SY 2019-2020 SCHOOL OPCRF VALIDATION TOOL

Sources and / References: SY 2016-2017 and SY 2017-2018 Validation Tool Prepared Upon the leadership of Ms. Benilda Daytaca; SY 2017-2018 Technical Validation
Group Observation and Findings; Minutes of the Meeting of the PMT and TVG on July 25, 2018; DO 2, S. 2015; Inputs from Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 RPMS-PPST TRAINING
of MPSDO, Feedbacks from SY 2018-2019 school heads and PMT-TVG

KRA 1: SCHOOL LEADERSHIP (21%)

Objectives Performance Indicators Means of Verification (MOVs)

1. Led and facilitated the development of the Quality:  Photocopy of the Certificate of
School Improvement Plan (SY 2020-2023) Acceptance
5 – all programs/projects identified are aligned
 Report of SDO Review Team
4 – one identified program/project lacks element/s of alignment containing their findings and
remarks (c/o SDO SIP Teams)
3 – two identified programs/projects lack element/s of alignment
Schools Findings/ Remarks/
2 – three identified programs/projects lack element/s of alignment Observations Recommendati
1 – four or more identified programs/projects lack element/s of ons
alignment

Timeliness:

5 – submitted finalized copy of the SIP 2 weeks after it was returned

for incorporation of the correction

4 – submitted finalized copy of the SIP within 3 weeks after it was

returned for incorporation of the correction

3 - submitted finalized copy of the SIP 1 month after it was returned

for incorporation of the correction

2 - submitted finalized copy of the SIP more than 1 month after it

was returned for correction

1 - submitted finalized copy of the SIP 2 months after it was returned

for correction
2. Ensured the implementation of the School Quality:  AIP evaluation
Page 1 of 15
 Annual Implementation Plan
- AIP prepared was taken from the eSIP
and SMEA reports
- School head, assisted by all school
personnel, leads the implementation of
the plans
- All teachers / staff in the school
performed expected tasks as identified in
the plan
- Other stakeholders were involved in the
School AIP preparation, implementation
and monitoring
- All objectives, activities and expected
outputs delivered on time
- AIP implementation was captured by the
OPCRF and the Teacher / MT/
Department Head IPCRFs
- All school personnel are involved in the
preparation of the AIP review and catch-
up plans
- All teachers/coordinators of different
programs/activities prepared actions
plans in relation to their designations
- others
Page 2 of 15
5 – Implemented 95-100% of all identified programs/ projects/
activities and tasks in the School AIP  Minutes of meetings, pictorials
and attendance (during the
4- Implemented 90-94.99 % of all identified activities and tasks in
planning stage and evaluation of
the School AIP
projects implemented)
3 – Implemented 80-89.99 % of all identified activities and tasks in  Accomplishment report of the
the School AIP projects Others deemed
necessary
2 – Implemented 70-79.99 % of all identified activities and tasks in
the School AIP
1 – Implemented 69.99 % and below of all identified activities and To focus only on the conduct of the
tasks in the School AIP quarterly evaluation of the AIP first week
of the first month of the preceding
Efficiency:
quarter
5 – all school personnel with other stakeholder representatives are
- 1st Quarter - 1st week of April
involved in the AIP preparation, implementation and evaluation
- 2nd Quarter - 1st week of July
4 – only representatives of the school stakeholders are involved in
the AIP preparation, implementation and evaluation - 3rd Quarter - 1st week of October
- 4th Quarter - 1st week of January
3 – all school personnel only were involved in the AIP preparation,
implementation and evaluation
2 – 60% of the school personnel but less than 100% were involved in
the AIP preparation, implementation and evaluation
1 – 59.99% and below of the school personnel were involved in the
AIP preparation, implementation and evaluation
Timeliness:
5 - Conducted all AIP evaluation on time
4 - Conducted 3 AIP evaluation on time with 1 delay
3 - Conducted 2 AIP evaluation on time with 2 delays

