The document discusses key aspects of the European standard EN 13121-3:2016 for GRP chemical equipment. Some of the important features discussed include:
1) The standard introduces limit state design concepts along with a partial factor method to account for uncertainties in material properties and testing.
2) It brings a proper grading of resins, recognizing that the resin, not just the fibers, control durability and serviceability of GRP products.
3) Safety factors indicate the level of uncertainty for different parameters, and are largest for material property testing, showing batch-to-batch variability must be considered in designs.
4) Users must follow all provisions of the standard rigorously to ensure reliability and dur
The document discusses key aspects of the European standard EN 13121-3:2016 for GRP chemical equipment. Some of the important features discussed include:
1) The standard introduces limit state design concepts along with a partial factor method to account for uncertainties in material properties and testing.
2) It brings a proper grading of resins, recognizing that the resin, not just the fibers, control durability and serviceability of GRP products.
3) Safety factors indicate the level of uncertainty for different parameters, and are largest for material property testing, showing batch-to-batch variability must be considered in designs.
4) Users must follow all provisions of the standard rigorously to ensure reliability and dur
The document discusses key aspects of the European standard EN 13121-3:2016 for GRP chemical equipment. Some of the important features discussed include:
1) The standard introduces limit state design concepts along with a partial factor method to account for uncertainties in material properties and testing.
2) It brings a proper grading of resins, recognizing that the resin, not just the fibers, control durability and serviceability of GRP products.
3) Safety factors indicate the level of uncertainty for different parameters, and are largest for material property testing, showing batch-to-batch variability must be considered in designs.
4) Users must follow all provisions of the standard rigorously to ensure reliability and dur
EN 13121-3:2016 EN 13121 is the European standard for GRP chemical removed by adopting partial factors for each type of uncertainty. equipment which replaces BS 4994.In the May issue of this I believe that extensive research might have gone into the journal, I wrote about the features of this new standard.One formulation of this standard. As I wrote in the last editorial, the important feature is the introduction of Limit state design standard for the first time brought a proper grading of resins. concept in conjunction with partial factor method. For the benefit The standard clearly brings out that it is the resin and not the of readers, a full feature on this design method is presented in fibrethat controls the serviceability and durability. Many believe this issue.Part of this articlewill be continued in the next issue. that resin is only a bonding medium and any resin will do the The limit state design concept has been in use since 1974 in job. The standard shows it is not true. Good resin shall be used European codes for the design of structures made of steel, for creating good products. aluminium, reinforced concrete, timber and masonry structures. This method is now used in the 2016 edition of EN 13121-3. The value of partial safety factor is an indication of the level of Though many more improvements are needed in its use, uncertainty in that parameter. The Factor A1 relating to the test adoption of this limit state concept for chemical equipment is verification of material properties is the largest among all certainly a welcome forward step. The standard brings GRP on factors. It indicates the batch to batch property variation that par with other major engineering construction materials. The exists for fibres and resins. Standard does not recognize test benefits of design based on this methodology will be better reports prepared before 18 months. When the test report is 18 understood only when the users start using it for practical months' old, the safety factor is 50% more than that of samples designs. Do not equate GRP with ordinary plastics. prepared just before the design. This means that 50 % more materials must be used. It is cheaper to test materials and use I used to emphasize that Composites technology is both the proper value for design rather than add more materials and “knowledge based and knowledge driven”.Every step of design increase cost. Since it is the purchasers who suffer the financial and manufacture shall be executedwith proper scientific loss due to premature failure of the product or due to cost of understanding and decision making.Recognition of this fact is excess materials used, they mustinsist to get the designs made the reason for the success of composites in aerospace and with proper material properties. Very often design is being done defense sectors bringingmuch needed weight savings. Such a after making the product for clearing the payment. Purchaser rigorous knowledge based analysis is costly to be adopted in the must ask for design before the product is made. They must also industrial and social sectors. Yet, EN 13121 has brought in insist guarantee of service life that they expect from the product. scientific decision making for selection of fibres, resins, product wall structure and laminate property evaluation methods. Another tendency seen is to sideline the many stringent Product is designed for both serviceability requirements during provisions given in the standard. We shall not sideline the normal operation and structural resistance for overload various provisions of the standard, because the reliability and conditions. The arbitrariness of selection of safety factor is durability must be lost.Do not get quality certificate for one set of materials and use other set of materials.