Professional Documents
Culture Documents
99 \ \
S current distribu . 98 \
98 \ -
t i o n curves for
\
i 95 — men a n d w o m e n
^•ER I M E N TAL 90 by\rc.niivi&i^ i
90 - - I y POINTS FO
/ 134 M E N : 80 13 4 Μ E N
y 80
• \ VIE m = 15B 7 M A I 7 0
i 70 : 60
60 ; 5 0 —
5
b
50
40 \Λ V 40
30 -
30 20 —
u 20 Λ—·
\ 10
\
10 ζ
• UJ
ο
5 —
5 -
/
\ ••is 2
•—'
2
EXPERIMENTAL
— • \
I
POINTS FOR V Fig. 2 (right).
I V\
28 WOMEN
0.5 " MEAN = 10.5 MA. — \ \ 60-cycie let-go
0.5
lower than those which would have been Reasonably Safe Currents curve for the 28 women in contrast to the
obtained had a group of women accus consistent response for 134 men illus
tomed to physical labor been used. Re The principle of biological variabiHty is trates the point. The distribution curve
sults based on these data, therefore, so universally recognized that no attempt is a ready means for predicting the prob
should be conservative and on the side of should be made to specify any electric able response for a given percentage of a
safety. These data constitute the avail current as safe for all people. The press large group. It is believed that data
able let-go data on women. contains frequent accounts of fatalities have been obtained from sufficiently large
The mean or average value, which is ascribed to heart failure caused b y over- groups to permit vahd predictions to be
called the let-go threshold, was estab- excitement, intense emotion, or shock made, not only for these particular
Hshed at 15.87 and 10.5 milHamperes (shock of injury, not electric shock). groups but also for a large segment of the
(ma) for men and women respectively. Some of the subjects volunteering for normal, healthy population of the coun
Probably women's threshold let-go cur these tests became frightened and trem try.
rent is only 66 per cent (%) of the let- bled all over; some even complained of Without a single exception experimen
go threshold value found for men because pain when holding the test electrode be tal points representing the very low cur
their nervous systems are more sensitive fore the circuit was energized. Although rents diverge somewhat from the distri
and their muscular development is poorer, these persons were not used in the ex bution curves. This is consistent with
and not because there is any difference in periments, the experiences dramatically the observation that every normal person
sex. illustrate the possibihty that a person should be able to release some current.
There was considerable variation in with a diseased heart might succumb In contrast, because of the nature of the
the individual's let-go current in repeated from any contact, or even the fear of probability scale, the distribution ciu^es
tests made at weekly intervals, the trend contact, with an electric circuit. This yield a theoretical probabiHty for zero
usually being toward shghtly higher possibility must be recognized, and an current. A great deal of thought has
values; therefore, the largest current re occasional death is to be expected as a been given to establishing a reasonable
leased on the first test was taken as the result of casual contact involving currents criterion for safety and an arbitrary limit
individual's let-go current. This was known to be harmless to the great major based on the theoretical response for
done to include the element of surprise to ity of healthy individuals. Quite aside 99V2% of a large group has been quite
as great an extent as possible and to give from determining an absolutely safe generally accepted by the profession.
conservative results. Psychological fac electric current for all human beings is the Thus, it is concluded that the reasonably
tors, especially fear and competitive practical problem of determining a cur safe 60-cycle let-go current for men and
spirit, were the most important causes rent which would be reasonably safe for women is approximately 9 and 6 ma
for the variations. Physiological factors most normal, healthy individuals. respectively.
played an important part but so far their It has been found that the response to An alternate method of plotting the
exact mechanism remains unknown. It electrical stimulation obtained from sub data is illustrated in Fig. 2, in which the
seemed that the let-go current in both stantial numbers of subjects inevitably points for the 134 men are plotted as per
sexes was related to the muscular de follows a normal distribution. This fact cent deviations from the mean of the
velopment of the wrist and forearm. is illustrated in the distribution curves of group. This method has the advantage
Husky subjects having low let-go values Fig. 1, in which the majority of the in of increased accuracy in analyzing the
could almost invariably be persuaded to dividual points fall closely about the data, as it has been found that as long as
continue the test until their values were straight Hnes on the probability graph the sensations and other manifestations
in line with others of similar physique; paper. It has been found that the resulting from electrical stimulation are
however, attempts to correlate let-go greater the number of individual points similar, the deviation curves will have the
currents with physical measurements of the more closely the points fall about a same or nearly identical slopes. In con
the forearm, wrist, strength of grip, etc., straight Hue. The shghtly greater scat trast, the corresponding distribution
were inconclusive. tering of the points about the distribution curves generally have different slopes.