3. Improved SBM level of practice through the
following:
- Develop and review plans with stakeholders
- Conduct participatory assessment of
performance
- All teachers, school head and stakeholders
share accountability and continuous
improvement in the delivery of basic
education
- School prepared SBM Report
- School has an updated transparency board
- School conducted quarterly SMEA and
review eSIP at least once a year
- Used data in making decisions
3. Ensured the implementation of the following
programs:
- School Banner
- Brigada Eskwela
- Oplan Balik Eskwela
- Child Friendly School System (CPC & CPP)
- Monitoring and Evaluation (SMEA, Mid Year
Page 3 of 15
2 - Conducted 1 AIP evaluation on time with 3 delays
1 - Conducted AIP evaluation with 4 delays
Quality: ● SBM Self-Assessment for 2 SYs &
Report showing the increase
5 - The school was recommended for RO validation (Level II) for SY
2018-2019.
4 - SBM rating (level of practice/ self-assessment) increased by 0.5 &
above
3 - SBM rating increased by 0.3 - 0.4
2 - SBM rating increased by 0.1 - 0.2
1 - SBM rating increased by 0.09 and below or decreased
Timeliness:
5 - Submitted SBM Self-Assessment 3-5 days before deadline
4 - Submitted 1-2 days before deadline
3 - On time
2 - Submitted 1-5 days after deadline
1 - Submitted six days or more after the deadline
Quality: ● accomplishment report
5 - Implemented 11 or more of the identified indicators. ● CFSS checklist and
accomplishment report of the
4 - Implemented 8-10 of the identified indicators.
PPAs implemented
3 - Implemented 5 - 7 of the identified indicators.
● accomplishment reports of the
2 - Implemented 2-4 of the identified indicators identified programs.
1 - Implemented 1 of the identified indictors.
 Assessment)

- Early Registration

- School Health Programs (SBFP; DO 13 s. 2017;

Gulayan sa Paaralan, Waste Mgnt., ecobricks)

- DRRM

- Youth Development Program/ Guidance

Program (SPG/SSG)

- Sports

- Scouting

4. Managed the implementation of the 4 Phases Quality and Timeliness: ● Minutes of activities/ narrative
of the RPMS report of conducted RPMS
5 - Implemented the 4 phases of RPMS
phase/s; attendance; pictorials
- Planning & Commitment - May
4 - Implemented 3 phases of RPMS with one phase delayed
- Monitoring & Coaching - October
3 - Implemented 2 phases of RPMS with two phases delayed
- Review & Evaluation - April
2 - Implemented 1 phase of RPMS with three phases delayed
- Awarding & Development Planning - April-
1 - Implemented RPMS cycle with four phases delayed
May
5. Updated/ Managed online and offline school Timeliness - Screenshot of report submission, if
data management system online (is the report of the in-
5- All the identified systems were complied/ updated 3-5 days
charge not enough?)
- EBEIS/LIS before deadline.
- Transmittal of submission, if offline
- PSIPOP (secondary) 4 - All the identified systems were complied/ updated 1-2 days
before deadline. - Status of reports from SDO in-charge
- WINS
with percentage of compliance and errors
3 - All of the identified systems were complied/ updated on time.
- LSIS
2 - 4 to 5 of the identified systems were complied/ updated on time.

1 - 3 and below of the identified systems were submitted/ updated

Page 4 of 15
 on time.

Quality

5 - 100% of the data elements in the identified systems were

complied with and have no error.

4 - 90-99.99% ….

3 - 80-89.99% ….

2 - 70-79.99% ….

1 - 69.99% and below ….

Possible PLUS FACTORS: 5 – 100% of the School Children are in normal health status ● School Feeding Program Report

● For schools with feeding program 4 – 90% to 99.99% of the School Children are in normal health status ● Gulayan sa Paaralan
Implementation Report
Improved Nutritional Status of the Children 3 – 80% to 89.99% of the School Children are in normal health status
● Physical Fitness Test Results (pre
2 – 70% to 79.99% of the School Children are in normal health status
and posttest)
1 – 69.99% and below of the School Children are in normal
● Physical Fitness Activities Report
health status
(i.e. Regular morning exercises)
● Research on School Governance & 5 - Implemented recommendations and findings of the research - Report of implementation with
Leadership conducted on school governance & leadership recommendations & findings

4 - Conducted 1 research on school governance & leadership. - Research manuscript/ proposal/ concept
paper
3 - 1 research proposal on school governance & leadership approved

2 - 1 research proposal on school governance & leadership

submitted for review

1 - Conceptualized 1 research proposal on school governance &

leadership.

