You are on page 1of 9

1.

Insurance defined: agreement to indemnify another the burden is upon him to establish the amnt of
against LOSS, DAMAGE OR LIABILITY arising from such loss. [*APPLICABLE TO PROP
unknown or contingent event. INSURANCE EX CREDITOR INSURING THE
LIFE OF HIS DEBTOR]
2. Characteristics: f. Consensual (relate with Cognition Theory)- IC
is consensual and is therefore perfected the
a. Risk-distribution device – serve to distribute the moment there is a meeting of the minds with
risk of economic loss among as many as respect to the object and the
possible to those who are subject to the same cause/consideration. GR= the insured is the
kind of risk. By paying a pre-determined amount one making the offer by submitting an
into a general fund out of wc payment will be application to the insurer and the latter accepts
made for an eco loss. the offer by approving the application. The mere
b. Aleatory – obli of the insurer to pay the submission of the app w/o the corresponding
proceeds of the insurance arises only upon the approval doesn’t result in the perfection of the
happening of the event wc is uncertain or wc is IC.2
to occur at a certain time.  Thus, acceptance made by letter shall not
c. Contract of Adhesion or Fine Print Rule – most bind the person making the offer ex from the
of the terms of the contract doesn’t result from time it came to his knowledge.3
mutual nego between the parties as they’re g. *Personal – each party having in view the
prescribed by the insurer in printed form to wc character, credit and conduct of the other.4
the insured adhere if he chooses but wc he cant
change. [GR= IN CASE OF DOUBT THE K 3. Elements: in add to consent, object and
SHALL BE INTERPRETED AGAINST THE cause/consideration: [PARIS]
INSURER AND LIBERALLY IN FAVOR OF a. Insurable Interest 5 - the insured has an
THE INSURED1] insurable interest in the life/thing insured.
d. Uberrimae Fides Contract – utmost good faith. b. Risk of Loss 6 - the happening of designated
It req the parties to the K of Insurance to events, either unknown or contingent, past or
disclose conditions affecting the risk of wc he’s future, will subject such interest to some kind of
aware or the material facts.
e. Contract of Indemnity – the insured who has 2 Great Pacific Life Assurance Co. v CA.
3
insurable interest over a prp is only entitled to Enriquez v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada.
4 p. 22, De Leon & De Leon, Jr., Insurance Code (2014); p. 80, Reviewer on
recover the amount of actual loss sustained and
Commercial Law, Sundianag & Aquino.
5 Sec. 12-14, ICP.
1 6 Sec. 51 (f), ICP.
Rizal Surety and Insurance Co. v. CA.

1
loss, whether in the form of injury, damage or amount of the insurance merely represents the
liability. insurer’s max liability.12
c. Assumption of Risks7 - insurer assumes such. b. Valued – definite valuation is agreed upon by
d. Scheme to Distribute losses - is part of a both parties and written on the face of the
general scheme to distribute the loss among a policy.13
large number of persons exposed to similar c. Running – successive insurances and wc
risks. provides that the subject of the policy may from
e. Payment of Premiums 8- consideration for the time to time be defined.14
insurer’s promise to undertake the RoL.
NB: LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES ARE ALWAYS VALUED
4. Insurance Policy – the written instrument where POLICIES.
terms/condition of IC is set forth9.
 Need not be signed by the insured EX when express 6. Types of Insurance Contracts
warranties are contained in separate docs, part of the a. LIFE
policy. i. Group – a blanket policy covering a
 Such isn’t necessary for the perfection of the K. number of individuals. Its most common
however, the law provides that no policy of insurance form is an insurance that provides
shall be issued or delivered unless in the form life/health insurance coverage for the
previously approved by the Insurance Commission.10 Ees of a single Er.15
 The Code doesn’t provide for prescribed forms but ii. Industrial – a form of life insurance
requires certain provisions to be included in the under wc the premiums are payable
policy.11 either monthly or oftener, if the face
amount of insurance provided in any
5. Kinds of Policy policy isn’t more than 500x that of the
a. Open – value of the thing not agreed upon but current statutory min. wage in the city of
left to be ascertained at time of lost. The manila and if the words “industrial”
policy are printed upon the policy as part
of the descriptive matter.16

7 Sec. 2, ICP.
8 12
Sec. 77, ICP; Philamcare Health Systems, Inc. v. CA; Gulf Resorts, Inc. v. Sec. 60, ICP.
13
Phil Charter Insurance Corp.) Sec. 61, ICP.
9 Sec. 49, ICP. 14 Sec. 62, ICP.
10 Sec. 232, ICP. 15 Pineda v. CA.
11 Sec. 233-237, ICP. 16 Sec. 235, ICP.

