You are on page 1of 23

Macroeconomic Modelling and Forecasting

Capabilities: NiGEM

Dr Garry Young
Director of Macroeconomic Modelling and Forecasting, g.young@niesr.ac.uk

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Key benefits of global macroeconomic models for
forecasting and what-if exercises:
1. Provide a framework for understanding how economies
work and interact.
2. Are a tool for thinking about possible identifiable risks,
policy responses and wider consequences.
3. Can have multiple applications, so don’t need to reinvent
wheel each time.
4. Incorporate key magnitudes and impose consistency -
make sure things add up.
5. Improve over time in reaction to new ideas and events.

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM

National Institute Global


Econometric Model

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


What is NiGEM?
• A transparent, peer reviewed global econometric
model that has evolved over 30 years of regular use

• Over 60 countries and regions modelled


– Detailed country-level models

• Provides access to forecasts, scenarios and


stochastic output for over 5000 macro variables
– Allows complete replicability of our in-house processes

• Historical and forecast data updated quarterly

• The scenario suite allows users to run simulations for


economic shocks:
– Common shocks include, fiscal, monetary policies
commodity prices, labour market
– Tariffs, trade and investment
– Financial market modelling of risk premia

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


What type of macroeconomic model is NiGEM?

NiGEM is a global macro-econometric policy model:


• Policy models are ‘aimed at analysing actual macroeconomic policy
issues. Models in this class should fit the main characteristics of the
data, including dynamics, and allow for policy analysis and
counterfactuals. They should be used to think, for example, about the
quantitative effects of a slowdown in China on the United States, or
the effects of a US fiscal expansion on emerging markets.’ (Blanchard,
Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2018)
• May 2018 issue of National Institute Economic Review includes
overview of NiGEM plus articles on use by OECD, Deutsche
Bundesbank, Banque de France, Rabobank, Central Bank of Ireland.

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM based on modern macroeconomics
• Individual country models have following features:
• Sticky prices
• Forward-looking consumption and investment
• Taylor rule and other options for monetary policy
• Long-run fiscal solvency
• Individual countries related by trade relations and asset
pricing relationships (UIP etc)

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM long-run properties

In the long run output is determined by potential reflecting:

• working age population and equilibrium unemployment


and participation
• the capital stock, influenced by equilibrium user cost of
capital
• exogenous technological capability which is assumed in
each country to catch up gradually to that in highest
productivity economy

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Benefits of using NiGEM
• Transparency • Flexible to your requirements
– All data, assumptions and judgments – Flexibility to modify existing model or
used in our published forecasts are create your own countries and regions
included as standard
• Easy to install
• Rigour – Fully compatible with Microsoft
– NiGEM has been peer-reviewed by windows
users, academics and journal editors for
over 30 years. • Support
– Internationally-recognised – Full technical and economic support
provided to all users
• Flexibility
– Easily incorporate your own • Training
assumptions and judgments, change – Monthly training workshops available
policy regimes and other elements free to subscribers
– NiGEM user group meetings
• Usability
– ‘click and play’ options or more
advanced manipulation

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Some of the unique model capabilities

• Expectation formation is flexible, Distributions around forecasts and simulations


adaptive or rational can be chosen based on draws from historic shocks
for the following:
CPI inflation (per cent per annum)
– Long rates and long real rates, Exchange
rates, Consumption, Financial market,
Wages, Housing market

• Flexible monetary policy and fiscal


policy rules
– Taylor Rule, 2-Pillar rule, Nominal GDP
targeting, Orphanides rule
– Fiscal solvency can be manipulated

• Can use in single country mode

• Built-in stochastic forecasting tool

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Macroeconomists at NIESR
• Professor Jagjit S. Chadha, Director of NIESR
• Professor Roger Farmer, Research Director
• Dr Garry Young, Director of Macroeconomic Modelling and Forecasting
• Dr Angus Armstrong, Director of Rebuilding Macroeconomics
• Rebecca Riley, Director of the Economics Statistics Centre of Excellence
• Amit Kara, Head of UK Economics
• Barry Naisbitt, Head of Global Macroeconomics
• Dr Ian Hurst, Associate Research Director for Model Development
• 30 Research Staff and some 25 Fellows.