Page 5 of 15
KRA 2. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP (30%)
Objectives
1.Ensured the implementation of the K to 12 program through
the following:
● All teachers prepared on time DLL/DLP with
appropriate instructional materials.
● All teachers analyzed and evaluated quarterly
performance of learners as basis for remediation,
intervention, home visitation, enrichment activities.
● Per class of learners garnered an average of 83%.
● All teachers contextualized or practiced
contextualization in their respective subjects taught.
For Principals with 15 or more teachers:
 School head with MTs/Department Heads conducted at
least 4 formal observations per teacher with the
Principal himself/herself being responsible for at least
12 teachers
For Principals/HTs/ MT-TICs with 14 or less teachers
 School head conducted at least 4 formal observations
per teacher
For TICs but are not MTs - Ensured that teachers are observed
and are provided with TA for at least 4 times each
teacher
● At least one or more innovative practice implemented.
● School head analyzed and evaluated observation
findings on classroom management, learning
Page 6 of 15
Performance Indicators
For Principals II & IV:
5- 10 indicators met
4- 9 indicators met
3 - 8 indicators met
2 – 7 indicators met
1 - 6 indicators met
For Principal I:
5- 8 or more indicators met
4- 7 indicators met
3 – 6 indicators met
2 –5 indicators met
1 - 4 indicators met
For Head Teachers:
5- 7 or more indicators met
4- 6 indicators met
3 - 5 indicators met
2 –4 indicators met
Means of Verification (MOVs)
● Summary of all teachers’ DLL/ DLP checking by MT or school
head incorporating use of appropriate instructional materials,
● Summary of quarterly teachers’ analysis of quarterly
performance of the learners stipulating the failing subject and
the least learned competency with particular recommendation,
● Summary of computed average per class showing all the
sections, the enrolment per section as of March and the
computed average per section, ( MOVs 1-3 shall be merged)
● Summary of the evidences of contextualization showing all the
names of the teachers and the contextualization done by each
teacher,
● Write up with pictorials of an innovative practice,
● Summary of the observations done by the school head showing
all the names of the teachers, date observed and facilitating and
hindering factors for the head teacher and principal including
master teacher heading the school or request letter or any form
of communication showing the effort of the TIC to ensure the
observation of the teachers’ delivery of instruction and the
provision of TA to the teachers,
● Summary of observations, findings and recommendations for
each of the teachers, ( shall be merged as one in one template)
● Certificate of recognition, (samples of certificate & list of
Awardees to be attached plus pictorials)
● Copy of the analysis of learning results for all learning activities
with respective recommendations,
● Summary of the use of ICT including the level of ICT use done by
 assessment as basis for follow-up, observation, 1 - 3 indicators met each of all the teachers
technical assistance and innovation or research.
SAMPLE of TEMPLATES Objective 1- MOV 2,3,9
For Principals and schools with 8 teachers or more:
Sub 90- 80- 75- GW Stu Lea Interv
 School participated and won in the division and higher ject abo 89 79 A den st ention
For TICs: ve (Av (Slo MP ts Lear s
level co-curricular activities.
5- 6 or more indicators met (fas era w) S @ ned
For schools with 7 teachers or less: School participated and t) ge) risk com
won in district level or higher co-curricular activities 4- 5 indicators met pet
enc
● Analyzed assessment of learning results with 3 - 4 indicators met y
recommendations and actions taken as interventions.
2 –3 indicators met
● Teachers Used ICT in teaching, learning, partnership Sample Template 1 for MOV 1&4
building and learning assessment. 1 - 2 indicators met
Subjects Dates IPED Instructional
Integration Materials USed
/Contextuali
Choose only what’s
zation
applicable to you

2. Implemented Indigenous Peoples Education (IPEd) through Quality: ● Summary of contextualized competencies done by each of all
the following: the teachers,
5- 6 indicators met
● Each teacher contextualized the competencies and ● Compilation of contextualized lessons with remarks from the
4- 4 or 5 indicators
reflected in the lesson plan noted by the school head. MT, HT, SH, PSDS or EPSvr,
3- 3 indicators
● Each teacher contextualized lessons, taught and were ● Record of Secretariat during SLAC, Matrix of SLACS and TA
supervised. 2- 2 indicators report on contextualization,

