Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practical Use of Entropy
Practical Use of Entropy
Entropy can be used to understand thermodynamic applications from first principles. This tutorial
gives practical examples of how this can be done.
Use the quick links below to take you to the main sections of this tutorial:
Top
The T - S chart is often used to determine the properties of steam during its expansion through a nozzle or an
orifice. The seat of a control valve would be a typical example.
To understand how a T - S chart is applied, it is worth sketching such a chart and plotting the steam properties
at the start condition, reading these from the steam tables.
Example 2.16.1
Steam is expanded from 10 bar a and a dryness fraction of 0.9 to 6 bar a through a nozzle, and no heat is
removed or supplied during this expansion process. Calculate the final condition of the steam at the nozzle
outlet? Specific entropy values quoted are in units of kJ/kg °C.
As no heat is added or removed during the expansion, the process is described as being adiabatic and
isentropic, that is, the entropy does not change. It must still be 6.1413 kJ/kg K at the very moment it passes the
throat of the nozzle.
At the outlet condition of 6 bar a, steam tables state that:
But, in this example, since the total entropy is fixed at 6.1413 kJ/kg K:
By knowing that this process is isentropic, it has been possible to calculate the dryness fraction at the outlet
condition. It is now possible to consider the outlet condition in terms of specific enthalpy (units are in kJ/kg).
It can be seen that the specific enthalpy of the steam has dropped in passing through the nozzle from 2576.25
to 2489.30 kJ/kg, that is, a heat drop of 86.95 kJ/kg.
This seems to contradict the adiabatic principle, which stipulates that no energy is removed from the process.
But, as seen in Tutorial 2.15, the explanation is that the steam at 6 bar a has just passed through the nozzle
throat at high velocity, consequently it has gained kinetic energy. As energy cannot be created or destroyed,
the gain in kinetic energy in the steam is at the expense of its own heat drop.
The above entropy values in Example 2.16.1 can be plotted on a T - S diagram, see Figure 2.16.1.
Fig. 2.16.1
The T - S diagram for Example 2.16.1
It can be further shown that, when incorporating Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat, kinetic energy can be
written as Equation 2.16.1:
Equation 2.16.1
Where:
E = Kinetic energy (kJ)
m = Mass of the fluid (kg)
u = Velocity of the fluid (m/s)
g = Acceleration due to gravity (9.80665 m/s2)
J = Joule's mechanical equivalent of heat (101.972 m kg/kJ)
Equation 2.16.2
For each kilogram of steam, and by using Equation 2.16.2
As the gain in kinetic energy equals the heat drop, the equation can be written as shown by Equation 2.16.3:
Equation 2.16.3
Where:
h = Heat drop in kJ/kg
By calculating the adiabatic heat drop from the initial to the final condition, the velocity of steam can be
calculated at various points along its path; especially at the throat or point of minimum pass area between the
plug and seat in a control valve.
This could be used to calculate the orifice area required to pass a given amount of steam through a control
valve. The pass area will be greatest when the valve is fully open. Likewise, given the valve orifice area, the
maximum flowrate through the valve can be determined at the stipulated pressure drop. See Examples 2.16.2
and 2.16.3 for more details.
Example 2.16.2
Consider the steam conditions in Example 2.16.1 with steam passing through a control valve with an orifice
area of 1 cm2. Calculate the maximum flow of steam under these conditions.
Specific volume of dry saturated steam at 6 bar a (sg) equals 0.3156 m 3/kg.
Specific volume of saturated steam at 6 bar a and a dryness fraction of 0.8718 equals 0.3156 m 3/kg x 0.8718
which equates to 0.2751 m3/kg.
The heat drop in Example 2.16.1 was 86.95 kJ/kg, consequently the velocity can be calculated using Equation
2.16.3:
Equation 2.16.3
Equation 2.16.4
An orifice area of 1 cm2 equals 0.0001 m2
Point of interest
Thermodynamic textbooks will usually quote Equation 2.16.3 in a slightly different way as shown in Equation
2.16.5:
Equation 2.16.5
Where:
u = Velocity of the fluid in m/s
h = Heat drop in J/kg
2 = Constant of proportionality incorporating the gravitational constant 'g'
This velocity is exactly the same as that calculated from Equation 2.16.3, and the user is free to practise either
equation according to preference.
The above calculations in Example 2.16.2 could be carried out for a whole series of reduced pressures, and, if
done, would reveal that the flow of saturated steam through a fixed opening increases quite quickly at first as
the downstream pressure is lowered.
The increases in flow become progressively smaller with equal increments of pressure drops and, with
saturated steam, these increases actually become zero when the downstream pressure is 58% of the absolute
upstream pressure. (If the steam is initially superheated, CPD will occur at just below 55% of the absolute
upstream pressure).
This is known as the 'critical flow' condition and the pressure drop at this point is referred to as critical pressure
drop (CPD). After this point has been reached, any further reduction of downstream pressure will not give any
further increase in mass flow through the opening.
In fact if, for saturated steam, the curves of steam velocity (u) and sonic velocity (s) were drawn for a
convergent nozzle (Figure 2.16.2), it would be found that the curves intersect at the critical pressure. P1 is the
upstream pressure, and P is the pressure at the throat.