2
iii. Endowment - is a life insurance and will not be avoided until the interest in the
contract designed to pay a lump sum thing and the interest in the insurance are
amount after a specific term (on its vested in the same person.19
‘maturity’) or on death. i. GR: the mere transfer of the thing
NB: if insured outlives the period, the insured doesn’t transfer the policy but
face value of the policy is paid to him; if suspends it until the same person
not, his beneficiaries the receive benefit. becomes the owner of both policy and
b. NON-LIFE the thing insured.20 The term “change in
i. Marine interest” in this section means absolute
ii. Fire transfer of the property insured such as
iii. Accident conveyance of the property insured by
iv. Medical/Health means of absolute deed of sale.
c. SURETYSHIP  RATIO: Insurance contract is a personal (remember).
 Surety/Bond – a contract w/ indemnity agreement.  NB: A lessor can’t demand payment of the insurance
o Fidelity Bond – contract of insurance against proceeds from the insurer. Lessor cant be validly a
loss from misconduct. beneficiary of the fire insurance policy cause he didn’t
o Fidelity Guaranty Insurance – a contract have insurable interest over the goods. The automatic
whereby one for a consideration, agrees to assignment of the policy to the lessor (where failure to
indemnify the assured against loss arising from obtain to consent of the Lor by the Lee to insure the
the want of integrity, fidelity or honesty of Ees leased property) under the provision of the lease
or other persons holding positions of trust. contract is void for being contrary to law and/or public
policy.21
7. TRANSFER OF POLICY ii. EX:
a. Life insurance can be transferred even w/o 1. Life, health and accident
consent of insured. insurance.22
i. EX: when notice to an insurer is 2. Change of interest in the thing
required in the policy.17 insured occurs after the injury wc
b. On the other hand, in property insurance results in a loss.23
consent of insurer is required.18
c. If the property insurance is transferred w/o
19
consent of the insurer, the policy is suspended Sec.20, ICP.
20 Sec.20, ICP.
21 Cha v. CA, 1997.
17 22 Sec. 20, ICP
Sec.185, ICP.
18 23 Sec. 21, ICP
Sec. 184, ICP.

3
 RATIO: after the loss of the thing happens, the liability a. Insurers who are duly authorized by the
of the insurer becomes fixed. Hence, the insured can Insurance Commish may be28 –
assign his claim against the insurer as any other i. Partnership
money claim. ii. Association
3. Change of interest in one or iii. Corporation
more of several things iv. Cooperatives
separately insured by one v. Foreign Insurance Corp.
policy.24 1. Appointment of resident agent in
 RATIO: the contract is divisible. the Phil
4. Change of interest by will or 2. Posses paid-up unimpaired
succession on the death of the assets/capital and reserve not
insured.25 less than P1Bil
 RATIO: no new party was introduced into the co- 3. Dep to the Commish for the
ownership and what the law dictates is the transfer of benefit and security of
the interest/ownership to a stranger or non-original policyholders
party to the contract of insurance. 4. Investment shouldn’t exceed
20% of the net worth of the
5. Change of interest by 1 or foreign corp or 20% of the capital
several partners, joint owners or of the registered enterprise.
owners in common who are  NB: An individual can’t be an insurer anymore.29
jointly insured to the other.26  NB: Must obtain a Certificate of Authority before it can
transact any insurance business in the Phil.30
6. When a policy is so framed that
it will inure to the benefit of b. Insured are persons w/ the capacity to contract
whomever, during the and having an insurable interest in the life or
continuance of the risk, may prop of the insured
become the owner of the interest i. A public enemy can’t be insured. With
insured.27 respect to corp., the nationality is
8. PARTIES

24 Sec. 22, ICP


25 28
Sec. 23, ICP Sec.6, 190-193, ICP.
26 Sec. 24, ICP 29 RA 10607.
27 Sec.57, ICP. 30 Sec.193, ICP.

