Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LITERATURE REVIEWS
1
Figure 2.1. Location of the study
2
the normal range of 2,000 – 3,500 mm annually. Dry season in this area falls in the
months of June to September. Annual precipitation for the period 1978–2008 is
presented in figure 2.2. The average annual rainfall over this period was 2866 mm. The
wettest year was 1988 with annual rainfall of 3,614 mm and the driest year was 1997
with annual rainfall of 1,899 mm. The wettest month was December with average
monthly rainfall of 336 mm and the driest month is August with average monthly
rainfall of 103 mm.
Figure 2.2. Average annual precipitation (top) and average monthly precipitation
(bottom) for the period 1978–2004
3
humified) peat was found near to the bottomlayer. Peat core sample indicated low dry
bulk densities of the peat which were ranged from 0.02 to 0.21 g cm −3. Ash contents in
the sample varied between 0.33% and 1%, and mean pH was 3.2 ± 0.4 (Weiss et al.
2002). The water draining from this peatland is black in color due to high levels of
humic and fulvic acids, polyphenols and other products of organic matter decomposition
(Wosten et al. 2008).
Figure 2.3. Long section and the illustration of peat dome of Kalampangan Canal
4
a. Fibric, for undecomposed peat with a fibre content >66% and a low degree of
humification
b. Hemic, for peat with a fibre content of 33-66% and a moderate degree of
humification
c. Sapric, for the most decomposed peat with a fibre content of <33% and a high degree
of humification
Figure 2.4. The illustration of peat soil based on the humification degrees (Wust et al.
2003).
5
Bulk density is defined as the mass of soil (peat) per unit volume. Peat soils have
bulk density values varying from 0.01 to 0.20 g/cm3. The lower the degree of peat
humification, the lower the value of bulk density. Low bulk density of the peat gives
the consequences of the low bearing capacity of peat soil (Noor 2001). The bulk
density of the surface peat is only 0.15 – 0.30 g/cm 3. This value showed that peat soil
is very light in weight if compared to mineral soils which have bulk density 1.25 –
1.45 g/cm3 (Brady 1997). Bulk density of surface peat in Central Kalimantan varies
between 0.12 and 0.17 g/cm3 under pristine peat swamp forest. In cultivated and fire
damaged peatlands, the bulk density is between 0.17 and 0.31 g/cm 3. This condition
happened because after land reclamation peat substrates start to decompose and
become compacted (Rieley and Page 2008).
b. Water content
Peat soil water content is the water retained by the peat, especially as capillary water
and absorbed water. The water retained in the capillaries is affected by the total
porosity and the rate of decomposition, while the absorbed water is affected by
colloidal properties and specific surface area of peat. Maximum water content of peat
is 850 – 3000%, 450 – 850%, and <450% for fibric, hemic, and sapric peat,
respectively (Andriesse 2003).
c. Shrinking and swelling
Peat soils will shrink when it is dried and will swell when it is re-wetted. On the
other hand, shrinkage values can be expressed as specific volumes of peat (McLay et
al. 1992). Specific volumes of peat from Block C of ex–MRP is between 2.7 and 6.5
cm3/g and decreasing significantly with cultivation and fire damage, especially in the
top 0 – 30 cm layer (Kurnain et al. 2001).
d. Irreversible drying
Peat soils which has experienced severe drought due to reclamation and land clearing
will experience a condition called irreversible drying. In this state, peat soil can no
longer be wet easily. Irreversible drying causes the decrease in the rate of infiltration
and water holding capacity. Rieley et al. (1996) suggested that the water holding
capacity of peat soil which has been burning is only 50% of its original capacity. In
addition, the peat soil will become dry and flammable, so the risk of peat fires is
increasing. Some experts argued that the irreversible drying increases the density of
6
peat soils and establishes water-retaining metal blanket on the surface of the peat
soil. Other experts stated that the irreversible drying establishes carboxyl and
phenolic formed from acids, humus, and high lignin which inhibits re-wetting
process (Noor 2001). As an example, irreversible drying of peat in Block C of ex-
MRP of Central Kalimantan occurs at mean critical water contents ranging from 27.9
to 17.9%, 34.7 to 22.0%, and 5.5 to 3.5% for fibric, hemic, and sapric peat,
respectively (Kurnain et al. 2001).
e. Hydraulic conductivity
Due to it porous nature, peat soil has high to moderate hydraulic conductivity.
