Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IAS Mains Economics 2018 Paper 2 PDF
IAS Mains Economics 2018 Paper 2 PDF
1 EGT-D-ECON
www.examrace.com
(§ G:S ' A'' SECTION A'
1. セ ォャ ゥヲャュ\@ セ@ m q;r -:aw.: QZ セ m セi@ 150 セ@ it セ@ :
AnS\ver the following questions in aJbout 150 words ・。」ィ セ@ I 0>= 5- 50
L{a) W &N セ@ セ@ "« セ@ セ@ fcfi amm ciit Jl'tllMqt W-IT iUfOIMqi i(lfd<il \セゥヲ@
セ@ セ@ セ@? セ@ GrqfiiQ I *f セGゥエ@ ?.1T
De, you agree with the view that the objective of industrial and commercial
policies of British was セッ@ transfom1 India as a corn_plementary economy of
Eng] and 1 Givc reasons. 10
t.(b) <&. in. 31R. iff. セ@ セ@ セ@ ifi セ@ "it セ@ %u$ 3fllf Sl f ヲciセGQ@ セ@ セ@ 1liliR WlJR M
m?
How did V. K. R. V. Rao improve· upon the ear] aer nat] em a] inocnne estimates ·o f
milia? lO
J*(c) セ@ 'll'roJ セG@ ifi;w'1 セ@ m
セ@ 1%'« WfiR セ@ セA@ セ@ ュセ@ 3ia セ@ セ@ ?
T
How did Gold Bullion. Standard end with 'ratio controversy' in British mdia? 1.0
ャセH 、 I@ セ@ セ@ セ@ セMjエ ャ セャゥヲQ@ セ@ セMアCLjᆬ@ 'ijif ftna セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ t I
Explain bow ョオセャ エゥ M\ゥ ゥュ ・ョウゥッュ、@ ーッカ セ ・イエケ@ jndex is, oomputed. I0
l .(e) セ@ セ@ fi..f.tf<tftil セゥヲ@ i@セ セAHh@ セG@ セ@ GアセcA N BQ@ 'fR セゥエ@ セQ@
Elaborate· on the phenomenon of '·missjng nUddle in Indian mannfacturiog sector. 3
10
Z.(a) セ@ セ@ 1iftr
サqセTエ@ セI@ "&it セ@ fEfi セ@ 4iFfqi'R iti セ ᄋ@ セ@ eft セ@ m
31 ヲQ p Qセキゥェ@ Clil ·tffi!HUT i$ffl1 QO I
Examine thB featm-es of penrumcnt land scU:h.:ment as introduced by Lord
ComwalHs. 20
l.(b) セ@ dtmttil ゥエセ@ qql% セ@ セ@ it 11lWiii'wf1 セ@ セ@ セ@ セゥ@ "<lit セ@
4?Jfsttr I
Expla in the problems faced by j ute mills in India duri!Jg the early years of their
existenc-e. l .5
2.{c) ᄋセrZウエt@ セ@ セ@ G TゥBャセ`ア@ 1Ri1'rn Cifif JtW fC£q"lH1 !3IT' I Lf4f 3Wi エQセ BQ エQ@ エセZ@ セ@ ? セ@ セ@
eqi!f;t it セ ᄋ@ ゥAh i セ@ I
'Britisb rule led. セ ッ@ India,s underdevelopment '. Do you agree· 7 Give ·Nasons in
support of your answer. l5
3 .(a) 'Jfffir cfi't· \エサゥセ@ 31PJ セ@ tt<'lll'"l lfflCh セ ゥ mッエui@ -ij セ@ セ@ セ@ ヲZエイュセ@ セ@ セャ@
Gァヲエゥセ@ I
Reflect on issues and セュー ャゥ」。エ ッョウ@ of structurn1 transformation in India's oational
income. 20
l .(b) m«r ii 1liJ1t セ@ セゥTQヲャ、@ セ@ セ@ セ@ セ}@ セ@ セ@ セ@ mfu セ@ 3m fcm セ@
••ot:wnhrtq ill エゥャセ セ@ ?