● School head/ Master Teacher provided TA on the 1-1 indicator ● Matrix of the midyear review activities and accomplishment
contextualization of lessons report,

● School head initiated quarterly/ midyear review on the ● Pictorials on the participation to IPEd activities with captions
utilization/ implementation of IPEd.
● Programme on the conduct of school IPEd and pictorials with
● School participated in IPEd activities. captions

● Conducted school IPEd activities ● SLACS on IPED & Implementation reports

Page 7 of 15
 3. Prepared instructional materials that support the Quality: ● Inventory of contextualized LMS showing the proponent, date
implementation of IPEd as contextualized K to 12. quality assured in the school
5- 6 indicators met
● Compiled all contextualized IMs by grade level by ● SLACs action plan and SLACs accomplishment report or school or
4- 4 or 5 indicators
learning area and submitted to the Division LRMDC for certificate of attendance for MG teacher
quality assurance. 3- 3 indicators
● Summary of the usage of school validated LMs in the
● School head/ Master teacher initiated LAC sessions in 2- 2 indicators contextualization of the lessons,
the construction/ development of instructional
1-1 indicator ● Summary of the supervision and monitoring of the use of the
materials (initiated or participated in the cluster school
contextualized LMs,
LAC or DisLAC at least 4 times for MG.
● TA REPORT ON CONTEXTUALIZATION will be separated as 1 MOV
● Each teacher prepared or contextualized at least 1
LM/IM validated in the school level which are used in ● Transmittal on the submission of contextualized LM to the Division
the implementation of contextualized lessons. Office for quality assurance
● School head and MT supervised the use of LM. ● Approval sheet of research proposal or research write-up
● School submitted at least I LM for quality assurance in PROPOSED TEMPLATE for OBJECTIVE 1.-MOV 5,7,10 & Objective 3 ,
Teac Date the division
Subje Stren level
Weak IP ICT Cont TA MOV 3 & 4
hers Obse ct gth nesse Cont Level extua Done
rved ● Conducted a sresearch related to IPEd.
extua lized
lizati USed
Additional Objectives foron those implementing special Quality: ● Annual summarized report of students / teachers who pass the
programs/ Senior High School: TESDA NC assessment and TM course
5 – Attained ____
Implemented the (SPEd/ STE/ STVEP/ SHS/ SPJ) with the indicators ● List of researches done by the SHS students per strand
following indicators ((select applicable criteria or please provide 4 – Attained ____
● Promotion, Drop-Out, Retention Rates in each grade per strand/ in
indicators including the following, if applicable): indicators
each special program
3 – Attained ____
● Assessment of Grades 9 to 12 (STVEP) or of Grades 11 and
indicators ● Intervention Reports for SARDOs if applicable (including
12 (SHS) in their vocational specializations by TESDA
2 – Attained ____ Remediation)
● Produced group or individual SHS researches appropriate in indicators
1 – Attained ____ ● Report on participation to different co and extra-activities
the different strand offering
indicators ● Photocopy of certificate of participation or recognition
● Maintained a 100% holding efficiency of learners enrolled in
the special program (for all) ● Photocopy of TM certificate

Page 8 of 15
 ● Participated in co- or extra-curricular activities pertaining to ● List of all Teachers in the Particular program and trainers attended
the specialization (for all)
● List of activities joined and wins
● Teachers served as trainers in the program implementation
● Others, as needed
(for all)

● 100% of teachers were trained in the particular program

implementation (for all)

● Teachers worked for their Trainers’ Methodology or

upgrading of NC, if applicable (STVEP and SHS with TVL)

● Learners contributed articles or photos to local papers and

the school papers (SPJ)

● Participated and garnered wins in the Division Schools Press

Conference (DSPC), RSPC or NSPC or other similar events
exercising journalistic skills

● Other indicators which were not captured but which is

applicable to the implementation of the special program

Possible Plus Factors: (Please turn these into objectives) Please provide PIs and To TICs handing teaching loads:
appropriate MOVs
1. TICs with teaching loads ● brief and weekly lesson plans/ logs

