Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Time context:
2009
II. Viewpoint:
Marketing Department
A. Major problem:
B. Minor problem:
IV. Objectives
[1]
1. To identify the customers preference for a particular product.
V. Areas of Consideration
A. SWOT Analysis
Strengths
[2]
This is their key factor to dominate the industry for
decades
5. Product customization
Which enable the customers to be more creative in the
styles they want.
6. Customer loyalty
Because they established on the mind of the consumer
that they belong to the family of Harley when they own a unit.
Weaknesses
[3]
Opportunities
Threats
[4]
7. Potential entries of more players with lower prices.
SWOT MATRIX
Strength Weaknesses
Opportunities Having an academy of Technological
motorcycles expand advancement that
the motorcycles puts Harley-Davison
industry in Asia and product more
Mexico expensive compare to
(S4,O1) its competitors
(O4,W1)
The costumers loyalty Harley-Davidson
helps in the expansion pursuing the American
in the global market pride due to
(S6,O5) increasing no. of aging
population which their
target market
(O3,W3)
Increasing no. of
women riders cause of
powerful brand image
of Harley-Davidson
(S1,O2)
Threats Harley-Davidson is the Harley-Davidson must
only one motorcycle provide substitute
manufacturer in products because its
America but its only offer single
competitors offer product line
more diversified (T2,W7)
product line
[5]
(S3,T1)
Product customization Due to changing
that Harley-Davidson preferences of the
offer grow in the costumer makes slow
European motorcycle growth in the
industry international market
(S5,T3); shares
(T6,W5)
PESTEL ANALYSIS
POLITICAL
4. Smoke Emission.
ECONOMICAL
[6]
1. Confidence in economy is directly proportional to the
purchasing of consumer items
SOCIAL
TECHNOLOGICAL
[7]
3. Anti-lock breaking systems and ‘clutchless'' transmissions
are beginning to be developed by Harley-Davidson and
other competitors.
ENVIRONMENT
LEGAL
[8]
2. The pollution regulations have recently changed, but the
tariff problem is yet unresolved
Industry Analysis
[9]
insurance related programs primarily to Harley-Davison and Buell
dealers and their retail customers.
[10]
helped by a heavily weak dollar. Because Harley incurs its production
costs in the U.S it benefits when the dollar weaken against the Euro
and Yen.
[11]
D. Are there high fixed cost?
[12]
Their U.S. market share in that segment increased to 54.9% from
53.3% a year earlier and 45.4% in 2008.
Harley-Davidson Motorcycles
[13]
[14]
B. Is the industry consolidated or fragmented?
[15]
-Consumers of Harley Davidson motorcycles are individual
customers, that’s why they can’t seriously affect Harley’s financial
position.
-The number of dealers around the globe is also less and they
are also dependent to the individual customers that cannot affect
Harley-Davidson financial position.
-Faria
-No
Japanese makers own the biggest market share against other strong
European competitors
[16]
* Chezk’s Husquaena and the Spanish Derby they manufacture and
customized bikes
* Customer loyalty and strong image is a barrier for the makers than
the classic Harley-Davidson Inc. and BMW just as for the super car
segment Ferrari and Porsche.
* Product differentiation
* Switching costs on the cost that buyer has to absorb to switch from
one supplier to another.
Yes, because of the brand loyalty that continuing in the mind set
of an individual that if you say Harley-Davidson it’s has a good quality
and an adventure experience to have this kind of product and services
that HD offered. The real power of Harley-Davidson is the power to
market to consumers who love the product
[17]
market because of the atomized of the number of suppliers and the
brand loyalty of distributors/dealers.
• Distribution method
[18]
Different competitors have different market strategy to advertise
and effectively introduce their certain products.
• Increase of income
[19]
10 B. What influence do regulations have on industry
competitiveness?
ADVANTAGES:
- Innovation can create new growth segment
- Gain new valuable costumer
- It would be difficult for rivals imitate
- Create more awareness of the product existence
DISADVANTAGES:
- Introducing new product would be costly and expensive.
- Risk for the new product not to be successful.
- Their limited edition product can be replaced in the market.
[20]
ACA#2: Strengthen Harley’s product advertisement.
ADVANTAGES:
- Increase the firm sales.
- Raises customers’ product awareness.
- Serves as a catalyst to re-establish he firm as the prime
dealer of motorcycles.
- Enhance their market competitiveness.
DISADVANTAGES:
- A stand-out advertisement is costly and expensive.
- Unique and effective advertising ideas are difficult to produce.
- It may not be effective to attract local customers.
ADVANTAGES:
- Products that have distinction provide more value for
customers.
- Expansion of market segment.
- Unique products are difficult for competitors to imitate.
- Core competence will be enhanced.
- Brand loyalty is increased.
DISADVANTAGES:
- Implementation is costly and expensive.
[21]
- Risk of the product not to be successful.
- It is difficult to come up with advantageous and unique idea.