4
determined by the controlling SHs is irrevocable. The irrevocable B
irrespective of the place of corp.31 has a vested right.35
ii. Minors can’t enter into insurance 2. If the insured refuses to pay the
contract and under the NCC, a contract premiums, the designated
entered into bet a minor and capacitated irrevocable B may continue the
person is considered voidable. policy by paying premiums that
iii. Spouse’s consent isn’t necessary for the are due.36
validity of an insurance policy taken out iii. EX to the EX: innocent sps may revoke
by a married person on the life of other the designation of the guilty sps as
persons other than life of the spouses irrevocable B after Annulment, Nullity, or
themselves or his/her children. LegSep.37
iv. All rights, titles and interest in the policy
of insurance taken out by an orig owner b. GR: Insured may designate anyone as B under
on the life/health of the person insured a Life Insurance. EX:
shall automatically vest in the latter i. Concubine/paramour
upon death of the orig owner unless 1. Conviction condition precedent
others provided for in the policy.32 isn’t req.
2. The designation of the illegit
9. BENEFICIARY children as B in the deceased
a. Not a party but entitled to insurance proceeds. father’s insurance policy is valid.
i. GR: the designation is revocable Under the existing law, there’s
1. If there’s no waiver under no legal proscription in
sec.181, assignment of the designating the children of illicit
policy may be deemed as relationships by the insured.38
implied revocation.33 ii. Those specified under art.739 and 2012
ii. EX: right to revoke is expressly waived iii. Bet. Persons found guilty of the same
in the policy34 crim offense
1. The insured can’t assign the
policy if the designation of the B
31 35
Filipinas Compañia de Seguros v. Christern Huenfeld and Co., 1951. p.97, Reviewer on Commercial Law by Jose R. Sundiang, Sr. and Timoteo
32 Sec.3, ICP. B. Aquino, Seventh Ed. 2014.
33 p.97, Reviewer on Commercial Law by Jose R. Sundiang, Sr. and Timoteo 36 Ibid.
37 Art.43(4); Art.50; Art.64, NCC.
B. Aquino, Seventh Ed. 2014.
34 Sec.11, ICP. 38 Heirs of Loreto Maramag v. Maramag, June 5, 2009.

5
iv. Made to a public officer or his accordance w/ the policy contract. If the policy
wife/descendant/ascendant by reason of contract is silent, the proceeds shall be paid to
his office. the estate of the insured.41 EX:
 Ratio: a life insurance policy is no different from a i. Accidental killing
donation insofar as the B is concerned. A B is like a ii. Self-defense
done cause from the premiums of the policy wc the iii. B was insane at the time he killed
insured pays out of liberality, the B will receive the insured.
proceeds of the insurance.39  NB: the insurer isn’t liable for a loss caused by the
 NB: the designation of persons mentioned in Art.739 is willful act/thru connivance of the insured.42
void but the policy is binding. The estate will get the f. Effects of annulment/legsep (or nullity) – no
proceeds.40 effect as to designation of B in the policy.
i. EX: if the guilty sps is the designated
c. A person may take out life insurance and make irrevocable B, the innocent sps may still
it payable to whomsoever he pleases revoke such by operation of law.43
regardless of the B’s lack of insurable interest.
i. On the other hand, if a person will insure 10. INSURABLE INTEREST
the life of another payable to himself he a. The relation, connection or concern in a
must have insurable interest on the life person/prop that the insured will derive
of the person whose life he is insuring. pecuniary benefit/advantage for its preservation
and suffers pecuniary loss/dmg from its
d. GR: In Property Insurance, the B must have destruction, injury/death by the happening of
insurable interest on the prop. event insured against.44
b. GR: in the absence of insurable interest, the
e. GR: If the B caused the willful killing of the person w/o interest on the subject matter
insured whether as a P/Accom/Access, the insured would be gambling or would be entering
interest of the B in the policy shall be forfeited. into a wagering contract wc is void for illegality.
The share forfeited shall pass on to the other c. EX: Life Insurance.
Bs, unless otherwise DQ. In the absence of i. GR: Insurable interest must exist only at
other Bs, the proceeds shall be pain in the of perfection of the Contract.45
41 Sec.12, ICP; see also Heirs of Maramag v. Maramag, supra.
39 42
The Insular Life Assurance Co. v. Ebrado, 1977. Sec.89, ICP.
40 p.96, Reviewer on Commercial Law by Jose R. Sundiang, Sr. and Timoteo 43 Supra, Note 33.
44 Lalican v. Insular Life Insurance Co., Ltd., August 25, 2009.
B. Aquino, Seventh Ed. 2014.
45 Sec.19, ICP.