Hydraulic conductivity in peat soils is driven by several factors, including total
porosity, bulk density and degree of decomposition. Particle density of peat soils in
Kalimantan varies between 1.23 and 1.76 g/cm3 and the total porosity of peat soils in
Kalimantan, in general, varies between 80% and 90% (Rieley and Page 2008). There
are not so many data about hydraulic conductivity for tropical peat soil. Some studies
stated that the range of hydraulic conductivity of tropical peat soil is between 0.2 to
52 cm/h (Sajarwan et al. 2002). Hydraulic conductivity of waterlogged peat 1-2 m
below the surface of peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan has been investigated
by Takahashi and Yonetani (1997). The values varied between 0.001 and 0.0001
cm/sec. At the surface, hydraulic conductivity was very high and impossible to
measure.
Some of important chemical characteristic of tropical peat soil are soil pH, ash
content, cation exchange capacity, and organic carbon content. All are described below:
a. Soil pH
Acidity (pH) of peat is related to the presence of organic compounds, aluminum, and
hydrogen that can be exchanged, as well as iron sulfide and other sulfur compounds
that can be oxidized. Tropical peat is ombrogen and olgotrophic and usually acid or
very acid with a pH range of 3.0 to 4.5 (Andriesse 1988). Peat acidity tends to be
higher if the peat is denser. Shallow peat has a pH between 4.0 and 5.1, while deep
peat has a pH between 3.1 and 3.9. In Central Kalimantan, pH of peat soil was
ranging from 3.0 to 4.0, and tends to be decreased with increasing depth in the peat.
Dry surface peat has pH that ranges from 3.2 to 7.8. The pH of tropical peat soil is
7
also depending on utilization and agricultural management such as addition of lime
and fertilizers (Suryanto 1994).
b. Ash content
Ash content in the peat soil describes the mineral content in it. The higher the ash
content, the higher the minerals it contains. Ash content in the natural undisturbed
peat is low. Based on previous study, Indonesian peat ash content was ranging from
2.4% to 16.9% (Radjagukguk 1997). Deep peat has lower levels of the ashes if
compared to the shallow one. Ash content for Indonesian peat is 11%, 12%, and 15%
for very deep peat (>3 m), middle peat (1 – 3 m), and shallow peat (<1 m),
respectively (Noor 2001). Ash contents of pristine peat soil in Kalimantan are very
low. It varied between 0.2% and 2%. On the other hand, ash content for drained peat
in Central Kalimantan ranged between 0.6% and 3% (Page et al. 2004).
c. Cation exchange capacity
The general definition of cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil is the maximum
quantity of total cations, of any class, that a soil is capable of holding, at a given pH
value, available for exchange with the soil solution. CEC describes the fertility,
nutrient retention capacity, and the capacity of the soil to protect groundwater from
cation contamination. Based on the weight, the CEC value of tropical peat soil varied
between 50 to 100 cmol(+)/kg. This value will be less if the CEC value is calculated
based on the volume of the soil (Radjagukguk, 1997). The CEC of soil depends on
the level of acidity. The CEC of tropical peat on the pH of 7 with minor
decomposition is 100 cmol(+)/kg, while the CEC of the one with major
decomposition is about 200 cmol(+)/kg (Andriesse 1988).
d. Organic carbon content
Organic carbon content of tropical peat soil depends on the level of decomposition.
The process of decomposition reduces organic carbon content in the peat soil. Based
on this circumstance, in general, organic carbon content of peat with major
decomposition such as hemic and sapric is lower than the one for fibric peat. organic
carbon content of tropical peat soil varied between 12% and 60% (Andriesse 1988).
The value of organic carbon content in peat soil can be derived from the value of C/N
ratio of the soil. Organic carbon contents, total N contents, and C/N ratios of peat
8
soils in the upper 100 cm profile at Block C of ex-MRP varied between 49% to 57%,
1.0% to 2.2%, and 29% to 52%, respectively (Kurnain et al. 2001).
9
the island of Sumatera, with an area of approximately 6.44 million ha with peat depth of
shallow to very deep. Peatlands in Kalimantan Island has an area of about 4.78 million
ha with peat depth of shallow to very deep. The peatland area in Papua Island is about
3.69 million ha with peat depth of shallow to moderate. Central Kalimantan is a
province with the largest area of peatland in Kalimantan Island (about 2.66 million ha).
