Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted By
Submitted to the
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
In
AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING
Submitted By
AMBATI RAMESH REDDY (16PEIC4029)
Submitted to the
MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY
In
AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the work reported here
in does not form part of any other project report or dissertation on the
basis of which a degree or award was conferred on an earlier occasion on
this or any other candidate.
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Date :
Seal :
iii
CERTIFICATE OF EVALUATION
UNIVERSITY : VELTECH DR.RR & DR.SR. TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY
BRANCH : AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING(IC
ENGINES)
SEMESTER : II
SL.NO NAME OF THE PROJECT TITLE INTERNAL GUIDE
STUDENT
1 A.RAMESH REDDY PERFORMANCE, MR. G.SUGASH
EMISSION .ME
The report of the project work submitted by the above students in partial fulfillment for the award
of DEGREE of BACHELORE OF TECHONOLOGY in AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING of
VELTECH DR.RR & DR.SR. TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY was evaluated and confirmed to
be the report of the work done by the above students. This project report was submitted for VIVA
VOICE held on …………….................. at VEL TECH DR.RR & DR.SR. TECHNICAL
UNIVERSITY, AVADI, CHENNAI -600062.
INTERNAL GUIDE
INTERNAL EXAMINER EXTERNAL EXAMINAR
iv
ACKOWLEDGEMENT
This project, through done by us would not have been possible without the support
of various people by their co-operation have helped in bringing out this project
successfully.
We would like to thank our Founder president col. Prof. Dr.R.RANGARAJAN
B.E (Elec.), M.S.(Auto.).D.Sc. and vice chairman Dr. SAKUNTHALA
RANGARAJAN and trustees & directors for providing us ambient learning
experience at our institution.
We give special thanks to our CHANCELLOR Dr. R.P.BAJPAI, Ph.D. (IIT),
D.Sc. (Hokkaido, Japan), and FIETE for providing all facilities to complete our
project.
I also give a special thanks to our VICE CHANCELLOR PROF. BEELA
SATYANARAYAN, B.E(Mech), M.E (MD), M.E(IE), M.Tech(CSE), Ph.D.(IIT,
Delhi), for providing all facilities to complete our project.
We express our immense respect to Dr. P.SARASU, DIRECTOR R&D, for
providing this opportunity to do this project work.
We also express our sincere thanks to Dr. AMALA JUSTUS SELVAM, B.E
(Mech).,M.E(Thermal).,Ph.D. (Head of the Department, Department of
Automobile Engineering) for his support to do this project work. A special thanks
to internal guide Mr. M.RAJESH KUMAR, M.E (Auto) and Mr. M. AHMED
JINNAH Lab instructor (AETF) for immense care and encouragement towards
us throughout the course of this project.
We also express our sincere thanks to Mr. SENTHIL KUMAR PB sir, project
coordinator, Department of Automobile Engineering for his continuous and
valuable suggestions which helped us to proceed with this project work.
Also, we thank all faculty members, supporting staff, Parents and friends for the
help they extended to us for the completion of project.
v
ABSTRACT
Petroleum based fuels worldwide have not only resulted in the rapid depletion of
conventional energy sources, but have also caused severe air pollution. The search
for an alternate fuel has led to many findings due to which a wide variety of
alternative fuels are available at our disposal now. The existing studies have
revealed the use of vegetable oils for engines as an alternative for diesel fuel.
However, there is a limitation in using straight vegetable oils in diesel engines due
to their high viscosity and low volatility. In the present work, neat TAMARIND
seed oil is converted into their respective through transesterification process.
