Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Most investments involve an initial payment in return for future income. This is especially true
of investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy systems, both of which typically
require an up-front investment in equipment in order to derive future savings or future income.
In order to evaluate these investments, it is necessary to understand how the value of money
changes over time. Energy Economics describes the methods used to evaluate investments
which contain cash flows at different times.
Engineers who can clearly and correctly communicate the financial impacts of energy saving
ideas have more influence in the decision-making process. Those who do not have these skills
are less able to judge the economic merit of an idea or to advocate for ideas they believe in.
Although economics is important, many important factors are difficult to translate into dollars.
For this reason, economic analysis should not be the only criteria in accepting or rejecting a
design or investment option.
InitialCost $
SP = [1]
SavingsPerYear $/yr
Example:
Calculate the simple payback of a lighting retrofit that will cost
$1,000 to implement and will save $250 per year.
$1,000
SP = = 4 years
$250/year
The rate of return, ROR, is the reciprocal of the simple payback. Rate of return represents the
annual return on the investment.
SavingsPerYear $/year
ROR = 1 / SP = [2]
InitialCost $
Example:
Calculate the ROR of a lighting retrofit that will cost $1,000 to
implement and will save $250 per year.
Document1 1
$250/year
Rate of Return = = 25% per year
$1,000
One of the strengths of the simple payback and rate of return methods for evaluating
investments is that the results are independent of assumptions about the time-value of money.
Over short time periods, the value of money does not change much with time. Thus, simple
payback and rate of return are appropriate methods to analyze investments with short
paybacks.
Example:
Would you rather have $100 now or $100 next year?
To compare investment options with cash flows that occur at different times, it is useful to
covert all cash flows to a common time. The most common way to do so is to covert all cash
flows into their “present value”, and then compare the present values to evaluate alternative
investments. Cash flows involving future amounts of money can be converted to their present
values using three important equations:
Present Value of a Future Amount
Present Value of a Series of Annuities
Present Value of an Escalating Series of Annuities
F0 = 100
F1 = 100 + 100(.05) = P + Pi = P (1+i)
F2 = [100 + 100(.05)] + [100 + 100(.05)](.05) = P(1+i) + P(1+i)i = P(1+i) 2
Fn = P (1+i)n
Document1 2
Equation 3 is the fundamental equation of exponential growth and can be applied whenever
growth is a fixed percentage of the current quantity.
F = P (1+i)n [3]
Equation 3 can be rearranged to show the present value of a future amount, as in Equation 4.
P = F (1+i)-n [4]
The factor (1+i)-n is sometimes called the present worth factor, PWF(i,n). Thus,
P = F(1+i)-n = F PWF(i,n)
Example:
Someone promises to pay you $1,000 in 5 years. If the interest
rate is 10% per year, what amount would you take today that is
equivalent to $1,000 in 5 years (i.e. what is the present value of
$1,000 5 years from now?) ?
0 1 2 3 n
The following derivation shows how to calculate the present value, P, of this series of payments.
P0= 0
A
P1 =
(1 i)
Document1 3
A A
P2 =
(1 i)2
(1 i)
1 A 1
Pn = A n1
...
(1 i) (1 i)
n
(1 i)
1)
Pn (1 i)n = A 1 (1 i) ... (1 i)n1
2) Pn (1 i) n1
n1
= A (1 i) ... (1 i) (1 i)n
2-1)
Pn (1 i)n1 (1 i)n = A (1 i)n 1
Pn =
A (1 i)n 1 A
1 (1 i)n
(1 i)n (1 i) 1 i
1 (1 i)n
Pn = A [5]
i
1 (1 i)n
The factor is sometimes called the series present worth factor, SPWF(i,n). The
i
reciprocal of the series present worth factor is sometimes called the capital recovery factor,
CRF(i,n). Thus,
1 (1 i)n
Pn = A = A SPWF(i,n) {SPWF(i,n) = 1 / CRF(i,n)}
i
Document1 4
Example:
A standard-efficiency furnace costs $100 and consumes $40 per
year in fuel over its 10 year lifetime. A high-efficiency furnace
costs $200 and consumes $20 per year in fuel over its 10 year
lifetime. If interest rates are 10% per year, which is the better
investment?
