You are on page 1of 7

IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / APPLICATION / 2017 (1)

Institut Pengajian Siswazah Institute of Graduate Studies


PERMOHONAN NAIKTARAF APPLICATION FOR
SARJANA KE KEDOKTORAN CONVERSION FROM
MASTERS TO PHD
Proses permohonan naiktaraf Sarjana ke Kedoktoran memerlukan penggunaan tiga (3) borang:
1. Borang Permohonan - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/APPLICATION/2017(1)
2. Borang Laporan Penilai Individu - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/ASSESSOR/2017(2) – dua (2) salinan
3. Borang Sokongan Panel Penilai - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/PANEL/2017(3)
A. Arahan Untuk Pelajar:
i. Pelajar dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian I dalam ketiga-tiga borang (Borang 1, 2 & 3) dan diserahkan bersama laporan
penyelidikan kepada Penyelia Utama.
ii. Permohonan pelajar mestilah diserahkan kepada pihak fakulti di dalam tempoh 12 bulan daripada tarikh pendaftaran.
iii. Pelajar dikehendaki membentang laporan penyelidikan dalam sesi pembentangan di hadapan panel penilai pada tarikh
yang ditetapkan.
B. Arahan untuk Penyelia:
i. Penyelia Utama dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian II dalam Borang Permohonan (IGS/RSCH/APPLICATION
CONVERSION/2017(1)) dan menyerahkan ketiga-tiga borang (Borang 1, 2 & 3), laporan penyelidikan untuk naiktaraf (rujuk
keperluan laporan penyelidikan dalam buku Process and Procedures of Post Graduate Research Degree Programmes)
kepada Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti.
C. Arahan untuk Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti (KPPS):
i. Fakulti akan melantik panel penilai (seorang pakar dalam UiTM dan seorang pakar luar UiTM) untuk menilai laporan
penyelidikan pelajar.
ii. Setelah mendapat sokongan dari Panel Penilai dan pengesahan JKAPS, sila serahkan borang permohonan lengkap,
salinan asal laporan penyelidikan pelajar, Laporan Penilai Individu serta Laporan Pengesahan Panel Penilai yang telah
disahkan kepada IPSis untuk kelulusan Jawatankuasa Induk Penilaian Akademik (JKIPA).
The application for conversion from Masters to PhD requires the use of three (3) forms:
1. Application Form - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/APPLICATION/2017(1)
2. Individual Assessor Report Form - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/ASSESSOR/2017(2) - two (2) copies
3. Panel of Assessors’ Recommendation Form - IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/PANEL/2017(3)
A. Instructions for Student:
i. Student must complete Section I in all three (3) forms (Forms 1, 2 & 3) and submit all forms with the research report to the Main Supervisor.
ii. The application must be submitted to the faculty within 12 months from the commencement of the student’s registration.
iii. Student is required to present the research report to the panel of assessors at scheduled date.
B. Instructions for Supervisor:
i. The Main Supervisor must complete section II of the Application Form and submit all three forms with the student’s research report for conversion (refer to the Process
and Procedures of Post Graduate Research Degree Programmes) to the Faculty Head of Postgraduate Studies.
C. Instructions for Faculty Head of Postgraduate Studies
i. The Faculty will appoint a panel of assessors (one internal expert in UiTM and one external expert outside UiTM) to assess student’s research report.
ii. Upon recommendation by the Panel of Assessors and application for the JKAPS Committee has endorsed conversion, submit completed application form, original copies
of student’s research report, the Individual Assessor’s Reports and the endorsed Panel of Assessors’ Recommendation to IPSis for approval by the JKIPA Committee.

BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information

Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. K.P. Baru :


I.C No/Passport No. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. Kad Pelajar :


Student ID No …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year

PENYELIA NAMA FAKULTI / INSTITUSI


SUPERVISOR NAME FACULTY / INSTITUTION

Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor

Penyelia Bersama 1
Co-Supervisor 1

Page 1 of 2
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / APPLICATION / 2017 (1)
BAHAGIAN II : ULASAN / CADANGAN PENYELIA UTAMA
SECTION II : Main Supervisor’s Comments / Recommendations

1. Ulasan Penyelia Utama (Sila beri ulasan ringkas tentang kekuatan penyelidikan pelajar)
Main Supervisor’s Comments (Please provide brief summary of strength of student’s research work)

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

.......................................................................... ..........................
Nama dan Tandatangan Penyelia Utama Tarikh
Name and Signature of Main Supervisor Date

BAHAGIAN III : PENGESAHAN JAWATANKUASA KECIL AKADEMIK PENGAJIAN SISWAZAH (FAKULTI)


SECTION III: Endorsement By JKAPS Committee

Jawatankuasa telah bermesyuarat pada ...................................... (tarikh mesyuarat) dan mencadangkan program pengajian pelajar
dinaiktaraf dari Sarjana ke Kedoktoran. Bersama ini disertakan Borang Permohonan Naiktaraf, Laporan Penyelidikan Pelajar,
Laporan Penilai Individu dan Borang Sokongan Panel Penilai.

The Committee has met on ...................................... (date of meeting) and recommends student’s program of studies be converted from Master to PhD. Attached are the Application
Conversion Form , Student’s Research Report, Individual Assessor’s Report and Panel of Assessors’ Recommendation Form.

Disahkan oleh Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kecil Akademik Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti:


Endorsed by Chairman of JKAPS Committee

........................................................ ..........................
Tandatangan dan Cop Rasmi Tarikh
Signature and Stamp Date

PEJABAT IPSis
IGS OFFICE

Diterima oleh :
Received by :

........................................................ …………………………
Tandatangan dan Cop Rasmi Tarikh
Signature and Official Stamp Date

Institut Pengajian Siswazah (IPSis)


Institute of Graduate Studies (IGS)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
Block 8, INTEKMA Convention Centre,
Persiaran Raja Muda, Section 7,
40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan,
Tel: 03-5522 5334 (Academic), 5338 (Admission), 5572 (Student Affairs),
5244 (Research), 5333 ( Coursework)
Faks (Fax): 03-5522 5335
Laman Web (Web Site): http://www.ipsis.uitm.edu.my

Page 2 of 2
IGS/RSCH/CONVERSION/ASSESSOR/2017(2)
/2012(2) (2)
Institut Pengajian Siswazah Institute of Graduate Studies
PERMOHONAN NAIKTARAF APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION FROM
SARJANA KE KEDOKTORAN – MASTERS TO PHD –
LAPORAN PENILAI INDIVIDU ASSESSOR’S INDIVIDUAL REPORT

Arahan:
1. Pelajar dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian I dan menyerahkan dua (2) salinan borang penilaian ini kepada Penyelia Utama.
2. Penyelia Utama dikehendaki menyerahkan borang penilaian ini kepada Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti.
3. Penilai membuat keputusan permohonan setelah mendengar pembentangan penyelidikan pelajar.

Instructions:
1. Student must complete Section I and submit two (2) copies of the assessment form to the Main Supervisor.
2. The Main Supervisor submits the assessment forms to the Head of Graduate Studies Faculty.
3. The Assessor makes decision once student has presented his / her research report.

BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information

Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. K.P. Baru :


I.C No/Passport No. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. Kad Pelajar :


Student ID No …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year

PENYELIA NAMA FAKULTI / INSTITUSI


SUPERVISOR NAME FACULTY / INSTITUTION

Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor

Penyelia Bersama
Co-Supervisor

BAHAGIAN II (Diisi oleh Penilai. Bulatkan yang berkenaan)


SECTION II (To be completed by the Assessor. Please circle the appropriate descriptor.)

