Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1702 - Structural Parameter Comparision and Impact

    Uploaded by

    Omprakash Khodke
    9 views4 pages
    This document compares the parameters and factors used for structural design of a project according to normal engineering practice versus those suggested by Tayras. Key differences include: 1) Tayras suggests a lower response reduction factor of 1.5 versus 2.5 normally, and an importance factor of 1.5 versus 1.25. 2) Deflection limits are more stringent under Tayras' suggestions, such as L/360 for structural beams versus L/300. 3) Tayras' suggested seismic ground acceleration and importance class would result in higher base shears and tonnages compared to normal values, which could impact the design. 4) A geotechnical report is pending from the client to

    Original Description:

    Structural design parameters required in steel design

    Original Title

    1702_structural Parameter Comparision and Impact

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the parameters and factors used for structural design of a project according to normal engineering practice versus those suggested by Tayras. Key differences include: 1) Tayras suggests a lower response reduction factor of 1.5 versus 2.5 normally, and an importance factor of 1.5 versus 1.25. 2) Deflection limits are more stringent under Tayras' suggestions, such as L/360 for structural beams versus L/300. 3) Tayras' suggested seismic ground acceleration and importance class would result in higher base shears and tonnages compared to normal values, which could impact the design. 4) A geotechnical report is pending from the client to

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views4 pages

    1702 - Structural Parameter Comparision and Impact

    Uploaded by

    Omprakash Khodke
    This document compares the parameters and factors used for structural design of a project according to normal engineering practice versus those suggested by Tayras. Key differences include: 1) Tayras suggests a lower response reduction factor of 1.5 versus 2.5 normally, and an importance factor of 1.5 versus 1.25. 2) Deflection limits are more stringent under Tayras' suggestions, such as L/360 for structural beams versus L/300. 3) Tayras' suggested seismic ground acceleration and importance class would result in higher base shears and tonnages compared to normal values, which could impact the design. 4) A geotechnical report is pending from the client to

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Sr.No.

    Parameters/ Factors

    1 Wind

    gust speed / 10 min


    2 Wind speed

    3 Siesmic/Earthquake A

    4 Piping hydro load

    5 Material

    6 Deflection Limits
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E

    F
    Normal factors/Value etc. as per good Engineering
    practice which we use in American Code/ Sequoia's
    suggestions

    42 m/s ( 10 min avg time)

    151Km/hr for Structure 20m<H<60 130Km/hr for


    Structure H<20m

    NA

    Ss = 0.645, S1 = 0.205

    Response Reduction Factor R = 2.5

    Risk Catagory = III

    Importance factor = 1.25

    Site Class = D

    Fa = 1.28, Fv = 2.19

    TL = 6 Sec

    Base Shear = 587.24 kN (HT)

    Base Shear = 775.924 kN (DT)

    Tonnage = 45 (HT)

    Tonnage = 80 (DT)

    120%

    S275J0 / S275JR/ S275JS

    Vertical Deflection
    For all structural beam members L/300
    For Equipment Supporting Structural Beam L/450
    For Monorail Beams - L/400
    Cantilever Beams - L/180
    For Crane supporting Cantilever Beam L/600
    Horizontal Deflection
    Main Frame members - H/200
    Tayras suggestions/requirement

    42 m/s ( 10 min avg time)

    151Km/hr for Structure 20m<H<60 130Km/hr for


    Structure H<20m

    Ground acceleration (agR) = 0.266 g

    Ss = 0.645, S1 = 0.205

    Behavior factor (q) = 1.5

    Importance class = II

    Importance factor = 1.5

    Ground type = ??

    Fa = 1.28, Fv = 2.19

    TL = 6 Sec

    Base Shear = 842.86 kN (HT)

    Base Shear = 1674.91 kN (DT)

    Tonnage = 50 (HT)

    Tonnage = 92 (DT)

    150%

    S275J0 / S275JR/ S275JS

    For Structural Beam L/360

    For Equipment Supporting Structural Beam L/600


    For Monorail Beams - L/800
    For Structural Cantilever Beam L/180
    For Crane supporting Cantilever Beam L/600

    Main Frame members - H/200


    Impact on 1702 Design (may be calculated in the form of %)

    seems high based on location, which will impact on total tonnage

    The geotechnical report is pending from Client

    Pls note down your comments if any By Mr.Amol

    You might also like