2. School head/ Master teacher provided TA on ● With 80% and above GWA of learners
instruction outside jurisdiction through demonstration Possible PIs for Number 7:
● Others
teaching, speakership or instructional supervision.
5– participated in 2
For School Head/ Master Teachers providing TA Outside:
3. Participation in the higher level co-curricular activities. National or won in one
national competition; ● Accomplishment Report
4. Prepared Professional Development Material (PDM)
participated in 4 or more
Regional and won in one ● Certificate
5. Conducted an action research

6. Prepared IM/LM/PDM was used in the whole district 4-participated in 3 Regional ● Others
or won in one regional For International Co-curricular activities:
7. Participation/ wins of learners in co-curricular competitions; participated
competitions in 3 or more Division and ● Invitation
Page 9 of 15
 8. Others won in two or more ● Accomplishment Reports

3– participated in 3
Division or won in 2
Division co-curricular
competitions; participated
in 3 or more District
competitions and won in
two or more

2 – participated in 3 or won
in 2 District co-curricular
competitions;

1 – participated in
competitions but never
won; conducted school
competitions

KRA 3. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT – 16%

Objectives Performance Indicators Means of Verification (MOVs)

1. Managed personnel actions in the school with the
following indicators:
● Submission of correct and complete documents for
personnel actions (such as appointment papers, payment
and salary adjustment claims, leaves, step increment,
service credits, PDS and other benefits)
● Compliance to recruitment and selection guidelines
● All school personnel oriented on recruitment and
selection guidelines
Quality:
5 – Achieved all 7 indicators
4 – Achieved all 6 indicators
3 – Achieved 5 indicators
2 – Achieved 4 indicators
1 – Achieved 2-3 indicator/s
● Summary and checklist for the following personnel actions
(appointment papers, payment and salary adjustment
claims, leaves, step increment, loyalty pay, service credits
and other benefits)
● Division Memo informing recruitment and selection
signed by teachers/teacher- applicant
● Minutes of Meeting on the discussion about recruitment
and selection guidelines that was initiated by the SH and
conducted in the school/pictorials/ attendance
● Report of Personnel Unit on the status of school PSIPOP

Page 10 of 15
 ● PSIPOP updated regularly / as needed (secondary schools)
● Updating of offline IHRIS submitted to division office as
needed
● All qualified school personnel and ALS teachers (if
applicable) joined the pool of applicants for promotion
● Update teachers and other employees of their benefits
and other administrative policies
2. ENSURE the implementation of the human resource
strategic development plan for teaching and non-
teaching personnel.
Page 11 of 15
updating /screenshot of PSIPOP and compliance on
submission of PDS
● Transmittal/CA or certification from the OIC-HRMO on the
Timeliness:
compliance on the iHRIS/ STATUS REPORT from in-charge
● CAF of Assessed Teachers 2 and 3 applicants with notes on
5 – Documents were submitted a days of posting at the school level
week before
● Minutes of meeting highlighting updating employee
4 – Documents were submitted 3 benefits and other administrative policies.
days before
3 – Documents were submitted a day
before
2 – Documents were submitted on
time
1 – Late submission
Quality: *Consolidated and analyzed IPDP
5 – 90- 100% of the HRD Plan is *School HRD plan & Accomplishment report
realized thru SLAC, Inset, Seminars,
(the group recommended that there be a CAPB for IPDP
trainings and other related activities
analysis, HRD plan preparation )
4 – 80-89.99% of the HRD Plan is
realized thru SLAC, Inset, Seminars,
trainings and other related activities
3 – 70-79.99% of the HRD Plan is
realized thru SLAC, Inset, Seminars,
trainings and other related
 activities…

2 – 60-69.99% of the HRD Plan is

realized thru SLAC, Inset, Seminars,
trainings …

1 – 50-59.99% of the HRD Plan is

realized thru SLAC, Inset, Seminars,
trainings …

3. Managed other professional development activities Quality: ● List of Re-entry plans or SLAC plans per quarter (this
for teaching and non-teaching personnel including includes re-entry plan or LAC Plan, Activities conducted)
5- Achieved all indicators
PRAISE
Proposed Template
4-Achieved 8-7 indicators
● School head monitored or used output of trainings, if any
Re- Objectiv Output/ Evidence of usage
3-Achieved 5-6 indicators
● PRAISE Committee organized (Suggested composition: SH, entry/LA e of the result of of knowledge/skill
1-2 PTA representative, Faculty representative/s, SSG/SPG 2-Achieved 3-4 indicators C activity the gained during
President/ representative) Activity activity activity (as per SH
1-Achieved 1-2 indicator observation)
● Conducted PRAISE activities

