Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ERA
Submitted By
Safi Ullah
(M.A Regional Studies )
Submitted To
Zahid Ali
(Lecturer )
I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result of my individual research and that it
has not been submitted concurrently to any other university for any other degree.
Safi Ullah.
PAKISTAN-AFGHANISTAN TRADE RELATIONS POST 9/11 ERA
ABSTRACT
Soon after the terrorist attacks in the United States of America in 2001, allegations were held that
Al-Qaeda a terrorist organization was behind it. President George W. Bush demanded the Taliban
to hand over Osama bin laden (the top leader of Al-Qaeda) to the United States or otherwise
prepare for the consequences. They also demanded Pakistan to decide, either to support the war
against terror or the Taliban government creating a critical situation arose for Pakistan’s
government and policy. As a landlocked country, Afghanistan has remained dependent on Pakistan
for its transit trade while both countries are also immediate markets for each other. Unfortunately,
trade relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan have remained unpredictable and after 9/11 the
trade has suffered a lot due unstable political conditions of both the countries. After trade-transit
agreement in 2010, the trade got a little bit increase. However, this study examines in detail that
how are the trade relations between the two countries after 9/11 incident and US attack on
Afghanistan
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I have no words to express my deepest gratitude to Almighty Allah. Who is the creator of whole
universe, without whom no task is possible and without whose name no endeavor is worth
undertaking. Thank you Almighty Allah for answering my prayers, for giving me the strength to
complete this research project successfully.
With profound gratitude and deep sense of devotion, I wish to thank my supervisor, Zahid Ali
Lecturer, Department of Regional Studies, University of Peshawar for his guidance and positive
criticism throughout this research made my work achievable.
Furthermore, I would, also, like to extend my regards to all the staff members of the Department
of Regional Studies.
Lastly and most importantly, I would like to extend my deepest regards to my parents, who
supported me throughout my academic career both morally and financially.
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Soon after the terrorist attacks in the United States of America in 2001, allegations were held that
Al-Qaeda a terrorist organization was behind it. President George W. Bush demanded the Taliban
to hand over Osama bin laden (the top leader of Al-Qaeda) to the United States or otherwise
prepare for the consequences. They also demanded Pakistan to decide, either to support the war
against terror or the Taliban government creating a critical situation arose for Pakistan’s
Pakistan had friendly relations with the Taliban government in Afghanistan. Also it had to face the
growing pressure from USA and the West. This was crucial time for the government either to
support and sustain friendship with Taliban regime or to join hands with the US and her allies and
fight the former. As it is said that today’s friends are tomorrow’s enemies and today’s enemies are
tomorrow’s friends. Nothing is permanent in foreign policy but national interests. Pakistan in the
light of her broad national interests decided to take part in the so called ‘War on Terror.’ Pakistan
provided all sort of assistance to the US including aerial, logistic and intelligent sharing.2
Afghanistan is endowed with the wealth of natural recourses, including extensive deposit of natural
gas, Petroleum, sulfur, Lead, Iron, Chromate, Zink, Salt, and many precious and semiprecious
stones. Unfortunately due to the continuing conflict they could not make their best effort to explore
their recourses which can make their economy better. Economics literature insists that trade among
nations is beneficial for job creation and fueling economic growth. Trade helps improve living
standards and promote better quality products and services at competitive prices. Thus trade
remains at the top of agendas when it comes to bilateral relations among countries.3
As a landlocked country, Afghanistan has remained dependent on Pakistan for its transit trade
while both countries are also immediate markets for each other. Unfortunately, trade relations
between Afghanistan and Pakistan have remained unpredictable and after 9/11 the trade has
suffered a lot due unstable political conditions of both the countries. After trade-transit agreement
in 2010, the trade got a little bit increase. However, this study examines in detail that how are the
trade relations between the two countries after 9/11 incident and US attack on Afghanistan.4
Pakistan and Afghanistan are two neighboring countries and have a number of commonalities.
Both are predominantly Muslim countries and share similar values, culture and civilization. Both
states are also a part of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. Pakistan –
Afghanistan have a long history of being trade partners. Afghanistan has been a good market for
the Pakistani products ranging from food items to light machinery and engineering goods. After
9/11 attacks on the United States of American (USA), relation changed dramatically. US President
George W. Bush demanded from Pakistan to decide, either to support the war against terror or the
Taliban government. In this critical situation Pakistan changed their foreign policy and gave full
support to USA against Taliban government, which affected trade between the two countries.
However, this study is conducted to examine in detail the trading relations between the two
countries after 9/11 due to the fact that this has not been much focused in the literature.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
To study what is Afghanistan Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement and its impact on trade between
Q3: What is Afghanistan Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement and what is its impact on trade
Q4: What are the external factors that affects trade between the two countries?
This study is particularly focused on examining the trade relations between Pakistan and
Afghanistan after the 9/11 terrorists attacks on US.5 This study will be helpful to know about the
history of Pak-Afghan trade relations. This study will also provide evidence that why it is important
for Pakistan to engage in trade relations with Afghanistan as well as also the benefit for
Afghanistan in trading with Pakistan. Another significance of this study is that this study will
highlight the transit trade agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan, and benefits for both the
countries and also the hurdles and myths about this trade agreement will be discussed in detail
which are important to know while studying the trading relations between the two countries.