Experiments are conducted using various blends of TAMARIND seed oil with
diesel in a 3 Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Inline, Water cooled, DI TAFE diesel engine. The
experimental results of this study showed that the TSO biodiesel has similar
characteristics to that of diesel. The brake thermal efficiency, unburned
hydrocarbon and smoke density are observed to be lower in case of TSO biodiesel
blends than diesel. The CO emission for B10, B20 and B30 are observed to be
lower than diesel at full load, whereas for B100 it is higher at all loads. On the
other hand, BSFC and NOx of TSO biodiesel blends are found to be higher than
diesel. It is found that the combustion characteristics of all blends of TAMARIND
seed oil showed similar trends with that of the base line diesel. From this study, it is concluded that optimized
blend is B10 and could be used as a viable alternative fuel in a multi cylinder direct injection diesel engine without
any modifications.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDEGEMENT IV
ABSTRACT V
NOMENCLATURE IX
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 FUEL PREPARATION
TAMARIND SEED BIO
2.1 DIESEL 6
2.2 BIODIESEL PRODUCTION 6
2.3 TRANSESTERIFICATION 6
2.4 BIODIESEL PROPERTIES 8
3.1 ENGINE 9
3.2 INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE 9
3.3 DIESEL ENGINE 10
3.4 ADVANTAGES OF DIESEL ENGINE 10
3.5 BASIC TYPE 11
3.6 WORKING PRINCIPLE OF ENGINES 11
3.7 FOUR STROKE COMPRESSION-IGNITION ENGINE 11
vii
5 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY
8 CONCLUSION 38
REFFERENCE 39
viii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
2.1 Properties of biodiesel in comparison with diesel and
best blend 8
2.2 Fatty acid composition of biodiesel 8
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
2.1 Production of Biodiesel by Transesterification 7
2.2 Production of Biodiesel from TAMARIND seed 7
3.1 Schematic diagram of IC Engine 9
3.2 Working principle of a four stroke engine 13
4.1 Fuel injector 15
5.1 Engine Test Laboratory 18
5.2 Engine Test Laboratory Layout 18
5.3 EDACS- Engine Control System and Data
Acquisition Setup 19
5.4 SAJ Fuel Consumption meter 19
5.5 AVL DI GAS 444 (4 Gas Analyzer) 20
5.6 U-Tube Manometer 20
5.7 AVL SMOKE METER 21
6.1 Variation of BSFC with BP at Full Load 24
6.2 Variation of BSFC with BP at 50% Load 24
6.3 Variation of BSFC with BP at 75% Load 25
6.4 Variation of BTE with BP at Full Load 26
6.5 Variation of BTE with BP at 50% Load 26
6.6 Variation of BTE with BP at 75% Load 27
6.7 Variation of Exhaust Temp with BP at Full Load 28
6.8 Variation of Exhaust Temp with BP at 50% Load 28
6.9 Variation of Exhaust Temp with BP at 75% Load 29
6.10 Variation of CO with BP at Full Load 30
6.11 Variation of CO with BP at 50% Load 30
6.12 Variation of CO with BP at 75% Load 31
6.13 Variation of HC with BP at Full Load 32
6.14 Variation of HC with BP at 50% Load 32
6.15 Variation of HC with BP at 75% Load 33
6.16 Variation of NOX with BP at Full Load 34
6.17 Variation of NOX with BP at 50% Load 34
6.18 Variation of NOX with BP at 75% Load 35
6.19 Variation of CO2 with BP at Full Load 36
6.20 Variation of CO2 with BP at 50% Load 36
6.21 Variation of CO2 with BP at 75% Load 37
ix
NOMENCLATURE
BP Brake Power
Cv Specific heat
N Engine speed
P Pressure
HC Hydrocarbon
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
India is importing crude petroleum and petroleum products from Gulf countries. Indian scientists
searched for an alternate to diesel fuel to preserve the global environment and to withstand the
economic crisis. As far as India is concerned because of its vast agro forestry base, fuels of bio
origin can be considered to be ideal alternative renewable fuels to run the internal combustion
engines. Vegetable oils from plants both edible, non-edible and methyl esters (Biodiesel) are used
as an alternate source for diesel fuel. Biodiesel was found to be the best alternate fuel,
technically, environmentally acceptable, economically competitive and easily available.
There are more than 350 oil bearing crops that have been identified, among which only
sunflower, soybean, cottonseed, TAMARIND seed, rapeseed and peanut oils are considered as
potential alternative fuels for diesel engines. Apart from the renewability, the advantages of
biofuel are: High oxygen content, higher flash point and higher lubricity that produce complete
combustion in comparison with conventional diesel fuel. Further, the environmental benefit is
another investigation factor due to lesser greenhouse effect, less air pollution, less contamination
of water, soil and reduced health risk. Traditional oilseed feedstock for biodiesel production
predominantly includes soybean, rapeseed/canola, palm, corn, sunflower, cottonseed, peanut and
coconut oil. The long chain hydrocarbon structure, vegetable oils have good ignition
characteristics, however they cause serious problems such as carbon deposits build up, poor
durability, high density, high viscosity, lower calorific value, more molecular weight and poor
combustion. These problems lead to poor thermal efficiency, while using vegetable oil in the
engine. These problems can be rectified by different methods which are used to reduce the
viscosity of vegetable oils.
