Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tower Piping PDF
Tower Piping PDF
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
LIST OF FIGURES 3
1.0 PURPOSE 4
2.0 INTRODUCTION 4
3.0 TERMINOLOGY 4
3.1 Safety 4
3.2 Operation 4
3.3 Maintenance 4
3.4 Economics 5
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 1 OF 1
5.4 Reflux Nozzle 9
5.5 Instrument Nozzles 9
5.6 Preferred Component Locations 10
5.7 Miscellaneous Nozzle Considerations 10
5.8 Tray Details 11
5.9 Packed Bed Sections 12
5.10 Platform Details 12
5.11 Optimizing Tower Layout 13
5.12 Reboiler and Pipe Support Considerations 13
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 2 OF 2
LIST OF FIGURES
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 3 OF 3
1.0 PURPOSE
2.0 INTRODUCTION
The philosophy addressed in this guide primarily deals with trayed fractionation
towers. It is the responsibility of the Plant Design and Piping group to develop
a layout based upon a combination of certain specific rules and logic. The
optimum tower design is achieved through a trial and error approach when not
governed by specific industry codes and regulations. This includes striking a
balance between setting tray orientations, use of internal piping, and proper
grouping of valves and instruments to minimize platforming requirements.
3.0 TERMINOLOGY
3.1 Safety
Design of towers must give proper attention to safety for all plant personnel
who will be required to work within its confines. As one travels from grade to
the upper most platform, the area must be free of dangerous obstructions when
attempting to gain access to values, instruments or exit the tower in an
emergency.
3.2 Operation
3.3 Maintenance
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 4 OF 4
removable platform sections if necessary to accommodate maintenance below,
etc.
3.4 Economics
Financial impact of one design over another is one feature that is often
overlooked when engaged in development of a tower layout. Setting the
bottom tangent line at the true minimum elevation; arranging internal and
external piping in such a way that platforming can be minimized and weighing
the cost of increasing the vessel wall thickness to directly support a vertical
reboiler over a support from grade requiring foundations, steel structure, etc.
c. Establish tray orientation based upon review of all governing criteria (see
4.2).
d. Start layout by working from the top of tower downward (see 5.0).
The three prime factors listed below should be considered when attempting to
set the bottom tangent line elevation include:
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 5 OF 5
4.1.1 Pump NPSH
The project process engineer is responsible to establish the dimension from the
vessel tangent line to the centerline of a thermosyphon reboiler. When a
vertical reboiler is used, adequate clearances must be given to remove the
lower channel section.
a. The two primary piping circuits which normally impact tray orientation are
the feed nozzle and reboiler connection.
b. The feed nozzle may have one or a multiple of external connections with
an array of internal piping configurations. See Figure 4. Three typical
feed arrangements are:
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 6 OF 6
c. For Bechtel preferred internal piping and tray details see Drawings B-
501, 502, 503 and 504.
d. Should the feed nozzle not be a deciding factor, refer to the reboiler
piping requirements in paragraph e.
e. Since the preferred reboiler piping arrangement is the most direct route,
coming off the bottom tray downcomer now comes into play in setting
tray orientations. A stress engineer should approve the proposed layout
before assuming the selected nozzle location will work for the piping.
Scheme (A) in Figure 2 is an example of an optimum design for the
reboiler inlet line. Scheme (B) shows one of a number of arrangements
for the reboiler return line. Tray orientations are unaffected by draw-off
nozzles located in the bottom head of the tower. These nozzles may be
located at any orientation to suit.
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 7 OF 7
The first order of business is to select the routing of the vapor overhead line.
This line is normally run to a condenser located in an adjacent structure or over
the piperack directly in front of the tower. Consideration for flexibility will most
likely determine what segment of the tower facing the piperack the line will be
located. See Figure 6. The most direct route may apply if no flexibility concern
exists, assuming the line can span the horizontal distance from the tower to the
condenser header. Locating the line along the 0° axis would provide a
moderate "leg" for stress while routing the line away from the condenser would
allow greater flexibility should it be necessary. This issue must be worked with
a stress engineer as the design is developed. The vapor overhead line may
exit the tower in one of two general locations. The most common is shown in
scheme (A) off the top head. A variation of this design would be the elimination
of the flanged nozzle for a butt weld connection for very large O.D. lines. This
would most likely require client approval, but should be considered for
economic reasons. The second approach, scheme (C), utilizes an internal pipe
exiting the top side of the vessel just below the tangent line. This design may
eliminate the need for a top head platform. As with all lines at similar
equipment, the piping will be supported as close to the top tangent or nozzle as
possible. Additional items normally found on vapor overhead lines may
include, temperature connections, inhibitor injections, relief valves and vents.
Potential variations found at top head platforms are shown in Figure 7. The
relief valve system is the next feature to be considered. It may be an open or
closed system, with or without block valves and bypass. Scheme A shows the
two variations for an open system, without block valves. The ideal location for
the relief valve would be off the top of the overhead line, discharging at least
10'/3M above the platform assuming there are no other platforms at higher
elevations in close proximity to this point. Should the valve be too high, the
inlet line can come off the vertical portion of the overhead line which would
enable the valve to be set at a lower elevation.
Davits for tower maintenance are commonly located on the top head platform.
They handle vessel intervals and large relief valves, 4" x 6" and above. The
davit should preferably be located in a corner of the platform. It must be able to
swing over the relief valve to be maintained and be moved to the specified drop
zone for tower maintenance. The centerline elevation must permit the lifting
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 8 OF 8
device to clear the highest item to be handled. The lifted load of the heaviest
single component must be identified either from the vessel engineer or relief
valve vendor. The vessel vent should be located in the most convenient place
to accommodate operator maintenance and access on the top head platform.
