Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What are the prospects for obtaining slow-light delay lines with
103 bits capacity?
Slow Light and Optical Buffers
Daniel Blumenthal, UC Santa Barbara; Alexander Gaeta, Cornell University; Daniel Gauthier, Duke
University; Alan Willner, University of Southern California; Robert Boyd, John Howell, University of Rochester
Slow Light in Optical Fibers:
Applications of Slow Light in Telecom
probe absorption
ω 0.6
0.4 ΩT1 = 10
delay. ΩT1 = 40
ΩT1 = 20
0
80 40 0 40 80
δ T1
40
0.12
maximum delay in pulse widths
Group index
30 ∆=0 ΩT1 = 10
∆=0
T1/T2 = 100 0.08
group index /ω T1
20
T1/T2 = 100 ΩT1 = 5
10 Maximum 0.04
fractional delay ΩT1 = 20 ΩT1 = 2
0
0 50 100
Rabi frequency times T1 ΩT1 = 40
0
Okawachi, Bigelow, Sharping, Zhu, Schweinsberg, Gauthier, Boyd, and Gaeta Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153902 (2005).
Related results reported by Song, González Herráez and Thévenaz, Optics Express 13, 83 (2005).
Increasing the Bandwidth of a
Slow Light Medium
1
5% maximum distortion
relative delay td Δ b
doublet
singlet
0
0 1 1.6
bandwidth Δ b/ γ
9
-23
7
-25
5 BW = 60 MHz
-27
3
-29
1
9.76 9.78 9.8 9.82 9.84 9.86 9.88 9.9 9.92
Xu et al.
- 97.5 mW
Fractional Advancement
0.1 - 49.0 mW
- 24.5 mW
- 9.0 mW
- 6.0 mW
0.05
- 0 mW
0
• Slow light in PbS quantum dots
-0.05
-0.1
10 100 10 3 10 4 10 5
Modulation Frequency (Hz)
3 ps
FWM-Dispersion Delay Method
FWM FWM ΔT
wavelength dispersive wavelength
conversion delay D(λ) conversion
Boyd and Gauthier, “Slow and Fast Light,” in Progress in Optics, 43, 2002.
Switch to Overheads
Approaches to Slow Light Propagation
• Use of quantum coherence (to modify the spectral
dependence of the atomic response)
e.g., electromagnetically induced transparency
1/T2 1/T1
inhomogeneously homogeneously
broadened medium broadened medium
(or inhomogeneously
broadened)
PRL 90,113903(2003).
Slow Light via Coherent Population Oscillations
absorption
b profile
E3, ω + δ
saturable
ω +δ
2 1 1/T1
2γ Γba =
medium measure ba
=
T T
1
2
E1, ω absorption
a
Boyd, Raymer, Narum and Harter, Phys. Rev. A24, 411, 1981.
Slow Light Experimental Setup
Digital
Oscilloscope
Reference Detector
or
Function
Generator
Signal Detector
40 cm
Argon Ion Laser
Ruby
EO modulator Pinhole
1.4
1.2
P = 0.25 W
1.0
0.8
Delay (ms)
P = 0.1 W
0.6
0.4
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Modulation Frequency (Hz)
1.2
512 µs
1.0
Normalized Intensity
Output Pulse
0.6
ng = 2 x 106
0.2
0
-20 -10 0 10 20 30
Time (ms)
No pulse distortion!
Matt Bigelow and Nick Lepeshkin in the Lab
Advantages of Coherent Population
Oscillations for Slow Light
Works in solids
Works at room temperature
Insensitive of dephasing processes
Laser need not be frequency stabilized
Works with single beam (self-delayed)
Delay can be controlled through input intensity
Alexandrite Displays both Saturable and Reverse-Saturable Absorption
Mirror Sites:
4 σ2,m rapid
T2 or
4
T1
2
Al, Cr rapid E
σ1,m
T1,m = 260 µs
4
A2
O
Inversion Sites:
4
T2 or
4
T1 rapid
2
Be E
σ1,i
a T1,i ~ 50 ms
4
A2
Time
0.15
- 97.5 mW
Fractional Advancement
0.1 - 49.0 mW
- 24.5 mW
- 9.0 mW
0.05 - 6.0 mW
- 0 mW
6 ms
-0.05
out
in -0.1
10 100 10 3 10 4 10 5
Modulation Frequency (Hz)
Schweinsberg, Lepeshkin, Bigelow, Boyd, and Jarabo, Europhysics Letters, 73, 218 (2006).
Observation of Backward Pulse Propagation
in an Erbium-Doped-Fiber Optical Amplifier
or
Ref
80/20
1550 nm laser ISO
coupler
WDM
980 nm laser EDF
Signal
1550
980 WDM
normalized intensity
We time-resolve the propagation
of the pulse as a function of 2
position along the erbium-
doped fiber. 1 in
Procedure out
• cutback method 0
• couplers embedded in fiber 0 2 4 6
time (ms)
Experimental Results: Backward Propagation in Erbium-Doped Fiber
Normalized: (Amplification removed numerically)
Experimental Results: Backward Propagation in Erbium-Doped Fiber
Un-Normalized
Observation of Backward Pulse Propagation
in an Erbium-Doped-Fiber Optical Amplifier
Δt=0
0.04 ms
pulse amplitude (arb units)
0.06 ms
0.08 ms
0.12 ms
0.14 ms
-25 0 25
normalized distance |ng | z (m)
Observation of Backward Pulse Propagation
in an Erbium-Doped-Fiber Optical Amplifier
Summary:
normalized intensity
output pulse
input pulse
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
time (ms)
Bigelow, Lepeshkin, Shin, and Boyd, J. Physics: Condensed Matter 18, 3117 (2006).
Information Velocity – Tentative Conclusions
front
Slow Light in Optical Fibers:
Applications of Slow Light in Telecom