6
ii. EX: ii. nieces/nephew
1. Taken by the creditor on the life iii. uncles/aunts
of the debtor, the C is req to iv. Stepchildren/pare
have an insurable interest not nts
only at the time of the perfection v. Engaged couples
but also at the time of the D’s vi. Cohabitees.
death;
2. Insurance taken by the Er on the  NB: insurable interest in life/health must exist and
life of the Ee.46 prove the relationship DURING THE PERFECTION OF
THE CONTRACT or WHEN THE INSURANCE TAKES
d. 2 general classes of Life Policies (Insurance) EFFECT. Subsequent events, such as legal separation
i. Insurance upon one’s life (cestui que of the sps, after such perfection doesn’t change the
vie) fact that the insured may claim from the insurer.
1. Unlimited insurable interest  NB: on the above statement, if the claimant is the B, he
ii. Insurance upon life of another – the B doesn’t need to have an insurable interest and as long
must have an insurable interest in the as he isn’t a person who is forbidden to receive
life of the insured. donations under the law.
1. Relations by blood or marriage –
any person who provides 2. Business relationships –
education and/or support may be
insured by the person benefitting  Any person so related to another, either by
therefrom. Mere relationship is contract/commercial relation, that a right possessed by
sufficient. him will be extinguished or impaired by the
a. w/ insurable %: death/illness of the other may lawfully procure
i. Husband/wife/chil insurance on the other’s life.
dren  A person may take a policy on the life of his business
ii. Grandparents/chil partner cause the latter’s death may result in an
dren interruption of business operations wc can cause
iii. Bro/sis financial loss.
b. w/o insurable % 3. Creditors –
i. other relatives by
affinity  a C may name himself as B in a policy he takes on the
life of his D. the death of the D may either prevent
46 El Oriente Fabrica de Tabacos, Inc. v. Posadas, September 21, 1931.

7
payment if his estate isn’t sufficient to pay his f. GR: a person has an insurable interest in the
debts/delay such payment if an admin has to be property if he derives benefit/advantage from its
appointed to settle his estate. preservation or would suffer pecuniary loss,
 if the D is the insured and the C is named B, the C will dmg or prejudice by its destruction whether he
be entitled to the whole proceeds of the policy upon the has or has no title, lien or possession of the
D’s death, tho his credit may be much less. prop.48
i. Absence of such will make the property
4. Insurable interest in the life of a insurance void.
person upon wc an estate or g. The ins-int must exist when the insurance takes
interest depends on – effect AND when the loss occurs.
h. Ins-Int of Mgor-Mgee:
e. Property Insurance – consist of47: i. Mgor – (owner) extent of the value of
i. Existing interest – legal or equitable. the prop. The L/D of the prop insured
E.G.: shall not extinguish the mortgage debt.
1. Trustee (legal) EX:
2. Mortgagor (legal) 1. Loan on Bottomry
3. Lessor (legal) 2. Respondentia loan
4. Purchaser before delivery of the
thing (equitable) ii. Mgee – extent of the debt.
5. Mortgagee (equitable) i. Standard/union mortgage clause
6. Mortgagor after foreclosure but i. Subsequent acts of the Mgor cant affect
before expiration of the rights of the Mgee
RedemPeriod (equitable) ii. Reason: it’s as if the insurer made a
new and independent contract w/ the
ii. Inchoate interest founded on an existing Mgee
interest j. Open/Loss Payable mortgage clause
i. Acts of the Mgor affect the Mgee
iii. Expectancy coupled w/ an existing ii. Reason: Mgor doesn’t cease to be a
interest in that out of wc the expectancy party to the contract.49
arises.

48 Filipino Merchants Insurance, Inc. v. CA; see also Gaisano Cagayan, Inc.
v. Insurance Company of North America, June 8, 2006.
47 49 Sec.8-9, ICP.
Sec.14, ICP.

8
9

You might also like