Fig. 5 . Effect o f w a v e
fomi on let-go cunents
for m e n , w o m e n , a n d 20 30 40 50 60
children DIRECT CURRENT COMPONENT AVERAGE Μ ILL! AM PERES
Offset W a v e Offset W a v e
P.... ....18.8 ... ....36.0 ... 5.6 .... ....C 16.5 ... ....30.0 ... 5.2
C... ....16.5 ... 34.0 ... 5.6 ... 14.0 ... 30.0 . . . 5.3
B.... ....15.0 ... 32.0 ... 5.7 ... ..../ 16.2 ... ....30.0 ... 5.6
I 16.2 . . . 31.0 ... 5.9 ... .. . . Α . . . . 16.0 ... 26.0 . . . 4.7
M.... ....14.5 ... 30.0 ... 5.3 ... . . . . Μ . . . ....14.5 ... 26.0 . . . 4.6
....14.0 ... 30.0 ... 5.2 ... ....G.... ....12.4 ... ....24.0 ... 4.3
A 16.0 . . . 30.0 ... 5.5 ... ....Β.... 15.0 ... ....23.5 ... 4.2
Fig. 6. Oscillogram from rectifier-type ....12.4 ... 27.5 ... 4.9 ... .. ..Ν.,.. . . . . 1 2 . 5 ... ....23.0 ... 4.1
....12.8 ... 25.0 ... 4.4 ... ....11.0 ... ....21.2 ... 3.9
welding machine ....13.3 ... 25.0 ... 4.4 ... .. 12.8 ... ....20.0 ... 3.7
K.... ....12.0 ... 25.0 ... 4.6 ... .. ..Η.... 13.3 ....20.0 ... 3.5
A to B = d - c component output voltage = 0.... ....12.0 ... 24.0 ... 4.3 ... . . . . 0 . . . . ....12.0 ... ....18.0 ... 3.2
75 v o l t s F.... ....11.0 ... 23.0 ... 4.2 ... ....7.... ....ll.O ... ....18.0 ... 3.4
ΛΓ. . . . . . . . 1 2 . 5 . . . 23.0 ... 4.1 ... ....L.... ....11.1 ... 17.5 . . . 3.3
Β t o C = d-c c o m p o n e n t = 5,5 crest v o l t s L.... ....11.1 . . . 23.0 ... 4.3 ... ....Κ.... ....12.0 ... ....17.0 ... 3.0
Corrected mean:
mean of sample for given test condition (1) D-c a v e r a g e = 2 7 . 9 0 X 1 5 . 8 7 / 1 3 . 8 7 = 3 1 . 9 2 m a 2 2 . 9 5 X 1 5 . 8 7 / 1 3 . 3 5 = 27
27.2.S m a
Λ / 2 Χ 4 . 1 3 Χ 15.87/13.3, 0.94 m a
A-c c r e s t = \/2 X 4 . 9 3 X 1 5 . 8 7 / 1 3 . 8 7 = 7 . 9 8 m a
The current required for other percentile
99Vi p e r c e n t i l e :
ranks is obtained by using the following D-c a v e r a g e m e n = 31.92 ( 1 . 0 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) = 18.13 m a 27.28 ( 1 . 0 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) = 15..W m a
A-c c r e s t m e n 7.98 ( 1 . 0 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) = 4.53 m a 6.94 ( 1 . 0 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) = 3.94 m a
equation
D-c a v e r a g e c h i l d r e n = 0.5 X 18.13 == 9.1 m a 0 . 5 X 1 5 . 5 0 = 7.8 m a
