It has been determined The values of 0.80 d P , / 1 0 0 were calculated for
empirically from impact crushing tests," and plant each mesh size at which tests have been made, where
and pilot mill tests on the same materials, that the PI is the sieve opening in microns, and this factor
hp-hr per ton required to crush a scalped feed of multiplied by the Wp value obtained from the
specific gravity S and impact strength of C foot- grindability tests by eqs 13 and 14 gives the work
pounds per inch of thickness, a t a reduction ratio index for the test a t that mesh.
of 5: 1, where P is the size in inches, which 80 pct The values of the work index factor, 0.80 d P , / 1 0 0 ,
of the product passes, equals 0.219C/SP0,a8. for each mesh size in both rod and ball mill tests
At a reduction ratio of 5: 1 a normal feed has 25 are as follows:
pct passing the product size P , or F, = 25.
If a feed with normal slope is used instead of a Mesh Wf Factor Mesh WI Factor
scalped feed, the exponent of P should increase from
1 - 1 / d z to 1 / 2 , according to the Third Theory,
and the energy required to crush at any reduction
ratio is
hp-hr 0.219C
ton
Work indexes can be found directly from rod and
ball mill grindabilities by Fig. 1 or an enlargement
thereof.
From eq 3 the total input energy required in kw- Proof of Third Theory
hr per ton is From Laboratory Tests: Since consistent data
0.1626C covering a wide variety of materials, size ranges,
Wt = and machines are necessary to prove the correctness
sdF of a comminution theory, the work index has been
and since 100 microns equals 0.003937 in., the work calculated for reported materials on which more
index from eq 5 is than one test has been made.'Yomparison of these
Wi = 2 . 5 9 C / S [lzl Wi values for different rod and ball mill grinds and
for crushing tests shows the correspondence ob-
Eq 12 is used to calculate the work index from tained; differences at different size ranges in these
impact crushing tests. The work required to crush results, which are greater than the experimental
a normal feed from a given feed size to a given error of about 5 pct in sampling and testing, are
product size is calculated from the work index and caused principally by differences in the ease of
eq 6 , using 0.003937 i.n place of 100 when F and P breaking at different sizes.
are in inches. The general consistency of the work index values
Rod and Ball Mill Tests: Where G-, is the rod mill obtained for a large number of different .materials
grindability, and Go,, is the ball mill grindability" and conditions by the Third Theory and by empirical
a t the product size P , the kw-hr per net ton of ma- equations, which fairly represent actual plant oper-
terial passing the product size (Wp) is found from ating results, is regarded as conclusive proof of the
the following empirical equations, which represent correctness of the theory. Nothing approaching
the average of a number of installations. The ball such consistency has ever been shown in support of
mill equation applies to a wet grinding overflow the Rittinger or Kick theories, neither of which
ball mill 7 % f t in diam inside the shell, operating in has been particularly helpful in actual crushing and
closed circuit with a classifier. The rod mill equa- grinding operations.
tion applies to a wet grinding overflow rod mill 6 These tests are listed alphabetically in Table I;
ft in diam inside the shell, operating in open circuit. they include 559 tests on 144 different materials. The
Table I. Work Indexes Calculated from Allis-Chalmers Laboratory Tests, Work lndex = Kw-Hr Per Ton from
Infinite Feed Size to 80 Pct Passing 100 Microns, or About 65 Pct Passing 200 Mesh.
Key: BM Mesh - Work lndex = Ball Mill Mesh - Work lndex
RM Mesh - Work Index = Rod Mill Mesh - Work Index
IC S - Work Index = Impact Crushing Sp. Gr. - Work lndex
-- ---
Cline Lake
CMS-Golden Rose
CMS-Kimberley 1
2
Cobrecite
Cohart Refract. 1
2
Cons. Copper, Nev. 1
2
Cons. Feldspar
Cyprus Mines
East Malartic
East Sullivan
Massive
East Sullivan
Normal
Elect. Met. Chrom.
Emsco Refractories
Exolon-Sic
Federal Chem.
Ford Motor
Fresnillo
Getchell Mines
Golding-Keene
Granby Cons.
Graphite Conc.
Grootvlei-
Banket
BM Feed
Shale
Quartzite
Hanna-Taconite
Homestake
- -
Industrial Silica
Inland Steel
Int. Nickel
Ipanema
H. J. Kaiser 1
2
Kerr Addison 1
Kelowna Exp.
Kinetic Chem.
Lake Shore
Lawrence Cement
Limestone Prods.
Little Long Lac
Malartic
Maine Dev.
Marievale, S.Af.
