Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Data Collection 1
Data Collection 1
collection. Observational data collection is the most effective method for education related topics
for many reasons. For example in education the data is mostly qualitative, so the need for
detailed notes is paramount over recording basic statistics in a chart. Another reason why
observational data collection was used is because there are many small differences from teacher
to teacher that cannot be planned for with a regular data chart such as a unique activity or
schedule. The most important reason why observational data collection was chosen was the ease
of access to different level language courses here at Glenelg. The observations were conducted
by finding a class and planning with a teacher when a visit would be appropriate where notes
could be taken about the class. The most important parts of a language class that were looked for
were the amount of the other language spoken vs english, student engagement, the populations of
classes, what skills the students had the most success with, and what students thought about their
The first class observed was Spanish 5 AP, and the class was very impressive. The most
obvious thing that I noticed was that nearly everything in the class was said in Spanish. This was
very surprising considering my past experiences in that teachers Spanish 2 honors class where
there was usually about an even split of how much english was spoken versus how much was
said in Spanish. This demonstrated that the students were proficient enough to be able to have
conversations completely in Spanish on a variety of topics. On the other hand Spanish 3 honors
and Spanish 1 were very different with the amount of Spanish spoken by the teacher only falling
around one third to half of everything they said to the class. Understandably this is because the
students wouldn’t be able to follow directions due to their lack of knowledge in the language.
This small amount of Spanish spoken was also met with a severe lack in understanding from a
lot of students when any directions were given in Spanish with most asking for it again in english
or trying to ask the few students who could comprehend what was said. The second most
noticeable thing when comparing the 5 AP classes to 3 honors and level 1 was the class size. In
Spanish 5 AP both classes had a total of about 30 students with 21 of them participating in the
AP exam in May. Meanwhile in the lower level Spanish courses there was about 20 to 30
students per class with there being as many as 4 Spanish 3 honors classes and 6 Spanish 1
classes. While speaking with some of the AP students a lot of them had said they are considering
getting a minor in Spanish in college or even further pursuing it as a main part of their career.
When the same questions were asked to the students in the Spanish 3 class only very few had
considered Spanish being apart of their future at all. Finally when this was asked to the Spanish 1
class it was met with blank stares as none of them had thought about Spanish playing a role in
their future at all. This difference in thoughts about Spanish in each student's future and the
difference in the amount of students in each class most likely stems from each increase in class
level filtering out students who no longer want to pursue the subject as it becomes harder.
The results gathered from the data collection overall point to the fact that the biggest
issues in language education arise in the lower level courses. That information is extremely
helpful to solving language education issues in the United States because the problematic areas
can be targeted and resources are not wasted on areas where help is not needed. However, this
data collection was not perfect and had limitations that are very hard to surmount with the
resources available. One of the largest limiting factors of this data collection was time, much
more data could have been collected on different course levels for different languages if more
time was given. This would help create a much better picture of what language programs have
more noticeable problems than others. Another limitation is that only the problems in my school
can be observed as I cannot go to other schools while my class is in session along with me not
being able to drive myself to other areas to observe there. The final and biggest limitation is that
I cannot go to other countries to observe the successes of other language programs meaning that
my knowledge of their successes can only come from secondary sources. If I were to do my data
collection again I would make sure to give myself a larger time frame so I could have a more
diverse set of observations for classes. This is the only change that I could realistically make due
The results gathered by my data collection will help future researchers figuring out what
the reasons for the lack of efficient foreign language programs in the United States. They will be
able to look at the observations I took and realize the failures of lower level language courses.
Researchers in the future could use this data to help further improve the United States language
education programs by targeting the low level language courses and attempting to improve the
proficiency and retention rate of students. This could either be through the methods I am
investigating by taking techniques and strategies from other countries, or creating and
experimenting with original strategies. This could overall make United States citizens more
competitive in the global job market as the future generations will be able to pick up valuable
language skills and apply them to almost any job they choose.