Established in 1938 to build a better society through research and analysis.

Research topics from household and firm-level behaviour to monetary and


fiscal policy, as well as macroeconomic modelling and financial flows

Econometric development of nowcasting and regional data

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Significant model oversight

Model Oversight Committee Institute Model Committee


• Prof. Rafaella Giacometti, University • Prof Jagjit Chadha
College London • Prof Roger Farmer
• Prof. Denise Osborn, University of • Dr Garry Young
Manchester • Dr Ian Hurst
• Prof. Hashem Pesaran, University of
Southern California and University of
Cambridge
• Prof. Simon Wren-Lewis, University of Institute Macroeconomic
Oxford Partnerships
• Prof. Ron Smith, Birkbeck College, London • University of Warwick
• Centre for Macroeconomics
• Rebuilding Macroeconomics
Client User Groups • ESCoE
• Challenge from global client base • Money, Macro, Finance Research Group
• Annual user group meeting • LLAKES
• Regular Training Sessions • CVER

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM clients include:

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Bespoke front-end software

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Menu driven functionalities

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Bespoke viewing platform
Forecast suite output Simulation suite output

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Training
• Nine training workshops per year held
at NIESR in Westminster
– Beginner, intermediate or advanced
options

• Intermediate and advanced courses are


all bespoke

• Online training content available at


https://nimodel.niesr.ac.uk/

• Direct contact with modellers on the Executive Education Available


NiGEM team with University of Warwick:

https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/about/london/s
• Developing online video tutorials tudy/executive-
education/programmes/forecastingwithniesr/

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM Applications

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


NiGEM Applications

Integrate your
own models
or amend
parameters

Stochastic Historical and


Simulations Forecast
(IFRS9) Databases
NiGEM

Scenario
Analysis Country
(Stress Forecasting
Testing)

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Examples of recent scenario work using NiGEM
• NIESR Scenarios have included The impact of potential monetary policy
– Modelling Brexit scenarios options in an MPC response to the 2016-18
– Optimal regulation of bank capital and liquidity downturn
(for FSA)
– Chinese ‘hard landing’ scenarios
• Studies published by our external user
group
– Impact of Britain leaving EU (HM Treasury,
OECD, Rabobank, Central Bank of Ireland)
– Impact of structural reforms in the G20 (Banque
de France)
– Impact of US monetary policy tightening (OECD)
– Impact on Europe from a negative shock to US
(ECB, Bundesbank)
– Impact of changing financial regulation on UK
economy (BoE)
– Effect of fiscal stimulus on German economy
(German Finance Ministry)
– Impact of protectionism (BoE)

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Impact of global escalation of protectionism
Impact of tariffs on GDP in the third year (2020)
0
Percentage difference from base

-1

-2

-3

-4

-5

-6
US UK EA World
10% increase to 75 basis points Expectations of Expectations of continued
non-commodity export increase in term continued tariffs tariffs in 2022 and all
prices in 2018-19 premia in 2021 subsequent years

Source: NiGEM Simulation

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Stress Testing
• Use the model that the PRA uses to
develop the stress testing scenarios

• So NiGEM allows a consistent


replication of their key variables

• It provides stochastic outputs to the


stress scenarios that give additional
scenario reporting capabilities

• Well recognised by regulators not only


in the UK but globally.