McIntyre Porcupine
Miami Copper
Mines Dominiales
Mines d e Bor
Mineral Mining
Minn. Mines
Moose Mountain
Montecatini
Morenci
Mozan
Nat. Lead-Tahawus
Pacific Coast
Aggregates
Parcoy
Picacho
Pickands-Mather
Taconite
Pitts. Coal Co.
Pitts. Met. FeSi
Pitts. Plate Glass 1
L
Portland Gold
Powell-Rouyn
Preston East Dome
Quartz-Crystallized
Queenstown-Gold
Quincy
Rand-Springs Mines
Rep. Steel
Chateaugay
Harmony
Old Bed
New Bed
Reserve Taconite
(Different samples)
Rochester-Plymouth
St. Joe. Lead
(Different samples)
San Luis
Santa Maria del Oro
Sherritt-Gordon
Silver Bell
South Am. Dev.
Sullivan Mines
Sutton Steele & Steele
Sydvaranger
Tenn. Copper Co.
Isabella
London
Tri-State Flint
TVA-Fontana
Union Potash
Western Minerals
Tripoli
Western Mining
Australia
Weston Brooker
White Pine (Copper Range)
Shale
Sandstone 1
2
Amygdaloid
Wright-Hargreaves 1
2
Gyratory crusher
Utah copper
Chino
Ajo 1
(New Cornelia) 2
Cone crusher
Utah copper
Chino
Crushing rolls
Utah copper 4-64 2.240 27.920 795 7.6 11.49 29,000
Ajo (New Cornelia) 4-67 0.910 11.690 2,540 8.0 21.36 - 14,000
McIntyre Porc. 4-65 0.530 97.500 34,000 20.3 17.96 126,000
McIntyre Porc. 4-67 0.633 12.800 7,300 14.9 17.96 18,000
C & Hecla 4-61 2.175 16,000 3.000 20.2 20.00 18,000
McIntyre Porc.
Kelowna
Kelowna
McIntire Wrlght-
Work Index Utah Chino Ajo Porcupine Hargreaves
--
work input required for any feed and product size rived from the published data. In cases where the
of any material listed is found from the work index feed is marked Fe the equation is modified, as pre-
nearest that product size and eq 6. viously described. Similar corrections for closed
It is noted that the work index of pure crystal- circuit grinding installations are usually small and
lized quartz increases regularly from 28 mesh to were not made because of incomplete data. Com-
200 mesh, with a slope of -0.15 on a log-log plot parisons of the relative efficiencies of different plants
against the product size, indicating that a general can be made by dividing the plant work index by
theory of comminution should not be based on the the laboratory work index. Additional comparisons
behavior of this material unless corrections are can be readily made by anyone interested in a
applied. particular ore.
From Direct Plant Data: Work indexes were cal- Work lndex Use
culated from published plant operating data for The work index Wi can be calculated from labora-
comparison with each other and with those calcu- tory tests by the methods shown and can be calcu-
lated from laboratory test results and are listed in lated for any plant operation by eq 5 from the feed
Table 11. All the published operating data are from and product sizes and the work input in kw-hr per
Taggart's Handbook of Mineral D r e ~ s i n g , with
~ ton. The kw-hr per ton required for any size reduc-
references to section and page. The examples were tion can be calculated from the work index by eq 6.
chosen largely a t random, for the purpose of enabl- The correction described should be applied when
ing those interested to become familiar with the cal- the feed is scalped.
culation method, and have no particular significance When laboratory or plant results show a n appre-
in themselves other than to demonstrate the utility ciable and consistent difference in the work index a t
of the Third Theory in comparing relative efficien- different product sizes, indicating a difference in the
cies over the complete comminution size range. No breakage characteristics, the work index at the
such consistent comparison is possible under the proper size should be used. Higher work indexes
Rittinger or Kick theories. for scalped feeds may indicate concentration of a
Much of the published data on crushing is not hard fraction in the scalped feed, which can be con-
sufficiently complete for the calculation in Table 11. firmed by additional laboratory tests made upon it.
To obtain uniformity in the crusher calculations, the Judgment must be used in each case regarding the
cutoff size Yc was assumed to equal one half the effects on the relative efficiency of such variables as:
product size P, which was taken as the open side different breakage characteristics a t varying sizes
crusher setting. The feed size F was considered and natural grain sizes, segregation of harder frac-
equal to 15 pct of the crusher gape. These arbitrary tions, different machines, oversize feed, ball and rod
approximations were necessary in the absence of sizes, circuit change, and differences in circulating
exact size analyses, and the work indexes calculated loads. After the work indexes are obtained for a
therefrom are of value chiefly in illustrating the variety of conditions, correction factors for each
correction methods for scalped feeds. variable can be developed, and the range of the
The work indexes were calculated by eq 5 from judgment factor required at present will be de-
the kw-hr per ton, feed size, and product size de- creased still further.