You are on page 1of 19

GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 1 of 19

GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work


Practice (SWP)
Document Number: CD # UPS-US-SW-GOM-HSE-DOC-00678-2

GoM Director Ops


Document Authority: Document Custodian: GoM CoW Authority
and OMS
GoM H&S Document
Scope: GoM H&S Doc Admin:
Management Administrator
Issue Date: 06/12/08 Issuing Dept: GoM H&S
Revision Date: 10/15/12 Control Tier: 2 – GoM H&S
3.1 Risk Assessment and
Next Review Date: 03/01/15 OMS Element:
Management

1 Purpose/Scope
This Safe Work Practice (SWP) details the prerequisites and guidelines for the planning and execution of
Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) to ensure the safety of personnel and protection of equipment and
the environment.
SIMOPS shall be defined as conducting independent operations in which the events of any one operation
may impact the safety of personnel or equipment or the environment of another operation. Typically this
involves production operations, drilling operations, and project execution operations, but may include any
incidence where concurrent operations create risk.
The SIMOPS prerequisites and guidelines detailed below apply to all operations in the GoM. This
includes but is not limited to: topsides, subsea, drilling, completion, well work, construction, marine, and
pipeline or production activities. This includes activities not only onboard a producing facility but any
simultaneous operations that occur field- or lease-wide.

2 Key Responsibilities
Proper coordination, communication and control are critical to the safe conduct of SIMOPS.

3 General Requirements
It is the intent of these guidelines to establish procedures for planning and coordination and outline rules
to ensure that SIMOPS are conducted without incident.

3.1 Field SIMOPS Plan


Each field in the GoM shall have an approved field SIMOPS plan. A "field" is defined as any BP-operated
developing or producing operation. SIMOPS plans may be required for operations outside of a field
where SIMOPS risks exist between concurrent operations.
This document should be kept evergreen and shall include:
• Field description or project area description (including all fixed obstructions, infrastructure, and
bathymetry)
• A field SIMOPS matrix (see Appendix B in this chapter for definitions of some example areas this
should cover) that includes pre-risk assessed activities (see Appendix C in this chapter for an
example matrix)
• Organization and Roles and Responsibilities
• Daily communications process specifying time and participants; the daily written report requirements
and distribution must also be defined

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 2 of 19

• Key contact information


The plan shall include or reference existing procedures for:
• Description of emergencies and All Stop Criteria
• Emergency Response and Incident Notification Procedure
• Identification of Health, Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE) plan. If a contractor plan is being
used, a bridging document must exist that reconciles the BP and contractor GoM HSE policies.
• Identification of Control of Work processes, including MOCs for change-out of key personnel
The plan should consider additional resources that may be required based on field activity complexity,
such as a dedicated SIMOPS coordinator.
The field SIMOPS plan shall be in compliance with the BSEE, Coast Guard, BSEE approved Deep Water
Operations Plan (DWOP) and class regulations.
Any deviation from or changes to an approved SIMOPS plan requires Management of Change with
appropriate Line and Technical Authority sign-off. This should include the SIMOPS plan signature
authority and should be communicated and understood by all affected parties (see Section 4.4.2).
Everyone has the duty to stop the job at any time the SIMOPS plan is not, or cannot be followed, or at
any time the SIMOPS plan is not clear.
The appropriate Vice President or Area Operations Manager is accountable for ensuring this field
SIMOPS plan is kept up to date and is the highest level of sign-off. This should be a controlled document
stored in the appropriate document management database.

3.2 Adding an Activity to the Field SIMOPS Plan


For each new activity which involves field SIMOPS the following documents are required:
• Work plan/pack and detailed procedure
• Risk assessment of that procedure, including risk assessment of SIMOPS
• A reference document that addresses the requirements outlined in Section 3.1 above with particular
emphasis on roles and accountabilities

3.3 Development of Field SIMOPS Plan

Roles Responsibilities

Vice President or Area • Ensures that the field has a SIMOPS Plan
Operations Manager • Final level of approval for the field SIMOPS plan
Operations Support • Accountable for additional activity approval
Lead or Equivalent • Field SIMOPS plan preparation
Offshore Installation • Accountable for field SIMOPS plan content
Manager
Project Manager • Accountable for their project's additional activity SIMOPS requirements
(per Section 3.2) to supplement the field SIMOPS plan
• Act as integrator, working with the Activity Person in Charge (see
Section 3.4) to ensure planned activities are aligned with the field
SIMOPS plan in advance
• Ensure planned field activities are included in the Integrated Field
Planning (IFP) process