A-c c r e s t c h i l d r e n = 0 . 5 X 4.53 == 2.3 m a 0.5 X 3.94 = 2.0 m a
current = mean of sample ( l ± d e via tion
from mean corresponding to percentile D-c a v e r a g e w o m e n = 18.13 X 1 0 . 5 / 1 5 . 8 7 = 12.0 m a 1 5 . 5 0 X 1 0 . 5 / 1 5 . 8 7 = 10.2 m a
A-c c r e s t w o m e n = 4 . 5 3 X 1 0 . 5 / 1 5 . 8 7 = 3.0 m a 3 . 9 4 X 1 0 . 5 / 1 5 . 8 7 = 2.0 m a
rank desired) ( 2 )
% ripple 7.98/31.92 = 2 5 . 1 % 6 . 9 4 / 2 7 28 = 2.5.4%
The effect of frequency on let-go cur P o l a r i t y effect 2 7 . 2 8 / 3 1 . 9 2 = 8 5 . 5 %
99.5
Fig. 7 (left). A 2 5 % ; 9 9
\ 1
offset w a v e current d e
\ - f •
' \ ο • E X P E J R I M E N ΓΓΑΙ
viation curve
95
\ s
• • · •
ΝΝ* EXPERIMENTAL
Y
/ P O I N T S F O R
/] o n 1 MTC c n ο
)' • '
/ ) IV s • 23 M E N
ο
), , ! 1
ο • /
J' • |- •^
•\
"i
ο · \ο 6 0
•
J'
"\,
· • •
' \ 5 0 \•
}• i
\c • 4 0
\
] \
\
Ο H A ND ΕL E C ; T R O D Ε ^«IEG A T I V E
Ε Α Ν = 2 3 : 0 Μ Α . D.C.
\
^ \
»l
· H A ND E L E C T R O D E
\ ^1 E A N = 2 7 . 9 MA. D.C.
P O S I T !V E
\ \ t
\.
1 \ I
Ν
>l 1 0.5
-40 -30 -20 -10 10 2 0 3 0 4 0 Fig. 8 (right). 6 0 cycle - 4 0 - 3 0 - 2 0 -10 0 10 2 0 3 0 4 0
PERCENT DEVIATION FROM MEAN let-go voltage deviation PERCENT DEVIATION FROM MEAN
OF EACH GROUP curve OF 2 0 . 3 VOLTS R M S
ζ
98
\ t A K t K I I V I t N lAL
'^POINTS FOR
Pathway 95
Subject
Correction
Factor y 90 \ >3 MEN
i 80 -
UJ
/ 0.959 ο 70
G 0.932 Q:
LU 60
Ο 0.888 Q.
Τ 0.888 50 Ν
Ρ 0.864 40
Ρ 0.835
30
J 0.823 -
Κ 0.820 20
UJ
Υ 0.811
ο
C 0.808 10 >
Χ 0.806 i
UJ •
\V
D 0.780 5
Β 0.766 Fig. 9 . Subject i n process o f d e t e r m i n i n g ο
α:
UJ •
Α 0.738 his l e t - g o current a n d v o l t a g e Q. 2
Μ 0.737 1
5.... 0.721 1
Ε
R
0.676
0.667
05
-30 -20 -10 0 10 \20 30
υ 0.660 a-c reasonably safe voltage, hand to feet = PERCENT DEVIATION FROM MEAN
Η 0.634
L 0.592
18.0 ( 1 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) =10.2 volts rms OF 1225 VOLTS
Mean 0.781 Fig. 1 0 . D - c release v o l t a g e d e v i a t i o n curve
(Deviation from the mean at 99V2%
= - 0 . 4 3 2 is from Fig. 8.) Let-go and
release voltages for the hand-to-hand
hand when standing barefoot in a bucket pathway were obtained from the data D-c release values were available for
of salt water to a depth of about 4 inches. given in Tables I and II of reference 3. 23 subjects, and no points were rejected.