Finally, this study is helpful to identify the external factors that make different hurdles in trade
This research study is qualitative as well as quantitative in nature. Most of the information for this
study are collected from secondary sources. The secondary sources that are used to collect
information for this study includes online libraries, online journals for searching related research
papers, books and different websites on the internet. The collected information is then analyzed
using views of different authors and writers and concluded that how the 9/11 terrorist attacks on
the United States of America affected trade relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society Volume No. 31, Issue No. 1, January - June 2018
Afghanistan is a landlocked country and always depended upon the cooperation of Iran, India and
Pakistan to develop its international trade links with the world through seas. Pakistan’s economic
relations with Afghanistan passed through various stages after the creation of Pakistan. From 1947
to 1965 their economic relations witnessed ups and downs owing to political reasons but once it
concluded Transit trade Agreement of 1965, their economic ties solidified despite all odds. By
concluding the Transit trade agreement of 2010 it ties between Pakistan and Afghanistan further
consolidated because now they became international trade partners. After 9/11 Pakistan provided
financial and technical assistance to the Afghanistan for its Reconstruction, Rehabilitation and
Development. This study argues that Pakistan and Afghanistan have unquestionable significance
for each other. especially for economic reason, make it compulsion for both the countries to have
cordial relations in their respective vested interests and larger interests of peace and prosperity in
Pakistan and Afghanistan After 9/11: A Case of the Failing Bilateralism Muhammad Idrees1 * and Khalid
Soon after the terrorist attacks in the United States of America in 2001, allegations were held that
Al-Qaeda a terrorist organization was behind it. President George W. Bush demanded the Taliban
to hand over Osama bin laden (the top leader of Al-Qaeda) to the United States or otherwise
prepare for the consequences. They also demanded Pakistan to decide, either to support the war
against terror or the Taliban government. In the wake of this entire very critical situation arose for
Pakistan’s government and policy. Pakistan had friendly relations with the Taliban government in
Afghanistan. Also it had to face the growing pressure from USA and the West. This was crucial
time for the government either to support and sustain friendship with Taliban regime or to join
hands with the US and her allies and fight the former. As it is said that today’s friends are
tomorrow’s enemies and today’s enemies are tomorrow’s friends nothing is permanent in foreign
policy but national interests. Pakistan in the light of her broad national interests decided to take
part in the so called ‘War on Terror.’ Pakistan provided all sort of assistance to the US including
aerial, logistic and intelligent sharing [1]. Pakistan became a front line state in the war against
terrorism. This shift in the foreign policy is to be regarded as a U-Turn. Since that time till now
the relations between the two countries have never been cordial. Pakistan is seemingly losing her
position in Afghanistan and her Afghan policy is also failing. The policy makers and strategists
Afghanistan (Land of the Afghan) is a mountainous country in Central Asia with a history and
culture that goes back 5000 years. Throughout its long and sometimes chaotic history, this area of
the world has been known by various names. In the ancient times, the land was called Aryana by
its inhabitants. In the medieval era, it was called Khorasan, and in modern times, its people have
estimated to be around 21-26 million. Afghanistan is being recognized as Islamic state. Economy
of Afghanistan Afghanistan’s economic growth has slowed but remains at satisfactory levels to
generate rising average standards of living. Real GDP growth is expected to close the fiscal year
2011-12 at 5.7 percent, down from 8.4 percent in 2010-11. The slowdown in growth was mainly
Economy: This year (2012-13) GDP growth is expected to pick up again and is projected to reach
7.1 percent. A sizeable financing gap will continue to exist through 2021 despite projections of
strongly as a result of an exceptionally good harvest this year. Real gross domestic product (GDP)
growth will most likely close the calendar year at 10 percent, a significant increase from last year's
5.8 percent. The services and construction sectors continue to grow strongly, driven mostly by
continued high military spending and external aid. The good harvest has also brought Afghanistan
to near food self-sufficiency and slowed inflation to 4.6 percent in July 2012 (y-o-y). Progress in
the mining sector is clouded by uncertainty about a new mineral law. While investor interest in the
sector is encouraging, gaps in the legal and regulatory framework of the sector do not provide
economic growth prospects for 2012 give cause for optimism. Although real GDP growth slowed,
to around 7 percent in 2011 (from 8 percent the year before), due mainly to unfavorable weather
and a poor harvest, the agriculture sector rebounded strongly in 2012 and is expected to boost
The study is organized in five different chapters. Chapter is introduction and includes introductory
background of the study, problem statement, research objectives, research questions, significance
of the study, research methodology. Chapter 2 will be divided into two different parts in the first
part the introduction to Afghanistan, introduction to Pakistan, economy of both the countries,
natural resources of both the countries and export and import partners of both the countries will
include and in the second part the post 9/11 trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan will be
mentioned. The chapter 3 will include the details of trade transit agreement between the two
countries and views of experts about this agreement from both the countries. The chapter 4 will
highlight the external factors that affects the trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan in detail. The
final chapter will be conclusion, which will conclude the study based on what is mentioned in all
the chapters. At the end of the study references will be provided in Turabian style.
References
1. Siddiqi, S. (2008) Afghanistan-Pakistan relations: History and Geopolitics in regional and
Thesis, Department of Political Science, Qurtuaba University of Science and IT, Peshawar.
4: 52.
3. Siddique, Q. (2011) Pakistan’s future policy towards Afghanistan a look at strategic depth,
Militant movements and the role of India and The US (DIIS Report): 08: 16.
4. Ibid.,
5. Katzman K (2013) Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security and U.S. Policy CRS
report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. 1: 51.
CHAPTER – 2
AND AFGHANISTAN
Afghanistan (Land of the Afghan) is a mountainous country in Central Asia with a history and
culture that goes back 5000 years. Throughout its long and sometimes chaotic history, this area of
the world has been known by various names. In the ancient times, the land was called Aryana by
its inhabitants. In the medieval era, it was called Khorasan, and in modern times, its people have
Afghanistan is in the middle of Asia. The country is landlocked and mountainous, and has most of
the Hindu Kush mountains. There are four major rivers in the country: the Amu Darya, the Hari River,
the Kabul River and the Helmand River. The country also contains a number of smaller rivers, lakes,
and streams. Afghanistan has a total of 5529 km of borders - the longest part of the border (2,430 km)
is known as the Durand Line and forms Afghanistan international border with the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan. It is in the south and southeast of Afghanistan. The border with Iran, which is to the west of
Afghanistan, is 936 km. To the north are the Central Asian countries - Tajikistan has a border of 1,206
km with Afghanistan, Turkmenistan has 744 km, and Uzbekistan has 137 km. Afghanistan also has a
short border with China, it is 76 km in length and is in the far northeast of the country, although it is
disputed by both Pakistan and Tajikistan which lay irredentist claims on Wakhan area.
2.1.2 Demography of Afghanistan
Afghanistan's population is estimated at 37.21 million in 2019 based on the most recent UN data.
It's unclear how accurate these estimates may be, given that the last census was nearly 40 years
ago in 1979. This census estimated the population at 15.5 million. If the current estimate is correct,
then Afghanistan would be the 39th most populous country in the world, overtaking Morocco's
population ranking in 2018. Afghanistan is now just behind Canada in the world population lineup.
Most Afghans live in rural areas in tribal and kinship groups. Around 10% of the population lives in the
capital city, Kabul. Kabul's 2015 population is estimated at 3.1 million, which makes it the only Afghan
city with a population of more than 1 million. The second-largest city is Kandahar, with less than
400,000 people.
In 1979, a countrywide census was due to take place, but because of the Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan, it was never completed. However, early indications pointed to the figure of 15.5
Afghanistan’s economic growth has slowed but remains at satisfactory levels to generate rising
average standards of living. Real GDP growth is expected to close the fiscal year 2011-12 at 5.7
percent, down from 8.4 percent in 2010-11. The slowdown in growth was mainly due to weather-
Afghanistan's economy is growing strongly as a result of an exceptionally good harvest this year.2
Real gross domestic product (GDP) growth will most likely close the calendar year at 10 percent,
a significant increase from last year's 5.8 percent. The services and construction sectors continue
to grow strongly, driven mostly by continued high military spending and external aid. The good
harvest has also brought Afghanistan to near food self-sufficiency and slowed inflation to 4.6
percent in July 2012 (y-o-y).3 Progress in the mining sector is clouded by uncertainty about a new
mineral law. While investor interest in the sector is encouraging, gaps in the legal and regulatory
framework of the sector do not provide sufficient confidence to investors to start operations or
make firm commitments. Afghanistan's economic growth prospects for 2012 give cause for
optimism. Although real GDP growth slowed, to around 7 percent in 2011 (from 8 percent the year
before), due mainly to unfavorable weather and a poor harvest, the agriculture sector rebounded
strongly in 2012 and is expected to boost economic growth to over 10 percent. Agriculture is an
times larger than exports. The key exports of Afghanistan include vegetable saps, fresh and dried
grapes, carpets and other textile floor covering, fresh fruits and dried fruits. The top imports of
Afghanistan are wheat and meslin flour, braids of textile material, animal or vegetable fats and oil,
petroleum gas, machinery and surgical instruments. Major importers of Afghani products are
Pakistan, India, Iran Turkey and Iraq while top origins for Afghani imports are Iran, Pakistan,
In 2017 Pakistan exported goods worth $1.3 billion to Afghanistan. Pakistan is the largest importer
of Afghani Products with imports of $369 million while Afghanistan is the 4th largest destination
for Pakistan Exports. Due to the consistent decline in trade volume since 2012, the bilateral trade
Despite the infusion of international assistance much of the population continues to suffer from
shortages of housing, clean water, electricity, medical care, and jobs. Afghanistan is remarkably
rich in natural resources. There are currently more than 1,400 identified mineral deposits like
natural gas, petroleum, and coal, marble, precious and semiprecious stones, gold, copper, chromite,
talc, barites, sulfur, lead, zinc, iron ore and salt. Some of these resources are extensive deposits of
natural gas, petroleum, coal, copper, chromite, talc, barites, sulfur, lead, zinc, iron ore, salt, and
Afghanistan’s main industries are small-scale production of textiles, soap, furniture, shoes,
fertilizer, and cement; hand woven rugs; natural gas, apparel, food-products, petroleum, coal and
copper. Agriculture accounts only for 30% of the GDP, but it is a source of income for 80% of the
population.7
The following are the major commodities that form the basis of Afghanistan’s economy:
Export commodities include fruits and nuts, hand-woven carpets, wool, cotton, hides and
Imports include machinery and other capital goods, food, textiles, petroleum products.