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 3 of 19

3.4 Execution of SIMOPS Plan

Each field shall appoint a field SIMOPS team. The field SIMOPS team shall include at a minimum the
following individual roles and responsibilities

Roles Responsibilities
Vice President or Area • Ensures field SIMOPS plan is followed and is working
Operations Manager
Operations Support Lead • Accountable for allocating adequate resources to support the field
or Equivalent SIMOPS plan
OIM/Field Person-In- The Field Person-in-Charge (FPIC) is the BP Offshore Installation Manager
Charge (FPIC) (OIM) unless otherwise stated. This individual is accountable for execution
of the field SIMOPS plan and will have complete control to determine
which operation or phase of work has precedence at any given time. The
FPIC shall communicate daily with the Activity Person(s)-in-Charge (APIC)
with respect to field SIMOPS activity. The FPIC or designee shall
communicate with each Vessel Person(s)-in-Charge (VPIC) upon entry and
departure from the particular field
• Accountable for execution of the field SIMOPS plan
• Ensures that all key stakeholders (rig, vessel and facilities) are briefed
and engaged, including contractors. Must have broad communications
across the crews and shifts
• Monitor daily field SIMOPS activity
• Chair daily field SIMOPS review(s) (daily call)
• Evaluate the risk of planned simultaneous operations and ensure
mitigation plans are in place
Project Manager • Facilitate the briefing and engagement of key stakeholders, including
contractors, and report back to the OIM for approval that engagement
has been adequate
Activity Person-in-Charge The individual accountable for executing a specific defined activity. The
(APIC) APIC shall communicate with the FPIC with respect to field SIMOPS
activity. When a marine vessel/unit is a component of the activity, the APIC
shall also be accountable for vessel coordination. The APIC shall
communicate with the respective VPIC with respect to executing the
marine activity. Examples of potential APICs are a Operations Support
Lead or Equivalent, Well Site Leader or BP Representative on a vessel
When a single vessel is performing the activity, the APIC may assume the
additional accountabilities of the VPIC.
• Monitor daily SIMOPS activity
• Facilitate daily activity SIMOPS review(s)
• Attend daily field SIMOPS review(s)
• Ensure that risks associated with the planned operations are
understood and communicated to the FPIC
• Accountable for executing a specific defined activity. When a marine
vessel/unit is a component of the activity, the APIC shall also be
accountable for vessel coordination
Vessel Person-in-Charge The individual aboard the vessel accountable for executing that specific
(VPIC) vessel's activity under the direction of the APIC. The VPIC shall

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 4 of 19

Roles Responsibilities
communicate with the APIC with respect to activity SIMOPS. The VPIC
shall communicate with the FPIC prior to entry, upon entry and upon
departure from the particular field. The VPIC shall also be accountable for
monitoring onboard vessel SIMOPS and identifying and reporting any
SIMOPS activity that may impact the vessel's ability to perform the
intended work scope (activity). In some circumstances the FPIC and APIC
can be the same person; and the APIC and VPIC can be the same person.
Examples of potential VPICs are a Well Site Leader, BP Representative on
a vessel, MODU OIM, Captain, Mate or Dynamic Position Operator
• Monitor daily vessel SIMOPS activity
• Facilitate daily vessel SIMOPS review(s)
• Attend daily activity SIMOPS review(s)
• Attend daily field SIMOPS review(s) - upon request
• Execute specific vessel activity under the direction of the APIC
Officer-in-Charge The Officer in Charge of the navigational watch is the master's
representative and is primarily responsible at all times for the safe
navigation of the vessel. Examples of potential Officers in Charge are a
MODU OIM, Captain, Mate or Dynamic Position Operator
Field SIMOPS The FSC, if needed as an additional resource, shall provide support to the
Coordinator OIM and field SIMOPS team. Depending on the complexity of the activity
(FSC) set, the FPIC and asset management may determine a dedicated FSC is
required

4 General Procedure

4.1 Identify Scope of SIMOPS Activity


Each asset must have a process in place to clearly define a detailed work scope of the field SIMOPS
activity to allow for an appropriate level risk assessment to be performed. The scope must be defined
early enough so that the activity risk assessment can be referenced against the asset's scheduled work
activities to ensure any known SIMOPS conflicts are addressed. The Integrated Field Planning (IFP)
process may be utilized to satisfy the criteria and timescale for this advance notice requirement. A typical
SIMOPS process flow chart is shown in Appendix D.

