The Lung Center of the Philippines owns a hospital building in Quezon City that is used to treat both paying and non-paying patients. However, portions of the building are leased to private entities for commercial purposes. While the Lung Center argued it was a charitable institution exempt from property taxes, the court ruled that the portions leased commercially were not exempt as they were not used directly and exclusively for charitable purposes. The court affirmed the Lung Center was a charitable institution overall but only the areas used for hospital operations were tax exempt.
Original Description:
lung center v qc
Original Title
Handouts Lung Center of the Philippines vs. Quezon City
The Lung Center of the Philippines owns a hospital building in Quezon City that is used to treat both paying and non-paying patients. However, portions of the building are leased to private entities for commercial purposes. While the Lung Center argued it was a charitable institution exempt from property taxes, the court ruled that the portions leased commercially were not exempt as they were not used directly and exclusively for charitable purposes. The court affirmed the Lung Center was a charitable institution overall but only the areas used for hospital operations were tax exempt.
The Lung Center of the Philippines owns a hospital building in Quezon City that is used to treat both paying and non-paying patients. However, portions of the building are leased to private entities for commercial purposes. While the Lung Center argued it was a charitable institution exempt from property taxes, the court ruled that the portions leased commercially were not exempt as they were not used directly and exclusively for charitable purposes. The court affirmed the Lung Center was a charitable institution overall but only the areas used for hospital operations were tax exempt.
IS LUNG CENTER A non-profit entity, is the registered owner of a lot CHARITABLE INSTITUTION? located in Quezon City. YES. A charitable institution does NOT lose its character Erected in the middle of the as such and its exemption aforesaid lot is a hospital. from taxes simply because it and a big space at the ground derives income from paying floor is being leased to private patients or receives subsidies parties, for canteen and small from the government, so long store spaces and private as the money received is clinics. Almost one-half of the devoted or used altogether to the charitable object which it entire area on the left side of the is intended to achieve; and no building is vacant and idle, while a money inures to the private big portion on the right side, is being benefit of the persons leased for commercial purposes to a managing or operating the private enterprise, the Elliptical Orchids and institution. Garden Center. Petitioner accepts paying and non-paying patients. Aside from its income from paying patients, the petitioner receives annual subsidies from the government. IS LUNG CENTER Thereafter, both the land and the hospital EXEMPT FROM REAL building of the petitioner were assessed for PROPERTY TAXES? real property taxes by the City Assessor of The portion of its real property Quezon City. Petitioner filed a Claim for LUNG CENTER OF Exemption from real property taxes with the LEASED to private entities are NOT EXEMPT from real property taxes. What is meant by actual, City Assessor, predicated on its claim that it is THE PHILIPPINES a charitable institution. The petitioner’s direct and exclusive use of the property for charitable purposes request was denied, and a petition was, VS. thereafter, filed before the Local Board of is the direct and immediate and actual application of the property Assessment Appeals of Quezon City for the itself to the purposes for which QUEZON CITY reversal but the same was dismissed. Both the charitable institution is organized. It is not the use of the the Central Board of Assessment Appeals of GROUP 3 - ABELARDO, ILACAD, income from the real property that Quezon City and Court of Appeals affirmed is determinative of whether the MANUEL, RAMAJO, REAL the assailed decision. Hence, this petition. property is used for tax-exempt purposes. FACTS: ISSUE & RULING: Petitioner, a non-stock and non-profit entity, is the IS LUNG CENTER A registered owner of a lot CHARITABLE INSTITUTION? located in Quezon City. YES. A charitable institution Erected in the middle of the does NOT lose its character aforesaid lot is a hospital. as such and its exemption and a big space at the ground f r o m t a x e s s i m p l y b e c a u s e i t derives income from paying floor is being leased to private patients or receives subsidies parties, for canteen and small f r o m t h e g o v e r n m e n t , s o l o n g store spaces and private as the money received is clinics. Almost one-half of the d e v o t e d o r u s e d a l t o g e t h e r t o entire area on the left side of the the charitable object which it building is vacant and idle, while a is intended to achieve; and no big portion on the right side, is being money inures to the private benefit of the persons leased for commercial purposes to a managing or operating the private enterprise, the Elliptical Orchids and institution. Garden Center. Petitioner accepts paying and non-paying patients. Aside from its income from paying patients, the petitioner receives annual subsidies from the government. IS LUNG CENTER Thereafter, both the land and the hospital EXEMPT FROM REAL building of the petitioner were assessed for PROPERTY TAXES? real property taxes by the City Assessor of The portion of its real property LUNG CENTER OF Quezon City. Petitioner filed a Claim for Exemption from real property taxes with the LEASED to private entities are NOT EXEMPT from real property THE PHILIPPINES City Assessor, predicated on its claim that it is a charitable institution. The petitioner’s taxes. What is meant by actual, direct and exclusive use of the
VS. request was denied, and a petition was,
thereafter, filed before the Local Board of property for charitable purposes is the direct and immediate and actual application of the property QUEZON CITY Assessment Appeals of Quezon City for the reversal but the same was dismissed. Both itself to the purposes for which the charitable institution is organized. It is not the use of the the Central Board of Assessment Appeals of GROUP 3 - ABELARDO, ILACAD, income from the real property that Quezon City and Court of Appeals affirmed is determinative of whether the MANUEL, RAMAJO, REAL the assailed decision. Hence, this petition. property is used for tax-exempt purposes.