Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Integrated pest management (IPM) has remained the dominant paradigm of pest
control for the last 50 years. IPM has been endorsed by essentially all the multilateral
environmental agreements that have transformed the global policy framework of natural
resource management, agriculture, and trade. The integration of a number of different
control tactics into IPM systems can be done in ways that greatly facilitate the
achievement of the goals either of field-by-field pest management, or of area-wide (AW)
pest management, which is the management of the total pest population within a
delimited area. For several decades IPM and AW pest control have been seen as
competing paradigms with different objectives and approaches.
IPM and Area-Wide Management pest control have gradually converged, and it
is now generally acknowledged that the synthesis, AW-IPM, neither targets only
eradication, nor relies only on single control tactics, and that many successful AW
programmes combine a centrally managed an approach, and that some are managed in
a fully bottom-up manner. AW-IPM is increasingly accepted especially for mobile pests
where management at a larger scale is more effective and preferable to the
uncoordinated field-by-field approach. For some livestock pests, vectors of human
diseases, and pests of crops with a high economic value and low pest tolerance, there
are compelling economic incentives for participating in AW control. Nevertheless issues
of free riders, public participation and financing of public goods, all play a significant role
in AW-IPM implementation. These social and managerial issues have, in several cases,
severely hampered the positive outcome of AW programmes; and this emphasises the
need for attention not only to ecological, environmental, and economic aspects, but also
to the social and management dimensions.