The methods are transesterification, dilution and cracking method. The transesterification of
vegetable oil gives better performance when compared to straight vegetable oil. Many researches
are focused on non-edible oils which are not suitable for human consumption due to the presence
of toxic components present in the oil. Moreover, the non-edible oil crops grow in waste lands
which are not suitable to use as food. The increase in brake thermal efficiency and lower in
specific fuel consumption were observed in a diesel engine.
Implementation of biodiesel in India will lead to many advantages like green cover to waste land,
support to agriculture, rural economy, reduction in dependence on imported crude oil and
reduction in air pollution. Currently, India is spending about Rs.80,000 million per year for
importing 70% of petroleum fuels and produces only 30% of the total fuel requirements. It is
estimated that mixing of 5% of biodiesel fuel to the present diesel fuel can save Rs.40, 000
million per year. The objective of the present study is the preparation of biodiesel from
TAMARIND seed oil; the performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a diesel
engine using biodiesel and its various blends are analyzed and compared with neat diesel.
2
Due to their high flash point, non-edible oil has certain advantages like great safety during
storage, handling and transport. However, this may create problems during engine starting. Non
edible oils typically have large molecules, with carbon, hydrogen and oxygen being present.
They have a higher molecular mass and viscosity as compared to diesel. Contrary to fossil fuels,
non-edible oils are free from sulfur and heavy metals.
The main problems associated with the use of non-edible oils are their high viscosity and density.
There are various methods to use non edible oils 2 efficiently in diesel engines like
transesterification, blending with Diesel/alcohol, dual fuel operation, use of additives etc.
1.2 BIODIESEL
Biodiesel is obtained from trans-esterification of vegetable oils. Biodiesels can be used in diesel
engines without any modification in the engine. They have higher cetane number than diesel but
they are viscous than diesel. Biodiesel is obtained from trans-esterification of vegetable oils. To
improve the characteristics of biodiesel and to bring its performance near to diesel, methods like
Blending with alcohols, water emulsification, low heat rejection technique, exhaust gas
recirculation, using it with gaseous fuels in dual fuel mode are followed.
Rakopoulos et.al. studied the use of four straight vegetable oils like sunflower, cotton seed, olive
and corn oils on mini-bus engine and reported that olive oil has very high content of the
unsaturated oleic acid (one double carbon bond) and very low content of the unsaturated linoleic
acid (two double carbon bonds), in contrast with the other three vegetable linoleic acids. Further,
the cotton seed oil has the highest content of palmitic acid (saturated). These may play some role
in the soot formation and oxidation mechanism.
Saravanan et al. reported that pure Mahua oil methyl ester (B100) gives the lower emissions as
compared with neat diesel (B0) in a DI diesel engine. The performance of diesel engine with rice
bran oil methyl ester and its diesel blends resulted in increase of CO, HC and soot emissions and
slight increase of NOx with increase in blends compared to diesel Also the ignition delay and
peak heat release rate for RBME were lower for biodiesel and it was increased with increase in
RBME blends.
Rajan et al have investigated the performance of a diesel engine with internal jet piston using
biodiesel and observed increase in brake thermal efficiency and decrease in CO and smoke
emissions at full load, whereas NOx emission is increased at full load compared to diesel fuel.
Sharanappa et al investigated the use of Mahua oil methyl ester and its diesel blends as an
alternative fuel in a hevy duty diesel engine and observed that B20 blend gives better
performance and lower emissions. The methyl ester of Thevetia peruviana seed oil (METPSO)
results lower emission of CO, HC and higher NOx as compared to that of diesel . The cylinder
peak Pressure of soyabean biodiesel is close to that of diesel and also the peak rate of pressure
rise and peak heat release rate during premixed combustion are lower for biodiesel.
