Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bearing capacity of soil is the value of the average contact pressure between the foundation and
the soil which will produce shear failure in the soil. Ultimate bearing capacity is the theoretical
maximum pressure which can be supported without failure. Allowable bearing capacity is what is
used in geotechnical design, and is the ultimate bearing capacity divided by a factor of safety.
Theoretical (Ultimate) and allowable bearing capacity can be assessed for the following:
Shallow Foundations
o strip footings
o square footings
o circular footings
Deep foundations
o end bearing
o skin friction
For comprehensive examples of bearing capacity problems see:
Bearing Capacity Examples
Where:
Qu = c Nc + D Nq + 0.5 B N
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow strip footings, (kN/m2) (lb/ft2)
Qu = 1.3 c Nc + D Nq + 0.4 B N
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow square footings, (kN/m2) (lb/ft2)
Qu = 1.3 c Nc + D Nq + 0.3 B N
= Ultimate bearing capacity equation for shallow circular footings, (kN/m2) (lb/ft2)
Where:
Qu = NB + ND (tons/ft2) (standard)
10 10
Qa = N (tons/ft2) (standard)
10
Where:
Note: All Meyerhof equations are for foundations bearing on clean sands. The first equation is for
ultimate bearing capacity, while the second two are factored within the equation in order to
provide an allowable bearing capacity. Linear interpolation can be performed for footing widths
between 1.2 meters (4 feet) and 3 meters (10 feet). Meyerhof equations are based on limiting total
settlement to 25 cm (1 inch), and differential settlement to 19 cm (3/4 inch).
Qult = Qp + Qf
Where:
Qp = Apqp
Where:
Where:
Qf = Theoretical bearing capacity due to shaft friction, or adhesion between foundation shaft and
soil, kN (lb)
Af = pL; Effective surface area of the pile shaft, m2 (ft2)
qf = k tan = Theoretical unit friction capacity for cohesionless soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
qf = cA + k tan = Theoretical unit friction capacity for silts, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
qf = Su = Theoretical unit friction capacity for cohesive soils, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
p = perimeter of pile cross-section, m (ft)
for a circular pile; p = (B/2)
for a square pile; p = 4B
L = Effective length of pile, m (ft) *See Notes below
= 1 - 0.1(Suc)2 = adhesion factor, kN/m2 (ksf), where Suc < 48 kN/m2 (1 ksf)
= 1 [0.9 + 0.3(Suc - 1)] kN/m2, (ksf) where Suc > 48 kN/m2, (1 ksf)
Suc
Suc = 2c = Unconfined compressive strength , kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
cA = adhesion
= c for rough concrete, rusty steel, corrugated metal
0.8c < cA < c for smooth concrete
0.5c < cA < 0.9c for clean steel
c = cohesion of soil, kN/m2 (lb/ft2)
= external friction angle of soil and wall contact (deg)
= angle of internal friction (deg)
= D = effective overburden pressure, kN/m2, (lb/ft2)
k = lateral earth pressure coefficient for piles
= effective unit weight of soil, kN/m3 (lb/ft3) *See notes below
B = diameter or width of pile, m (ft)
D = Effective depth of pile, m (ft), where D < Dc
Dc = critical depth for piles in loose silts or sands m (ft).
Dc = 10B, for loose silts and sands
Dc = 15B, for medium dense silts and sands
Dc = 20B, for dense silts and sands
= summation of differing soil layers (i.e. a1 + a2 + .... + an)
Notes: Determining effective length requires engineering judgment. The effective length can be the
pile depth minus any disturbed surface soils, soft/ loose soils, or seasonal variation. The effective
length may also be the length of a pile segment within a single soil layer of a multi layered soil.
Effective unit weight, , is the unit weight of the soil for soils above the water table and capillary
rise. For saturated soils, the effective unit weight is the unit weight of water, w, 9.81 kN/m3 (62.4
lb/ft3), subtracted from the saturated unit weight of soil.
Theoretical unit tip-bearing capacity for driven piles in sand, when D > 10:
B
2
qp = 4Nc tons/ft standard
Where:
Example #1: Determine allowable bearing capacity and width for a shallow strip footing on
cohesionless silty sand and gravel soil. Loose soils were encountered in the upper 0.6 m (2 feet)
of building subgrade. Footing must withstand a 144 kN/m2 (3000 lb/ft2) building pressure.