India 25.5%
Pakistan 25.9%
US 14.9%
Tajikistan 9.6%
Germany 5%
Pakistan 23.3%
US 29.1%
Germany 4.2%
India 7.6%
Russia 4.5%
Pakistan is the largest importer of Afghani products with imports of $369 million while
Afghanistan is the 4th largest destination for Pakistani exports. During the last five years, the trade
volume between Pakistan and Afghanistan has declined from $2.3 billion to $1.4 billion. Pakistan
is losing its market share in Afghanistan due to the entrance of Iran and India. Pakistan was the
top origin for Afghanistan’s imports, but since 2014 Iran has taken away the first position from
Pakistan. Primary reasons for declining exports include dispute on Afghan-Pakistan Transit Trade
Agreement, trade controls at borders, deterrence of Indian imports in Afghanistan via Pakistan,
Most of the exports to Afghanistan include agricultural products. The reason is that Afghanistan
prefers to import agricultural products from neighboring countries like Pakistan, Iran, and
Tajikistan due to low cost. Wheat, cement, sugar and, rice are the top products which Pakistan
exported to Afghanistan in 2016. For some of the products, the market share of Pakistan is more
than 90%.9
The potential export items identified are based on the criteria of supply, demand and market share.
Items are preferred to be included as a potential product if Pakistan has enough supply, Afghanistan
has high demand, and existing market share of Pakistan is low for the specific item. The filtered
products are the surgical instruments, soap, rubber tires, milk and cream, and footwear. Pakistan
already has a high market share for a number of products, but it can be further improved because
Afghanistan is a developing country and has a high dependency on Pakistan. For each potential
item ranking of Pakistan and other suppliers has been calculated based on Export Competitive
Index and compared with preceding years. Pakistan’s Competitiveness is weakened for medical
instruments and soap while other products either improved or maintained their competitiveness.
Lack of transparency and ambiguous custom procedures make it difficult to trade in Afghanistan.10
Moreover, World Bank (2014) placed Afghanistan at 184th place out of 189 regarding trading
across the borders. There are several demand and supply issues like the undeveloped banking
system, poor infrastructure, weak legal system, deteriorating security situation, trade controls and
closure of borders which further hinder trade. Moreover, exports to Afghanistan can be improved
by arranging more exhibitions, facilitating exporters, renegotiating improved terms for the APTTA
The following table depicts the top 15 items exported to Afghanistan in 2016 with the percentage
change in value as compared to 2015, the share of that product in Pakistan’s exports and tariff
faced by Pakistan for a particular product. It can be observed that in top 15, most of the products
are agricultural commodities. Furthermore, for some of the products like wheat or meslin flour,
cane or beet sugar, vegetable fats and oils, household articles, fiberboard, milk and cream and fresh
or dried bananas Afghanistan is the leading destination, as more than 90% exports of these items
are to Afghanistan only. It is because Afghanistan prefers to import agricultural products from
neighboring countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Tajikistan due to low cost.
By comparing the value of the major products with the year 2015, it can be seen that most of the
products, export value has declined in 2016. Fresh or chilled potatoes, cane or beet sugar, and
wheat or meslin flour, faced a substantial decline of 62%, 47%, and 47% respectively. Pakistan
suffered the highest tariff of 16% on fresh and chilled vegetables. Pakistan being a member of
SAFTA, pays 2% less tax on fresh or dried bananas and 1% less tariff on fresh or dried mandarins
Ever since the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon in Washington and Twin Towers in New York, the
US has been involved in the war on terror in Afghanistan. From 9/11 to present, new alignments
have either been forged or are continuing in the region: PakistanUS informal alliance in the US
war on terror to combat Al Qaeda related terrorism on Pak-Afghan border from 2001 to present,
Indo-US strategic partnership of 2005, Indo-Afghan strategic partnership of 2011 and Pakistan-
China strategic friendship which has endured. In order to understand the nature of conflict and
cooperation in the region, it is important to comprehend the nature of the great game in Central
Asia and its impact on issues of war and peace in South Asia. In the region, this study will stress
the relationship between India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and examine its effect on Pakistan’s
The renewed bilateral diplomatic and political relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan auger
well for establishing sound economic relations. The current Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral trade
stands at one billion dollars against three million dollars in 2002. The formation of the Pakistan-
Afghanistan Joint Economic Commission (JEC) in 2002 has offered tremendous opportunities to
both states to boost their bilateral trade. Pakistan signed its last Afghan Transit Trade (ATT)
agreement in 1965 and now the formation of the JEC has made it possible for both states to re-
examine their trade ties and formulate plans to strengthen economic collaboration.12
Pakistan and Afghanistan have taken various steps to consolidate their economic relations. The
two states:
Agreed to open branches of Pakistani and Afghan banks in Pakistan and Afghanistan
respectively;
Agreed to start constructing a railway line between Chaman and Spin Boldak and between
Decided to reduce the negative list of six items under the transit trade agreement;
Announced the opening of ten more entry points on the PakistanAfghanistan border;
These moves indicate that Pakistan wants to utilize all possible resources to augment its trade with
Afghanistan. Along with Turkmenistan, the two states have been engaged in discussions over the
Following the 9/11 incidents and the resultant environment in the region, the interdependence of
Afghanistan and Pakistan has followed an upward trend. The problems which both the countries
share and the points of convergence on major issues, especially terrorism, make cooperation and
regular consultation an imperative element in their bilateral relations. The strategic equation
between Pakistan and Afghanistan compels the two states towards maintaining friendly relations.
Afghanistan has strategic significance for Pakistan as a gateway to Central Asia. Now, with an
entirely new political set-up, the future relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan could be
2. Sengupta, K. (2010). Afghanistan's resources could make it the richest mining region on
4. Kay, C., Najafizada, E. (2017). Ghani Says Afghanistan Hit by 'Undeclared War' From
5. Ibid
afghan-pakistan-gas-pipeline.
from http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e487016.html.