Lei Zhu et al [2011] studied the combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a 4
cylinder engine with diesel fuel, biodiesel, and ethanol–biodiesel blends (BE) under five engine
loads at the maximum torque engine speed of 1800 rpm. The results indicate that when compared
with biodiesel, the combustion characteristics of ethanol–biodiesel blends changed; the engine
performance has improved slightly with 5% ethanol in biodiesel (BE5). In comparison with
diesel fuel, the biodiesel and BE blends have higher brake thermal efficiency. On the whole,
compared with diesel fuel, the BE blends leads to reduction of both NOx and particulate
emissions of the diesel engine. The effectiveness of NOx and particulate reductions increases
with increasing ethanol in the blends. With high percentage of ethanol in the BE blends, the HC,
CO emissions increase. But the use of BE5 reduces the HC and CO emissions as well.
4
Vipul Vibhanshu et al [2003] “Jatropha oil + ethanol blend” studied the blends of jatropha oil
and ethanol as diesel engine fuel with ethanol fraction of 5, 10, 15 and 20% (v/v) and important
properties of blends were evaluated. The results show that the properties are quite similar to
diesel fuel. Performance and emission characteristics were evaluated for straight vegetable
jatropha ethanol (SVJE) blends. It has been found that at part load condition, the brake thermal
efficiency and brake specific energy consumption of blends of SVJE were insignificant. HC, CO
emissions and smoke opacity were reduced at part load condition. However, there was a decrease
in NOx in case of SVJE diesel blends at full load condition.
1.5 METHODOLOGY
STEP 1
Biodiesel Production
↓
STEP 2
Biodiesel properties
↓
STEP 3
List out the technical specification of the present experimental Diesel engine setup
4
↓
STEP 4
Conduct experiments to evaluate characteristeristics of the engine using diesel fuel
5
↓
STEP 5
Prepararation of bio diesel blend .
↓
STEP 6
Conduct experiments to evaluate characteristics of the engine using bio diesel fuel
↓
STEP 7
Compare and optimizing the steps 4 and 6.
6
CHAPTER 2
FUEL PREPARATION
In this Fig 2.1 shows the process oil reacts in the presence of catalyst(KOH). During the process,
the molecule of raw TAMARIND seed oil is chemically broken to form the ester and glycerol.
TAMARIND seed ester is filtered to separate from glycerol. The properties of diesel, TSO and
other fuels are given in the table 1. Undoubtedly, transesterification is well accepted and best
suited method of utilizing vegetable oils in CI engine by reducing its viscosity without
significant long-term operational and durability issues. However, this adds extra cost of 4
processing because of the transesterification reaction involving chemical and process heat inputs.
7
When comparing the properties, the specific gravity, viscosity, flash point, and fire point
of TSO is more than diesel fuel.
8
In Table 2.1 it is shown that the viscosity of biodiesel is evidently higher than that of diesel fuel.
The density of the biodiesel is approximately 8% higher than that of diesel fuel. The gross
calorific value is approximately 8.5% lower than that of diesel. Therefore, it is necessary to
increase the fuel amount to be injected into the combustion chamber to produce the same amount
of power. Fuels with flash point 52oC are regarded as safe. Thus, biodiesel is an extremely safe
fuel to handle when compared to diesel. B25 has a flash point much above that of diesel; making
biodiesel a preferable choice as far as safety is concerned.
Table 2.2: Proximate and ultimate analysis and gross cllorific values of solid
tamarind seed
9
CHAPTER 3
3.1 ENGINE
An engine is a device which transforms one form of energy into another form. However while
transforming energy from one form to other the efficiency of conversion plays an important role.
Normally, most of the engine converts thermal energy into mechanical work and therefore they
are called heat engines.
4) For any given partial load the fuel efficiency of a diesel engine remains nearly constant,
as opposed to petrol and turbine engines which use proportionally more fuel with partial
power outputs.
5) They generate less waste heat in cooling and exhaust.
6) Diesel engines can accept super- or turbo-charging pressure without any natural limit,
constrained only by the strength of engine components. This is unlike petrol engines,
which inevitably suffer detonation at higher pressure.
7) The carbon monoxide content of the exhaust is minimal.