$40 $20
$100
$200
1 (1 .10) 10
Pstd costs = $100 + $40 = $346
.10
1 (1 .10)
10
Phigh costs = $200 + $20 = $323
.10
and
-$100
$100
1 (1 .10) 10
Phigh savings = -$100 + $20 = $23
.10
It is sometimes easier to understand “annualized savings” than the “present value” of savings”.
To find annual savings, find the present value of savings, and then annualize that amount by
solving P = A SPWF(i,n) for A.
Document1 5
Example:
Find the annualized savings from investing in the high efficiency
furnace over the standard efficiency furnace:
1 (1 .10) 10
Ahigh savings = P / SPWF(.10,10) = $23 /
.10
Ahigh savings = $4
A(1+e)n
A
0 1 2 3 n
Using a method similar to the previous derivation, the present value of an escalating series is:
1 1 e
n
A 1 if e i [6a]
(i e) 1 i
P=
n
A if e = i [6b]
(1 e)
1 1 e
n
n
The factor 1 or (depending on whether i = e) is called the escalating
(i e) 1 i (1 e)
series present worth factor, ESPWF(i,e,n). Thus,
P = A ESPWF(i,e,n)
Note that when e = 0, escalating series present worth factor ESPWF(i,0,n) is identical to the
series present worth factor SPWF(i,n).
Document1 6
Example:
The maintenance director says that it will cost $50 this year to
maintain an aging piece of equipment and estimates that the
equipment will require 5% more maintenance every year for
the next 10 years. New replacement equipment would cost
$400 and would require only $10 of maintenance per year with
no expected escalation over the next 10 years. Which is a
better investment if interest rates are 5%?
Current Equipment:
0 1 2 3 10
$50(1+.05)10
New Equipment:
0 1 2 3 10
$10
$400
Hence, the two options are expected to cost about the same
amount.
Fn =
A (1 i)n 1 [7]
i
Document1 7
Example:
The future value of an annual investment of $2,000 per year for
20 years in an IRA that accrues interest at 5% per year is:
2,000 1 0.05 20 1
F= $66,132
0.05
Compounding Periods
Typically, interest is paid or payments are due on fixed intervals rather than continuously.
These intervals are called compounding intervals. Interest rates are typically reported for an
annual compounding period. If interest is paid or payments are due at other compounding
intervals, simply divide the annual interest rate, i, in the time value of money equations by the
number of compounding periods per year, m, and multiply the number of years, n, by m.
Example:
Calculate the future value of $100 earning 8% annual interest
compounded quarterly for 10 years.
Example:
Calculate the monthly house payment if $100,000 is borrowed
at 8% on a 30 year mortgage.
P = A SPWF(i,n)
A = P / SPWF(.08/12, 30*12) = $734 / month
Document1 8
P = F (1+i)-n = F PWF(i,n)
1 (1 i)n
P = A = A SPWF(i,n)
i
Fn =
A (1 i)n 1
i
1 1 e
n
A
1 if e i
(i e) 1 i
P= = A ESPWF(i,e,n)
n
A if e = i
(1 e)
Document1 9
Example:
A standard-efficiency furnace costs $100 and consumes $40 per
year in fuel over its 10 year lifetime. A high-efficiency furnace
costs $200 and consumes $20 per year in fuel over its 10 year
lifetime. If the discount rate is 10% per year, which is the
better investment? What if the discount rate is 30%?
$40 $20
$100
$200
$20
-$100 1 2 3 10
$100
If the discount rate is 10%, then:
1 (1 .10) 10
Phigh-eff savings = -$100 + $20 = $23
.10
The positive savings indicate that the high-efficiency furnace is
the best investment.
