CHIR13009- Professional Chiropractic Practice -2

ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING

SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete)

Name: Natalie Short Due date:
SID:
SUBMISSION DETAILS (student to complete) Submission for unit/course: CHIR13008
First
Name: marker:
Natalie Short Second marker:
Due date:
SID: S0292612 Submission for unit/course: CHIR13008
First marker: Second marker:

ASSESSMENT 1- PORTFOLIO MARKING RUBRIC & FEEDBACK

MARKING EXCELLENT VERY GOOD ABOVE AVERAGE PASS BORDERLINE FAIL

DOMAIN (100-85%) (84-75%) (74-65%) (64-50%) (49-45%) (< 45%)

COMPLETION
OF  Some minor omissions were noted  Some considerable omissions were  Some significant omissions were  A majority of elements in the
 All assessment preparation tasks
in the assessment preparation task noted in the assessment preparation noted in the assessment assessment preparation task were  Assessment preparation tasks were
ASSESSMENT were fully completed and accurately
but were submitted in a timely task but were submitted in a timely preparation task but was submitted missing and submitted after due not completed or submitted
TASKS submitted in a timely manner
manner manner after due date date

(5 MARKS)

 Language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  Language used almost never
 Language used always supported  Rarely did the language support the
supported the self-reflective used supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective supported the self-reflective
the self-reflective learning process self-reflective learning process
learning process learning process learning process learning process
GRAMMAR &  The language used always  Rarely did the language used
 The language used almost always  In a majority of instances, the language  The language used sometimes  The language used almost never
demonstrated candour and demonstrate candour and
LANGUAGE demonstrated candour and used always demonstrated candour demonstrated candour and demonstrated candour and
intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
intellectual honesty with respect to and intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to intellectual honesty with respect to
the chosen topics the chosen topics
(5 MARKS)  All portfolio topics were written the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics the chosen topics
 Only elements of the portfolio
 Most portfolio topics were written  The majority of portfolio topics were  Only some of the portfolio topics  All of the portfolio topics included
without any grammatical or spelling topics were written without any
without any grammatical or spelling written without any grammatical or were written without any significant grammatical or spelling
errors grammatical or spelling errors
errors spelling errors grammatical or spelling errors errors