Closed relief systems require special consideration before the valve or valves
can be located. See Figure 8. Will there be an economic advantage to locate
the valve at a lower platform elevation? Can a lower platform accommodate
the relief valve without significantly increasing steel cost which may offset any
piping material saving by being set at the lower elevation? Both options should
thoroughly be investigated before taking the design further down the tower.
Figure 9 shows variations of internal piping arrangements for the reflux nozzle.
Scheme A and B are fixed arrangements, while scheme C enables the reflux
nozzle to be oriented at any desired orientation within a 270° arc. This offers
multiple opportunities to develop an optimum layout for the reflux line.
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 9 OF 9
5.6 Preferred Component Locations - Figure 11.
a. Plan to run piping down the tower on the side facing the pipe rack, away
from manways, instrumentation, ladders, etc. for small diameter towers of
4'/1.2 or less, lines should be grouped for common support. (See Figure
17).
b. Locate the manways toward the maintenance access area, away from
the piperack.
d. Ladders should be located between the main piping area and the
segment of platforming, manways, instruments, etc.
When initiating a tower layout the following information can be used to develop
nozzle locations and elevations.
b. Top head nozzles are set from the platform elevation (top of steel) to the
face of flange. The dimension varies with the nozzle rating.
c. The maximum distance a nozzle can be set in the top head from the
vessel centerline is shown in detail "A".
d. Platform penetrations for nozzles and lines are shown in Figure 15.
e. Liquid outlet nozzle in the bottom head may have minimum dimensional
requirements. If a valve is bolted to the nozzle, a tower drain connection
is likely to be needed. Clearance between nozzles, and the drain nozzle
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 10 OF 10
flange and skirt access opening reinforcement or fireproofing must be
checked.
There are various types of tray designs, packing, internal piping details to affect
liquid vapor contact. Common tray designs include single or double pass
bubble cap, sieve and perforated design. As the liquid flows across the tray
surface and down to the tray below through the downcomer area, the hot vapor
rises through the bubble caps and eventually out the overhead line to a
condenser. Trays are numbered, with the top tray normally being number one,
the second, number two and so on. The P&IDs will identify which tray a nozzle
is to be set at. The piping designer using the basic data outlined in this guide,
knowledge of good industry practice, safety, maintenance operation and
economics must orient all trays, locate all nozzles, piping, instruments, ladders,
platforms, davits, etc.
Another type of tray is the chimney type. When called for, the orientation of
trays above and below the chimney tray may vary as desired. Other towers
have multiple diameters. One arrangement uses a single downcomer in the
transition section, with a feed nozzle to the tray below. Another variation uses
internal piping from the downcomer to the tray below. Both enable the trays
below to be oriented differently from the upper section of the tower. This
enables a designer to optimize the external layout for piping, platforms, ladders,
etc.
Packed bed sections use metal rings for liquid vapor contact instead of trays.
The rings are packed into specific sections of the tower, called beds, supported
by cross grid bars. They are spaced close enough together to prevent the rings
from falling through. The supports are designed to allow vapor to rise and
liquid flow down. Liquid is fed in at the top of each bed through a distributor
pipe. Unlike trayed towers, there are no special orientation considerations of
these beds, distributor or packing supports.
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 11 OF 11
Tower platforms should enable plant personnel to work safely during normal
operations and maintenance, without being costly and excessive in size. The
minimum size for top head, crossover or normal operations can be seen in this
figure. Bracket spacing should be standardized whenever possible. Ladder
runs must adhere to certain industry and code regulations as shown in the
elevation view of the tower. No single ladder may not exceed 30'/10.0. Should
a ladder service more than one platform, the platforms must be set at an
elevation that is consistent with the rung spacing of 12"/.300. Dimension "A"
shall be in even increments or rung spacing. Avoid setting two platforms
serviced by one ladder at the same elevation for operator safety. Elevation
difference must be 2'/600 minimum.
Ladder cages are not needed for platforms whose elevation is under 20'/6.10.
Step through ladders are permitted. One rule to remember when designing
any platforming: never force plant personnel to go up a higher elevation, when
attempting emergency egress off a tower.
Platform penetration sizes should be consistent with the specifics of each case.
Clearance should be given to bare pipe, insulated pipe, and flanged
connections as necessary. It is not necessary to allow for clearance of
insulation on flanges, since it is likely the insulation will be removed prior to
removal of the flanged pipe.
a. A process suggested arrangement for a feed nozzle would put the block
valve away from any planned platforming. By employing one of the
alternate feed nozzle arrangements, the internal pipe can be set at any
desired orientation. This would put the block valve over the desired
platform layout.
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 12 OF 12
of platform can normally be reduced if not required to traverse around
such items
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 13 OF 13
- Manway Davits C-509
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 14 OF 14
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 15 OF 15
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 16 OF 16
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 17 OF 17
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 18 OF 18
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 19 OF 19
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 20 OF 20
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 21 OF 21
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 22 OF 22
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 23 OF 23
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 24 OF 24
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 25 OF 25
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 26 OF 26
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 27 OF 27
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 28 OF 28
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 29 OF 29
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 30 OF 30
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 31 OF 31
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 32 OF 32
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 33 OF 33
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 34 OF 34
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 35 OF 35
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 36 OF 36
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 37 OF 37
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 38 OF 38
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 39 OF 39
O:\WINWORD\3DG\P22\001-00.DOC PAGE 40 OF 40