1 (1 .30) 10
Phigh-eff savings = -$100 + $20 = $-38
.30
In general, renewable energy and energy conservation technologies have high first capital costs
and low future fuel costs. Thus, high discount rates (which value the present and ‘discount’ the
future) work against these technologies. Some people argue that a discount rate of zero ought
Document1 10
to be used in non-renewable resource decisions. A zero discount rate implies that the future is
equally as important as the present.
Example:
-$16,000 1 2 3 20
$100=.
Document1 11
Return on Investment
Because of the discount rate’s large influence on the results of time value of money
calculations, the discount rate is sometimes solved for, rather than input, in time value of
money calculations. The discount rate when the present value of an investment is zero
represents the return on an equivalent investment, and is called the return on investment, ROI.
To calculate ROI, set NPV = 0 and solve for i.
Example:
Reconsider the furnace example. Find the return on investment
for upgrading to a high-efficiency furnace if the enatural gas =
0.84%.
-$100 1 2 3 10
$100
1 1 .0084 10
$100/$20 = 5 = 1
(i .0084) 1 i
In Microsoft Excel, return on investment (ROI) is called internal rate of return (IRR). The IRR is
calculated by an internal function: IRR(range), where the range is made up of all cash flows.
Document1 12
Example:
A high efficiency furnace costs $100 more than a low efficiency
furnace and saves $20 per year over a ten year period. Use
Microsoft Excel to calculate the return on investment.
$20
-$100
$100
In Excel the cash flows below should be entered in separate
cells such as A1: A11.
-100, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20.
However, the real problem is that simple payback, and hence rate-of-return, are poor metrics
for evaluating cost effectiveness because they do not take into account project lifetime.
Consider for example a project with a simple payback of 4 years, and hence a rate-of-return of
25% per year. This appears to be a highly profitable project. However, if the project lifetime is
3 years, then the initial investment will never be paid off. In this case, the 25% per year return is
completely misleading. If the project lifetime is 5 years, the investment is barely cost effective,
since it positive revenue is generated for only one year. If, however, the project lifetime is 20
years, then the project is highly cost effective since the project will generate positive revenue
for 16 years after it has paid back the initial investment. Thus, to properly evaluate energy
saving investments, the economic analysis must include project lifetime.
The economic criteria return on investment (ROI) includes project lifetime, and is thus a much
better measure of cost effectiveness. The return on investment, in contrast to rate of return,
can be directly compared to alternative investments in order to evaluate economic merit.
Document1 13
Example:
A project has a simple payback of 3 years. Calculate the rate of return, ROR,
and return on investment, ROI, if the project has a lifetime of 3, 6, 12, 15 and 18
years.
To evaluate return on investment for a project with a 33% rate of return, let the
initial cost be $1,000. If so the annual savings would be $333. The net present
value of the investment, assuming that the initial investment has no value at
the end of the project life, is:
1 (1 i)n
NPV = -$1,000 + $333 SPWF(i,n) = -$1,000 + $333
i
To solve for return on investment ROI, set NPV = 0 and solve for i. If the project
lifetime is 3 years, then:
1 (1 i)3
0 = -$1,000 +$333 By iteration: i = ROI 0%
i
1 (1 i)6
0 = -$1,000 +$333 By iteration: i = ROI 24.2%
i
Graphing the rate of return and return on investment as functions of project life
gives:
Document1 14
Note that ROI calculated in the preceding example is for the case in which the initial investment
has no value at the end of the project life. If the initial investment had value at the end of the
project life, then that value should be added to the NPV equation explicitly. However, once ROI
is calculated using this method, the ROI represents the value of an alternative investment with
both capital and interest accumulation. For example, if an alternative investment returned
24.2% per year for six years, the value of a $1,000 investment after six years would be:
NPV = 0 = -$1,000 + $3,671 / (1+i)6 and solving for i gives i = ROI = 24.2%.