In four-stroke cycle engines there are four strokes completing two revolutions of the crankshaft.
These are respectively, the suction, compression, power and exhaust strokes.
Suction:
In Fig the piston is shown descending on its suction stroke. Only pure air is drawn into the
cylinder during this stroke through the inlet valve, whereas, the exhaust valve is closed. These
valves can be operated by the cam, push rod and rocker arm.
Compression:
The next stroke is the compression stroke in which the piston moves up with both the valves
remaining closed. The air, which has been drawn into the cylinder during the suction stroke, is
progressively compressed as the piston ascends. The compression ratio usually varies from 14:1
to 22:1. The pressure at the end of the compression stroke ranges from 30 to 45 kg/cm2 . As the
air is progressively compressed in the cylinder, its temperature increases, until when near the end
of the compression stroke, it becomes sufficiently high (650-800°C) to instantly ignite any fuel
that is injected into the cylinder.
12
Power:
When the piston is near the top of its compression stroke, a liquid hydrocarbon fuel, such as
diesel oil, is sprayed into the combustion chamber under high pressure (140-160 kg/cm2 ), higher
than that existing in the cylinder itself. This fuel then ignites, being burnt with the oxygen of the
highly compressed air. During the fuel injection period, the piston reaches the end of its
compression stroke and commences to return on its third consecutive stroke, viz., power stroke.
Expansion:
During this stroke the hot products of combustion consisting chiefly of carbon dioxide, together
with the nitrogen left from the compressed air expand, thus forcing the piston downward. This is
only the working stroke of the cylinder. During the power stroke the pressure falls from its
maximum combustion value (47-55 kg/cm2 ), which is usually higher than the greater value of
the compression pressure (45 kg/cm2 ), to about 3.5-5 kg/cm2 near the end of the stroke.
Exhaust:
The exhaust valve then opens, usually a little earlier than when the piston reaches its lowest point
of travel. The exhaust gases are swept out on the following upward stroke of the piston. The
exhaust valve remains open throughout the whole stroke and closes at the top of the stroke. The
reciprocating motion of the piston is converted into the rotary motion of the crankshaft by means
of a connecting rod and crankshaft. The crankshaft rotates in the main bearings, which are set in
the crankcase. The flywheel is fitted on the crankshaft in order to smoothen out the uneven
torque that is generated in the reciprocating engine.
CHAPTER 4
The performance of diesel engines is heavily influenced by their injection system design. In fact,
the most notable advances achieved in diesel engine resulted directly from superior fuel injection
system designs. While the main purpose of the system is to deliver fuel to the cylinders of a
diesel engine, it is how that fuel is delivered that makes the difference in engine performance,
emissions and noise characteristics.
Unlike its spark-ignited engine counterpart, the diesel fuel injection system delivers fuel under
extremely high injection pressures. This implies that the system component designs and materials
should be selected to withstand higher stresses in order to perform for extended durations that
match the engine’s durability targets. Greater manufacturing precision and tight tolerances are
also required for the system to function efficiently. In addition to expensive materials and
manufacturing costs, diesel injection system are characterized by more intricate control
requirements. All these features add up to a system whose cost may represent as much as 30% of
total cost of the engine.
The main purpose of the fuel injection system is to deliver fuel into the cylinders of an engine. In
order for the engine to effectively makes use of this fuel:
1) Fuel must be injected at the proper time, that is the injection timing must be controlled.
2) The correct amount of fuel must be delivered to meet power requirement, that is injection
metering must be controlled.
However, it is still not enough to delivery an accurately metered amount of fuel at the proper
time to achieve good combustion. Additional aspects are critical to ensure proper fuel injection
system performance including.
14
Fuel atomization – ensuring that fuel atomizes into very small fuel practices is a primary design
objective for diesel fuel injection systems. Small droplets ensure that all the fuel has a chance to
vaporize and participate in the combustion process. Any remaining liquid droplets burn very
poorly or are exhausted out of the engine. While modern fuel injection systems are able to
produce fuel atomization characteristics far exceeding what is needed to ensure complete fuel
evaporation during most of the injection process, some injection system designs may have poor
atomization during some brief but critical periods of the injection phase. The end of the injection
process is one such critical period.