Fig. 2.16.2 Steam and acoustic
velocities through a nozzle
The explanation of this, first put forward by Professor Osborne Reynolds (1842 - 1912) of Owens College,
Manchester, UK, is as follows:
Consider steam flowing through a tube or nozzle with a velocity u, and let s be the speed of sound (sonic
velocity) in the steam at any given point, s being a function of the pressure and density of the steam. Then the
velocity with which a disturbance such as, for example, a sudden change of pressure P, will be transmitted
back through the flowing steam will be s - u.
Referring to Figure 2.16.2, let the final pressure P at the nozzle outlet be 0.8 of its inlet pressure P1. Here, as
the sonic velocity s is greater than the steam velocity u, s - u is clearly positive. Any change in the pressure P
would produce a change in the rate of mass flow.
When the pressure P has been reduced to the critical value of 0.58 P1, s - u becomes zero, and any further
reduction of pressure after the throat has no effect on the pressure at the throat or the rate of mass flow.
When the pressure drop across the valve seat is greater than critical pressure drop, the critical velocity at the
throat can be calculated from the heat drop in the steam from the upstream condition to the critical pressure
drop condition, using Equation 2.16.5.
Top
Control valves
The relationship between velocity and mass flow through a restriction such as the orifice in a control valve is
sometimes misunderstood.
For any control valve operating under critical pressure drop conditions, at any reduction in throat area caused
by the valve moving closer to its seat, this constant velocity will mean that the mass flow is simultaneously
reduced in direct proportion to the size of the valve orifice.
It can be seen from Equation 2.16.4 that, under these conditions, if velocity and specific volume are constant,
the mass flowrate through the orifice is directly proportional to the orifice area.
Equation 2.16.4
In this case, Equation 2.16.4 shows that, as the valve closes, a reduction in mass flow is not directly
proportional to the valve orifice, but is also modified by the steam velocity and its specific volume.
Example 2.16.3
Find the critical velocity of the steam at the throat of the control valve for Example 2.16.2, where the initial
condition of the steam is 10 bar a and 90% dry, and assuming the downstream pressure is lowered to 3 bar a.
But as the dryness fraction is 0.8701 at the throat condition:
The velocity of the steam through the throat of the valve can be calculated using Equation 2.16.5:
Equation 2.16.5
The critical velocity occurs at the speed of sound, consequently 430 m/s is the sonic velocity for the Example
2.16.3.
For the reasons mentioned above, valves operating at and greater than critical pressure drop will incur sonic
and supersonic velocities, which will tend to produce noise. As noise is a form of vibration, high levels of noise
will not only cause environmental problems, but may actually cause the valve to fail. This can sometimes have
an important bearing when selecting valves that are expected to operate under critical flow conditions.
It can be seen from previous text that the velocity of steam through control valve orifices will depend on the
application of the valve and the pressure drop across it at any one time.
Perhaps the simplest way to overcome this problem is to reduce the working pressure across the valve. For
instance, where there is a need to reduce pressure, by reducing pressure with two valves instead of one, both
valves can share the total heat drop, and the potential for noise in the pressure reducing station can be
reduced considerably.
Another way to reduce the potential for noise is by increasing the size of the valve body (but retaining the
correct orifice size) to help ensure that the supersonic velocity will have dissipated by the time the flow
impinges upon the valve body wall.
In cases where the potential for noise is extreme, valves fitted with a noise attenuator trim may need to be
used.
Steam velocities in control valve orifices will reach, typically, 500 m/s. Water droplets in the steam will travel at
some slightly lower speed through a valve orifice, but, being incompressible, these droplets will tend to erode
the valve and its seat as they squeeze between the two.
It is always sensible to ensure that steam valves are protected from wet steam by fitting separators or by
providing adequate line drainage upstream of them.
Top
The point is that, during an adiabatic expansion, the steam is accelerating up to high speed in passing through
a restriction, and gaining kinetic energy. To provide this energy, a little of the steam condenses (if saturated
steam), (if superheated, drops in temperature and may condense) providing heat for conversion into kinetic
energy.
If the steam is flowing through a control valve, or a pressure reducing valve, then somewhere downstream of
the valve's seat, the steam is slowed down to something near its initial velocity. The kinetic energy is
destroyed, and must reappear as heat energy that dries out or superheats the steam depending on the
conditions.
The T - S diagram is not at all convenient for showing this effect, but the Mollier diagram (the H - S diagram)
can do so quite clearly.
The Mollier diagram can depict both an isenthalpic expansion as experienced by a control valve, (see Figure
2.15.6) by moving horizontally across the graph to a lower pressure; and an isentropic expansion as
experienced by steam passing through a nozzle, (see Figure 2.15.7) by moving horizontally down to a lower
pressure. In the former, the steam is usually either dried or superheated, in the latter, the steam gets wetter.
This perhaps begs the question, 'How does the steam know if it is to behave in an isenthalpic or isentropic
fashion?' Clearly, as the steam accelerates and rushes through the narrowest part of the restriction (the throat
of a nozzle, or the adjustable gap between the valve and seat in a control valve) it must behave the same in
either case.
The difference is that the steam issuing from a nozzle will next meet a turbine wheel and gladly give up its
kinetic energy to turn the turbine. In fact, a nozzle could be thought of as a device to convert heat energy into
kinetic energy for this very purpose.
In a control valve, instead of doing such work, the steam simply slows down in the valve outlet passages and
its connecting pipework, when the kinetic energy appears as heat energy, and unwittingly goes on its way to
give up this heat at a lower pressure.
It can be seen that both the T - S diagram and H - S diagram have their uses, but neither would have been
possible had the concept of entropy not been utilised.
Top