Because of the violent muscular reactions These 60-cycle let-go and release tests The voltage deviation curve of Fig. 10
and frequent loss of balance when the were comparable, since the contact con has the same slope as the corresponding
subject struggled to release the test elec ditions consisted of grasping the small d-c release current deviation curve of
trode, it was not safe to conduct let-go copper-wire electrode in the wet palm of Fig. 4, and is offered as substantiating
tests and, instead, a series of simultane the right hand, and the left hand was the analysis. T h e threshold for the hand-
ous current and voltage readings were held firmly on a flat brass plate 8 inches to-hand ciurrent pathway for a large
taken for both indifferent electrode loca in diameter and wet with salt water. group is computed with equation 1
tions with cturents from about 30 to 9 0 % The data were reduced according to the d-c threshold release v o l t a g e , h a n d t o hand
of the individual's let-go value. The methods previously described. Sixty- 15.87
tests were made on the same day, with cycle let-go values were available for 54 = - - - X 122.5 = 127.8 volts
lo.^ 1
the order alternated between different subjects, but the six highest voltage
subjects so that unpredictable variations values were discarded for the response to and the reasonably safe release voltage is
would average out. A pathway correc approximate a normal distribution. Al d-c reasonably safe v o l t a g e , h a n d t o hand
tion factor was determined for 21 sub though the data did not follow the antic = 127.8 ( 1 - 0 . 1 8 5 ) =104.2 volts
jects, and is defined as follows ipated response as closely as desired, it
is beheved that the substantial number of (Deviation for the mean at 9972%
p a t h w a y correction factor = subjects permits reasonably accurate = - 0 . 1 8 5 is from Fig. 10.) The ratio
voltage ^^^^^^^ current w i t h right computations. The 60-cycle currents of the d-c mean release voltage to the
h a n d holding pliers t o b o t h feet often produced muscular reactions at the corresponding a-c mean let-go voltage for
current b u c k e t of saU water the hand-to-hand pathway and the same
left hand which caused the hand and
voltage a n d current w i t h right fingers to curl, and it was found necessary contact conditions is 127.8/36.9 = 3.46.
h a n d holding small copper wire for a bystander to apply pressure on the This permits estimating the direct volt
current t o a r m b a n d on upper arm
back of the hand to assure good contact ages for the hand-to-feet current path
with the brass plate. It is likely that this way as follows
Values for the various subjects, including
difficulty is responsible tor the poorer re
t h e mean, are given in Table I I . d-c threshold release voltage, h a n d t o feet
sponse. Fig. 9 illustrates a subject in the
It had been anticipated that the resist = 3.46X18.0 = 62.3 volts d-c
process of determining his let-go values.
ance from the hand to the feet, being a
The threshold for the hand-to-hand ciu and the reasonably safe release voltage is
longer pathway, would be higher than
rent pathway for a large group is given
the resistance from the hand to the arm d-c reasonably safe v o l t a g e , hand-to-feet
by
band. Such was not the case, which in = 62.3 ( 1 - 0 . 1 8 5 ) = 5 1 volts d-c
dicates that the contact resistance at the a-c threshold let-go v o l t a g e , h a n d t o h a n d =
armband predominated. The threshold From the foregoing it is apparent that,
15.87. for wet contact conditions, the reasonabty
60-cycle let-go voltage for the hand-to- X 3 4 . 4 = 3 6 . 9 volts rms
14.81 safe 60-cycle let-go voltages for man, for
feet pathway for a large sample is ob
tained b y multiplying the mean pathway the major current pathways through the
The reasonably safe 60-cycle let-go
body, are between about 10 and 21 volts
correction factor b y the a-c mean let-go voltage for this current pathway is ob
rms, and the corresponding voltages for
voltage, or 0.781 X 23.0 = 18 volts rms. tained as before
direct ciurent are 51 to 104 volts.
Applying the 99V2% criterion, the rea
sonably safe 60-cycle let-go voltage is a-c reasonably safe v o l t a g e , h a n d t o h a n d The reader is cautioned against in
=36.9 ( 1 - 0 . 4 3 2 ) = 2 1 volts r m s terpreting the differences between the
computed from equation 2
With regard to voltage he concludes: France during t h e C I G R E meetings of Charles F . Dalziel. Ibid., p p . 739-44.
the maximum safe voltage t o which an approximately 24 volts for 50-cycle a-c 4. A S T U D Y O P T H E H A Z A R D S O F OpEN-CiRCuiTEo
individual may be subjected should not and 50 volts for direct current. CURRENT TRANSFORMERS, Frank P. Massoglia.
