Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Exam Output
Final Exam Output
APPENDIX K
Guidelines and Mechanics for the Group Learning Portfolio
I. Rationale:
Read the ‘signs of times’ which are stuffed with change and implicating the moral,
social, and religious engagement – Gaudium et Spes #4-10
II. Theme:
“Pamanuli king Kalikasang Kayapan”
(A Return to Natural Goodness)
IV. Goals
Long Term Goal
To develop the sense of volunteerism and leadership of the students through
active social participation by providing them simple but basic handlings, which
will be useful both in their personal and communal growth in the society.
o Objectives
At the end of the semester, the students should be able to:
1. Explain how the environmental issues correlates with social, moral,
economic, and religious issues through the Green Theology Conference
as expressed in written reflection.
2. Formulate personal and group manifesto on environment that is
correlated with other social, moral, religious issues integrating the
objective moral values taught by the Catholic Church.
3. Implement a socially relevant apostolate and advocacies for
countryside development.
4. Develop a team learning portfolio that effectively summarizes all the
significant learning from the service learning
5. Perform a team oral presentation demonstrating an appreciation to the
highlights of the Service Learning experience.
0
Theology 102 ADVOCACY Program Concept Paper
1. The class will be divided according to their pre-established small groupings which
composed of a minimum of 5 members and a maximum of 7.
2. Each group will be encouraged to practice the designed common project for the
advocacy. However, each group will be required to decide for its specific details.
COMMON PROJECT will be the collection of plastic bottles [or other materials] in
their respective community which they could sell to junk shops. The earned money
from selling the bottles can be saved and be donated either to the Calamity fund
(c/o OCES Department) or Share a meal program (c/o OSA). The group may
decide for the frequency of remittance (this should be stipulated in the concept
paper). Also the receipt for the remittance should be kept for the purposes of
documentation in the portfolio.
a. Basic details for consideration:
i. How many bottles can the group members commit to collect per week?
ii. How would be the arrangement for the selling of the collected items to the
junk shops?
iii. To which office (OCES or OSA) do they wish to donate their proceeds?
iv. How frequent would the remittance be (e.g. weekly, twice a month, monthly,
or by the end of the advocacy duration)?
3. Aside from the common project, each group should have to decide for an additional
project which will be implemented simultaneously with the common project. The
additional project will form secondary part of the group manifesto.
4. After the presentation of the group manifesto, the group can already begin the
actual implementation.
5. The implementation of the advocacy projects should as much as possible avoid
risky or dangerous areas and methods, meaning this should be a part of the
ordinary practices but making it extra-ordinary through its faithful and sincere
abidance to the simple protocols of life which we often tend to neglect.
6. The official simple but extra-ordinary implementation of the advocacy projects
begins December while February 25 to March 8, 2019 is reserved for full blast
apostolate and/or development of the portfolio.
7. March 11-15, 2019 will be the group oral presentation of the accomplishments in
the advocacy project.
1
Theology 102 ADVOCACY Program Concept Paper
4. We are promoting active social participation not only for the sake of compliance to
the subject.
What are the expected outcomes from the advocacy project reflected on the
group learning portfolio?
The advocacy program expects to produce an output of group learning portfolio
indicating the following outcomes:
1. Stewardship;
2. Compassion; and
3. Social Conscience.
How is the portfolio to be evaluated?
The learning portfolio will be graded using the rubric below.
2
Theology 102 ADVOCACY Program Concept Paper
________________________________________
Name over signature of Theology Professor