4.2 Risk Assessment


An appropriate level risk assessment should be conducted and should include known SIMOPS risks by
referencing the published field activity schedule. Some key SIMOPS risks would include dropped objects,
vessel collision, aviation, construction (including subsea) diving, DP failure, and loss of containment of
hydrocarbons. (Refer to Appendix E in this SWP for an example of a dropped objects prevention and
mitigation plan checklist.)
A daily risk assessment discussion should also take place as part of the 24 hour look ahead during the
daily SIMOPS meeting.
Additionally, a SIMOPS matrix (BP) or equivalent tool to evaluate risks shall exist for each SIMOPS plan.

4.3 Risk Mitigation


For risks identified in risk assessments, mitigation controls should be identified and put into place. Clearly
defined All Stop Criteria (with defined approval authorities) should also be outlined as part of the risk
mitigation process. In addition to mitigation controls resulting from risk assessments such as the

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 5 of 19

Dropped Objects Study, the field SIMOPS plan shall include a process to mitigate risk on a daily basis. If
additional risks are identified during the established, daily communications forum, mitigation controls
must be executed before the activity can commence or continue. Identification of these mitigation
controls may require a separate discussion outside of the daily communication forum.

4.4 Communication/Training of Field SIMOPS Plan and Activity Specific Information


No activity should take place prior to approval of the SIMOPS plan and appropriate communication and
training. The field SIMOPS plan shall be reviewed with all project manager(s), the Operations Support
Lead or Equivalent and the appropriate APICs and FPICs prior to execution of any SIMOPS activities. The
field SIMOPS plan shall be inclusive of any activity specific information as defined in Section 3.1. The
review of the plan shall be completed as early as necessary to allow for a clear understanding of the risks
and mitigation controls. If multiple shifts or crews will be engaged in this SIMOPS activity, then more
than one review may be required to cover all crews/shifts.

4.4.1 Communication during Execution of SIMOPS Activity Plan


During the execution of the field SIMOPS plan for a SIMOPS activity, daily routine verbal and written
communication must occur as defined in the plan. Participants should ensure all work groups clearly
understand the scope of work that is forecast for the next 24 hours with an emphasis on SIMOPS risk
mitigation. Ensure standing orders are in place for non-routine communications and provide clear
instructions as to when to notify the FPIC.

4.4.2 Changes to Work Scope


Stop the job, assess the risks, and initiate an MOC, if required, for all changes in work scope after the
activity risk assessment and approved mitigation controls have been established.

4.5 Drilling, Completion, Remedial Rig Operations, or Well Maintenance near


Producing Infrastructure

4.5.1 Potential Undesirable Events and Mitigation


Well control is a primary concern during these operations. If there is difficulty in maintaining well control
(e.g., unexpected pressures, gas cut mud, lost circulation, etc.), joint communications shall occur with all
parties (production, drilling, etc.) to determine if production operations should be shut in. Well control
procedures should be followed carefully.
Note: First priority must be given to controlling the well and to the safety of the personnel on board.
The greatest well control hazard is wellbore intersection with a producing well. Prior directional planning
is intended to avoid this interference. The plan should be reviewed by the appropriate individuals (Wells
Manager, Wells Program Manager, etc.).
Critical areas of SIMOPS are defined as areas in which explosive or ignitable mixtures are present or
potentially present due to the release of flammable gases or vapors. During simultaneous operations,
care shall be taken to avoid potential sources of ignition and damage to equipment in such areas. Critical
areas include the wellheads, mud tanks and pumps, shale shaker, degasser, de-sander, producing wells,
and all equipment for field processing of oil and gas.