● At least one school personnel participated in the district/

division / Region Search ● Composition of PRAISE Committee
● Conduct of School Personnel Search ● Validated PRAISE Committee Guidelines
● Given Spot Awards to Teaching/Non-teaching ● PRAISE Accomplishment Reports on conducted activities
in the school/ cluster of schools with documentations
● Participated in District or higher-level searches
● List of PRAISE awards
● Conduct of at least 2 personnel welfare activities (GAD
activity, Wellness Program, Teachers’ Day Celebration, ● Guidelines on PRAISE activities conducted
Teachers’ Christmas Program, etc.)
Page 12 of 15
 ● Minutes of Meetings and Deliberation on awards given

● Evidence of participation in higher level searches

● Pictures and documentations of personnel welfare

activities conducted

Possible Plus Factors: a. Photocopy of certificates or awards received in the district

or division
Performed beyond expectations in which school head,
teachers and other school personnel: b.Report/compilation of TA of the school head to the teachers
on the 4 phases (Planning and Commitment, Monitoring and
a. joined and were awarded in district/ division
Coaching, Review and Evaluation) of RPMS
searches / spot awards
b. 30% or more of the teachers IPCRF is c. Approved proposal and Accomplishment Report
outstanding
Provide appropriate PIs d. Proof of authorship
c. Proposed and conducted individual / team
action/ basic research (HRD related) e. Session guides and/ or matrix
d. Authored book/s or prepared Professional f. CI project write-up & accomplishment
Development Materials or articles
e. Served as facilitator/ trainer/ resource
speakers
f. Conducted Continuous Improvement Projects
g. Composition of a Grievance Committee to
manage teacher conflicts

Page 13 of 15
KRA 4. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT – 16%

Objectives Performance Indicators Means of Verification (MOVs)

1. Implemented effective and efficient recording of all Quality: (Carried)  Certification from the bookkeepers that stock cards & property
physical resources with the following indicators: 5 – Achieved all 5 or more cards are updated based on Delivery Receipts/Inspection and
 Correct and complete recording/ accounting of all acquired indicators Acceptance Report, Deed of Donation, MOU/MOA if any vis a vis
resources (procured by school or delivered from 4 – Achieved 4 indicators the issuances.
CO/RO/DO/Donated) 3 – Achieved 3 indicators
 Efficient release of all procured/delivered school supplies and 2 – Achieved 2 indicators  Certification from the bookkeepers that issuances of
equipment (using the appropriate form) 1 – Achieved 1 indicator supplies/equipment/properties are based on needs as shown in
 Submission to the division office of all required reports: Efficiency: (Carried) their PPMP; and such issuances are properly documented using
RPCPPE, Report of LR Situation, RPCI of School Furniture, 5 – All teachers and school the appropriate forms: Requisition & Issue Slip (RIS), Inventory
Deliveries (Form 1), report of disposal and others as required. head in the school, Custodian Slip (ICS) and Property Acknowledgement Receipt
Proper disposal of waste materials and unserviceable school maximized the use of their (PAR).
properties, if any. supplies as per their
 School sites ownership documents, updated documents, if PPPMP  Summary of submitted required reports (with date submitted)
any 4 – 90-99.99% of teachers from the Division Supply/Property Unit.
 And others and school head in the
school maximized the use ● Report of waste materials (RWM)
of their supplies as per ● Inventory & Inventory of Unserviceable Property (IIRUP)
their PPPMP
3– 80-89.99% of teachers  List (from the Division Engineer) of schools who submitted their
and school head in the school site document.
school maximized the use
of their supplies as per
their PPPMP
2 – 70-79.99% of teachers
and school head in the
school maximized the use
of their supplies as per
their PPPMP
1 – 69.99% and below of
teachers and school head
in the school maximized
the use of their supplies as
per their PPPMP