This area is still under the area of peatlands in Riau province of Sumatera (3.87 million
ha) (BPPP 2011). Peatland areas in Indonesia are classified into conservation forest area
(about 2.34 million ha), protected forest area (1.02 million ha), and production forest
area (about 8.95 million ha). Peat land area used for plantation is about 1.42 million ha,
used as an agricultural area of 1.23 million ha, and the rest are used for other activities
(Wahyunto 2010, Bappenas 2010). Figure 2.5 illustrates the distribution of peatland
areas in Indonesia.
10
high value of hydraulic conductivity of the surface peat layer (Takahashi and Yonetani
1997). The high value of hydraulic conductivity is caused by the physical characteristics
of the top peat layer (fibric and hemic) with its open, large pore structure (Rieley et al.
1996). Once the peat soil is in saturated condition, excess rainfall flows laterally over
and through the surface and subsurface zone. Finally, it flows towards surrounding
rivers or drainage canals. There is only small proportion (<3%) of the rainfall penetrates
into the deeper peat layers which has low hydraulic conductivities (Hooijer 2005). As a
consequence, lateral water flow towards rivers and drainage canals is then larger if
compared to downward flow into deeper layers (Wosten 2008).
The relationship between groundwater level and peat fire in tropical peatlands of
Central Kalimantan has also been investigated. In order to prevent peat subsidence and
fire, groundwater levels should be maintained between 40 cm below and 100 cm above
the peat surface. If groundwater level in tropical peat drops below 40 cm from the
surface, which under hydrostatic equilibrium is equivalent to a pressure head of -4 kPa,
the moisture content of the little humified top layer decreases from about 0.90 cm 3 cm−3
at saturation to about 0.50 cm3 cm−3 at a pressure head of −4 kPa (Rieley and Page
2005). In such condition, the risk of fire occurrence is very high (Takahashi et al. 2003,
Usup et al. 2004). If the fire happened, it will spread rapidly due to biomass and dry
peat spread (Frandsen, 1997).
Human activity is the most cause of peatland degradation. Million hectares of
peatlands peatland area in Central Kalimantan has been removed as a result of both
legal (concession) and illegal logging and conversion to agricultural use that requires
drainage and water management. The MRP project in Central Kalimantan has produced
abandoned areas that experience floods in the rainy season. On the other hand, in the
dry season, groundwater levels drop significantly and decrease moisture contents of the
surface peat and the vegetation. This circumstance creates huge amounts of dry fuel for
the peat fires (Wosten 2008). Peat fire risk in tropical peatland of Central Kalimantan is
becoming higher due to environmental events such as El Nino Southern Oscillation
(ENSO). Indonesian climate, including Kalimantan climate, is strongly influenced by
the ENSO. In the El Niño years, rainfall in dry-season can be less than half of normal
and severe El Niño events have long been associated with fire, for example in the year
of 1972-73, 1982-83, 1987, 1991-92, 1994, 1997-98, 2002, and 2006 (Harrison et al.
11
2009). Over 60,000 hotspots or fires were recorded in Indonesia in 1997, 2002, 2004,
and 2006. The highest number was 147,143 in 2006, making it the worst fire year since
1997 (Putra et al. 2008). The impacts of fire in dry years of El Nino year can be
extremely serious. During El Nino fire in 1997-98, about 10 million hectares of
Indonesia forests were burned, including 1.5 million hectares of peat swamp forests. Of
these, six million total hectares burned in the Kalimantan provinces, including 750,000
hectares of peat forests. (Tacconi, 2003).
Annual green house gases (GHG) emissions, especially CO2, of Central
Kalimantan in 2005 were estimated to be 292 Mt. This number is equivalent to about
15% of total Indonesia’s total emissions of GHG. Peat and Land Use, Land-Use
Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) are dominant contributors to the GHG emissions of
Central Kalimantan, which their portion is about 98 percent of total emissions of the
province. If there are no changes on the environmental restoration and management in
the area, the emissions are expected to grow in number into 340 Mt in 2030. Of this
number, the peat alone will contribute about 68% of the total emissions (DNPI, 2010).
Annual CO2 emissions from peat fires in Indonesia indicate that emissions from peat
fires vary most around 0.1 – 0.2 billion tons per year, and it will be bigger in the El
Niňo years. In 1997 El Niňo, it was estimated that peat fire caused the volume of global
CO2 emissions of Indonesia reached 2.5 billion tons (Van der Werf et al. 2008).
Estimated global CO2 emissions from drained peatland areas in 2008 were 1.3 billion
tons CO2, which 0.5 billion tons of them were from Indonesia (Joosten 2009).
12