This document provides a rubric for evaluating period three YA lit books. It assesses books on their characterization, conflict/tension, relevance to modern society, entertainment value, and writing craft. For each category, example responses are given that range from positive ("Iconic (Obama & Biden Friendship-like)") to negative ("Anti-Vax Moms (NOT GOOD!)"). The rubric appears to be evaluating books on realism, character development, engaging plots, contemporary issues, and writing style.
Original Description:
Original Title
project lit young adult story rubric period three - period three ya lit rubric
This document provides a rubric for evaluating period three YA lit books. It assesses books on their characterization, conflict/tension, relevance to modern society, entertainment value, and writing craft. For each category, example responses are given that range from positive ("Iconic (Obama & Biden Friendship-like)") to negative ("Anti-Vax Moms (NOT GOOD!)"). The rubric appears to be evaluating books on realism, character development, engaging plots, contemporary issues, and writing style.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating period three YA lit books. It assesses books on their characterization, conflict/tension, relevance to modern society, entertainment value, and writing craft. For each category, example responses are given that range from positive ("Iconic (Obama & Biden Friendship-like)") to negative ("Anti-Vax Moms (NOT GOOD!)"). The rubric appears to be evaluating books on realism, character development, engaging plots, contemporary issues, and writing style.
Almost There! (26.1) & People Who Juul in the Friendship-like) Administration ($hitty) GOOD!) "Thank U, Emily's Rap Game Bathrooms (Aight) Summer Hits of 2000 LMAO! Next" & Aunt Becky There are well-developed and well-constructed examples of The conflict is pretty gooe but The conflict is there but does conflict that adds pop to a This book does not have very lacks the special ability to not have anything special Beef book. The situations and really create tension and may about it at all. the beef does much conflict or the conflict This is tofu, not beef. characters have excellent just falls short. just be big disagreemants. not really draw the reader in. interactions that create tension for the reader. Characters are well-developed The chatacters are realistic, The characters are well The characters are flat and What characters? If there are and realistic. Everything well-developed, and the reader developed but you can’t their significance on the plot is any distinguishable characters, needed to make good is able to identify with them indentify with any of them nor not clear. They are not they’re just kinda thrown at characters is present except Characterization well. Their characterization for relatability and are they realistic. Everything relatable and the reader does you without any sort of affects their interactions just seems kinda fishy despite not get a clear idea of who the context. You have no back representation. There is little to among each other and their their being sufficient character is or what they look story, no development… It’s no unreasonable dialogue or impact on the plot. development. like. just not good. characteristics. It's bad and therefore hilarious--kind of like Fergie This is Pretty Little Liars in a singing the national anthem. nutshell. You can't put the "It was the best of times, it was "Please Clap." -Jeb Bush <img You will not fall asleep. You The subsitute left the mouse book down becuase you have the worst of times..." (Dickens src="https://pmcvariety.files. Entertaining & can't keep this book down, and high expectations, but you 1). I don't know; it;s just kinda wordpress. over the pause button during Engaging it's THAT book. It's as good as the movie. Yeah, it's that don't really get the results you in that weird middle ground-- com/2018/02/fergie-national- Colton jumping the fence. bad/annoying. wanted--even though, it's still like limbo. anthem.jpg?w=1000& pretty good. h=563&crop=1" alt=" Image result for fergie national anthem"/> The book is an excellent The book is somewhat This book does not have a window to the social issue in There are a lot of references to applicable to today's society, The book attempts to, but good outlook in today's Pertinance in Society the book. It makes it easy to today's society, but it's not as but it doesn't give us a full ultimately fails to, be relatable. society. It is outdated. There is understand today's current in depth as it could be. background on the situations. no relevance. social climate. The writing style is engaging There are some pretty cool The writing style leaves a little and includes rhetoric that My little brother could have Craft makes me genuinely feel things going on here. I'm not I see you. to be desired. Nothing really written that. mad at it. wows me. something.