How would y-ou justify the policy of land イ セ・ヲッョウ@ rn the ligllt of the
fann size - producti vity debate in ]ndia ? ]5
EGl- D-ECON 2
www.examrace.com
SセH」I@ ᄋセ@ ヲQセq、エT@ SQセG@ 41"'""''t セッョ@ :iR "tJiJ1f セ@ セ@ セ@ セ l ュ@ "ifif
fエセ@ eヲゥャpセ@ I
AnaJyse lhe salient features of 'int·erest subvention scheme' and 'its implications on
the farm sector. 15
4.(a) セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ ゥDiuセ\@ セ@ セ@ ᄃ セャ ャBl、 A@ セ@ セ@ t«Cfil'\ セ@ cfitセ@ セ@ セ@ 1!R:
f(:tq aft セヲ[イゥt@ I
CoiDIIlCll!L on the new initiatives taken by the government to facilitate; inv|・sエュセ[iャ@
and ease of doing business. 20
4.(b) セ@ セ@ 4:f'tT Cf.iT m«f qtT セ M セ@ Cffffi ( 1\ilcM.stitt Dォuセ ャエ L@ セ@ セ@ 3fR: i
\igエ」ヲャ G wセ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ ゥヲセ@ セ@ w Hィエセ」n、ャ@ RFti_deJ4i qn セrョュ@ セ@ セ@ セッュ@ セ@
H@fitl セ@ ? セ@ 。イセャエ@ I
The ebequered fiscal history or India. of the last fifteen years has been a saga. of
fiscal prudence on the part of the States and fiscal profligacy by the Centre. Do you
agree ., Give reasons. 15
4.(c) セ@ ii §tltO>a< 。イ」ヲセ@ il Shセ@ *· 31t1 J;(dl セ@ PirEf11a1 % itq セ@ セ@ セ@
61fM I
Reflect on tlre relationship among economic ァセッキ エ ィL@ inequality and po,verty in the
post,reform pcri·od in Indl a. 15
S:.{a) "if<O セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@
1
&101{.411
1
m セ@ セBQ Q GQpj@ セ@ セ@ fttvi afR: ュョセ@ セ@ ヲア セ セ@
it '1lRra セ@ ゥャヲ、セ@B :#a I t ? セ@
Do you 。ァョセ N ・@ that MGNREGA bas been ーセ。ァオ・、@ wi.th rampant ュ。ャーイ」エゥ・セ@ leakage
s.(b}
:It 'r:R エャセ@
of ihnds and d]version of resources '/ セ gゥカ・@
セ@ セ@
エゥQ ᄋ セエ@ 'l
セ@ ュエセ@ セ@ 'Iii' * 。セャ\BヲHI@ セ@
·fieasons.
1 )u41a• セ@ it a:uqifi セ@
t0
if セ ᄋ@
Horticulture is now the growth driver of ]ndian Agriculture. Discuss the issue tn tbe
broad oontcx:t of nmlll diversification. I0
5.(c) ᄋ セ@ it セャji M セ@ SRiif .q ャイGJセゥ@ _セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ セ N 。 セ[ゥェ@ セ@
t! fi liHl"i::"'k41 tti MNrャセ@ qi\1\Jtq I
Critically examine the relative contribucions of public and private sectors in the
pre-liberaHsation period in lndb.. 10
5.(d} 9 "i セ@
ャ セャサ@ ·fcfi 'm"m lt セ@ セ@ セ@ セエ、j ャ L HQ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ I セ、@ セ@ "\ii"FIT =q iセGサ@ snttt I
Explain why the use of oa-ganic farming shou]d be encouraged in India. セ@ 0
3 EGT- 0 -E.CON
www.examrace.com
"..."'( '
..