Bulk mixing – while fuel atomization and complete evaporation of fuel is critical, ensuring that
the evaporated fuel has sufficient oxygen during the combustion process is equally as important
to ensure high combustion efficiency and optimum engine performance. The oxygen is provided
by the intake air trapped in the cylinder amount must be entrained into the fuel jet to completely
mixed with the available fuel during the injection process and ensures complete combustion.
Air utilization - Effective utilization of the air in the combustion chamber is closely tied to bulk
mixing and can be accomplished through a combination of fuel penetration into the dense air that
is compressed in the cylinder and dividing the total injected fuel into a number of jets. A
sufficient number of jets should be provided to entrain much of available air as possible while
avoiding jet overlap and the production of fuel rich zones that are oxygen deficient.
4.3.1 Nozzle refers to the part of the nozzle body/needle assembly which interfaces with the
combustion chamber of the engine. Terms like P-Type, M-Type or S-Type nozzle refer to
standardized dimensions of nozzle parameters, as per ISO specifications.
4.3.2 Nozzle holder or injector body refers to the part the nozzle is mounted on. In
conventional injection systems this part mainly served the nozzle mounting and nozzle needle
spring preloading function. In common rail systems, it contains the main functional parts: the
servo-hydraulic circuit and the hydraulic actuator ( electromagnetic or piezoelectric).
4.3.3 Injector commonly refers to the nozzle holder and nozzle assembly.
4.3.4 Start of injection (SOI) or injection timing is the time at which injection of fuel into
the combustion chamber begins. It is usually expressed in crank angle degrees (CAD) relative to
TDC of the compression stroke. In some cases, it is important to differentiate between SOI and
actual SOI. SOI is often indicated by an easily measured parameter such as the time that an
electronic trigger is sent to the injector or a signal from a needle lift sensor that indicates when
the injector needle valve starts open. The point in the cycle where this occurs is the indicated SOI
and the actual SOI when fuel exits the injector nozzle into the combustion chamber. The
difference between the actual SOI and indicated SOI is the injector lag.
15
4.3.5 Start of delivery in some fuel system, fuel injection is coordinated with the generation of
high pressure. In such systems, the start of delivery is the time when the high pressure pump
starts to deliver fuel to the injector. The difference between start of delivery and SOI is affected
by the length of time it takes for a pressure wave to travel between the high pressure pump and
the injector and by the speed of sound in the fuel. The difference between the start of delivery
and SOI can be referred to as injection delay.
4.3.6 End of injection (EOI) is the time in the cycle when fuel injection stops.
4.3.7 Injection fuel quantity is the amount of fuel delivered to an engine cylinder per power
stroke. It is often expressed in mm3/stroke or mg/stroke
4.3.8 Injection duration is the period of time during which fuel enters the combustion
chamber from the injector. It is the difference between EOI and SOI and is related to injection
quantity.
When signaled by the engine control unit the fuel injector opens and spray the pressurized
fuel into the engine. A device for actively injecting fuel into an internal-combustion engines by
directly forcing the liquid fuel into the combustion chamber at an appropriate point in the piston
cycle.
An Injection Pump is the device that pumps fuel into the cylinders of a diesel engine.
Traditionally, the injection pump is driven indirectly from the crankshaft by gears, chains or a
toothed belt (often the timing belt) that also drives the cam shaft. It rotates at half crankshaft
speed in a conventional four stroke engine. Its timing is such that the fuel is injected only very
slightly before top dead center of that cylinder’s compression stroke. It is also common for the
pump belt on gasoline engines to be driven directly from the camshaft. In some systems injection
pressures can be as high as 200 MPa.
CHAPTER 5
EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY
Fig 5.3: EDACS- Engine Control System and Data Acquisition Setup
To evaluate the performance parameters, the important operating parameters such as engine
speed, power output, fuel consumption, exhaust emissions and cylinder pressure were measured.
Significant engine performance parameters such as brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and
brake thermal efficiency (BTE) for biodiesel and its blends were calculated.