4.5.2 Regulatory Requirements


In addition to the above general requirements, the BSEE has specific requirements for conducting rig
operations in close proximity to production facilities and other hazards.
The regulation at 30 CFR 250.406 requires the shut-in of all producible wells located in the affected well
bay below the surface and at the wellhead when (1) a drilling rig or related equipment is moved on or off
a platform, (2) a drilling unit is moved or skid between wells on a platform, or (3) a mobile offshore drilling

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 6 of 19

unit (MODU) is moved within 500 feet of a platform. You may resume production once the MODU is in
place, secured, and ready to begin drilling operations.
The Appendices to the Rig Move NTL No. 2004-G09 provide guidance on how to comply with 30 CFR
250.406. They describe the various types of rigs and phases of rig movement, specify when wells must
be shut in, and delineate the documentation to be submitted to the appropriate BSEE Gulf of Mexico
OCS Region (GOMR) District Office to obtain approval for a departure under 30 CFR 250.142.
The Shallow Hazards NTL No. 2007-G01 includes requirements for moving rigs near pipelines and other
seafloor hazards. This includes onsite preparation and rig move requirements.

4.5.3 BP Requirements
BP's Global Drilling and Well Operations Policy has specific requirements for conducting risk
assessments prior to moving a rig onto an offshore location, conducting risk assessments for
simultaneous operations and collision avoidance while drilling on multi-well locations.

4.6 Marine
SIMOPS involving marine vessels/units shall be managed consistent with the field SIMOPS plan.

4.6.1 Identify Activity


The field SIMOPS plan shall contain or reference a process for identifying and monitoring marine activity.

4.6.2 Risk Assessment (Identify and Evaluate Risks)


Collision is the primary SIMOPS marine risk. Any marine vessel/unit operating less than 500 meters from
another marine vessel/unit or hazard to navigation shall be deemed a marine risk. Circumstances that
may contribute to collision risk are vessel traffic density, environmental conditions (visibility, sea state,
wind, and current), navigational aids status, vessel maneuvering characteristics and capabilities,
temporary measures in effect, vessel position reference systems, acoustic management, vessel defects
and other special circumstances. Details on marine SIMOPS guidance can be found in Appendix G in
this SWP.

4.7 Subsea Operations


Subsea operations may be conducted in the field to support any one of the following activities:
construction, production, drilling, and seabed surveys. Each has a unique set of risks (e.g. collision,
dropped object) to be managed via a SIMOPS plan.

4.7.1 ROV Activities


Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) may be deployed from any one of the production facilities, Mobile
Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs) or in-field vessels and could be in support of production optimization
(valve operation), inspection, repair, or component replacement, maintenance and underwater
construction. Typically this will be carried out at seabed facilities, risers, pipelines, dynamic umbilicals,
moorings, floating hulls and jackets.

4.7.2 Diving Activities


Diving activities typically are required only for critical maintenance and inspection of near-surface facilities
such as jacket structures, sea chest valves, and riser porches. In addition to compliance with the field
SIMOPS plan, to manage risk, diving operations will be performed in strict compliance with BP GoM
Diving Procedures.

4.7.3 Underwater Construction Activities


This includes installation and recovery of risers, manifolds, pipelines, trees, flow line jumpers, umbilicals
and associated sub-structures. This may be performed from and with a range of facilities and techniques.

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 7 of 19

4.7.4 Survey Activities


Surveys may be performed at the seabed typically by a number of vessel surface supported techniques,
such as seismic, core sampling, route corridor surveys and metrology. In addition to ROVs, there are
circumstances where non-surface connected autonomous ROVs may be deployed to carry out such
functions.

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 8 of 19

5 Appendices, Key Documents, Tools, References

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 9 of 19

Appendix A:

SIMOPS Acronyms List

Acronym Definition
AOM Area Operations Manager
APIC Activity Person In Charge
BOP Blow Out Preventer
CDP Company Designated Person
D&C Drilling and Completions
DP Dynamic Positioning
DWOP BSEE-approved Deepwater Operations Plan
FPIC Field Person In Charge
FSC Field SIMOPS Coordinator
HAZID Hazard Identification
HAZOP Hazard and Operability Study
HSSE Health, Safety, Security, Environment
IFP Integrated Field Planning
JSEA/RA Job Safety and Environmental Analysis/Risk Assessment
MASP Maximum Anticipated Surface Pressure
MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit
OIM Offshore Installation Manager
OM Operations Manager
PIC Person in Charge
PM Project Manager
POB Personnel on Board
PTW Permit to Work
ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle
RP Recommended Practice
SCR Steel Catenary Riser
SCSSV Surface Controlled Subsurface Safety Valve
SIMOPS Simultaneous Operations
SWP Safe Work Practice
TBD To Be Determined
USCG United States Coast Guard
VMS Vessel Management System
VPIC Vessel Person In Charge
VRP Vessel Response Plan (Coast Guard-related)