9. UNODC (2012). World drug report 2012. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and
analysis/WDR2012/WDR_2012_web_small.pdf.
10. ADB (2013). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific: Pakistan. Manila: Asian
http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/ki/2013/pdf/PAK.pdf.
11. Ahsan, M. B. (2013). A census without consensus. The Daily Star, 17 June. Retrieved from
http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=195122.
12. Ali, M. (2011). Frontier crimes regulation: Centuries-old law will take time to ‘reform’. The Express
crimes-regulationcenturies-old-law-will-take-time-to-reform
13. Chatterjee, K. (2013). Pakistan and Afghanistan: Of instability and umbilical ties’, in K. Chatterjee
(Ed.), Pakistan and Afghanistan. The (in)stability factor in India’s neighbourhood (pp. 35–55). New
Delhi: KW Publishers.
CHAPTER – 3
PAKISTAN
Afghanistan and all the south Asia have a very long history and holds a very key position in the
geography of the World. The regions Cultural values, Relations and backgrounds are very similar.
From the invasion of Alexander the Great to the Islamic Conquest all the in land routes to central
Trade has always been the prime objective of invasions and acquiring resources the British India
Company when came to India the basis was the trade. That has always lead to land disputes as
control over resources has always been a issue. In 1896 an agreement was signed named “Durand
Line Agreement” between Sir Mortimer Durand a British Diplomat in British India and Abdur
Rehman Khan the Afghan Amir. The reason for that was to fix the power of influence and Improve
Afghanistan and Pakistan share Multiple strands of History, Culture, Religion and civilization. The
Durand line between the Two countries is the border where many villages lie half and half in
Afghanistan and Pakistan as well there are houses having one door in Pakistan and the other in
Afghanistan. This ascertains the extent to which these two countries carry similarities.3
with all the similarities in culture tradition the relations between the two countries have been poor.
Afghanistan and Pakistan cut off their Diplomatic relations in 1961. Many comment that
Afghanistan tried to take advantage of newly born Pakistan instability as it had good relations with
India and USSR that time it is also believed that the Politicians in the Khyber Pakhtunkhua region
in Pakistan are also pro Afghanistan since beginning. In 1965 both countries reach to a trade
agreement called APTTA to promote trade in the region as Afghanistan is a land locked country
and Pakistan also wanted the access to the countries in the west of Afghanistan.4
During the decade of 1980s when soviet Afghan war started these trade routes were used to support
the Mujahideen fight USSR and Pakistan backed Afghanistan in every possible way. The trade
and exports to Afghanistan had been an important deal to Pakistan as Pakistan holds a very key
Fig 3.1: Map Showing Border Area between Pakistan and Afghanistan
3.3 Afghanistan – Pakistan Trade Transit Agreement (APTTA)
The Afghanistan–Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement (also known as APTTA) is a bilateral trade
agreement signed in 2010 by Pakistan and Afghanistan that calls for greater facilitation in the
movement of goods amongst the two countries. The APTTA agreement allows Afghan trucks to
transport exports to India via Pakistan up to the Wagah crossing point, but does not offer
Afghanistan the right to import Indian goods across Pakistani territory, out of fear that Indian
goods would end up on the Pakistani black market in the same manner that was common under
the 1965 ATTA. Instead, Afghan trucks offloaded at Wagah may return to Afghanistan loaded
only with Pakistani, rather than Indian goods, in an attempt to prevent the formation of a black
The APTTA agreement allows Afghan trucks to transport exports to India via Pakistan up to
the Wagah crossing point, but does not offer Afghanistan the right to import Indian goods across
Pakistani territory, out of fear that Indian goods would end up on the Pakistani black market in the
same manner that was common under the 1965 ATTA. Instead, Afghan trucks offloaded at Wagah
may return to Afghanistan loaded only with Pakistani, rather than Indian goods, in an attempt to
prevent the formation of a black market for Indian goods in Pakistan. The APTTA agreement
allows Afghan trucks to transport exports to India via Pakistan up to the Wagah crossing point, but
does not offer Afghanistan the right to import Indian goods across Pakistani territory, out of fear
that Indian goods would end up on the Pakistani black market in the same manner that was
common under the 1965 ATTA. Instead, Afghan trucks offloaded at Wagah may return to
Afghanistan loaded only with Pakistani, rather than Indian goods, in an attempt to prevent the
Iran via the Islam Qila and Zaranj borders, Uzbekistan via the Hairatan border, Tajikistan via Ali
Khanum and Sher Khan Bandar crossings, and Turkmenistan via the Aqina and Torghundi border
crossings. Pakistani imports and exports are granted permission to enter Afghanistan via border
crossings at Torkham, Ghulam Khan, and Chaman. The APTTA calls for various measures to
counter smuggling of duty-free goods into both Pakistan and Afghanistan by mandating: tracking
devices of goods, banking guarantees and special bonded carrier licenses for transit trucks,
vehicular tracking systems, and container security deposits. The Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit
Pakistan is not the only country through which imports and exports of Afghanistan are Transiting.
Afghanistan also has transit agreements with Iran, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The
share of these countries in terms of the transit load provided to Afghanistan is given in Figure 3.
Pakistan leads the list with 34 percent followed by Uzbekistan and Iran. Below graph shows the
In July 2012, Afghanistan and Pakistan agreed to extend APTTA to Tajikistan in what will be the
first step for the establishment of a North-South trade corridor. The proposed agreement will
provide facilities to Tajikistan to use Pakistan's ports and the Wagah Border for its imports and
exports while Pakistan would be granted rights to transit goods across Tajik territory to Kyrgyzstan
and Uzbekistan. Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani in 2015 made clear that Tajikistan cannot
be included in the trade agreement until Indian goods are offered the right to export goods to
Afghanistan across Pakistani territory, which is in direct contradiction of Articles 5 and 52 of the
signed Agreement which specifically forbids Indian goods and transporters this right.8
3.4 Afghan Transit Trade during Pre and Post-APTTA Period
The below table shows percentage of Afghan transit trade through Pakistan.
According to the above table the share of Afghan transit trade through Pakistan in the year 2006
was 30%, in 2007 declined to 21% and recorded lowest in 2008 i.e. 19% in pre APTTA period or
under ATTA. Share of Afghan transit trade via Pakistan under APTTA was 22% in 2011, increased
to 42% in 2013 and recorded highest in post APTTA period for the year 2014 i.e. 58%. Despite
the fact that exports to Afghanistan by countries sharing no border with Afghanistan have fallen
from $7.9 billion in 2011 to $4.3 billion in 2014, Pakistan’s share in Afghan transit trade has
increased from 22% in 2011 to 58% in 2014 (Samir and Attarwala, 2015). It reflects that the
decline in Pakistan’s share in Afghan transit trade during the immediate post APTTA period was
not entirely due to terms and conditions of APTTA. One can argue that in the face of deteriorating
law and order situation in Pakistan plus the worsening relations between US/NATO due to Salala
and Abbottabad incidents, the share of Afghan transit trade via Pakistan declined during the years
2011-12-13.9
There are several reasons that are responsible for a decline in Afghan transit trade through Pakistan
In addition to the law and order situation in Pakistan and deteriorated relations between
Pakistan and US/NATO as mentioned above, it seems that Afghanistan’s imports also
dropped during 2011 to 2014 which is the cause of fall in transit trade via Pakistan.