22
The engine performance and emission characteristics are determined by formulas and
Correlations described below
AFR = ma /
/ mf
BP = (2 * л * N * T)/60000 kW
Where,
N = Speed in rpm
T = Torque in Nm
-6
TFC = x/t *10 *3600 *ρ kg/hr
3)
ρ = Density of fuel (kg/m
23
Brake specific fuel consumption is a measure of the fuel efficiency of any prime mover
that burns fuel and produces rotational, or shaft power. It is the rate of fuel consumption
divided by the power produced, It is typically used for comparing the efficiency of
internal combustion engine with a shaft output.
Where,
BP = Brake Power in KW
TFC = Total Fuel Consumption
CV = Calorific Value.
T=W*R
Fig. shows the BSFC variation of the biodiesel and its blends with respect to brake power of the
engine. The BSFC of the engine with neat MEMSO (B15) is higher when compared to B5, B10,
and diesel at full loads. This may be due to lower heating value, higher viscosity and density of
MEMSO. The primary reason is, increase in BSFC with increase in fuel blends is the additional
consumption of biodiesel fuel by the test engine in order to maintain constant power output.
6.1.2 Variation of BTE with Brake Power:
Brake thermal efficiency (BTE) is the ratio between the power output and the energy introduced
through fuel injection, the latter being the product of the injected fuel mass flow rate and the
lower heating value. The brake thermal efficiency plots in Fig.show an increase of brake thermal
efficiency with an increase in the engine load as the amount of diesel in the blend increases.
Even a small quantity of diesel in the blend improves the performance of the engine. The brake
thermal efficiency of the B5 blend is better than other blends, which is very closer to diesel. This
is due to reduction in viscosity which leads to improved atomization, vaporization and
combustion. Due to a faster burning of biodiesel in the blend (B5), the thermal efficiency
improved.
6.1.3 Variation of EGT with Brake Power:
The variation of exhaust gas temperature with brake power for diesel, MEMSO and its blends are
shown in Fig. Exhaust gas temperature decreases with the increase in percentage of MEMSO in
the blend. But it is observed that the exhaust temperature of B5 is nearer to diesel. Since the
viscosity of B5 is closer to that of diesel, it improves the combustion process compared to B15
and other blends. Also, the compounds with higher molecular weight present in the MEMSO
burn at a later stage of combustion, increasing the combustion temperature and exhaust
temperature. However, for the other blends and B15 the temperature is low. Even though the
combustion duration of these fuels is also more than that of diesel, their higher viscosity results
in poor combustion.
6.2 EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS
Fig. shows the variations of CO emission with respect to brake power of the engine. The air-fuel
mixing process is affected by the difficulty in atomization of biodiesel due to its higher viscosity.
Also, the resulting locally rich mixtures of biodiesel cause more CO to be produced during
combustion. However, biodiesel which contains more number of oxygen atoms leads to more
complete combustion. At full engine loads, the percentage of CO emissions of biodiesel and its
blends are higher compared to diesel. This may be due to relatively poor atomization and lower
volatility of biodiesel. As a result, some of the fuel droplets may not get burned. When these
unburned droplets mix with the hot combustion gases, oxidation reactions occur, but do not have
enough time to undergo complete combustion. It vividly indicates that the combustion efficiency
improves with the blend of MEMSO with diesel and reduction in CO emission when compared
to neat diesel except B15. It may be due to incomplete and smaller premixed combustion for B15
compared to other blends. Moreover, higher fuel quantity at higher loads also causes higher CO
emission. Since the increase in the quantity of diesel in the blend improves the performance from
the emission point of view, the blend ratio is decided based on the amount of diesel to be
replaced or the level of emission that can be tolerated.
6.2.2 Variation of HC with Brake Power:
The variation of HC emission with brake power is shown in Fig. The emission of HC decreases
as the diesel is substituted by biodiesel. Cetane number of biodiesel is higher than diesel, due to
this it exhibits shorter delay period, which contributes to better combustion of fuel resulting in
low emission of HC. Another reason can be the oxygen molecules present in the structure of
biodiesel, which helps complete combustion of the fuel and hence decreases HC emission.