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 10 of 19

Appendix B:

Typical SIMOPS Activity Definitions

Activity Definition
Boat alongside Platform operations include offloading and back
Boat Operations
loading of cargo or bulk material from workboat.
Movement of BOP(s), BOP equipment over well slots, hydrocarbon
BOP Lifting/Handling
piping, flexible flowlines and hoses.
Bulk Methanol/Diesel Operations that include moving these flammable fluids through a
Transfer hose.

Coiled Tubing Any entry into a well with coiled tubing.


Operations
Coiled Tubing Work done as part of the drilling/completion or workover operation
(through rotary) (from Rig Floor).

Completion Operations Workover rig and drilling rig activities.


Personnel working in confined spaces where insufficient oxygen,
toxic or combustible gases may be present. Any space enclosed or
Confined Space Entry
partially enclosed area, either above or below deck with limited
access.
Equipment installation, removal or modification, repairs to processing
systems, pipelines or the platform structure; and crane lifts
considered as “heavy lifts” per BSEE or the Crane Operation
Construction Operations
Maintenance Program or any equipment or materials that could
penetrate a deck plate if dropped while over wells and production
equipment.
Any cold work or construction/repair activities with contract crews.
Cold Construction
Installation of equipment not requiring opening of vessels or welding,
Operations
etc.
Excess Casing Pressure
Pressure on A or B annulus in excess of 20% of design pressure.
(Operations)
Time period when barge moves to a position where a decision is
made to shut down operations and/or begins to make lifts toward the
platform, until lift is set and lifting equipment is away from the
Derrick Barge (Lifting)
platform. Period could start when the barge approaches the platform
if there is some other need to apply restrictions, such as excessive
flare radiation.
Diving to inspect or do maintenance whether from the facility or
Diving another vessel. Non-ROV.

Drilling in unfamiliar areas where you have no past experience in


Drilling (unknown area)
formation, pressures or hole trends.
Drilling in known area. Drilling in hole section with known/expected
Drilling in Reservoir
hydrocarbons.
Drilling operations conducted without a riser installed between the
Drilling Riserless
wellhead and the surface facility.

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 11 of 19

Activity Definition
Explosives above Electro-explosive devices (detonators) in wireline operations;
Mudline perforators, pipe cutters, severing tools and string shot (back-off).
Fire and Gas / ESD Fire and gas system and/or Emergency Shut Down (ESD) inoperable
Inoperable or placed out of service.
Depressurization or venting of process vessel or compressors via
Flaring
flare system.
Heavy lifts over production equipment includes Platform cranes or
from a barge/workboat. Platform crane lifts which exceed 75% of
Heavy Lifts (Platform,
rated load limit, at a given angle, are considered heavy lifts. Heavy
Crane) Over Live
lifts by platform cranes require that wells, pressurized lines, and
Production Equipment
production facilities located in the path of heavy lifts be shut-in if not
protected by solid steel decking.
Hot work is defined as any activity, which generates a spark, flame or
other ignition source under normal conditions. Welding in any
Hot Work (Outside
location of the platform other than the designated safe welding area.
Designated Areas)
Most likely includes major/minor construction projects and includes
safety work plans with OIM approval.
Hull Internal Inspection Entry in hull below water-tight doors.
Open Hydrocarbon Open vessels, piping open to atmosphere prior to positive isolation
Systems and purging.
Work outside handrails, over open area or water. Work within green
Over side Work
tagged scaffolding is NOT considered over side work.
Painting and coating at offshore location and discharge regulations
Painting/Coating
also apply.
Work associated with loading, running and retrieving a pig out of an
Pigging (Export Lines)
export pipeline.
Any and all activity related to pipeline operations, with operations
including all pipelines in the area, BP operated or third party
Pipeline Operations operated. The pipeline includes risers, SCRs, PLETS, Wye Sleds,
Subsea Tie-ins, Launchers, Receivers and other pipeline
appurtenances for the transportation of oil, gas and products.
Pressure testing during drilling operations involving BOPs and casing.
Pressure Testing Also, involving a lubricator, BOPs and grease injection head, or a
(BOP, Casing, etc.) shooting nipple, i.e., pressure control equipment during any wireline
work.
Production Operations Flowing of any well, except as part of a back surge.
Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) activity in controlled area of the
ROV Activity
field.
Running Riser Running of outer production riser or drill riser.
Any time wells are shut in due to heavy lifts in the well bay or for
hurricane evacuation, the SSVs, manual masters and the SCSSVs will
Securing Wells
be closed. Once the wells are shut in, the umbilicals and flowlines
need to be bled down.
Skidding Drill Rig Movement of rig or major components on the deck of the facility.
Snubbing Operations associated with well control or production
Snubbing Live Well
operations. A formal detailed prognosis will be developed and

