Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Total bay length 44m Live load on the sloping roof is = 750 – 20(α -10) N/m2
PEB roof slope 5.710 Therefore live load on purlins at 1.26 spacing
E. Earthquake Load
IV. LOAD CALCULATIONS
Earthquake loads are calculated as per IS: 1893-2000 [17].
C. Dead Load
Earthquake Load on Conventional Steel Building:
Dead load is calculated According to IS: 875 (Part 1) –
Dead load = 0.256 kN/m2
1987[15].
Live load = 0.128 kN/m2 (25٪ of reduction as per IS 1893-
Dead Load on Conventional Steel Building:
2002)
Weight of the G.I sheeting = 0.131 kN/m2
Total load = DL+LL = 0.384 kN/m2
Weight of fixings = 0.025 kN/m2
Bay width of the building is 4 m
Weight of services = 0.1 kN/m2
Therefore earthquake load on rafter = 0.384 × 4 = 1.538
Total weight = 0.256 kN/m2 kN/m.
F. Wind Load
Basic Wind speed Vb = 50 m/sec Fig.3 Bending moments and Reactions at Supports
Risk Coefficient K1 = 1
Topography factor K3 = 1
F = (Cpe – Cpi) x A x P
QUANTITY (Tonnes)
120
100
80
60
40
20
Fig.6 Bending moments and Reactions at mid-span of Rafters 0
VII. DISCUSSION
to its light weight structure (Purlins & Rafters) when users a much more economical and better solution for long
compared to that in CSB with concrete columns and span structures where large column free areas are needed.
steel columns (9.94 kN & 14.544 kN).
In Rafters at mid-span, the Axial force in PEB REFERENCES
(46.794 kN) is less when compared to that in CSB [1] Aijaz Ahmad Zende, Prof. A. V. Kulkarni, Aslam Hutagia,
with concrete columns and steel columns (135.335 “Comparative Study of Analysis and Design of Pre-Engineered-
kN & 178.16 kN). Shear force in PEB (59.685 kN) Buildings and Conventional Frames”, IOSR journal of mechanical
is more when compared to that in CSB with concrete and civil engineering, Volume 5, Issue 1, Jan.- Feb. 2013, pp 32-
43.
columns and steel columns (1.426 kN & 1.61 kN). [2] Bhavikatti S.S, “Design of steel structures by limit state method as
The Bending Moments in PEB (154.293 kN) is more per IS 800-2007”, I.K.International publishing house Pvt.Ltd. New
due to its light weight structure (Tapered Sections) Delhi, (2010).
when compared to that in CSB with concrete [3] Darshana P.Zoad, “Evaluation of Pre-Engineering Structure
Design by IS-800 as against Pre-Engineering Structure Design by
columns and steel columns (1.447 kN & 1.959 kN). AISC”, International Journal of Engineering Research and
In Rafters at Ends, the Axial force in PEB (34.226 technology (IJERT), Volume-1, issue 5, July 2012.
kN) is less when compared to that in CSB with [4] Duggal S.K, “Limit State Design of steel Structural” Tata
McGraw Hill education private limited, New Delhi, (2010).
concrete columns and steel columns (121.66 kN &
[5] Jatin D.Thakar, P.G. Patel, “Comparative Study Of Pre-
160.158 kN). Shear force in PEB (110.039 kN) is Engineered Steel Structure by varying width of Structure”,
less when compared to that in CSB with concrete International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology,
columns and steel columns (9.129 kN & 10.306 kN). Volume IV, Issue III, Sept 2013, pp 56-62.
[6] Meera C.M, “Pre-Engineered Building Design of an Industrial
The Bending Moments in PEB (252.821 kN) is more
Warehouse”, International journal of Engineering Sciences and
when compared to that in CSB with concrete Emerging Technologies, Volume 5, Issue 2, June – 2013, pp: 75-
columns and steel columns (9.94 kN & 13.456 kN). 82.
In Rafters at Ridge portion, the Axial force in PEB [7] Parth Thakker “Conventional steel buildings v/s Pre-engineered
buildings”.
(52.435 kN) is less when compared to that in CSB [8] Shiyekar. M.R, “Limit State Design in Structural Steel”, PHI
with concrete columns and steel columns (102.817 learning private limited, New Delhi (2011).
kN & 135.352 kN). Shear force in PEB (41.016 kN) [9] Subramanian. N, “Pre- Engineered buildings selection of framing
is less when compared to that in CSB with concrete system, roofing and wall materials” The Master builder, July,
2008, pp 48-62.
columns and steel columns (12.567 kN & 14.187 [10] Subramanian N, “Design of steel structures”, Oxford higher
kN). The Bending Moments in PEB (166.829 kN) is education, Chennai (2008).
more when compared to that in CSB with concrete [11] Syed Firoz et al, “Design concept of Pre Engineered Building”,
columns and steel columns (2.993 kN & 4.052 kN). International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA), Vol. 2, Issue 2, April 2012, pp.267-272.
VIII. CONCLUSION [12] Vrushali Bahadure, R.V.R.K.Prasad “Comparison between Design
and Analysis of various Configuration of Industrial Sheds”,
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
This paper effectively conveys that PEB structures can be easily
(IJERA), Vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan.-Feb 2013, pp: 1565-1568.
designed by simple design procedures in accordance with
country standards. Low weight flexible frames of PEB offer [13] Zamil steel, “Technical Manual” January 1999.
higher resistance to earthquake loads. PEB roof structure is [14] IS 800, “General construct in steel – code of practice” Bureau of
Indian standards, New Delhi, (2007).
almost 26% lighter than Conventional Steel Building. In [15] IS 875 (part 1) “Code of practice for design loads (other than
secondary members, light weight “Z” purlins are used for PEB earthquake) for building and structures”, dead loads, New Delhi,
structure, whereas heavier hot-rolled sections are used for CSB. 1987.
Support reactions for PEB are lesser than CSB as per analysis. [16] IS 875 (part 2) “Code of practice for design loads (other than
earthquake) for building and structures”, Imposed loads, New Delhi,
Light weight foundation can be adopted for PEB which leads to 1987.
simplicity in design and reduction in cost of construction of [17] IS 875 (part 3) “Code of practice for design loads (other than
foundation. Heavy foundation will be required for CSB structure. earthquake) for building and structures”, wind loads, New Delhi, 1987.
PEB building cost is 30% lesser than the cost of CSB structure.
PEB offers low cost, strength, durability, design flexibility,
adaptability and recyclability. To conclude “Pre-Engineered
Building construction gives end