4 セ ᄋ N@ ... • ;
5.( e)
セ@
ij•lfbtl セ@
'WRfT t'i ?
セ@ cit セ@ WliR セ q a icエGゥt@ * セ@ ャサセ@ m セ@ セ@ ii ェBQセエ@ ta;m
セ@ m セ@ セ@ w
セ@ \ ャ GゥャTセQ オ@ «A<Wi セ@ セ@ Mfi'Jd mm サMI セ@ セI@ ᄃァ[エセ@ 1
Do you agree that fiscal s lippage in the recent past is structt1tal in :nature ? Also
ウオァ セ ・ウエ@ road map for fi5cal consolidatio n in the next few years. 20
6.(b) セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@ qtT セ@ セ@ ;:ftfu R•,t<Haff セ@ セ@ セ@ -fmt
«lle:l l セ@ セ@
セ@ ャ セSャB _@ セWrqゥBQt@ I
The state-contr>olled section of i ョ、ゥ。セウ@ hankll1g sector corJt1nues to lbe a major
problem for policy makers. Do you agree ? Give reasons in support of your answer.
15
6.(c) セゥエ@ Gャ ャ \セャヲ@ セ@ 1R tftftm lmR セ@ ? セ@ セ@ セ@ セ@
@セ I
tfl ヲ 、ャ
Do you think that tbe green イ・カッ セ ャ@ uti on bad Iimited impact on f:ndian agricul rure ?
Justify your answer. I5
7.(a) ャTセ ャエヲ サエャ@ 3\?Ll,lt.i"fa アヲサoqセQ@ 3fu: ;fl%1tiilrl セ@ @セ セ@ セ@ セI@ 3tR Sヲ|\ゥGセ@
セ@ WI" セ@ l セ@ セ@ セ@ Wilf.f 1fr Cf;RlJT セ@ !¥1 Pltt I
Demonetisation has been a radica] and unpn."'C-e dented step with shorl-ron costs and
long-term benefits. Give reasons in sLJpport of thjs statemem. 20
7.(b) 1Tt'm セ@ セ\ ャ サゥャア[ッエ M セ@ セ M ゥエ@ セ@ セNMエゥ@ セ@ "tf{ wmr セ@ 1
Throw light on the poverty debate in the prewhb<:ralisation era in India. 15
7.(c) rftfu atl1im セ@ Miqii l;rr 'JTWf it セ@ >rcm SQ Q Mゥ G gjセ@ セ@ Clil q f<:qfcta セ@ セ@ t 1
セ@ I 4MG!q,
I!ow the setting-up of NITI Aayog has changed lhe ー「 ョセ ョァ@ perspective m India ?
Expbrin. ]5
8.(a) 'eftrl セ@ セッZエᆱ@ fcfi '001 li セJGBQ@ セエゥ@ t 'mill 4f<4cli1l tldl ュセ@
エ _ セ ャ@
Do you believe that capital accoum convertibility is feasib1e under the pres em
circumstanc es j n India ? E plam. 20
S.{b) ᄋセG@ it セ@ セ@ Cf;l セ@ <G!Mt{ I セ@ m«r it @セ セ@ セ@ セ@ 'tR セ@
Gwュセ@ ュゥtセ_@Z
Describe tho salic..'111 featuTes of TRIMS. How has it impacted the textile and
clothhlg !:lector m Inclia ? 15
8.( c) セヲ@ TI「`セqQ@ mwHセN@ -eft. セI@ tR セヲエ@ セ。@ t@セ HセN@ -iJ. 3TT$) セ@ セ@
セ@ 'ff\JJlG セ@ \1fT'ifl セ@ ? W セ@ 1f 6{il!R セ@ セ M セ@ ヲ\Zエアオセ@ エョセcH@ I
\Vhy should FDI be prefc..'tTcd over FPI '! Comment on govemment'"s initiatives itJ
this respect 15
4
www.examrace.com