Thus, ROI represents the value of an alternative investment with both capital and interest.
negative when the project life is less than the simple payback
much less than rate-of-return for short project lifetimes
approaches rate-of-return as project life increases.
This shows the importance of project lifetime in determining project cost effectiveness. It may
also explain why some companies require very short simple paybacks to fund a project. In
these cases, the company may believe that the project lifetime is very short. In our view,
however, the use of return-on-investment makes these assumptions explicit and is therefore a
much more transparent metric of economic fitness than simple payback.
Document1 15
IPD, 1949-2007, 2000 = 1.000
Year IPD Year IPD Year IPD
1949 0.16352 1970 0.27534 1991 0.84444
1950 0.16531 1971 0.28911 1992 0.86385
1951 0.17718 1972 0.30166 1993 0.88381
1952 0.18022 1973 0.31849 1994 0.90259
1953 0.18243 1974 0.34725 1995 0.92106
1954 0.18417 1975 0.38002 1996 0.93852
1955 0.18743 1976 0.40196 1997 0.95414
1956 0.19393 1977 0.42752 1998 0.96472
1957 0.20038 1978 0.45757 1999 0.97868
1958 0.20498 1979 0.49548 2000 1.00000
1959 0.20751 1980 0.54043 2001 1.02399
1960 0.21041 1981 0.59119 2002 1.04187
1961 0.21278 1982 0.62726 2003 1.06404
1962 0.21569 1983 0.65207 2004 1.09462
1963 0.21798 1984 0.67655 2005 1.13000
1964 0.22131 1985 0.69713 2006 1.16567
1965 0.22535 1986 0.71250 2007 1.19664
1966 0.23176 1987 0.73196
1967 0.23893 1988 0.75694
1968 0.24913 1989 0.78556
1969 0.26149 1990 0.81590
The annual rate of inflation, j, over any period of n years can be calculated by applying Equation
3.
Example:
Solution:
F = P (1+j)n
1.16042 = 0.93852 (1 + j)10
j = 0.02145
General inflation rates for various periods are shown in the table below.
Document1 16
The rate of inflation is important, since inflation erodes the value of money. For example, if an
investment appreciates at an interest rate of 3% per year and the rate of inflation is also 3% per
year, then the investment does not deliver ‘real’ value.
The discount rate with the effect of inflation removed is called the “real” discount rate and
indicates the “real” return from an investment. To calculate the real discount rate, i’, one needs
to explicitly remove the effect of inflation, j. To do so, consider the following derivation.
P(1 i)n
F = P(1 i' )n =
(1 j)n
i j
i’ = [8]
1 j
Document1 17
Example:
Returns from an S&P index fund indicate that a single share of
the fund was worth $14.90 in 1976 and $124.56 in 1994. What
is the market” rate of return from this investment?
1 F 1 124.56
ln ln
n P 18 14.90
i= e 1= e 1 = 12.52 %
1 F 1 126.1
ln ln
n P 18 52.3
j= e 1= e 1 = 5.01%
What is the real annual rate of return (discount rate) over the
period?