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


What do you get with a subscription?
• Quarterly update of model and • Regular training
software – Two-day workshop, run nine times per
– Includes wizards to create host of year at NIESR
scenarios with ease – All content posted online to allow self-
study
• NIESR’s quarterly forecast baseline
– Currently out to 2044Q4 • Support from our team of NiGEM
specialists
• Historical time series (back to
1961Q1) • NiGEM Observations
– Timely research notes by the NiGEM team
• Stochastic simulations package
– Creates confidence bands around • Quarterly National Institute Economic
outputs Review
– Details of our forecast and macroeconomic
research papers

National Institute of Economic and Social Research


Country and Variable Coverage
Government accounts
Europe Asia/Australasia Expenditure + GDP
Corporation tax rate;
Austria (169 variables) Australia (155 variables) Business investment; Corporation tax receipts;
Belgium (167 variables) China (121 variables) Domestic demand; Direct Taxes;
Bulgaria (81 variables) Hong Kong (66 variables) Exports of goods and services; Direct tax rate;
GDP; Federal indirect taxes;
Czechia (139 variables) India (67 variables)
GNP; Federal interest payments;
Denmark (167 variables) Indonesia (65 variables)
Govt consumption; General govt budget surplus;
Developing Europe (57 variables) Japan (165 variables) Govt investment; General govt expenditure as % of GDP;
EMU (54 variables) Korea (70 variables) Housing investment; Goods and Services;
Estonia (77 variables) New Zealand (67 variables) Imports of goods and services; Govt Debt Stock Gross;
Finland (166 variables) Singapore (65 variables) Industrial production; Govt Debt Stock Market Value;
France (171 variables) Taiwain (66 variables) Net Trade; Govt Interest Payments;
Germany (195 variables) Vietnam (93 variables) Nominal GDP; Govt balance;
Greece (164 variables) Nominal GNP; Govt debt as per cent of GDP;
Hungary (139 variables) Groups & Regions Nominal consumption; Govt debt ratio;
Ireland (168 variables) Nominal investment; Govt tax revenue as % of GDP;
CIS (59 variables)
Italy (194 variables) Private Sector Investment; Indirect tax rate;
East Asia (58 variables) Private consumption;
Latvia (77 variables) Indirect tax revenue;
Euro Area (51 variables) Stock building as a % of GDP;
Lithuania (83 variables) Miscellaneous Expenditure;
Latin America (57 variables) Stock building;
Netherlands (165 variables) Miscellaneous Taxes;
Middle East (57 variables) Total final expenditure; Other general govt expenditure;
Norway (69 variables) Nafta (2 variables) Whole economy GVA; Other income tax revenue;
Poland (139 variables) New Member States (4 variables) Personal social security contributions;
Portugal (161 variables) OECD Europe (4 variables) Profits tax revenue;
Romania (81 variables) OECD (8 variables) Deflators + Prices Public Sector Net Borrowing (% of GDP);
Russia (67 variables) Old EU-15 (5 variables) Average expected inflation (10 years); Public Sector Net Borrowing;
Slovakian Republic (83 variables) CPI administered; Public Sector Net Debt (% of GDP);
Slovenia (80 variables) CPI not administered; Stock of govt debt pers sector;
Spain (168 variables) Consumer expenditure deflator Target; Surplus on Current Budget (% of GDP);
Sweden (169 variables) Consumer expenditure deflator; Surplus on Current Budget;
Switzerland (69 variables) Consumer price index; Taxes on income;
Turkey (65 variables) Deflator exports of goods and services; Total Tax Revenue;
U.K. (272 variables) Deflator imports of goods and services; Total government expenditure;
UK-sector (19 variables) Export price of non-commodities; Total govt expenditure;
Exports deflator; Transfers;
Americas GDP deflator at factor costs; Wage tax revenue;
GDP deflator;
Argentina (70 variables) Harm consumer price index; Households
Brazil (67 variables) Harm consumer price index; Average earnings;
Canada (165 variables) Harmonised inflation; Gross disposable income;
Chile (70 variables) Imports deflator; Gross liabilities personal sector;
Mexico (70 variables) Inflation Expectations target; House Prices;
U.S.A. (187 variables) Inflation expectations; Human wealth, Household;
Inflation rate (CED); Other personal income;
Investment deflator; Personal Income;
Africa/Middle East Price of commodity exports; Real personal disposal income;
Share of administered prices; Saving Ratio;
Africa (57 variables) Total CPI; Stock Market Capitalisation;
South Africa (67 variables) Unit Total Costs; Value of personal sector housing stock
Wholesale prices;

National Institute of Economic and Social Research

You might also like