Page 14 of 15
 5 - Required reports were
submitted 3 days before
the deadline
4 - Required reports were
submitted 2 days before
the deadline
3 - Required reports were
submitted 1 day before
the deadline
2 - Required reports were
submitted on the deadline
1 - Required reports were
submitted a day or more
days after the deadline.
2. Managed the utilization of MOOE and Program Funds Quality:
with the following: 5 – Achieved 5 or more
FOR NON-IUs indicators
 School APP was prepared and approved by January of the 4 – Achieved 4 indicators
calendar year 3 – Achieved 3 indicators
 Monthly Liquidation reports are submitted to the Division 2 – Achieved 2 indicators
Office on a timely basis 1 – Achieved 1 indicator
 All procurement using MOOE and Program Funds conform to Efficiency:
the provision of Republic Act 9184 5 – 95-100%
 Actual utilization of MOOE and program funds are posted in implementation of
the Transparency board that must be publicly accessible and activities based on Annual
updated Implementation Plan
 Monthly liquidation of MOOE is 75% and above except 4 – 85-94.99%
December which is 100%. Program Funds are 100% liquidated implementation of
as of December 31. activities based on Annual
 Report on MOOE and Program Funds are formally Implementation Plan
communicated/presented to stakeholders through the School 3 – 75-84.99%
Report Card implementation of
For Implementing Units activities based on Annual
 School APP was prepared and approved by January of the Implementation Plan
calendar year 2 – 65-74.99%
 All procurement using MOOE and Program Funds conform to Implementation of
* Inventory of submitted and approved APP-CSE for 2019 and 2020 (c/o
Supply Office) and ( Inventory of submitted, reviewed and approved
APP-regular and AIP for 2019 and 2020 c/o SGOD-EF Section)
FOR QUALITY:
 List of submitted PPMP and APP with dates of submission, Copy
of modified APP (if any), List of supplemental APP for Program
Funds such as SBFP, Gulayan, Clean Up funds
 Consolidated Status Report of MOOE downloading and
Liquidation, Monitoring of Cash Advances of the Accounting
Unit
 Copy of designation of BAC, Minutes of BAC meetings,
Certification from the bookkeeper that procured goods and
services are in the APP
 Monthly report of Bookkeeper on checking of Transparency
Board (to be supported by report of PSDS)
 Consolidated Status Report on MOOE downloading and
Liquidation, Monitoring of Cash Advances of the Accounting unit
 Copy of School Report Card and proof of
communication/presentation to the stakeholders
 List of submitted PPMP and APP with dates of submission, Copy
of modified APP (if any),List of supplemental APP for Program
Funds such as SBFP, Gulayan, Clean Up funds

Page 15 of 15
 the provision of Republic Act 9184 activities based on 
Copy of designation of BAC, Minutes of BAC meetings,
 Actual utilization of MOOE and program funds are posted in 1 – 64.99% and below Certification from the bookkeeper that procured goods and
the Transparency board that must be publicly accessible and implemented activities services are in the APP
updated were based on AIP and APP  Report of the PSDS on transparency board
 Disbursement rate at the end of the fiscal year is 100%. (Cash  Budget and Financial Accountability Reports as of December 31,
based budgeting) Timeliness: 2019)
 Cash advances for program funds, including SHS MOOE are 5 – 100% submission of  Consolidated Report on Cash Advances prepared by the
fully liquidated at the end of the year monthly financial reports accounting unit
 All financial reports are submitted to the Division Office and 4 – 90-99% submission of  Report on submission of BFARs and Status of MOOE utilization to
COA on a timely basis monthly financial reports the Division Office (c/o Budget Officer and Accountant),
3–80-89% submission of Summary of submission of financial reports to DBM and COA
monthly financial reports (c/o bookkeeper), with copy of transmittals
2–70-79% submission of FOR EFFICIENCY:
monthly financial reports * AIP Monitoring & Evaluation report
1–1-69% submission of * Minutes of conducted AIP review and assessment
monthly financial reports FOR TIMELINESS:
 Consolidated Status Report on MOOE downloading and
Liquidation (FOR Non IUs)
 Report on submission of BFARs and Status of MOOE utilization to
the Division Office (c/o Budget Officer and Accountant),
Summary of submission of financial reports to DBM and COA
(c/o bookkeeper), with copy of transmittals (For IUs)
3. Managed funds from Other sources such as Income 5– Attained 5 indicators  Copy of Report on sources, intended use and actual utilization of
Generating Projects, Special Education Fund (SEF), 4– Attained 4 indicators funds
funding support from local stakeholders, Donations in 3– Attained 3 indicators  Copy of School Report Card, evidence of
Cash or in Kind, prizes and other sources, (per DepEd 2– Attained 2 indicators communicating/presenting to stakeholders
Order No. 008, s. 2019, part VI) 1– Attained 1 indicators  Evidence when reports were posted in the transparency board
 Report on sources, intended use and actual utilization of  Copy of designation of BAC, Minutes of BAC meetings,
funds from other sources are prepared and submitted by Certification from the bookkeeper that procured goods and
the school services are in the APP
 Report on Other funds (sources and uses) are formally  Copy of report on donations in kind
communicated/presented to stakeholders through the
School Report Card
 Report on Other Funds (sources and uses) are posted in
the transparency board
 All procurement using other funds conform to the
Page 16 of 15
 provisions of Republic Act 9184
 Details on quantity and description of donations in kind
are presented in the report.

