You are on page 1of 2

FACTS: ISSUE & RULING:

Petitioner, a non-stock and


IS LUNG CENTER A
non-profit entity, is the
registered owner of a lot
CHARITABLE INSTITUTION?
located in Quezon City. YES. A charitable institution
does NOT lose its character
Erected in the middle of the
as such and its exemption
aforesaid lot is a hospital. from taxes simply because it
and a big space at the ground derives income from paying
floor is being leased to private patients or receives subsidies
parties, for canteen and small from the government, so long
store spaces and private as the money received is
clinics. Almost one-half of the devoted or used altogether to
the charitable object which it
entire area on the left side of the
is intended to achieve; and no
building is vacant and idle, while a money inures to the private
big portion on the right side, is being benefit of the persons
leased for commercial purposes to a managing or operating the
private enterprise, the Elliptical Orchids and institution.
Garden Center. Petitioner accepts paying and
non-paying patients. Aside from its income from
paying patients, the petitioner receives annual
subsidies from the government. IS LUNG CENTER
Thereafter, both the land and the hospital EXEMPT FROM REAL
building of the petitioner were assessed for PROPERTY TAXES?
real property taxes by the City Assessor of
The portion of its real property
Quezon City. Petitioner filed a Claim for
LUNG CENTER OF Exemption from real property taxes with the
LEASED to private entities are
NOT EXEMPT from real property
taxes. What is meant by actual,
City Assessor, predicated on its claim that it is
THE PHILIPPINES a charitable institution. The petitioner’s direct and exclusive use of the
property for charitable purposes
request was denied, and a petition was,
VS. thereafter, filed before the Local Board of
is the direct and immediate and
actual application of the property
Assessment Appeals of Quezon City for the itself to the purposes for which
QUEZON CITY reversal but the same was dismissed. Both the charitable institution is
organized. It is not the use of the
the Central Board of Assessment Appeals of
GROUP 3 - ABELARDO, ILACAD, income from the real property that
Quezon City and Court of Appeals affirmed is determinative of whether the
MANUEL, RAMAJO, REAL
the assailed decision. Hence, this petition. property is used for tax-exempt
purposes.
FACTS: ISSUE & RULING:
Petitioner, a non-stock and
non-profit entity, is the IS LUNG CENTER A
registered owner of a lot CHARITABLE INSTITUTION?
located in Quezon City. YES. A charitable institution
Erected in the middle of the does NOT lose its character
aforesaid lot is a hospital. as such and its exemption
and a big space at the ground f r o m t a x e s s i m p l y b e c a u s e i t
derives income from paying
floor is being leased to private
patients or receives subsidies
parties, for canteen and small f r o m t h e g o v e r n m e n t , s o l o n g
store spaces and private as the money received is
clinics. Almost one-half of the d e v o t e d o r u s e d a l t o g e t h e r t o
entire area on the left side of the the charitable object which it
building is vacant and idle, while a is intended to achieve; and no
big portion on the right side, is being money inures to the private
benefit of the persons
leased for commercial purposes to a
managing or operating the
private enterprise, the Elliptical Orchids and institution.
Garden Center. Petitioner accepts paying and
non-paying patients. Aside from its income from
paying patients, the petitioner receives annual
subsidies from the government. IS LUNG CENTER
Thereafter, both the land and the hospital EXEMPT FROM REAL
building of the petitioner were assessed for PROPERTY TAXES?
real property taxes by the City Assessor of
The portion of its real property
LUNG CENTER OF Quezon City. Petitioner filed a Claim for
Exemption from real property taxes with the
LEASED to private entities are
NOT EXEMPT from real property
THE PHILIPPINES City Assessor, predicated on its claim that it is
a charitable institution. The petitioner’s
taxes. What is meant by actual,
direct and exclusive use of the

VS. request was denied, and a petition was,


thereafter, filed before the Local Board of
property for charitable purposes
is the direct and immediate and
actual application of the property
QUEZON CITY Assessment Appeals of Quezon City for the
reversal but the same was dismissed. Both
itself to the purposes for which
the charitable institution is
organized. It is not the use of the
the Central Board of Assessment Appeals of
GROUP 3 - ABELARDO, ILACAD, income from the real property that
Quezon City and Court of Appeals affirmed is determinative of whether the
MANUEL, RAMAJO, REAL
the assailed decision. Hence, this petition. property is used for tax-exempt
purposes.

You might also like