Given
unit weight of soil, = 21 kN/m3 (132 lbs/ft3) *from soil testing, see typical g values
angle of Internal Friction, = 32 degrees *from soil testing, see typical f values
footing depth, D = 0.6 m (2 ft) *because loose soils in upper soil strata
Solution
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Three is typical for this type of application. See factor of safety for
more information.
Determine bearing capacity factors N, Nc and Nq. See typical bearing capacity factors relating to
the soils' angle of internal friction.
N = 22
Nc = 35.5
Nq = 23.2
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Since Qa < required 144 kN/m2 (3000 lbs/ft2) bearing pressure, increase footing width, B or
foundation depth, D to increase bearing capacity.
Conclusion
Footing shall be 0.61 meters (2 feet) wide at a depth of 0.61 meters (2 feet) below ground surface.
Many engineers neglect the depth factor (i.e. D Nq = 0) for shallow foundations. This inherently
increases the factor of safety. Some site conditions that may negatively effect the depth factor are
foundations established at depths equal to or less than 0.3 meters (1 feet) below the ground
surface, placement of foundations on fill, and disturbed/ fill soils located above or to the sides of
foundations.
********************************
Example #2: Determine allowable bearing capacity of a shallow, 0.3 meter (12-inch) square
isolated footing bearing on saturated cohesive soil. The frost penetration depth is 0.61 meter (2
feet). Structural parameters require the foundation to withstand 4.4 kN (1000 lbs) of force on a
0.3 meter (12-inch) square column.
Given
bearing pressure from building column = 4.4 kN/ (0.3 m x 0.3 m) = 48.9 kN/m 2
bearing pressure from building column = 1000 lbs/ (1 ft x 1 ft) = 1000 lbs/ft2
unit weight of saturated soil, sat= 20.3 kN/m3 (129 lbs/ft3) *see typical g values
unit weight of water, w= 9.81 kN/m3 (62.4 lbs/ft3) *constant
Cohesion, c = 21.1 kN/m2 (440 lbs/ft2) *from soil testing, see typical c values
angle of Internal Friction, = 0 degrees *from soil testing, see typical f values
footing width, B = 0.3 m (1 ft)
Solution
Try a footing depth, D = 0.61 meters (2 feet), because foundation should be below frost depth.
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. See factor of safety for more information.
Determine bearing capacity factors N, Nc and Nq. See typical bearing capacity factors relating to
the soils' angle of internal friction.
N = 0
Nc = 5.7
Nq = 1
Qu =1.3(21.1kN/m2)5.7+(20.3kN/m3-9.81kN/m3)(0.61m)1+0.4(20.3kN/m3-9.81kN/m3)(0.3m)0
Qu = 163 kN/m2 metric
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Conclusion
The 0.3 meter (12-inch) isolated square footing shall be 0.61 meters (2 feet) below the ground
surface. Other considerations may be required for foundations bearing on moisture sensitive clays,
especially for lightly loaded structures such as in this example. Sensitive clays could expand and
contract, which could cause structural damage. Clay used as bearing soils may require mitigation
such as heavier loads, subgrade removal and replacement below the foundation, or moisture
control within the subgrade.
********************************
Example #3: Determine allowable bearing capacity and width for a foundation using the
Meyerhof Method. Soils consist of poorly graded sand. Footing must withstand a 144 kN/m2 (1.5
tons/ft2) building pressure.
Given
Try a minimal footing width, B = 0.3 m (B = 1 foot) at a depth, D = 0.61 meter (2 feet). Footings for
single family residences are typically 0.3m (1 ft) to 0.61m (2ft) wide. This depth was selected
because soil density greatly increases (i.e. higher N-value) at a depth of 0.61 m (2 ft).
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Three is typical for this type of application. See factor of safety for
more information.
Qu = NB + ND (tons/ft2) (standard)
10 10
Qa = Qu
F.S.
Conclusion
Footing shall be 0.3 meters (1 feet) wide at a depth of 0.61 meters (2 feet) below the ground
surface. A footing width of only 0.3 m (1 ft) is most likely insufficient for the structural engineer
when designing the footing with the building pressure in this problem.
********************************
Example #4: Determine allowable bearing capacity and diameter of a single driven pile. Pile must
withstand a 66.7 kN (15 kips) vertical load.