M.S. Thesis, U n i v e r s i t y of California, Berkeley,
exceed 12 (60-cycle a-c). This is based Calif., J a n . 2 8 , 1 9 5 4 .
resistance of the human skin, I believe that known. The maximum safe voltage when
Discussion it is impossible to predict "safe let-go contacting a circuit of maintained voltage
voltages" unless all of the conditions are is largely dependent upon the dryness and
W. B. Kouwenhoven (The Johns Hopkins acctuately known. dielectric strength of the epidermis at the
University, Baltimore, Md.): Prof. Dalziel's points of contact. In the paper the let-go
work on let-go current is a valuable contribu voltage study was confined to estimating
tion to our knowledge of the effects of elec A. TJ. Welch (General Electric Company, minimum probable let-go voltages under
tricity on the human body. In this paper Fitchburg, Mass.): Contact area is im very wet contact conditions. These condi
the authors have attempted to extend the portant in affecting current through the tions consisted of standing ankle deep in
data to include the voltage of the circuit. body. Wet gloves can amplify shock be salt water and grasping a bare wire or a pair
For example, they find that a reasonably yond that obtained on the bare hand by of pliers with the hand dripping wet with
safe direct voltage, hand to hand, is 104.2 increasing effective contact area. salt water. Conditions similar to this may
volts and hand to feet 51 volts. It is interesting to note that the trend prevail when working in very wet locations.
At the Johns Hopkins Hospital, the skin toward low voltage (40 or less) d-c power Perhaps the greatest value of the study is
resistance of the bodies of certain patients is sources for the high-speed consumable to emphasize the potential danger from very
meastired as an aid to diagnosis. The re electrode processes is definitely in the low voltages with the hope that such in
sistances are measured between an indiffer direction of increased safety. formation will result in creating more
ent electrode at some convenient location respect for ordinary house circuits among
and a small silver wheel which is moved users of electrical apparatus and appliances,
over the body stuface. In this work a D. B. Robinson (American Can Company, including all members of the family.
potential of 90 volts direct current is used Maywood, 111.): Do the let-go currents Fortunately, low-voltage hazards are virtu
and we have experienced no difficulties, and voltages discussed in the paper cause ally eliminated by the application of a
and no one has been injured. muscular reactions such as to promote Uttle common sense, such as: de-energizing
The outer layer of oiu skin, the epi "grabbing" of contact? the circuit whenever possible; never work
dermis, is our best protection against electric ing on a live circuit, or using electrically
shock. The resistance of the epidermis powered tools or appliances barehanded
varies widely over the surface of the body. K. A. Krasin (Chicago Bridge and Iron when standing on metal floors, in water, on
It is low on the palms of the hands, the Company, Chicago, 111.): Does not the wet ground, or in the rain. Instead, dry
soles of the feet, the axillae, the face, the higher voltage contacted on muscular gloves and rubber overshoes should be worn;
groin, and certain other body areas. In reaction result in an opposite effect to that and well-grounded and wet areas should be
passing the mid-line from the lower surface encountered at lower voltage? covered with a dryboard, a couple of sacks,
of a finger to the back there is an increase in or an old coat.
resistance of eight- to tenfold. The skin In reply to Mr. Welch, since contact
resistance also varies with the applied C. F. Dalziel and F. P. Massoglia: The resistance is a predominating factor in
voltage, its conditions as to wetness, and authors are in full agreement with Mr. limiting the current in low-voltage acci
other factors. Once the current gets inside Kouvenhoven that let-go current is a vaUd dents, anything that will increase the
the body the resistance is practically uni criterion of electric shock hazard, and that effective area of contact with the body will
form and is about 100 ohms per centimeter'. the corresponding let-go voltage is uncertain increase the hazard. Wet gloves would be
In view of the wide variations in the unless all of the conditions are accurately expected to increase greatly the potential