i j .1252 .0501
i’ = real discount rate = = = 7.15%
1 j 1 .0501
Document1 18
Table 8.10 Average Retail Prices of Electricity, 1960-2006
(Cents per Kilowatthour, Including Taxes)
Year Residential Commercial 1 Industrial 2
Nominal Real Nominal Real Nominal Real
1960 2.6 12.4 2.4 11.4 1.1 5.2
1961 2.6 12.2 2.4 11.3 1.1 5.2
1962 2.6 12.1 2.4 11.1 1.1 5.1
1963 2.5 11.5 2.3 10.6 1 4.6
1964 2.5 11.3 2.2 9.9 1 4.5
1965 2.4 10.7 2.2 9.8 1 4.4
1966 2.3 9.9 2.1 9.1 1 4.3
1967 2.3 9.6 2.1 8.8 1 4.2
1968 2.3 9.2 2.1 8.4 1 4
1969 2.2 8.4 2.1 8 1 3.8
1970 2.2 8 2.1 7.6 1 3.6
1971 2.3 8 2.2 7.6 1.1 3.8
1972 2.4 8 2.3 7.6 1.2 4
1973 2.5 7.9 2.4 7.5 1.3 4.1
1974 3.1 8.9 3 8.6 1.7 4.9
1975 3.5 9.2 3.5 9.2 2.1 5.5
1976 3.7 9.2 3.7 9.2 2.2 5.5
1977 4.1 9.6 4.1 9.6 2.5 5.9
1978 4.3 9.4 4.4 9.6 2.8 6.1
1979 4.6 9.3 4.7 9.5 3.1 6.3
1980 5.4 10 5.5 10.2 3.7 6.9
1981 6.2 10.5 6.3 10.7 4.3 7.3
1982 6.9 11 6.9 11 5 8
1983 7.2 11 7 10.7 5 7.7
1984 7.15 10.57 7.13 10.54 4.83 7.14
1985 7.39 10.6 7.27 10.43 4.97 7.13
1986 7.42 10.41 7.2 10.11 4.93 6.92
1987 7.45 10.18 7.08 9.67 4.77 6.52
1988 7.48 9.88 7.04 9.3 4.7 6.21
1989 7.65 9.74 7.2 9.17 4.72 6.01
1990 7.83 9.6 7.34 9 4.74 5.81
1991 8.04 9.52 7.53 8.92 4.83 5.72
1992 8.21 9.5 7.66 8.87 4.83 5.59
1993 8.32 9.41 7.74 8.76 4.85 5.49
1994 8.38 9.28 7.73 8.56 4.77 5.28
1995 8.4 9.12 7.69 8.35 4.66 5.06
1996 8.36 8.91 7.64 8.14 4.6 4.9
1997 8.43 8.84 7.59 7.95 4.53 4.75
1998 8.26 8.56 7.41 7.68 4.48 4.64
1999 8.16 8.34 7.26 7.42 4.43 4.53
2000 8.24 8.24 7.43 7.43 4.64 4.64
2001 8.58 8.38 7.92 7.73 5.05 4.93
2002 8.44 8.1 7.89 7.57 4.88 4.68
2003 8.72 8.2 8.03 7.55 5.11 4.8
2004 8.95 8.18 8.17 7.47 5.25 4.8
2005 9.45 8.38 8.67 7.69 5.73 5.08
2006 10.4 8.96 9.36 8.07 6.09 5.25
Document1 19
Table 6.8 Natural Gas Prices by Sector, 1967-2006
(Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
Year Residential Sector Commercial Sector 1 Industrial Sector 2
Prices Prices Prices
Using this data, the energy price escalation rate, e, over any period can be calculated by
applying Equation 3.
Document1 20
Example:
Find the energy price escalation rate, e, for natural gas for the
residential sector from 1996 to 2006 using nominal cost data
from the Annual Energy Review.
Solution:
F = P (1+e)n
13.76 = 6.34 (1 + e)10
e = 0.081
Residential natural gas price escalation rates for various periods are shown in the table below.
Residential electricity price escalation rates for various periods are shown in the table below.
The ‘real’ energy price escalation rate, e’, which represents the energy price escalation rate
with the effect of inflation removed, can be determined in two ways. The first is by removing
the effect of inflation, j, from the nominal energy escalation rate e using Equation 9. The
derivation for Equation 9 is analogous to the derivation for ‘real’ discount rate in Equation 8.
ej
e’ = [9]
1 j
Document1 21
Solution:
The nominal annual energy escalation rate, e, from 1996 to
2006 was e = 0.081. The annual rate of inflation over this
period was 0.021. The real annual energy escalation rate e’ is:
ej
e’ =
1 j
0.081 0.021
e’ = = 0.058
1 0.021
Alternately, ‘real’ energy escalation rates, e’, could be determined by applying Equation 3 to
energy costs reported in “constant dollars”.