Given
vertical column load = 66.7 kN (15 kips or 15,000 lb)
homogeneous soils in upper 15.2 m (50 ft); silty soil
o unit weight, = 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lbs/ft3) *from soil testing, see typical g values
o cohesion, c = 47.9 kN/m2 (1000 lb/ft2) *from soil testing, see typical c values
o angle of internal friction, = 30 degrees *from soil testing, see typical f values
Pile Information
o driven
o steel
o plugged end
o
Solution
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Smaller factors of safety are sometimes used if piles are load tested,
or the engineer has sufficient experience with the regional soils.
Qp = Apqp
qp = DNq
Qf = Afqf
Af = pL
k = 0.5; lateral earth pressure coefficient for piles, value chosen from Broms low density steel
= 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lb/ft3); given effective soil unit weight. If water table, then w
D = L = 1.5 m (5 ft); pile length. Check to see if D < Dc
Dc = 15B = 9.2 m (30 ft); critical depth for medium dense silts. If D > Dc, then use Dc
= 20 deg; external friction angle, equation chosen from Broms steel piles
B = 0.61 m (2 ft); selected pile diameter
cA = 0.5c; for clean steel. See adhesion in pile theories above.
= 24 kN/m2 (500 lb/ft2)
Qult = Qp + Qf
Qa = Qult
F.S.
Qa = 299.3 kN = 99.8 kN; Qa > applied load (66.7 kN) o.k. metric
3
Qa = 68,343 lbs = 22,781 lbs Qa > applied load (15 kips) o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
A 0.61 m (2 ft) steel pile shall be plugged and driven 1.5 m (5 feet) below the ground surface. Many
engineers neglect the skin friction within the upper 1 to 5 feet of subgrade due to seasonal
variations or soil disturbance. Seasonal variations may include freeze/ thaw or effects from water.
The end bearing alone (neglect skin friction) is sufficient for this case. Typical methods for
increasing the pile capacity are increasing the pile diameter or increasing the embedment depth of
the pile.
*******************************
Example #5: Determine allowable bearing capacity and diameter of a single driven pile. Pile must
withstand a 66.7 kN (15 kips) vertical load.
Given
Solution
Use a factor of safety, F.S = 3. Smaller factors of safety are sometimes used if piles are load tested,
or the engineer has sufficient experience with the regional soils.
Determine ultimate end bearing of pile,
Qp = Apqp
Qf = pqfL
k = 1.5; lateral earth pressure coefficient for piles, value chosen from Broms low density timber
= 19.6 kN/m3 (125 lb/ft3); given effective soil unit weight. If water table, then w
D = L = 1.5 m (5 ft); segment of pile within this soil strata. Check to see if D < Dc
Dc = 15B = 9.2 m (30 ft); critical depth for medium dense sands. This assumption is conservative,
because the soil is gravelly, and this much soil unit weight for a sand would indicate dense soils. If D
> Dc, then use Dc
= (2/3) = 20 deg; external friction angle, equation chosen from Broms timber piles
B = 0.61 m (2 ft); selected pile diameter
= 30 deg; given soil angle of internal friction
qfL = Su
Suc = 2c = 95.8 kN/m2 (2000 lb/ft2); unconfined compressive strength
c = 47.9 kN/m2 (1000 lb/ft2); cohesion from soil testing (given)
= 1 [0.9 + 0.3(Suc - 1)] = 0.3; because Suc > 48 kN/m2, (1 ksf)
Suc
L = 0.91 m (3 ft); segment of pile within this soil strata
Qf = pqfL
Qult = Qp + Qf
Qa = Qult
F.S.
Qa = 222.5 kN = 74.2 kN; Qa > applied load (66.7 kN) o.k. metric
3
Qa = 50,275 lbs = 16,758 lbs Qa > applied load (15 kips) o.k. standard
3
Conclusion
Wood pile shall be driven 8 feet below the ground surface. Many engineers neglect the skin friction
within the upper 1 to 5 feet of subgrade due to seasonal variations or soil disturbance. Seasonal
variations may include freeze/ thaw or effects from water. Notice how the soil properties within
the pile tip location is used in the end bearing calculations. End bearing should also consider the
soil layer(s) directly beneath this layer. Engineering judgment or a change in design is warranted if
subsequent soil layers are weaker than the soils within the vicinity of the pile tip. Typical methods
for increasing the pile capacity are increasing the pile diameter or increasing the embedment depth
of the pile.