Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Safe drinking water and adequate sanitation are the basic right of every citizen and are
vital for improving health and alleviating poverty. In adopting the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) countries pledged to reduce by half the proportion of
people without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation by 2015. Although
Nepal has shown some progress in improving access to drinking water, the country
remains plagued by extremely low levels of sanitation. The population with adequate
access to sanitation was only 27% in 2002 (WHO/UNICEF, 2004). Inadequate access
to safe water combined with poor sanitation and personal hygiene practices have
detrimentally impacted upon the health and quality of life of millions of Nepalis,
especially the poorest and most vulnerable.
In the Tenth Plan, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (HMGN) declared its intention to
provide sanitation facilities to 7.421 million people (5.613 million from rural and 1.808
million from urban areas) by 2007. It is recognised that the “[d]evelopment of this sector
will…produce healthy manpower, additional income generation and less health
expenditure on treatment of diseases” (National Planning Commission, 2002). Despite
the best efforts of many agencies working in Nepal, new approaches to expanding
sanitation provision are still needed if the government is to meet its targets and the
needs of its people.
Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is an innovative approach that empowers local
communities to stop open defecation and to build and use latrines without external
hardware subsidies. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools are used to help the
community understand the poor sanitation situation and the associated impacts.
Motivated by a sense of disgust and shame communities themselves commit to
improving the situation by whatever means are available. The role of the NGO is to
facilitate this process. The pioneer and leading advocate of CLTS is Dr Kamal Kar who
initiated the first pilot of CLTS in 2000 in a small community in Bangladesh, while
working as a participatory development consultant for WaterAid Bangladesh in
collaboration with the Village Education Resource Centre (VERC). Kamal Kar has since
facilitated the spread of CLTS to other areas of Bangladesh, India, Cambodia,
Indonesia, China, Mongolia, Nepal and Uganda. The key principles, processes and
experiences in Bangladesh were documented in the seminal IDS Working Paper by Dr
Kar entitled ‘Subsidy or self-respect? Participatory total community sanitation
in Bangladesh’ (Kar, 2003). Subsequent publications, including a draft
update of Working Paper 184, are detailed in the reference list at the end of
this paper.
CLTS in Nepal
In July 2004, following a visit to Nepal by Kamal Kar, a small number of INGOs/NGOs -
namely WaterAid Nepal, Plan Nepal and Nepal Water for Health (Newah) 1 – took the
1
Note that Newah are the local implementing partner for WaterAid’s projects, and two of those
implemented by Plan Nepal.
lead in piloting the scheme in rural Nepal, with varying degrees of success. These
organisations have also used a ‘non-CLTS approach’ in other villages (that is, still using
targeted/graded subsidies). The full list of project sites is at Annex A.
Nepal’s experience has shown the School Sanitation and Hygiene Education (SSHE)
program to be a successful model in improving health and sanitation. Recognising this,
HMGN’s Department of Water Supply and Sewerage (DWSS) in the Ministry of
Physical Planning and Works, together with UNICEF, developed a proposal to link
CLTS with SSHE - through a school-community partnership. They have named the
integrated approach School Led Total Sanitation (SLTS). Consultation and discussion
the draft proposal/SLTS guidelines took place in spring 2005, led by the DWSS National
Sanitation Steering Committee. Comments were sought from other sector organisations
before finalisation of the proposal/guidelines 2. The decision was made to pilot the
scheme in Chitwan. Two district level meetings were held and participating
organisations agreed to implement the scheme in different VDCs in Chitwan. According
to NEWAH, which is implementing SLTS in two VDCs, the initial survey and planning
work is currently being undertaken with selected schools. The approach will be rolled
out to other districts in 2006. A list of the proposed districts is at Annex B.
The following stakeholders are involved in CLTS (and SLTS) in Nepal. A full list of key
contacts, in Nepal and internationally, is attached at Annex C.
2
Final version of the SLTS guidelines has been saved in the RRN common drive/ruth/CLTS
Plan Nepal
Plan attended the CLTS orientation session delivered by Kamal Kar in Kathmandu in
July 2004. The participants of the workshop immediately carried out ignition PRA for
CLTS in three villages - Nitanpur, Gamar Gawan and Naya Behara of Chhata Pipra
VDC in Bara district. Since then Plan, together with Newah, have implemented CLTS in
Dumre Ekta Chowk and Dumre Prakriti Chowk in Ulabari VDC, Morang district. Thus
far, Plan has not conducted a formal piece of research and documentation of their
experiences (although the two Morang sites were covered by Newah’s internal research
project).