6.2.3 Variation of NOx with Brake Power:
Fig, shows the variation of NOx with brake power for diesel, biodiesel and its blends are shown
in Fig. Three factors that affect the formation of NOx in the cylinder are oxygen content,
combustion flame temperature and reaction time. NOx emissions of biodiesel and its blends are
slightly higher than those of diesel fuel. The higher temperature of combustion and the presence
of oxygen with biodiesel cause higher NOx emissions, especially at high engine loads. NOx
emissions were found to increase due to the presence of extra oxygen in the molecules of
biodiesel blends. However, the biodiesel with higher cetane number had comparable NOx
emissions with the diesel fuel. A higher cetane number would result in a shortened ignition delay
period, thereby allowing less time for the air-fuel mixing before the pre-mixed combustion
phase. Consequently, a weaker mixture would be generated and burnt during the premixed
combustion phase resulting in relatively reduced NOx formation. NOx emission is the most
harmful gaseous emissions from the engines; the reduction of it is always the target of engine
researchers and engine manufacturers. Reduction of NOx with biodiesel may be possible with
the proper adjustment of injection timing and by introducing exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) or
selective catalytic reduction technology (SCR).
6.2.4 Variation of CO2 with Brake Power:
Fig. shows the variations of CO2 emission with respect to brake power of the engine. The air-
fuel mixing process is affected by the difficulty in atomization of biodiesel due to its higher
viscosity. Also, the resulting locally rich mixtures of biodiesel cause more CO2 to be produced
during combustion. However, biodiesel which contains more number of oxygen atoms leads to
more complete combustion. At full engine loads, the percentage of CO2 emissions of biodiesel
and its blends are higher compared to diesel. This may be due to relatively poor atomization and
lower volatility of biodiesel.
38
CHAPTER 7
CONCLUSION :
In the present investigation, the performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a direct
injection, compression ignition engine fuelled with methyl ester of TAMARIND seed oil and its
blends have been analyzed and compared with diesel fuel. The biodiesel is produced from raw
TAMARIND seed oil by a method of transesterification. The tests for properties of biodiesel
demonstrate that almost all the important properties of biodiesel are in close agreement with the
diesel fuel. Thus the diesel engine can perform satisfactorily on methyl ester of TAMARIND
seed oil and its blends with diesel fuel. The results of the present work are summarized as
follows:
1. The BSFC increases with increase in percentage of biodiesel in the blends due to lower
heating value of biodiesel.
3. At full load, the emission of CO for B10, B20 are slightly higher, whereas for B30 it is
9% higher than diesel.
4. It is observed that there is a significant reduction of HC for biodiesel and its blends at full
engine loads.
5. The emission of NOx is higher than diesel for biodiesel and its blends, but for B10 slight
increase of only 2.88% at full load.
The combustion starts earlier for biodiesel and its blends than diesel. The peak cylinder pressure
and heat release rate of biodiesel and its blends are lower than diesel. From this study, it is
concluded that optimized blend is B20 with respect to performance, emission and combustion
characteristics for full loads compared with diesel and it could be used as a viable alternative fuel
in a Multi - cylinder direct injection diesel engine without any modifications and thereby saving
10% of the precious neat diesel fuel.
39
REFFERENCE
• Sylvester C.Izah and Elijah I.Ohimain , The challenge of biodiesel production from oil
palm feed stock in Nigeria , Greener Journal of Biological sciences 3 (2013) 001-012.
• Experimental Investigation of Diesel Engine Fueled with Jatropha Oil Blend with
Ethanol. Vipul Vibhanshu, NaveenKumar, Chinmaya Mishra, Sunil Sinha,Harveer
Singh Pali, Sidharth ansal. SAE technical paper 2013-24-0105.
• A.Gopinath, Sukumar Puhan and G.Nagarajan, Effect of Unsaturated fatty acid esters of
biodiesel fuels on combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a DI diesel
engine, International Journal of Energy and Environment, 1 (2010) 411-430.
• N.Nabi, M.Rahman and S.Akhter, Biodiesel from cotton seed oil and its effect on engine
performance and exhaust emissions, Applied Thermal Eng., 29 (2009) 2265-2270.
• K.Nantha Gopal, Arindam Pal, Sumit Sharma, Charan Samanchi, K.Sathyanarayanan and
T.Elango, Investigation of emission and combustion characteristics of a CI engine fueled
with waste cooking oil methyl ester and diesel blends, Alexandria Engineering Journal 53
(2014) 281-287.