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 12 of 19

Activity Definition
outlined for each snubbing operation. Snubbing operations concerns
are pollution and uncontrolled well flow.
Unloading of Well, start up/clean up prior to directing well to normal
Well Clean-Up
flow path.
Well control conditions and the corrective actions necessary to
Well Control
maintain proper well control. Any time primary well control is lost
(Drilling)
either downhole or at surface.
Well Control Abnormal well control conditions and the corrective actions
(producing) necessary to maintain well control on Producing Well.
Well Stimulation Work done as part of the drilling/completion/workover operations.
(through Rotary)
Wellbore Proximity Conducting drilling operations where there is potential for
(Collision) intersection with an existing wellbore.
Wire line electrical or slick line on producing well. Work not done as
Wireline
part of the drilling/completion or workover operation. (Not done from
(Production Operations)
rig floor).

Wireline electrical or slickline through rotary. Electric or slickline


Wireline (Rig Operations)
operations from the rig floor.

A conventional or concentric workover activity when performing


Workover Operations
remedial work on any wells.

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 13 of 19

Appendix C:
Example SIMOPS Matrix (Atlantis)

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 1 of 19

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 1 of 19

Appendix D:SIMOPS Process Flow Chart

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 2 of 19

Appendix E:
Dropped Objects Plan Guidance

Severe damage to subsea infrastructure is a major concern due to dropped objects as well as damage
due to BOP lift-off and well-to-well BOP moves.
A Dropped Objects Prevention and Mitigation Plan must be developed to ensure infrastructure is
protected and that there is a contingency plan in effect should there be a dropped objects incident.
The Dropped Objects Prevention and Mitigation Plan typically should include:
 Actions following a dropped object incident
 Preemptive production shut-in:
 During special deployments and recoveries if winch or crane systems are in use
 During open water works
 During seabed construction activities
 During BOP well-to-well move
 During tie-in of wells and infrastructure
 Where the system may be exposed to only one barrier between hydrocarbon production and the
environment
 Production equipment maintenance
 Well intervention
 Other activities considered risky and outside the planned activities
 Emergency production shut-in using an emergency shut-in system
 Dropped load during vessel-to-vessel transfer
 Dropped load during a load deployment or recovery with a winch or drill pipe

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 3 of 19

Appendix G:
Marine SIMOPS Risk Management

Acoustic Management Plan Guidance


An acoustic frequency management plan is developed when two or more vessels in the same area are
using acoustics for position referencing, ROV tracking, clump weight tracking and surveying. The plan is
needed to ensure maximum vessel safety and to avoid acoustic disruptions.
The Frequency Management Plan assumes there is no safe distance where acoustics will not interfere. A
typical acoustic frequency management plan will list frequencies in the Medium Frequency (MF) band of
19-kHz to 36-kHz band width where a frequency separation of 500-Hz is used. A 250-Hz separation may
be possible, but opens up the possibility of extensive interference. A separation of 500-Hz is, therefore,
recommended.
A frequency management plan produces a set of compatible channel allocations and guidelines that will
allow each vessel to operate freely and without concern as to the effect their acoustic operations may
have on other vessels nearby. There is no need to enable and disable channels, which improves
efficiency and safety.
A more extensive plan may be developed for multiple vessel and survey operations. Use of a digital
acoustic system opens up to an increased number of safe channels in the MF band. Use of 28 carrier
frequencies combined with 16 codes give 448 unique frequencies, i.e., 224 interrogation and 224 reply
frequencies. This system has little or no affect on any tone-based acoustics, specifically High Precision
Acoustic Positioning (HiPap).
A seismic survey operation generates noise in the water column and may give acoustic disturbance. Any
seismic activity near an area where acoustics are in use needs to be planned. DP operators, in particular,
must be informed of seismic activities to ensure steps are taken during seismic or other acoustic
operations near a dynamically positioned vessel.
Provide Mitigations
The field SIMOPS plan shall include or reference a process to mitigate marine vessel/unit collision risk.
When a Safety Zone is established around a facility, the BP 500 Meter Zone Practice also shall apply.
Every vessel operating in a field shall at all times maintain a proper look-out by sight and by hearing as
well as by all other available means (including radar) appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and
conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of collision. The field SIMOPS
team may monitor vessel traffic if deemed necessary.
Vessel congestion, restricted visibility, adverse weather, or other hazardous circumstances require the
control, supervision, or other management of traffic and communications, including specifying times of
entry, movement, or departure from or within a field.