Example:
Find the real energy escalation rate, e’, for natural gas for the
residential sector from 1996 to 2006 using constant dollar cost
data from the Annual Energy Review.
Solution:
F = P (1+e)n
11.86 = 6.76 (1 + e)10
e = 0.058
In many cases, taxes have the effect of equaling reducing both initial costs and operating
savings. Initial costs are reduced since the initial cost can depreciated over the lifetime of the
equipment and deducted from income. Similarly, annual savings are reduced by the tax rate
Document1 22
applied to profit. Hence, when considering taxes, the initial cost and annual savings are both
reduced by the tax rate, however the simple payback and ROI remain unchanged.
Example:
Find the NPV and annualized NPV for an energy investment which costs $1,000
and returns $500 per year for 10 years if the discount rate is 5% per year and
the energy cost escalation rate is 2% per year. Do so without considering taxes
and with considering taxes assuming the total tax rate is 40%.
Interest Expenses
If equipment is purchased with a mortgage, the interest is usually deductible. Because energy
saving equipment usually has a higher first cost than traditional equipment, interest deductions
Document1 23
usually enhance the cost effectiveness of energy saving investments. Following the fuel savings
example:
The example below shows how to calculate the interest and principle components of a
mortgage payment.
Example:
Show the interest and principle components of loan payments for a $10
loan borrowed at an interest rate of 10% for 5 years.
P = A SPWF(.10,5)
A = P / SPWF(.10,5) = $10 / 3.79 = $2.64 per year
Depreciation Expenses
Because equipment wears out over time, many tax laws allow businesses to deduct the cost of
equipment wear from income taxes. The annual amount of wear is called the depreciation, D.
Several methods are usually allowed by the tax laws to calculate the depreciation. Straight-line
depreciation calculates D as:
The higher costs of energy conserving equipment usually increases the depreciation deduction
and make energy saving investments more attractive.
Document1 24
Uncertainty in Economic Analyses
Studies have shown that the results of economic analyses are most sensitive to i, e and n.
Because of this, it is recommended that one determine and report the sensitivity of the
economic analyses results using analytical or substitutional methods.
Example:
Determine the sensitivity of the present value of a future
amount of $100 in year 10 if the discount rate is 6% 2%.
By calculus...
P = F (1+i) -n
P P P
dP = di dn dF
i n F
if F and n are known exactly, then dn = dF = 0 and
P
dP = di
i
= F (-n) (1+i)-n-1 di = $100 (-10) (1+.06)-10-1 (.02)
=
Or by substitution...
P = F (1+i) -n at limits of i
Plow = $100 (1+.08)-10 = $46.3
Phigh = $100 (1+.04)-10 = $67.5
Document1 25
the reason for the high economic hurdle is that energy efficiency projects must compete for in-
house capital and management time. Some analysts have observed that mandatory projects
(such as regulatory compliance, replacement of essential equipment, and maintenance of
product quality) and strategic projects (such as those which increase market share or new
product development) have higher corporate priority than discretionary (energy efficiency)
projects. Another commonly cited reason for high discount rates for energy efficiency projects
is the risk associated with those projects. Although risk means different things to different
organizations, when risk is measured in terms of volatility, the risk of energy efficiency
investments is about the same as U.S. T-bills, while the return on investment is greater than
that of small company stocks.
Source: Laitner, J., Ehrhardt-Martinez, K. and Prindle, W., 2007, “American Energy Efficiency
Investment Market”, Energy Efficiency Finance Forum, American Council or and Energy Efficient
Economy .
Some of these barriers can be lessened by energy service companies offering shared savings
and the linking of energy efficiency to pollution prevention and a good corporate image.
Duffie, J. and Beckman, W., 1991. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York, NY.
Stoecker, W., Design of Thermal Systems, 1989. Design of Thermal Systems, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,
New York, NY.
Document1 26
Thuesen, G. and Fabrycky, W., 1993. Engineering Economy, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Industrial Energy Efficiency, OTA-E-560, 1993.
Document1 27