Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shear Force Lab Report
Shear Force Lab Report
Shear Force Lab Report
2
1.0 OBJECTIVE
3.0 INTRODUCTION
Moving loads on beam are common features of design. Many road bridges are
constructed from beam, and as such have to be designed to carry a knife edge load,
or a string of wheel loads, or a uniformly distributed load, or perhaps the worst
combination of all three. To find the critical moment in section, influence line is used.
4.0 THEORY
Part 1: This experiment examines how moment varies at a cut section as a unit load
moves from one end another (see diagram 1). From the diagram, moment
influence equation can be written.
3
For a unit load between 0 < x < a ,
Mx = ( L – x ) a - 1 (a – x )……….(1)
L
Mx = xb / L – ( x – a )…………..(2)
‘ cut ‘
1 ( unit load ) Mx
x
Mx
RA = (1-x/L) RB = x/L
a b
Figure 1
Part 2: If the beam is loaded as shown below, the moment at the ‘cut’ can be
calculated using the influence line. (See diagram 2).
4
( y1, y2, and y3 are coordinates derived from the influence line in terms of x1, x2, x3, a,
b and L )
a+b = L
x1
x2
x3
y1 y2 y3
Figure 2
5
5.0 APPARATUS
6
6.0 PROCEDURES
Part 1:
2. Hanger with any mass between 150 – 300 g was place at the first grooved
hanger support at the left support and the digital forces reading were
recorded in Table 1.
3. The procedure repeated to the next grooved hanger until to the last groove
hanger at the right hand support.
4. Calculation in Table 1 completed.
Part 2:
1. Three load hangers with any load between 50 – 400 g was placed on it
and placed it at any position between the supports. The position and the
digital forces display reading recorded in Table 2.
2. The procedure repeated with three other location.
3. The calculation in Table 2 completed.
7
7.0 RESULT
Notes :
8
2. Experimental Influence line values = Moment (Nm)
Load (N)
3. Calculate the theoretical value using the equation 1 for load position 40 – 260 mm
and equation 2 for load position 320mm and 400mm.
Part 2,
Table 2
Notes:
9
8.0 CALCULATION
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
PART 1
When x = 0.32 m
Mx = (0.32) (0.14) – (0.32 – 0.3)
0.44
= 0.082 Nm
10
PART 2
F1 = 100g
= 100 x 9.81
1000
= 0.981N
F2 = 200g
= 200 x 9.81
1000
= 1.962N
F3 = 300g
= 300 x 9.81
1000
= 2.943N
x1
x2
x3
y2
y1 y3
11
*For location 1,
Experimental moment at cut section (Nm) = Digital force reading x 0.125
= 2.6 x 0.125
= 0.325 Nm
Moment at cut:
For 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0.3
∑ 𝑀𝑥 = 0
𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 1(0.3) − (0.3) − 1(0.3 − 𝑥)
0.44
0.3𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.3 − 0.44 − 0.3 + 𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.318𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
When x = 0.3
Mx = 0.318x
= 0.318 (0.3)
= 0.095 Nm
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
= - 0.682 (0.3) + 0.3
= - 0.095 Nm
12
Use interpolation to get y1,y2 and y3
0.095 𝑦1
y1, = 0.08
0.3
0.3𝑦1 = 0.0076
𝑦1 = 0.025 𝑚
0.095 𝑦2
y2, = 0.16
0.3
𝑦2 = 0.051𝑚
0.095 𝑦
y3, = 0.13
0.14
𝑦3 = 0.068𝑚
13
1.962 N 2.943 N 0.981 N
x1
x2
x3
y2
y1 y3
*For location 2,
Experimental moment (Nm) = 0.325 Nm
Moment at cut:
For 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0.3
∑ 𝑀𝑥 = 0
𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 1(0.3) − (0.3) − 1(0.3 − 𝑥)
0.44
0.3𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.3 − 0.44 − 0.3 + 𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.318𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
14
When x = 0.3
Mx = 0.318x
= 0.318 (0.3)
= 0.095 Nm
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
= - 0.682 (0.3) + 0.3
