Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 Surds PDF
03 Surds PDF
SURDS
1 = 1, 4 = 2, 9 = 3, 16 = 4, 25 = 5, 36 = 6 3. m a ± n a = (m ± n ) a
3
27 = 3, 4 625 = 5, 5 32 = 2 4. m a ´ n b = mn a b
Notice that in the above examples the result is an Applying this rule, we have
exact number. So, these numbers are not examples of
2 5 ´ 3 3 = 2 ´ 3´ 5 ´ 3
surds, even though they can be expressed using root
signs. = 2 ´ 3 ´ 5 ´ 3 = 6 15
m a m a 4 - 2 4 - 2 3+ 5
5. = = ´
n b n b 3- 5 3- 5 3+ 5
Applying this rule, we have 12 - 3 2 + 4 5 - 10 12 - 3 2 + 4 5 - 10
= =
5 3 5 3 9-3 5 +3 5 -5 4
=
2 2 2 2
Example 4
Rationalising a surd 1+ 2
Rationalise .
To rationalise a surd, we remove all surds from the 2+ 2
denominator of the expression, without altering its
numerical value. In the process, surds may now Solution
appear in the numerator of the expression, where
1+ 2 1+ 2 2 - 2
there may not have even had any from before. = ´
2+ 2 2+ 2 2- 2
Example 1 2+2 2 - 2 -2 2
= =
3 4-2 2 +2 2 -2 2
Rationalise .
2
Solution
3 3 2 3 2
= ´ =
2 2 2 2
Example 2
6 + 10
Rationalise .
2
Solution
6 + 10 6 + 10 2 6 ´ 2 + 10 ´ 2
= ´ =
2 2 2 2
12 + 20 4´ 3+ 4´ 5
= =
2 2
2 3+2 5
= = 3+ 5
2
Example 3
4- 2
Rationalise .
3- 5
Solution
We multiply by the conjugate (same expression with
opposite signs separating the terms) of the
denominator.