- Harley Davidson not to be able to sustain their brand image.
Weight
Weig
ht
1 The criterion that would have this weight is not the main
focus or consideration for the company as of the current time
frame.
2 The factor to be spotted in this particular weight would have
the company’s moderate consideration that will affect their
decision making.
3 This weight means that the company puts a lot of focus and
consideration in this criterion. They think that it will be the
company’s best need at the current time context.
Rubrics
Criterion 5 3 1
Potential impact There is a great The company is The company
on company’s positive impact seeing an have low impact
performance. on company’s average impact on the
performance. on this performance of
[22]
alternative and this alternative.
will not
adversely affect
the company’s
performance.
Ease of The decision of The decision of The decision of
Implementation the company to the company to the company to
implement the implement the implement the
actions needed actions related action is
is not is not that hard complex.
complicated. to implement.
Benefit/Cost The benefit that The benefit that The benefit that
Relationship will be gained will be gained will be gained in
would exceed will or won’t the future will
the cost to be exceed the cost be for a short
incurred in a to be incurred. period time
very significant only.
percentage.
Speed of The The The
Implementation implementation implementation implementation
can be done will be done will be done in a
within a short beyond a very long period
period of time. reasonable of time.
duration.
Decision Matrix
[23]
Alternative Course of Action Number One
Criterion Weight Rating Score
Potential impact 3 5 15
on Company’s
performance
Ease of 1 5 5
Implementation
Benefit/Cost 2 5 10
relationship
Speed of 2 3 6
Implementation
Total Rating 36
[24]
performance
Ease of 1 3 3
Implementation
Benefit/Cost 2 3 6
relationship
Speed of 2 3 6
Implementation
Total Rating 30
VII. Recommendation
VIII. Conclusion
[25]
This gives HD a competitive edge over its competitors; it will also serve
as a catalyst for their eventual dominance of the motorcycle industry.
[26]
development
team for the R&D
plan on
identifying the
local market
preference
1-6 months Marketing Start and
Department finalization of the
together with the gathered data on
Product the research and
Development development
Team
1 week Keith Wandell, Discussion of the
Product new product to be
Development introduce in the
Team market and
forecasting of
product
development cost
that will be
possibly incurred
by the company
1-2 days Strategic Business Finalization of the $40,000,00
Unit needed capital for 0
the proposed
product
development
1-4 months Product Research and $1,000,000
Development Development that
Team will be done by
the team to start
the formulation of
[27]
plans for the
propose product
Keith Wandell, Meeting to
1-2 days Product discuss the
Development proposal done by
Team, Marketing the team and its
Department approval
3 days Keith Wandell and Dissemination of
the Department information of the
head propose product
development
1 month Chief Finance Meeting with
Officer possible investor
and other
Financing services
firm
1 week Production Head Discussion of the
materials needed
and the its
incremental cost
1 day Production Head Submission of the
report for the
projected cost of
production
1-2 days Keith Wandell Approval of the
projected
production and
development cost
1-2 months Production Commencement $35,000,00
Department of the production 0
of the newly
develop product
[28]
1-2 months Quality Control Testing, $2,000,000
Department monitoring,
evaluating of the
newly develop
product
2 months Keith Wandell, Meeting for the
Marketing launch and
Department continues
advertisement of
the product
3 months Marketing Start of product $1,000,000
Department launch and
advertisement
Quarterly Keith Wandell and Sales and Product
Semi-annually Top Management performance
Annually Evaluation
X. Financial Analysis
Debt Ratio
2009
7047400 / 9155518 = 76.97%
2008
3914887 / 7828625 = .5 or 50%
2007
2099955 / 5656606 = 37.12%
[29]
Current Ratio
2009
4341949/2268224 = 1.914
2008
5377881 / 2603757 = 2.06 times
2007
3467314 / 1905079 = 1.82 times
2008
(593558 + 400908) / 2603757 = .38 times
2007
(402854 + 349697) / 1905079 = .40 times
2008
654718 / [(7828625 + 5656606) / 2]
654718 / 6742615.5 = 9.7%
2007
933843[(5656606 + 5532150) / 2]
933843 / 5594378 = 16.69%
[30]
2008
654718[(2115603 + 2375491) / 2]
654718 / 2245547 = 29.16%
2007
933843[(2375491 + 2756737) / 2]
933843 / 2566114 = 36.4%
Equity Ratio
2009
2108118/9155518 = 0.2302
2008
2115603 / 7828625 = 27.02%
2007
2375491 / 5656606 = 42%
[31]
Technological Institute of the Philippines
938 Aurora Boulevard Cubao Quezon City
(CASE ANALYSIS)
Diamante, Cheryl
[32]
Dinglasan, Paolo T.
Llorca, Hazeline L.
Manuguid, Lorilyn C.
Mendoza, Jay-Ar V.
Nadal, Rachel Anne V.
Tirana, Raymart C
Submitted to:
Prof. Paul Ma. Pesito
[33]