 The level of knowledge was always
appropriate for the year of study
engaged. The reflective process, as
a vehicle for change, was always
apparent throughout the portfolio
CRITICAL SELF-  The student clearly demonstrated
REFLECTION an appreciation of the nuances
AND LOGIC relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and
clearly embedded their newly
(15 MARKS)
discovered understanding.
 The student was always successful
in putting forward an argument that
was logical, underpinned by good
evidence, and well-reasoned
 There were ample references, or
REFERENCING external resources, to support the
& THE USE OF entire portfolio
ADDITIONAL  All references fully adhered to the
prescribed style guide
EXTERNAL
 All references were from recognised
REFERENCES
and well-respected journals and
OR RESOURCES
were PubMed indexed
 The supporting material was always
(15 MARKS) well referenced and followed the
prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was developed
GENERAL to an exemplary level and was very
COMPOSITION easy to navigate through and use
& OVERALL  The hyperlinks (if used) were all
functional and/or relevant to the
WRITTEN
topic at hand
PRESENTATION  The learner has demonstrated a
commendable sense of ownership
with respect to the material
(10 MARKS) presented
 There were demonstrations of
exemplary levels of critical self-
reflection in almost all parts of the
portfolio
 always appropriate for the year of
study engaged. The reflective
process, as a vehicle for change,
was almost always apparent
throughout the portfolio
 The student mostly demonstrated
an appreciation of the nuances
relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and in
most occasions embedded their
newly discovered understanding
within their written reflections
 The student was in most cases
successful in putting forward an
argument that was logical and well-
reasoned
 There were ample references, or
external resources, to support most
of the portfolio
 Most references fully adhered to the
prescribed style guide
 Most references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
 The supporting material almost
always strengthened the points
being made in the portfolio
 The supporting material was almost
always well referenced and followed
the prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was developed
to an exemplary level and was
somewhat easy to navigate through
and use
 The hyperlinks (if used) were mostly
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
 The learner has demonstrated a
notable sense of ownership with
respect to the material presented
 There were demonstrations of
exemplary levels of critical self-
reflection throughout a most part of
the portfolio.
 The level of reflection was usually
appropriate for the year of study
engaged. The reflective process, as a
vehicle for change, was mostly
apparent throughout the portfolio
 The student somewhat demonstrated
an appreciation of the nuances relating
to their chosen clinical/professional
topics and in the majority of cases
embedded their newly discovered
understanding within their written
reflections
 The student was successful in putting
forward an argument that was logical
or well-reasoned in a majority of cases
 There were ample references, or
external resources, to support the slight
majority of the portfolio
 The majority of references fully adhered  Some of the references adhered to
to the prescribed style guide
 The majority of references were from
recognised and well-respected journals
and were PubMed indexed
 The supporting material in the majority  The supporting material on
of times some-what strengthened the
points being made in the portfolio
 In the majority of times, the supporting  The supporting material was
material was well referenced and
followed the prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was developed to
an above average level and was
somewhat easy to navigate through
and use
 The hyperlinks (if used) were all
functional and/or relevant to the topic
at hand in a majority of instances
 The learner has demonstrated an above
average sense of ownership with
respect to the material presented
 There were demonstrations of
exemplary levels of critical self-
reflection in some parts of the
portfolio
 The level of reflection was
occasionally appropriate for the
year of study engaged. The
reflective process, as a vehicle for
change, was occasionally apparent
throughout the portfolio
 The student somewhat
demonstrated an appreciation of
the nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and on
occasion embedded their newly
discovered understanding within
their written reflections
 The student was occasionally
successful in putting forward an
argument that was logical and/or
well-reasoned
 There were ample references, or
external resources, to support some
of the portfolio
the prescribed style guide
 Only some references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
occasion strengthened the points
being made in the portfolio
occasionally well referenced and
followed the prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was developed
to an adequate level and was on
occasion easy to navigate through
and use
 The hyperlinks (if used) were
occasionally functional and/or
relevant to the topic at hand
 The learner has demonstrated a
satisfactory sense of ownership with
respect to the material presented
 There were infrequent
demonstrations of exemplary levels
of critical self-reflection in the
portfolio
 The level of reflection was rarely
appropriate for the year of study
engaged. The reflective process, as
a vehicle for change, was
infrequently apparent throughout
the portfolio
 The student generally failed to
demonstrate an appreciation of the
nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics, but
attempted to embed their
understanding within their written
reflections
 The student was seldom successful
in putting forward an argument that
was logical and/or well-reasoned
 There were very few references, or
external resources, to support the
portfolio
 Only a few references adhered to
the prescribed style guide
 Only a few references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals and were PubMed indexed
 The supporting material rarely
strengthened the points being
made in the portfolio
 The supporting material was rarely
well referenced and did not follow
the prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was developed
to a below average level and was
difficult to navigate through and use
 The hyperlinks (if used) were rarely
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
 The learner has demonstrated a
below average sense of ownership
with respect to the material
presented
 There was no evidence of exemplary
levels of critical self-reflection in the
portfolio
 The level of reflection was not
appropriate for the year of study
engaged. The reflective process, as
a vehicle for change, was not
apparent throughout the portfolio
 The student clearly demonstrated a
lack of understanding of the
nuances relating to their chosen
clinical/professional topics and
failed to embed their newly
discovered understanding within
their written reflections
 The student did not put forward an
argument that was logical and/or
well-reasoned
 There were not any references, or
external resources that supported
the portfolio
 None of the references adhered to
the prescribed style guide
 None of the references were from
recognised and well-respected
journals or PubMed indexed
 The supporting material failed to
add much to the points being made
in the portfolio
 The supporting material was not
well referenced and did not follow
the prescribed style guide
 Overall the portfolio was very poorly
developed and was very difficult to
navigate through and use
 The hyperlinks (if used) were never
functional and/or relevant to the
topic at hand
 The learner has demonstrated a
very poor sense of ownership with
respect to the material presented
 ADDITIONAL
FOCUSED
FEEDBACK

Markers to FINAL
FIRST SECOND
DOMAINS AGREED
complete MARKER MARKER
MARK
1. COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS (5)

2. GRAMMAR & LANGUAGE (5)

3. CRITICAL SELF-REFLECTION AND LOGIC (15)

4. REFERENCING & THE USE OF ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL REFERENCES OR RESOURCES (15)

5. GENERAL COMPOSITION & OVERALL WRITTEN PRESENTATION (10)

TOTAL ( /50)