KRA 5. SCHOOL COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP

Objectives Performance Indicators Means of Verification (MOVs)

Resourcing: 5- Engaged partners for financial/in-kind/manpower  MOA/ MOU, Letter of

support in the conduct of 5 and above PPAs of the Request/ Resolution, Deed of
5.a. Engaged all possible partners for financial/in-kind/manpower
school Donation, Deed of
support of the identified programs, projects, and activities of the
Acceptance/
school: 4- Engaged partners for financial/in-kind/manpower  Acknowledgement letters /
support in the conduct of 4 PPAs of the school photocopy of awards given to
a. Brigada Eskwela;
3- Engaged partners for financial/in-kind/manpower partners
b. Curricular Activities in any of the different subject areas  BE awardees may only submit
support in the conduct of 3 PPAs of the school
c. Co-curricular Activities e.g. Journalism, Technolympics, Scouting and Brigada Eskwela Division
2- Engaged partners for financial/in-kind/manpower Certificate of Participation/
Sports (at least three)
support in the conduct of 2 PPAs of the school Recognition
d. Health and nutrition programs;
1- Engaged partners for financial/in-kind/manpower
e. DRRM measures; support in the conduct of 1 PPA of the school

f. Maintenance of Discipline and the like

g. IPEd Activities

k. Work Immersion

l. OTHERS
Sustaining Partnership 5- Achieved all 5 indicators and exceeded targets  Certificates/Designations
from partners assigning
5.b. Actively participated in the programs, projects, and activities of
them as chairman/member
partners like the LGUs, NGAs, NGOs, private sectors, and others as a
4- Achieved 4 indicators  Program paper / letter of
way of sustaining productive partnership: invitation / attendance
a. BLGU/MLGU/PLGU Activities like assemblies, clean-up drives, sheet / minutes of meeting

Page 17 of 15
 foundation days, fiestas and others; 3- Achieved 3 indicators

b. Religious activities

c. Participation to educational and other related activities of NGOs/ 2- Achieved 2 indicators

NGAs/ CSOs or other institutions

d. Chairmanship/membership of teachers/SHs in the conduct of PPAs of

1- Achieved 1 indicator
partners

e. Other activities that promote, build or sustain partnerships, please

specify

f. OTHERS

Advocacy 5- achieved all 5 indicators and exceeded targets  School publication for the
current School Year
5.c. Utilized all forms of media for information education campaign/
information dissemination of all school PPAs to internal and external
4- achieved 4 indicators
stakeholders through the following :
 Printed screen shots of
a. Articles published in the school publication/organ/ newsletter; uploaded advocacy materials in
3- achieved 3 indicators the social media
b. Advocacy materials uploaded in the social media;

c. Articles published in newspapers;

2- achieved 2 indicators
d. Certification of broadcast from any radio stations;

e. Posters and other forms of advocacy materials, including

documented texts with responses 1- achieved 1 indicator
f. included in the School Report Card;

g. Minutes of Meetings with Stakeholders;

h. Screenshots of text messages to stakeholders;

i.. OTHERS

Page 18 of 15
Please review and comment on the following:

1. Have we achieved our goal of lessening the MOVs but retaining the quality?
2. What else can we change and / or improve?
3. Will these make our school heads focused and guided?

Submit your comments by tomorrow to be finalized. Thank you. Ai

Page 19 of 15