Despite the initial success of CLTS in Dumre Ekta Chowk, Dumre Prakriti Chowk, and
Gamar Gawan - which have been declared open defecation free – Plan staff have
some reservations about the long term sustainability. A decrease has been noted in the
community engagement with the CLTS process, and the enthusiasm of the user groups
for continuous community level monitoring and evaluation has declined. Some of the
less permanent structures have been damaged/destroyed by heavy rainfall, land
erosion and wear and tear - and low income households do not have the financial
resources to build new structures. This demonstrates the need for continuous follow
up, long after the NGO has withdrawn – to ensure that the activities started under the
project are continued. Plan are thinking about how they might promote the
establishment of appropriate financial mechanisms, in order that the community
themselves can mobilise funds for longer term operation and maintenance. At a my
meeting with Nabin Pradhan on 13 September he also stated Plan’s desire for a
researcher (external?) to undertake a 1-2 month price of research into Plan’s
experiences with CLTS, to document the process of implementation and develop
recommendations for ensuring long term sustainability – including possible financial
mechanisms.
Unfortunately Nabin Pradhan and Sudeep Gautam, who were leading on CLTS work for
Plan Nepal, have now left the organisation. It is not yet clear how Plan Nepal will be
taking the work forward.
Sanitation Alliance
In 2004, a loose alliance was formed of 8 organisations working on water and sanitation
in Nepal, coordinated by Water Aid and Plan. A few meetings were held, however
enthusiasm has since waned and they have not convened a meeting since 10
September 2004. Newah have expressed a desire for the alliance to be reactivated and
RRN has expressed its wish to participate. The alliance currently comprises the
following: WaterAid Nepal, Plan Nepal, Newah, LUMANTI, the Nepal Red Cross,
Environment and Public Health Organisation (ENPHO), Helvatas and the Gorkha
Welfare Scheme.
DFID Nepal
DFID Nepal supports the implementation of CLTS through their funding of WaterAid,
and has visited one of Newah’s project sites.
Kamal Kar
Kamal Kar is a social and participatory development consultant based in Kolkata, India.
Kamal Kar initiated the first pilot of CLTS in 2000 in a small community in Bangladesh,
while working as a consultant for WaterAid Bangladesh in collaboration with the Village
Education Resource Centre (VERC). Here, Kamal Kar worked closely with Timothy
Clayton, who then worked for WaterAid Bangladesh, and is now Country
Representative for Oxfam GB Nepal. Kamal Kar has since facilitated the spread of
CLTS to other areas of Bangladesh, India, Cambodia, Indonesia, China, Mongolia,
Nepal and Uganda. Kamal Kar gave a presentation on CLTS at the March 2005 DFID
Asia Regional Advisors Retreat in Delhi.
Since joining RRN in September 2004, I have undertaken the following activities
specifically related to CLTS:
According to Dr Kamal Kar, follow-up research and documentation are an integral part
of the approach. In his view, “[m]onitoring and continuing learning about the CLTS
approach will help to ensure that scaling up and transfer to other countries and
contexts has more likelihood of success. Participatory research should be encouraged
in order to provide feedback to policy and practice”. He goes on to say that “[i]t is
important to know more about where CLTS works best and where it is unlikely to work
well. Lessons from different socio-cultural, physical and political contexts need to be
explored, compared and documented” (Kar and Pasteur, 2004). Although follow-up
assessments of CLTS projects have been undertaken in Bangladesh and India so far
no comprehensive research has been conducted into the implementation process and
outcomes of the CLTS projects in Nepal.
WaterAid, Newah and Plan have all acknowledged the need for a detailed analysis into
the implementation and effectiveness of the approach in order to inform the
development of future project activities, and broader understanding of CLTS. In light of
this, and my own personal interest in CLTS (coupled with the need to obtain a research
visa), I developed a research proposal/concept note in April 2005. The goal of the
proposed research was to assess and systematically document the implementation of
CLTS in Nepal, as undertaken by WaterAid, Newah, Plan and RRN. The specific
objectives, activities, budget and timeline are detailed in the concept note saved in the
common drive.
The concept note was finalised with the agreement of WaterAid, Newah and Plan Nepal
in May/June 2005. The intention was to undertake this research between June and
November 2005, however disappointingly the pressure of other work commitments at
RRN meant that it could not be undertaken. In addition, NEWAH were also conducting
their internal research into CLTS at that time and saw less value in a collaborative study
until this had been completed.
Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [Nepal]. 2001b. Statistical year book of Nepal 2001.
Kathmandu, Nepal: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Kar, K (2004) ’Practical Guide to Triggering Community led Total Sanitation’. Draft.
Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, unpublished
National Planning Commission (2002) ‘Tenth Plan’ His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
Noor, T. R. and Ashrafee, S. (2004) ‘An end to Open Defecation: Process, Cost,
Motivation and Sustainability’. A paper presented at the 30th WEDC International
Conference, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 2004
World Sanitation Programme – South Asia (WSP-SA) (2001-2) ‘Igniting Change for
100% sanitation’. Jalvaani. Vol 4, No 3 (Nov 20012-Feb 2002)
List of Acronyms
CLTS approach
Central Region:
Eastern Region
Western Region
Central Region
Eastern Region
Eastern Region
1. Panchthar
2. Udayapur
3. Sunsari
4. Saptari
Central Region
1. Chitwan
2. Parsa
3. Kavre
Western Region
1. Kaski
2. Tanahun
3. Nawalparasi
4. Kapilvastu
3
Note: Nabin has now left Plan Nepal, and his successor has not yet been appointed.