Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEETING 2
MEETING 4
How can this framework be used for evaluating the effects of a CVI?
What would be the implications of this framework for research into CVI?
What kinds of criticism are possible on this framework?
Research model, including the hypotheses that were and were not confirmed
Research design
To what extent can causal inferences be made based on the research design?
How does the research design relate to Crilly et al.’s framework?
The five dimensions, and the way they affect reputation (visibility, distinctiveness,
authenticity, transparency, and consistency)
How do these findings relate to Fouroudi et al.’s research and Crilly et al.’s framework?
MEETING 5
Brand architecture
Brand relationship spectrum
House of brands
Endorsed brands
Subbrands
Branded house
Considerations in deciding the right position in the brand relationship spectrum
Employee-brand alignment
Relationship between employee-brand alignment and brand evaluations/ brand equity
Differences between familiar and unfamiliar brands
Conceptual fluency
The mediating role of conceptual fluency in the effects of employee-brand alignment
The role of employee authenticity in the effects of employee-brand alignment
Why does employee-band alignment have more impact for unfamiliar brands than for
familiar brands?
What are the implications of this study for CVI management?
How does conceptual fluency relate to processing fluency?
What are methodological strengths and weaknesses of the research?
Urde (2003)
Three viewpoints in looking at values (related to the organization, summing up the brand,
experienced by the customer)
Relationship between values and identity
Internal and external core value-based brand building process
Brand architecture based on core values and identity (shared/individual)
Corporate brand
Product brands
Corporate- and product brand
Product- and corporate brand
How do the internal and external core value-based brand building processes relate to each
other?
How does the brand architecture described by Urde relate to that described by Aaker and
Joachimsthaler?
Do you consider this article to be descriptive or normative?
MEETING 6
Overall: How do you judge the validity of the research designs aimed at investigating the
communicative value of CVI elements?
To what extent does this study support the relevance of congruence or consistency in a CVI?
Four possible criteria for successful logos: Correct recognition, false recognition, affect, and
familiar meaning
Design variables in creating logos: natural (representative / organic), harmony (balance /
symmetric designs), Elaborate (complexity / active designs / depth) , parallel, repetition,
proportion, round
Typology of four types of logos: high-recognition, low-investment, high-image, and poorly
designed
Relationship between design variables and criteria for successful logos
What are, based on this study, restrictions regarding the communicative power of logos?