According to Afghan traders, transit trade via Pakistan costs a single container $5000 while
through Iran $3500. The cost of doing business might be increased due to the condition of
insurance companies charge a premium of 0.5 to 0.7 percent of the amount. Insurance
Guarantee through Banks is even more expensive. Financial guarantee plus the tracking
device on bonded carriers to avoid any diversion from designated routes have increased the
cost of transition by 25 percent. While in Iran no such condition has been included in their
Underpowered and outdated trucks, poor connectivity infrastructure and unnecessary delay
FBR might have diverted its focus from Afghan transit trade as it does not yield any
customs duty and therefore unnecessary delay follows which results in avoidable
demurrage charges.
According to one source, port handling and other charges for Afghan transit traders are
almost double i.e. Rs. 291400 in comparison to that for Pakistani traders which are just
of Rs. 50000 to Rs. 80000. The reason might be that bonded carriers have to fulfill certain
It is also reported that the transportation cost through Pakistan has increased in the range
of Rs. 50000 to Rs. 80000. The reason might be that bonded carriers have to fulfill certain
The deterioration in the capacity of Pakistan Railways for freight transport has also
undermined Pakistan competitiveness for transit trade. At present, the major portion of the
transit goods is being transported through the roads network which is also in vanishing
form.
Illegal trade across Pakistan‘s borders with neighboring countries and the coastline is widely acknowledged.
It contributes to the informal economy which evades taxes, deals in contraband, and other criminal
activities. The size of the informal economy in Pakistan is large. A State Bank of Pakistan study 18
concludes that the size of the informal economy in Pakistan has been around 30% of GDP in the 2000s
(Arby, Malik, & Hanif, 2010). The SBP estimate means that Pakistan‘s informal economy was
approximately US$ 34 billion in 2009/10 according to a UNODC funded study in 2011.19 ―While the
illegal economy raises the cost for conducting legal economic activities, it also weakens states, threatens
development opportunities, undermines the rule of law and keeps countries trapped in a cycle of poverty
and instability. Proceeds of the illegal economy find their way into the world‘s formal economies every
year through money-laundering and acquisitions of legal assets. Illegal economic activities also fund the
activities of international organised crime groups and finance insurgent groups active in conflict zones
The UNODC study adds further that ―Pakistan is uniquely challenged by the nexus between crime and the
illegal economy due to its geographic location. The country‘s relations with its neighbors, particularly
Afghanistan, are complicated by cross-border criminality, which in turn creates a thriving regional illegal
economy orchestrated by complex informal and formal organized criminal networks.‖ (SDPI & UNODC,
2011).
Illegal trade across the Pakistan-Afghanistan border is nothing new to the porous border. Renewed focus
on illegal trade in discussions between Afghanistan and Pakistan stems from evidence that illegal trade has
flourished in the cover of Afghan transit trade. Illegal trade associated with transit trade is conducted in two
ways:20 transit diversion (in which goods in transit through Pakistan, never reach the destination and are
diverted for sale in Pakistan; and illegal re-export (where goods reach Afghanistan but are subsequently
smuggled back into Pakistan across the porous border). There is no consensus on the estimate of illegal
trade associated with Afghan transit trade, and estimates vary from study to study. The Pakistan Business
Council study concludes that the difference in the value of transit trade reported by Pakistan and
Afghanistan (reflecting illegal trade diversion) remained high at $1.0 billion in 2014 (post APTTA) but
much less than $2.9 billion in 2010 (the last year of ATTA). There are few estimates of illegal re-exports
from Afghanistan which make their way to Pakistan across the porous border over mountainous passes and
through FATA.11
As always, the incentive for illegal trade comes from a price differential (or quantitative restriction) between
the domestic economy and across the border. Studies have concluded that for some goods transiting through
Pakistan, the level of Afghan imports bear no relevance to the consumption levels in Afghanistan and that
many of these goods are primarily meant for Pakistani markets to benefit from the tariff differential between
the two countries. ―Pakistan‘s tariff rates are generally higher, particularly for the types of goods where it
is argued that substantial amounts of unauthorized trade are taking place. Pakistan‘s average tariff rate is
14.5 percent, about 2.5 times the average tariff for Afghanistan (i.e., 5.65 percent).
Whatever the size of the illegal trade across the AfghanistanPakistan border and whatever methods are
used, its impact on Pakistan‘s economy is significant. One, it causes a loss to the government in tax revenues
and duties, and two; it adversely impacts legal businesses and industry (USAID Pakistan, 2014). Pakistan‘s
concerns about illegal trade in discussions about transit trade are genuine and serious. There is a need to
take effective steps to reduce illegal trade without restricting transit trade. Illegal trade can be reduced by
improving border procedures, strengthening the bonded transport and guarantee system, especially build
the institutional and financial apparatus to implement the TIR Convention system.
Suggestions to harmonise tariff rates between the two countries to reduce incentives for illegal trade are
unrealistic in general although on a few items it‘s possible. Pakistan‘s tariff rates are set in view of the
protection considerations of a complex economy with a relatively large industrial base, and in other cases
with a view to raise revenues for a government of a large economy. In contrast, Afghanistan has no
industrial base in relative terms, and tariffs have been set at low levels to stimulate trade and lower the
burden on consumers.22 Revenue generation is an important consideration for Afghanistan as well, but till
recently it has been dependent on donor assistance and own revenue generation has been low. With such
diverse approaches to tariff determination, the two countries are unlikely to reach agreement on the level
of tariffs on all items in tariff structure. There will always be some items for which there is a strong price
differential between the two countries, creating an incentive for illegal trade. And in any case illegal trade
will continue if smugglers can avoid paying customs in Afghanistan where government control and tax
administration is relatively ineffective in the war torn country. The answer lies in better border controls,
The salient features of APTTA includes: freedom of Transit to both countries, allowing Pakistan
access to Central Asian Republics, allowing Afghanistan access to Pakistan’s sea ports and
allowing Afghanistan access to Wagah for its exports to India. The agreement does not allow
The 1965 Agreement does not specify entry, exit and designated routes for Pakistan’s exports to
Central Asia through Afghanistan. In 1965 Central Asian Republics were part of USSR which did
not allow entry of Pakistani origin goods through Afghanistan. Bulk of the present exports of
Pakistan to Central Asia through Afghanistan are being declared as Afghan origin. The official
exports of Pakistan to Central Asian States are US $ 20 million in the total imports market of US
$ 70 billion in 2009. This low volume amongst other things is the result of low accessibility of
110% of the value of the goods as security to Afghan Government for transit to Central Asia
irrespective of the ownership of transporting vehicles. It takes more than a year to get the security
released from the Afghan authorities through a non transparent mechanism. The exporters from
Pakistan have to file registration with multiple Ministries and Agencies of Afghanistan.