= - 0.095 Nm
0.095 𝑦
y1, = 0.11
0.3
𝑦1 = 0.032 𝑚
0.095 𝑦2
y2, = 0.22
0.3
𝑦2 = 0.070𝑚
0.095 𝑦
y3, = 0.13
0.14
𝑦3 = 0.068𝑚
15
2.941 N 0.981 N 1.962 N
x1
x2
x3
y2
y1 y3
*For location 3,
Experimental moment (Nm) = 0.275 Nm
Moment at cut :
For 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0.3
∑ 𝑀𝑥 = 0
𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 1(0.3) − (0.3) − 1(0.3 − 𝑥)
0.44
0.3𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.3 − 0.44 − 0.3 + 𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.318𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
16
When x = 0.3
Mx = 0.318x
= 0.318 (0.3)
= 0.095 Nm
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
= - 0.682 (0.3) + 0.3
= - 0.095 Nm
0.095 𝑦1
y1, = 0.06
0.3
𝑦1 = 0.019 𝑚
0.095 𝑦2
y2, = 0.12
0.3
𝑦2 = 0.038𝑚
0.095 𝑦3
y3, = 0.14
0.14
𝑦3 = 0.095𝑚
17
2.941 N 0.981 N 1.962 N
x1
x2
x3
y2
y1 y3
*For location 4,
Experimental moment (Nm) = 0.250 Nm
Moment at cut:
For 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0.3
∑ 𝑀𝑥 = 0
𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 1(0.3) − (0.3) − 1(0.3 − 𝑥)
0.44
0.3𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.3 − 0.44 − 0.3 + 𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = 0.318𝑥
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
18
When x = 0.3
Mx = 0.318x
= 0.318 (0.3)
= 0.095 Nm
𝑀𝑥 = −0.682𝑥 + 0.3
= - 0.682 (0.3) + 0.3
= - 0.095 Nm
0.095 𝑦1
y1, = 0.12
0.3
𝑦1 = 0.038 𝑚
0.095 𝑦
y2, = 0.22
0.3
𝑦2 = 0.063𝑚
0.095 𝑦3
y3, = 0.06
0.14
𝑦3 = 0.041𝑚
19
9.0 DISCUSSIONS
PART 1
F
1 cut
a b
RA L RB
= =
∑ 𝐹𝑥 = 0 1(𝐿−𝑥)
𝑅𝐴 = 𝐿
1−𝑥
= 𝐿
∑ 𝐹𝑦 = 𝑅𝐴 + 𝑅𝐵 − 1 = 0
𝑅𝐴 + 𝑅𝐵 = 1
𝑅𝐴 + 𝑅𝐵 = 1 (1 − 𝑥)
𝑅𝐵 = 1 −
𝐿
∑𝑀𝑥 = 0
𝑥
𝑅𝐴 (𝐿) − 1(𝐿 − 𝑥) = 0 𝑅𝐵 =
𝐿
𝑅𝐴 𝐿 = 1(𝐿 − 𝑥)
20
Equation 1 ; 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑎 Equation 2 ; 𝑎≤ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑏
𝑀 𝑥 – 𝑅𝐵 (𝑏) + 1(𝑥 − 𝑎)
−𝑀𝑥 + 𝑅𝐴 (𝑎) – 1(𝑎 − 𝑥) = 0
= 0
(1 – 𝑥)𝑎
𝑀𝑥 = – 1(𝑎 − 𝑥) 𝑀 𝑥 = 𝑅𝐵 (𝑏) – 1(𝑥 − 𝑎)
𝐿
𝑥
=
(𝐿 – 𝑥)𝑎 – 1(𝑎 − 𝑥) = (𝑏) – 1(𝑥 − 𝑎)
𝐿 𝐿
𝑥𝑏
= – 1(𝑥 − 𝑎)
𝐿
2. On the graph, plot the theoretical and experimental value against distance from
left and support. Comment on the shape of graph. What does it tell u about how
moment varies at the cut section as a load moved on the beam?
0.12
0.1 Theoretical Influence lines
0.08 value (Nm)
0.06 Experimental influence line
0.04 value (N)
0.02
0
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Distance (m)
From the graph, a peak shaped graph can be obtained. The peak is the weakest point
of the beam where there is a hinge in the beam. As load is being moved on the beam,
the influence line which was constructed can be used to obtain the value of the
moment. As load is moved across near to it, the moment will increase. So does the
other way round when load is moving further than the hinge, the value of moment
will decrease as the load is moving towards the support at the end. As the load is
21
moving along towards the hinge from both side of support, it will come to a peak
where the value of moment is the same.
22
3. Comment on the experimental results and compare it to the theoretical results.
The experimental results that we obtained are quite accurate and compare to the
theoretical results, the experimental results are only slightly different with theoretical
results. When we were conducted the experiment, we tried to minimize the error by
ensuring the Digital Force Meter reads zero with no load before we place the hangers.
PART 2
The experimental results are slightly different from theoretical results are due to
human error and instrument sensitivity as the reading of the instrument keep changing
when we conducted the experiment.