Nothing in this document or any field SIMOPS plan is intended to relieve any vessel,
owner, operator, charterer, master, or person directing the movement of a vessel from
the consequences of any neglect to comply with any other applicable law or regulation
Note: (e.g., the International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72
COLREGS or the Inland Navigation Rules) or of the neglect of any precaution which
may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances
of the case.

Additional Precautions
 All non-essential activity on the bridge of vessels in close proximity is not allowed.
 Switching between DP station keeping modes shall be avoided in close proximity.

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 4 of 19

BOEMRE 30 CFR Subpart 250


BP Drilling and Wells Operations Directional Survey Handbook

6 Definitions
Term Definition
SIMOPS Conducting independent operations in which the events of any one
operation may impact the safety of personnel or equipment or the
environment of another operation
Marine Activity Any and all activity related to BP's operations and use of floating production
units or vessels whether on the high seas, coastal waters, in harbors or on
inland waterways, including marine terminals
Marine Vessel/Unit A generic term covering all vessels/units engaged in marine activity. Any
vessel designed for the carriage of goods, equipment or people on the high
seas, coastal waters or inland waterways, for the provision of services, or
any offshore facility requiring positive buoyancy
Risk Assessment The process of estimating the likelihood that an incident will occur;
estimating the magnitude of the consequential loss, including the
environmental impact, and making a judgment as to the significance of the
risk. The scale of the risk is a function of both likelihood and consequence.
Refer to Integrity Management Standard Element 3 for further information
on risk assessment methodologies

Revision Log
Revision Date Authority Custodian Revision Details

Reformatted document to meet new GoM


GoM H&S GoM Safety document control template standardization
06/15/2012
Director Programs Lead guidelines. Appendices included in the main
document
Changed Asset Manager references to Area
GoM HSSE
GoM HSSE Operations Managers, Removed OPM
03/01/12 Programs
Director position since all facilities now have OIMS
Manager
only, Changed MMS references to BOEMRE
All corrections made were in Section F,
GoM HSSE
GoM HSSE including adding correct links to Appendices,
07/17/08 Programs
Director deleting out-of-date references, and
Manager
clarifying the titles of some of the references
Key requirement is for each field to have an
GoM HSSE
GoM HSSE approved field SIMOPS plan
06/01/2008 Programs
Director More rigor and guidance for completing a
Manager
SIMOPS plan added

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.
GoM Region Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Safe Work Practice (SWP) Page 5 of 19

Clarified who is in charge when drilling and


operations on same facility. Added example
simops matrices – Atlantis and Na Kika.
S. Garner/
Added SIMOPS – Work Task Definitions.
S. Tink/
02/28/06 Kathy Kanocz Changed CD # from 10074 to UPS-US-SW-
R. DeLeonardis/
GOM-HSE-DOC-00132-2 to conform to new
C. Jackson
numbering nomenclature inside of the new
GoM HSSE doc base. Changed 3 authorities
and 1 custodian.
S. Garner/
Initial issue as controlled document. Prior
B. Herbert/
02/01/02 Ray Britt revision history located in hard-copy
R. White/
consolidated manual.
S. Flynn

Control Tier: 2-GoM H&S Revision Date: 06/15/12


Document Number: UPS-US-SW-GoM-HSE-DOC-00678-2 Print Date: 11/30/2012
PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING.

You might also like