Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information
Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year
Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor
Penyelia Bersama 1
Co-Supervisor 1
Page 1 of 2
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / APPLICATION / 2017 (1)
BAHAGIAN II : ULASAN / CADANGAN PENYELIA UTAMA
SECTION II : Main Supervisor’s Comments / Recommendations
1. Ulasan Penyelia Utama (Sila beri ulasan ringkas tentang kekuatan penyelidikan pelajar)
Main Supervisor’s Comments (Please provide brief summary of strength of student’s research work)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................... ..........................
Nama dan Tandatangan Penyelia Utama Tarikh
Name and Signature of Main Supervisor Date
Jawatankuasa telah bermesyuarat pada ...................................... (tarikh mesyuarat) dan mencadangkan program pengajian pelajar
dinaiktaraf dari Sarjana ke Kedoktoran. Bersama ini disertakan Borang Permohonan Naiktaraf, Laporan Penyelidikan Pelajar,
Laporan Penilai Individu dan Borang Sokongan Panel Penilai.
The Committee has met on ...................................... (date of meeting) and recommends student’s program of studies be converted from Master to PhD. Attached are the Application
Conversion Form , Student’s Research Report, Individual Assessor’s Report and Panel of Assessors’ Recommendation Form.
........................................................ ..........................
Tandatangan dan Cop Rasmi Tarikh
Signature and Stamp Date
PEJABAT IPSis
IGS OFFICE
Diterima oleh :
Received by :
........................................................ …………………………
Tandatangan dan Cop Rasmi Tarikh
Signature and Official Stamp Date
Page 2 of 2
IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/ASSESSOR/2017(2)
/2012(2) (2)
Institut Pengajian Siswazah Institute of Graduate Studies
PERMOHONAN NAIKTARAF APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION FROM
SARJANA KE KEDOKTORAN – MASTERS TO PHD –
LAPORAN PENILAI INDIVIDU ASSESSOR’S INDIVIDUAL REPORT
Arahan:
1. Pelajar dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian I dan menyerahkan dua (2) salinan borang penilaian ini kepada Penyelia Utama.
2. Penyelia Utama dikehendaki menyerahkan borang penilaian ini kepada Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti.
3. Penilai membuat keputusan permohonan setelah mendengar pembentangan penyelidikan pelajar.
Instructions:
1. Student must complete Section I and submit two (2) copies of the assessment form to the Main Supervisor.
2. The Main Supervisor submits the assessment forms to the Head of Graduate Studies Faculty.
3. The Assessor makes decision once student has presented his / her research report.
BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information
Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year
Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor
Penyelia Bersama
Co-Supervisor
2. Background & Problem Statement Gap in the existing Gap in the existing Gap in the existing
knowledge not clearly knowledge clearly knowledge very clearly
identified identified identified
1 2 3
3. Research Objectives Objectives are missing or The objectives are clear The objectives are very
not clear and overlapping clear and concisely
stated
1 2 3
Page 1 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / ASSESSOR / 2017(2)
4. Significance of Research Importance is addressed Topic is justified and will Significance of research
but is not convincingly likely lead to an actual is clearly identified and
stated contribution will lead to an actual
contribution
1 2 3
5. Conceptual Framework (if applicable) Framework does not Framework clearly Framework very clearly
clearly describe the describes the variables of describes the variables of
variables of study and study and the study and the hypotheses
the hypotheses to be hypotheses to be tested to be tested
tested
1 2 3
1 2 3
7. Output of Research Achieved Output not achieved Output has been Output has been
(Publication, Presentation and / or achieved achieved beyond
Awards) expectation
1 2 3
Important Note: All aspects of assessment must at least meet expectations (2) to be considered for upgrading.
1. Research Objectives The objectives are clear, concise, but The objectives are very clear, concise,
insufficient for PhD study and sufficient for PhD study
1
1 2
2. Conceptual Framework (if applicable) New variables are not identified and no All new variables are identified and
extension of theory is proposed extension of theory is proposed
1 2
3. Research Methodology Description of research methods is not Very clear description and appropriate
clear and insufficient for PhD. research methods to be used
1 2
1 2
…………………………………………………………………………………………...…
…………………………………………………………………………………………...…
…………………………………………………………………………………………...…
…
Important Note: All aspects of assessment must be acceptable (2) to be considered for upgrading.
………………………………………………………………
Page 2 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / ASSESSOR / 2017(2)
Nama Penilai:
Name of Assessor
.......................................................................................................................................
Tandatangan Penilai:
Signature of Assessor
.......................................................................................................................................
Tarikh:
Date
.......................................................................................................................................
Page 3 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / PANEL / 2017(3)
Arahan:
1. Pelajar dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian I dan menyerahkan dua (2) salinan borang Laporan Penilai Individu kepada Penyelia Utama.
2. Penyelia Utama dikehendaki menyerahkan borang Laporan Penilai Individu, borang permohonan yang telah diisi dan laporan penyelidikan
pelajar kepada Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti.
3. Panel Penilai membuat keputusan permohonan setelah mendengar pembentangan penyelidikan pelajar.
Instructions:
1. Student is to complete Section I and submit (2) copies of the Individual Assessor form to the Main Supervisor.
2. The Main Supervisor submits the Individual Assessor form, the application form with student’s research report to the Head of Graduate Studies
Faculty.
3. The Panel of Assessors makes decision once student has presented his / her research report.
BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information
Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year
Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor
Penyelia Bersama
Co-Supervisor
..........................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................
Page 1 of 2
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / PANEL / 2017(3)
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
(B) Sila nyatakan kualiti penyelidikan pelajar (Bulatkan tahap yang sesuai)
Please indicate the quality of student’s research (Circle the appropriate rating)
1 2 3
Bawah Jangkaan Memenuhi Jangkaan Melebihi Jangkaan
Below Expectation Meet Expectation Exceed Expectation
Nama Penilai Dalam : Nama Penilai Luar : Nama Pengerusi Panel Penilai :
Name of Internal Assessor Name of External Assessor Name of Chair Panel of Assessor
Page 2 of 2