10.0 CONCLUSION
As a conclusion, both objectives were achieved. Moment influence line could be plot
and the influence line can be use to determine the moment. We were able to identify
the reaction and behavior of a beam in terms of its moment reaction value. This
method is useful to check every cross section for a particular beam.
23
11.0 REFERENCES
Ando, J., Komatsuda, T., and Kamiya, A. 1988. Cytoplasmic calcium responses to fluid shear stress
in cultured vascular endothelial cells. In Vitro 24: 871-877.
Ando, J., Nomura, H., and Kamiya, A. 1987. The effects of fluid shear stress on the migration and
proliferation of cultured endothelial cells. Microvascular Research 33: 6270.
Caplan, B.A. and Schwartz, C.J. 1973. Increased endothelial cell turnover in areas of in vivo Evans blue
uptake in the pig aorta. Atherosclerosis 17: 401-417.
Davies, P.F., Remuzzi, A., Gordon, EJ., Dewey, C.F., and Gimbrone, M.A. 1986. Turbulent fluid shear
stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences U.S.A. 83: 2114-2117.
deSouza, P.A., Levesque, M.J., and Nerem, R.M. 1986. Electrophysiological response of endothelial
cells to fluid- imposed shear stress. Federation Proceedings 45: 471.
Dewey, C.F., Jr., Bussolari, S.R., Gimbrone, M.A., Jr., and Davis, P.F. 1981. The dynamic response
of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 103: 177-
185.
Diamond, S.L., Eskin, S.G., and McIntire, L.V. 1989. Fluid flow stimulates tissue plasminogen
activator. Science 243: 1483-1485.
Frangos, J.A., McIntire, L.V., Eskin, S.G., and Ives, C.L. 1985. Flow effects on prostacyclin production
by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 227: 1477-1479.
Leung, D.Y.M., Glagov, S., and Mathews, M.B. 1976. Cyclic stretching stimulates synthesis of
matrix components by arterial smooth muscle cells in vitro. Science 191: 475-477.
Levesque, M.J., Liepsch, D., Moravec, S., and Nerem, R.M. 1986. Correlation of endothelial cell
shape and wall shear stress in a stenosed dog aorta. Arteriosclerosis 6: 220229.
24
APPENDIX
Influence lines play an important part in the design of bridges, industrial crane
rails, conveyor belts, and other structures where loads move across their span.
An influence line represents the variation of the reaction, shear, moment, or deflection at a
specific point in a member as a concentrated force moves over the member. Once this line
is constructed, one can tell at a glance where the moving load should be placed on a
structure so that it creates the greatest influence at the specified point. Furthermore, the
magnitude of the associated reaction, shear, moment, or deflection at the point can than be
calculated from the ordinates of the influence line diagram.
A bending moment exists in a structural element when a moment is applied to the element
so that the element bends. Moments and torques are measured as a force multiplied by a
distance so they have as unit newton-metres (N·m) , or foot-pounds force (ft·lbf). The
concept of bending moment is very important in engineering (particularly
in civil and mechanical engineering) and physics.
Tensile stresses and compressive stresses increase proportionally with bending moment,
but are also dependent on the second moment of area of the cross-section of the structural
element. Failure in bending will occur when the bending moment is sufficient to induce
tensile stresses greater than the yield stress of the material throughout the entire cross-
section. It is possible that failure of a structural element in shear may occur before failure in
bending; however the mechanics of failure in shear and in bending are different.
The bending moment at a section through a structural element may be defined as "the sum
of the moments about that section of all external forces acting to one side of that section".
The forces and moments on either side of the section must be equal in order to counteract
each other and maintain a state of equilibrium so the same bending moment will result from
summing the moments, regardless of which side of the section is selected.
Moments are calculated by multiplying the external vector forces (loads or reactions) by
the vector distance at which they are applied. When analyzing an entire element, it is
sensible to calculate moments at both ends of the element, at the beginning, centre and end
of any uniformly distributed loads, and directly underneath any point loads. Of course any
"pin-joints" within a structure allow free rotation, and so zero moment occurs at these
points as there is no way of transmitting turning forces from one side to the other.
25
If clockwise bending moments are taken as negative, then a negative bending moment
within an element will cause "sagging", and a positive moment will cause "hogging". It is
therefore clear that a point of zero bending moment within a beam is a point of contra
flexure—that is the point of transition from hogging to sagging or vice versa.
It is more common to use the convention that a clockwise bending moment to the left of the
point under consideration is taken as positive. This then corresponds to the second
derivative of a function which, when positive, indicates a curvature that is 'lower at the
centre' i.e. sagging. When defining moments and curvatures in this way calculus can be
more readily used to find slopes and deflections.
26