In view of the above, an Afghanistan – Pakistan Transit Trade Coordination Authourity will be
co-chaired by Secretary Commerce and Deputy Minister for Commerce of Afghanistan and
include representatives from relevant government Ministries and Chambers of Commerce. This
Authority will monitor effective implementation of the agreement, formulate and monitor
measures to curb smuggling and resolve disputes regarding the interpretation or the
Under the new agreement the rights have been secured on permanent basis with legal cover for the
trucks which are carrying Afghan cargo or exports beyond Pakistan would be allowed to lift
Afghanistan imports which Transit through sea ports. Only Afghan trucks having valid permits
duly cleared by biometric security systems will be allowed entry. Afghanistan is allowed to use
Pakistani trucks for transit of their Imports from Pakistani ports to Afghanistan. Empty Afghan
trucks would not be allowed entry to lift afghan Imports from sea ports. Afghan trucks will be
allowed to travel upto sea ports and Wahga land border station on designated routes only. The law
enforcement agencies to ensure their monitoring and security through modern tracking methods.
If Pakistan had not allowed this concession to Afghanistan, Pakistani trucks would not have been
3.7 Trade Relations Between Afghanistan And Pakistan Post 9/11 Incident
After 9/11 attacks in the US the situation further got worse as the two countries struggled to
facilitate their relationship with each other. Pakistan as an ally of the USA supported the troops
deployed in the region by the US to over throw and take charge of Afghanistan and the War on
As per the Government claims Pakistan was given huge amounts to support the US led NATO in
Afghanistan and Pakistan also believed that this alliance will help Pakistan to restrain terrorist not
to create problems for Pakistan as US is well equipped to handle the situation. this increased the
trade for Pakistan as all the NATO supplies reach Karachi Sea Port and then Transported to
Afghanistan as usual but unfortunately the war on terrorism directly effected Pakistan making it a
Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA), which was observed by United States Secretary Hillary
Clinton. Both countries also signed MoU for the construction of railway tracks to connect
Afghanistan with Pakistan. In October 2010, Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Afghanistan
around the world including foreign ambassadors attended the ceremony. The APTTA allows
Afghan trucks to drive inside Pakistan to Wagah border and to ports cities of Pakistan. The APTTA
is intended to improve trade between the both countries and for this both countries have formed
the joint Chamber of Commerce for the trade expansion to solve the problems trader face.
References
1. Seddon, D. (2004). A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East. Routledge. p. 15. ISBN 978-
1-85743-212-1.
2. Siddiqui, A. Q. (2010). Afghan-Pakistan chamber of commerce set up. Pajhwok Afghan News. Archived
3. Kakar, J. H. (2010). "Pakistan, Afghanistan ink MoU on rail links". Pajhwok Afghan News. Archived
4. Muzhary, F. (2010). Landmark trade pact inked with Pakistan. Kabul, Afghanistan: Pajhwok Afghan
6. Aneja, A. (2015). Xi comes calling to Pakistan, bearing gifts worth $45 billion. The Hindu.
9. Haidar, S. (2015). Pakistan must open Wagah for trade: Ghani. The Hindu. Retrieved 17
February 2019.
10. Muzhary, F. (2010). "Landmark trade pact inked with Pakistan". Kabul, Afghanistan: Pajhwok Afghan
11. Landler, M. (2010). Afghanistan and Pakistan Sign a Trade Deal, Representing a Thaw in Relations.
The New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 June 2013. Retrieved 3 September 2010.
CHAPTER – 4
AFGHANISTAN
During couple of years few elements have severely affected the confidence building measures
initiated by both the Governments for enhancing the cordial relationship between the two
neighboring countries. These mainly includes weak border management system promoting
informal trade, rise in unofficial payments across the border, political and legal insecurity, lack of
tariff parity or rationalization, coordinated investments by India and Iran in Afghanistan in contrast
to Pakistan, enhancing role of Iran as a transit route to Afghanistan, penetration of India, Turkey
and China as significant trade and development partners in Afghanistan and lack of facilitation in
Unregulated traffic across a rugged but porous border has been a sticking point and a major security
concern throughout. In addition to an estimated 6,000 illegal border crossings per day, this
unmanageable border facilitates a vast black economy that flourishes on the illicit drug trade and
smuggling.2
The pending bilateral talks between the two countries have significantly affected trade and social ties in
recent past. Not only it has led to decline in trade and transit, but has also shifted Afghanistan‟s focus to
other regional neighbors. India in the recent past has contributed both in terms of donations and subsidies
to Afghanistan and also by offering competitive tariffs. Iran has also improved its infrastructure and
offering better facilities and tariffs to Afghanistan that resulted in an intensive shift in both transit and
The decline in aggregate demand and purchasing power in Afghanistan, as a result of the withdrawal of
NATO Forces from Afghanistan and declining International donor funding for development projects, is also
causing overall reduction in Afghanistan‟s imports. However, as much as this corridor is important for
Afghanistan, it is needed to be understood that this is the major partner with which Pakistan has a positive
trade balance and losing this opportunity reflects in economic devastation in Pakistan also mainly in
border areas, where dependence on their economic activities is greatly on Afghanistan. The congenial
relationship between both the countries will not only ensure economic stability, but also peace and
Recently all Central Asian Republic countries have shown their interest in joining CPEC, whereby
Afghanistan and Iran has also shared same sentiments previously. The productive relationship between
these two countries will help pave ways for economic development across the belt. Recent visits to
Afghanistan by Honorable COAS and H.E. Prime Minister of Pakistan and subsequent meetings of Finance
ministers of both the countries in Washington has shown the ray of light and have reinstated the hopes
of the private sector across the border. The commitments pertaining to segregating economics from
political and security issues, avoiding border closures and improving both transit and bilateral trade
procedures are crucial confidence building measures. The announcement to rejuvenate table-talks,
especially holding JEC meeting after June 2018 is an initiative in the right direction. However, materializing
the commitments on due deadlines is of greater importance. Despite all odds, long-standing trade and
social relations, religious and geographical proximity, business stakeholders‟ preference of common trade
routes and products make the continuation of trade and transit between Pakistan and Afghanistan
essential. Owing to cultural and language similarities, the potential also exists for trade in the service
sector in education, healthcare, and information technology. Peaceful economic cooperation between
Afghanistan and Pakistan and improved trade and transit facilities would help connect South Asia with the
Central Asia. As disturbances across the border also greatly affects social ties between the two countries
mainly in border areas. This economic growth would increase domestic employment in both countries
Keeping trade balances in view, the highest was attained in 2010-11, since then exports of Pakistan have
declined by approximately 45% as reported in fiscal year 2016-17. From a slight increase in 2014-15, again
the decline has mainly been attributed to the frequent closure of PakAfghan border due to security
concerns, favorable conditions for India and Iran due to the increasing trust deficit, decreasing aggregate
demand due to withdrawal of NATO forces and declining international donor funded projects in
Afghanistan.
The imports from Afghanistan have grown steadily since 2009-10 and reported an all-time high in 2015-
16, from then showed decline in 2016-17. This increasing trend was discouraged by the Ministry through
trade in dollars and the imposition of regulatory duties specifically on complementary items.
Table 4.1: Bilateral trade of Pakistan with Afghanistan (US Million $)
In order to understand the trend of bilateral trade for the fiscal year 2017-18, a semi-annual comparison
was made that showed an increasing trend both in exports and imports during the 6 month period. If the
movement will persist in same ratio then overall effect would be better than last two fiscal years.
