Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Absorption Processes
Prashant Patil
Supervisor:
Dr. Megan Jobson
2005 Process Integration Research Consortium
1 Introduction
2 Model development
3 Superstructure development
4 Flowsheet synthesis and design
5 Conclusions and future work
MAKE UP
GAS OUT OFF GASES
ABSORPTION DESORPTION
GAS IN LEAN
SOLVENT
Test case: Gas sweetening - removal of acid gases (CO2, H2S) from
natural gas, fuel gas etc. aqueous amine solution
1
Feed conditions specified
A = L / KV At average conditions equilibrium constant is
calculated
Effective absorption factor(A) is calculated
N-1 based on this information
N Simple relationship calculates outlet vapour
Feed Gas Liquid Product and liquid compositions given effective
VN+1, yN+1 LN, xN absorption factor
Strengths
Easy to use
Almost no computational time
* Seader and Henley, Separation Process Principles, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.
B - basic block
S - rigorously modelled stage
Equilibrium
Basic block calculations
Step 2
VN,i Calculate non-key component flowrates using Kremser group method at average
N temperature and column pressure conditons
FN,i
Feed gas Liquid out Step 3
Solve non-equilibrium relations and mass balances for key components (see next
V1,i - key component flowrate in slide)
vapour phase leaving first stage
1 Krishna and Taylor, Multicomponent mass transfer, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 1993
B1
S1
J B2
K S2
B3
L
S3
B4
Equilibrium relation
li, j v i, j
ηi,jK i, j − + (1 − ηi, j ) = 0 i = 1,.....,NC j = 1,.....,NS Calculations at
li,j v i, j Update
i i
basic block calculations
Heat balance
FHF,j − HL, j li,j − HV, j v i, j + HV, j+1 v i, j+1 + HL, j−1 v i, j−1 = 0 Mass, equilibrium and heat balances at
i i i i
interfacing stages
i = 1,....,NC j = 1,....,NS
Satisfy all
Model calculations in basic block are same equations
as before No
Yes
Nomenclature: Solution
NC - number of components
NS - number of interfacing stages
v, l,f - component flowrate for vapour, liquid and feed
H - enthalpy
K - equilibrium constant
5
13
7
Feed Gas Rich Absorbent
Plant data*
CO2 (mole %) in Feed Gas 3.08
H2S (mole %) in Feed Gas 0.31
Feed Gas temperature (°C) 15.6
Absorbent inlet temperature (°C) 26.1
Amine (wt %) in Absorbent 32.4
Feed Gas pressure (bar) 27.1
Absorbent flow rate (m3/h) 15.9
Fraction fed to tray 1 0.39
Fraction fed to tray 7 0.61
* MacKenzie et al, Design and operation of a selective sweetening plant using MDEA, Energy Progress, 7, 31-36, 1987
Condenser stage
Feed stage
Reboiler stage
Desorption column
* MacKenzie et al, Design and operation of a selective sweetening plant using MDEA, Energy Progress, 7, 31-36, 1987
Semi
- Regenerator
lean Absorber
section
Sour
gas Lean solution
Strengths of model
• Model is computationally efficient, so suitable for flowsheet synthesis, design
and analysis purposes
• Number of variables is reduced considerably compared to rigorous stage by
stage equilibrium model
Flash
Heat integration
• Various streams needs cooling and heating
• Heat integration can reduce energy demand
- considered during, not after, flowsheet design
- pinch analysis allows minimum utility requirement to be
determined
• Extra capital cost
Other options
• Intermediate draws
• Heat recovery
Optimal flowsheet
Simulator Evaluate
Simulates a specified structure
• Material balances (A) objective (B) constraints
• Energy balances
Step II
Optimal solution
P4-41 Design and Synthesis of Chemical Absorption Processes
Perturbation moves
Heat
Absorber exchanger Regenerator
Bounds on variables
Optimisation variable Lower bound Upper bound
Absorption draw fraction 0 0.8
Desorption draw fraction 0 0.4
Split fractions of the stream entering at top stage of 0.7,0, 0 1.0,0.5, 0.5
the absorption column
Split fractions of the stream entering at first stage 0, 0, 0 1.0, 1.0, 1.0
of the absorption column
Split fractions of the stream entering at second 0, 0, 0 1.0, 1.0, 1.0
stage of the absorption column
Absorption column section stages 3, 3, 3, 3 7, 7, 7, 7
Desorption column section stages 3, 3 13, 13
Solvent circulation rate (kmol/hr) 3500 4500
Boil-up ratio 0.16 0.35
Absorption feed temperature (oC) 25 45
Desorption feed temperature (oC) 95 105
Heat
Semi-lean amine Integration
Desorber
Absorber
Feed
gas Rich amine
Lean amine
Base Optimised
case value
Total hot utility (kW) 7160 2193
Over 50% reduction in
Total cold utility (kW) 14204 13629
overall operating cost
Number of stages in absorption column 20 21
Number of stages in desorption column 20 20
Overall operating cost (M$ / yr) 0.68 0.31
H2S composition in sweet gas (ppm) 3.5 3.4
Sweet
gas
Acid
gases
Absorption
column Regeneration
Column
Semi-
lean
amine
Rich amine
Gas
Feed Lean amine
Absorber Desorption
Heat exchanger
Bulk absorption
with less
concentration
solvent
Feed gas Rich Lean Amine
Amine
Base case = 3.5 ppm H2S in outlet gas Optimised case = 3.4 ppm
Base case = 1.18 · 106 $/yr Annualised cost Optimised case = 0.71 · 106 $/yr
Heat
Absorber exchanger Regenerator
Problem -
Feed gas specification has changed for CO2 gas from 3.5% to
4.8% and thus sale gas specifications are not met.
* base case from Pakistan Petroleum Limited.
P4-50 Design and Synthesis of Chemical Absorption Processes
Case study 2: Feed and operating conditions
Absorption column Desorption column
* Malik, Z., VLE modelling for retrofit of gas sweetening units, MSc thesis, University of Manchester, 2005
P4-51 Design and Synthesis of Chemical Absorption Processes
Case study 2: comparison of model results
# calculated.
* load = moles of acid gas per moles of amine
Optimisation results
Optimisation variable Base Optimised
case value
Solvent feed temperature (oC) 55.7 50.5
Gas feed temperature (oC) 43.9 36.0
Amine concentration (wt %) 36.0 39.8
Absorption feed split 1 1.0 0.10
Absorption feed split 2 0.0 0.35
Absorption feed split 3 0.0 0.55
CO2 in treated gas (mol %) 2.8 2.2
6 0.35
10
Heat
Absorber 0.55 exchanger Regenerator