Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Principals:
1. Those who take a direct part in the execution of the act.
2. Those who directly force or induce others to commit it.
3. Those who cooperate in the commission of the offense by another act without
which it would not have been accomplished.
ACCOMPLICE
1. cooperate in the execution of an offense by previous or simultaneous acts.
2. He intends by said acts to commit or take part in the execution of the crime.
Requisites:
1. Knowing the criminal design of the principal by direct participation, he concurs
with the latter in his purpose.
2. That he cooperates in the execution of the offense by previous or simultaneous
acts, with the intention of supplying material or moral aid in the execution of the
crime in an efficacious way.
3. That there be a relation between the acts done by the principal and those
attributed to the person charged as accomplice.
Being present and giving moral support when a crime is being committed will make a
person responsible only as an accomplice in the crime committed.
Conspirator and accomplices have one thing in common: they know and agree with the
criminal design:
Conspirator : know and decided the criminal intention, decided that the crime should
be committed, authors of the crime.
Accomplice : know the criminal intention after the principals have reached the decision
and only then they agree to cooperate in the execution, do not decide whether the crime
should be committed, they merely assent to plan and cooperate in its accomplishment,
merely instrument who perform act not essential to the perpetration of the offense.
Accessories – accessories are those who, having knowledge (after) of the commission
of the crime, and without having participated therein, either as principals or
accomplices, take part subsequent to its commission in any of the ff. manners:
An accessory does not participate in the criminal design, nor cooperate in the
commission of the crime.
Having knowledge – the accessory must have knowledge of the commission of the
crime, and having that knowledge, he took part subsequent to its commission.
Mere possession of the stolen property does not make the accused an accessory where
the thief was already convicted.
Entertaining suspicion (not knowledge) that a crime has been committed is not enough.
Habitually guilty of some other crime – a person was previously punished three times for
less serious physical injuries and now commits estafa, the one how helps in his escape
is liable as an accessory.
- A mayor who refuse to prosecute offender is accessory.
- One who kept silent with regard to the crime he witnessed is not an
accessory.
- Accessories liability is subordinate and subsequent to that of the principal.
- A conviction of an accessory is possible, even if principal is acquitted when
the said principal is insane or minor.
Only accessories under paragraph 2 and 3 of article 19 are exempt from criminal liability
if they are related to the principals.
Does the concealing of the effects of the crime, not to prevent its discovery, but to
obtain gain, fall under paragraph 2 of article 19? Yes, the act is prompted not by
affection but by a detestable greed.
Liability of a public officer when related to the principal, does not incur any criminal
liability, ties of blood or relationship constitutes a more powerful incentive than the call
of duty.