Export of services to Afghanistan has shown a disappointing trend in 2015, although the quantum
increased during 2009 till 2012 but has declined since then. However, in 2016 the trend has shown
positivity. The growing sectors included telecommunication / computer and information services,
construction, transportation and insurance, whereas consumption of financial services and traveling has
reduced significantly.
As per stakeholders‟ feedback, the following issues were raised that have affected / are affecting the
bilateral trade along with possible economic alternatives for rejuvenating confidence building across the
border.
Traders have great concern due to uncertainty pertinent to Pak/Afghan border closure, it is the most
important factor which hits the business community of both the countries and creates a lack of trust
between each other. The shipments are stuck leading to psychological and financial losses, especially in
cases of perishable items and items of immediate consumption. The sudden closure without any prior
notice, especially in the season of Afghan exports of fruits and vegetables creates devastating effect.6
All issues related to transit are also applicable here like lack of infrastructure and custom support, undue
requirements, the arrogance of port and shipping lines, extensive demurrages and most importantly
border closures.
As Pakistan‟s bilateral ties with India are unfavorable hence Afghanistan‟s demand of including India is
uncalled for. Additionally, India is a competing economy of Pakistan, which does affect the businesses
within Pakistan. Despite several invitations to Afghanistan, table talks are halted and preferential trade
agreement (PTA) is also pending. These delays further worsen the relationship between the two countries.
Other regional players are trying to capture the share in Afghanistan due to widening gap between the
two countries. These regional players are providing competitive tariffs to Afghanistan and also
Another factor that affects the trade relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan is the trade of
Afghanistan with other countries, which are now competitors of Pakistan. The crucial issue is not only
declining trade quantum between the most important partners, but also is the shift of the same to other
Whereas, Pakistan’s and Iran’s exports to Afghanistan have declined, but the increase is witnessed in case
of India, especially in the last fiscal year, mainly due to frequent Afghanistan-Pakistan border closures.
Another thing to note is that even though exports of Iran are more than Pakistan, but has significantly
declined as compared to the last year (2015-16). The China is also growing as a potential trade partner
As Afghanistan is in a war zone, therefore major trade partners offer lots of subsidies in trade and transit
sector, but recent imposition of the regulatory duties (RD) on all import items to Pakistan disturbed the
export of Afghanistan significantly. In the past, Afghanistan was exempted from the RD duties; but now
more than 22 items of Afghanistan come under the RD policy which are the key export items. The export
of raw materials from Pakistan to other countries except Afghanistan are tax free that discourages the
Afghanistan has imposed high tariffs on Pakistan dominant products like juices, cement, pharmaceuticals,
PVC pipes and have raised duties / taxes on plastic & plastic made materials, medicinal drugs, safety
matches etc. which has affected Pakistan’s exports. However, this change has not been implemented on
imports from Iran, India and Turkey. Though Afghanistan was exempted from the ambit of regulatory
duties previously, yet not a single cement container was exported to Afghanistan via the Chaman border
There is a great potential for pharmaceutical exports to Afghanistan, but ad hoc rules controlling drug
If Afghan investor wants to invest or open sister branch of its business in Pakistan, so for approval the
case is being transferred to Intelligence agency and these agencies are authorized to approve or
Similarly, If a Pakistani investor wants to invest in Afghanistan, so he can transfer his capital/ money after
the approval of the State Bank of Pakistan, which is generally disapproved that discourages investors. The
Government is unwilling to remove the restriction for exporters who want to avail schemes like DTRE and
manufacturing bonds for exports to Afghanistan. Pakistani businesses are facing a lot of issues relevant to
This is one of the major deterrent for the Afghan business community as Pakistani Authorities do not treat
them properly, they always face problems from local police, further even if they have the business visa to
It has been the decision of the Government of Pakistan, that Afghan trucks, which are exporting goods
from Afghanistan to Pakistan would be allowed to go to Peshawar, but in some cases, it is not permitted
and the trucks are vacated in Torkham causing financial losses. Pakistan Government does not allow
Export shipments in Afghani Vehicle/Container to directly proceed to Pakistani Port and it has to cross
stuff the whole consignment from one container to another on Torkham / Chaman border. At present
Afghanistan exports are once examined by the Pakistan Customs at Torkham and then the custom’s sealed
containers are moved under customs escort to Pakistani Ports but they are re-examined by the customs
Pakistani exports to Central Asian countries is hampered by Afghanistan, whereas it is reported that either
Afghan partner is included in the transaction or it will be re-exported to Central Asia by Afghanistan’s
trader. Pakistani trucks are not allowed to move beyond the border causing the extra amount in
transshipment from Pakistani trucks to Afghani Trucks. Unnecessary checking and the halting of export
cargo trucks at the border, especially of perishable items, creates immense financial losses and product
damages.
The recent SRO issued by the Food and Security department to present health standard certificates for
Pest Risk Analysis and assessing potential phyto-sanitary risks (Quarantine Certificate, Aflatoxine test,
Form A, Import permit, etc.) on the Agri products (820 types of items) being imported to Pakistan has
significantly affected the Afghan exporters by causing heavy losses because thousands of tons of cotton,
fresh fruits and vegetables are stranded at the border. The concerned tests and certificates are not
applicable in the region and also getting the import permit for Afghan businessmen would be challenging
Chaman and Gawadar Chamber insisted that it is not possible to apply requirement of all these certificates
on Afghan imports as the infrastructure support is critically limited for such issuance and such imposition
in this season of Afghan exports (especially of fruits) would have a demoralizing effect on the traders. Due
to a lack of plant protection support, especially at Gwadar, the exports of fish to the other side and the
imports from Iran are also affected significantly. The Plant protection department (DPP) is not only slow
but also increases the requirements unnecessarily. They also require certificates for commodity which are
also not in the list and upon complaint states that it is done on the instructions of the Ministry of
Commerce. The samples are drawn after grounding the container which requires original delivery
order/release of documents. At that stage, the 100% payment is already made to the exporters. In case
the consignment is rejected, it is not possible for the importer to get the payment back from the exporter
2. Mashal, M. (2012). "Can Afghanistan Sort Out Its Cross-Border Water Issues?". Time.
Retrieved 2019-03-12.
3. Sohail, M. (1991). Partition and Anglo-Pakistan relations, 1947-51. Vanguard. ISBN 9789694020570.
7. Constable, P., Khan, H. N. (2017). Pakistan targets Afghan Pashtuns and refugees in anti-terrorism
crackdown. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2018-02-26.
8. Ahmed, V. (2015). Fiscal Challenges and Response. In I. P. Institute, Roadmap for EconomicGrowh
10. Hussain, I., & Elahi, M. A. (2015). The Future of AfghanistanPakistan Trade Relations. UnitedStates
5.1 Conclusion
This study aims to investigate the Pakistan – Afghanistan trade after 9/11 attacks. The main
objectives of the study include exploring background of trade and business of Pakistan and
Afghanistan, to investigate post 9/11 trade relations between the two countries, to study
Afghanistan Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement and its impact on trade between the two countries
and to study the factors that affects the trade between the two countries. This study is particularly
focused on examining the trade relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan after the 9/11 terrorist
attacks on US. This research study is both qualitative and quantitative in nature and most of the
information for the study is collected from secondary sources. The secondary sources that are used
to collect information for this study includes online libraries, online journals for searching related
research papers, books and different websites on the internet. Pakistan and Afghanistan are two
neighboring countries and have a number of commonalities. Both are predominantly Muslim
countries and share similar values, culture and civilization. Pakistan – Afghanistan have a long
history of being trade partners. Afghanistan has been a good market for the Pakistani products
ranging from food items to light machinery and engineering goods. After 9/11 attacks on the
United States of American (USA), relation changed dramatically. US President George W. Bush
demanded from Pakistan to decide, either to support the war against terror or the Taliban
government. In this critical situation Pakistan changed their foreign policy and gave full support
to USA against Taliban government, which affected trade between the two countries. From the
study it is found that Pakistan is the largest importer of Afghani products with imports of $369
million while Afghanistan is the 4th largest destination for Pakistani exports. During the last five
years, the trade volume between Pakistan and Afghanistan has declined from $2.3 billion to $1.4
billion. Most of the exports to Afghanistan include agricultural products. The reason is that
Afghanistan prefers to import agricultural products from neighboring countries like Pakistan, Iran,
and Tajikistan due to low cost. Wheat, cement, sugar and, rice are the top products which Pakistan
exported to Afghanistan in 2016. For some of the products, the market share of Pakistan is more
than 90%. Moreover, it is also found that lack of transparency and ambiguous custom procedures
make it difficult to trade in Afghanistan. Moreover, World Bank (2014) placed Afghanistan at
184th place out of 189 regarding trading across the borders. There are several demand and supply
issues like the undeveloped banking system, poor infrastructure, weak legal system, deteriorating
security situation, trade controls and closure of borders which further hinder trade. Moreover,
renegotiating improved terms for the APTTA and narrowing trust deficit. Thus, it is concluded
from the study that ever since the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon in Washington and Twin Towers
in New York, the US has been involved in the war on terror in Afghanistan. From 9/11 to present,
new alignments have either been forged or are continuing in the region and this war and terror
leads to the decreased trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The renewed bilateral diplomatic
and political relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan auger well for establishing sound
economic relations. The current Pakistan-Afghanistan bilateral trade stands at one billion dollars
against three million dollars in 2002. The formation of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Economic
Commission (JEC) in 2002 has offered tremendous opportunities to both states to boost their
bilateral trade. Pakistan signed its last Afghan Transit Trade (ATT) agreement in 1965 and now
the formation of the JEC has made it possible for both states to re-examine their trade ties and
Afghanistan should finalize pending Preferential Trade Agreement to resolve pending issues
It is vital to initiate pending table-talks and with reference to the bilateral trade, JEC meeting
For better coordination and resolution of mutual issues, it is proposed to formulate a joint
committee for rationalization of duties between the two countries having members of
customs also. Tariff disparity in Afghanistan and Pakistan should be minimized leading to
If the prices of the same products being imported directly or via transit trade in Afghanistan
are equalized and similarly duty structure is rationalized in both the countries then chances of
leakage would reduce and the existence of the parallel regime can be discouraged. This would
improve the trust and the platform of smuggling can be curbed significantly.
It is suggested to minimize the Exports examination process for smooth Exports of both the
Policy Advocacy should be done for Perishable vs. Non-Perishable items‟ trade, as perishable
items suffered significantly during border closures and unnecessary delay times. Farmers and
small traders took a hard hit when an entire year‟s worth of hard work rotted away on loaded
trading of perishable goods such as fruits, herbs, vegetables and frozen food etc
It is observed that Afghan Government has certificate issuing department at borders so same
1. ADB (2013). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific: Pakistan. Manila: Asian Development
2. Afghanistan Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement 2010 (PDF). Pakistan Ministry of Commerce.
4. Ahsan, M. B. (2013). A census without consensus. The Daily Star, 17 June. Retrieved from
http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=195122.
5. Ali, M. (2011). Frontier crimes regulation: Centuries-old law will take time to ‘reform’. The
http://tribune.com.pk/story/301002/frontier-crimes-regulationcenturies-old-law-will-take-
time-to-reform
6. Aneja, A. (2015). Xi comes calling to Pakistan, bearing gifts worth $45 billion. The Hindu.
Chatterjee (Ed.), Pakistan and Afghanistan. The (in)stability factor in India’s neighbourhood
8. Constable, P., Khan, H. N. (2017). Pakistan targets Afghan Pashtuns and refugees in anti-
gas-pipeline.
10. Durani, M., Khan, A. (2002) Pakistan-Afghanistan relations; Historic mirror, M. Phil Thesis,
Department of Political Science, Qurtuaba University of Science and IT, Peshawar. 4: 52.
11. Fair, C. C., Watson, S. J. (2015). Pakistan's Enduring Challenges. University of Pennsylvania
13. Haack, B. (1998). Remote sensing change detection of irrigated agriculture in Afghanistan.
14. Haidar, S. (2015). Pakistan must open Wagah for trade: Ghani. The Hindu. Retrieved 17
February 2019.
15. Hilali, A. Z. (2017). US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan. Taylor &
16. Hussain, I. (2015). The Future of Afghanistan-Pakistan Trade Relations. United States Institute
17. Hussain, I., & Elahi, M. A. (2015). The Future of AfghanistanPakistan Trade Relations.
18. Ibid
19. Ibid.,
20. Kakar, J. H. (2010). "Pakistan, Afghanistan ink MoU on rail links". Pajhwok Afghan News.
report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. 1: 51.
22. Kay, C., Najafizada, E. (2017). Ghani Says Afghanistan Hit by 'Undeclared War' From
23. Lalit, K. J. (2011). Huge rare-earth material in Helmand. USGS Archived 2016-01-24 at the
Wayback Machine.
24. Landler, M. (2010). Afghanistan and Pakistan Sign a Trade Deal, Representing a Thaw in
Relations. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 June 2013. Retrieved 3
September 2010.
25. Mashal, M. (2012). "Can Afghanistan Sort Out Its Cross-Border Water Issues?". Time.
Retrieved 2019-03-12.
28. Muzhary, F. (2010). "Landmark trade pact inked with Pakistan". Kabul, Afghanistan: Pajhwok
29. Muzhary, F. (2010). Landmark trade pact inked with Pakistan. Kabul, Afghanistan: Pajhwok
31. Seddon, D. (2004). A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East. Routledge.
32. Sengupta, K. (2010). Afghanistan's resources could make it the richest mining region on earth.
34. Siddique, Q. (2011) Pakistan’s future policy towards Afghanistan a look at strategic depth,
Militant movements and the role of India and The US (DIIS Report): 08: 16.
35. Siddiqui, A. Q. (2010). Afghan-Pakistan chamber of commerce set up. Pajhwok Afghan News.
37. The News International (2011). Afghan-Pakistan Trade Transit Deal Extended to Tajikistan.
38. UNHCR (2013). UNHCR country operations profile—Pakistan. Retrieved 13 June 2013, from
http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e487016.html.
39. UNODC (2012). World drug report 2012. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
analysis/WDR2012/WDR_2012_web_small.pdf.