(A) EXISTING RESEARCH WORK

BELOW MEET EXCEED


NO. ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT
EXPECTATIONS (1) EXPECTATIONS (2) EXPECTATIONS (3)

Not clearly defined Clearly defined Very clearly defined


1. Title of Research
1 2 3

2. Background & Problem Statement Gap in the existing Gap in the existing Gap in the existing
knowledge not clearly knowledge clearly knowledge very clearly
identified identified identified

1 2 3

3. Research Objectives Objectives are missing or The objectives are clear The objectives are very
not clear and overlapping clear and concisely
stated
1 2 3

Page 1 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / ASSESSOR / 2017(2)

BELOW MEET EXCEED


NO. ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT
EXPECTATIONS (1) EXPECTATIONS (2) EXPECTATIONS (3)

4. Significance of Research Importance is addressed Topic is justified and will Significance of research
but is not convincingly likely lead to an actual is clearly identified and
stated contribution will lead to an actual
contribution

1 2 3

5. Conceptual Framework (if applicable) Framework does not Framework clearly Framework very clearly
clearly describe the describes the variables of describes the variables of
variables of study and study and the study and the hypotheses
the hypotheses to be hypotheses to be tested to be tested
tested

1 2 3

6. Research Methodology No clear description of Clear description of Very clear description of


research methods to be research methods to be research methods to be
used used used

1 2 3

7. Output of Research Achieved Output not achieved Output has been Output has been
(Publication, Presentation and / or achieved achieved beyond
Awards) expectation

1 2 3

Important Note: All aspects of assessment must at least meet expectations (2) to be considered for upgrading.

PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PHD SCOPE


(B)

NO. ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE


1 2

1. Research Objectives The objectives are clear, concise, but The objectives are very clear, concise,
insufficient for PhD study and sufficient for PhD study
1
1 2

2. Conceptual Framework (if applicable) New variables are not identified and no All new variables are identified and
extension of theory is proposed extension of theory is proposed

1 2

3. Research Methodology Description of research methods is not Very clear description and appropriate
clear and insufficient for PhD. research methods to be used

1 2

4. Expected Output No novelty Has originality and novelty

1 2

5. Other comments …………………………………………………………………………………………...…

…………………………………………………………………………………………...…

…………………………………………………………………………………………...…

…………………………………………………………………………………………...…

Important Note: All aspects of assessment must be acceptable (2) to be considered for upgrading.
………………………………………………………………

Page 2 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / ASSESSOR / 2017(2)

BAHAGIAN III : KEPUTUSAN PENILAI


SECTION III: Outcome by Assessor

Sila tandakan (√) Cadangan permohonan naiktaraf pelajar adalah:


(Please Tick (√)) Application for conversion of student’s program is:

Penilai Dalam Disokong


Internal Assessor Recommended

Penilai Luar Tidak Disokong


External Assessor Not Recommended

Nama Penilai:
Name of Assessor
.......................................................................................................................................

Tandatangan Penilai:
Signature of Assessor
.......................................................................................................................................
Tarikh:
Date
.......................................................................................................................................

Institut Pengajian Siswazah (IPSis)


Institute of Graduate Studies (IGS)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
Block 8, INTEKMA Convention Centre,
Persiaran Raja Muda, Section 7,
40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan,
Tel: 03-5522 5334 (Academic), 5338 (Admission), 5572 (Student Affairs),
5244 (Research), 5333 ( Coursework)
Faks (Fax): 03-5522 5335
Laman Web (Web Site): http://www.ipsis.uitm.edu.my

Page 3 of 3
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / PANEL / 2017(3)

Institut Pengajian Siswazah Institute of Graduate Studies


PERMOHONAN NAIKTARAF APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION FROM
SARJANA KE KEDOKTORAN MASTERS TO PHD
(SOKONGAN PANEL PENILAI) (PANEL OF ASSESSORS’
RECOMMENDATION)

Arahan:
1. Pelajar dikehendaki melengkapkan Bahagian I dan menyerahkan dua (2) salinan borang Laporan Penilai Individu kepada Penyelia Utama.
2. Penyelia Utama dikehendaki menyerahkan borang Laporan Penilai Individu, borang permohonan yang telah diisi dan laporan penyelidikan
pelajar kepada Ketua Pusat Pengajian Siswazah Fakulti.
3. Panel Penilai membuat keputusan permohonan setelah mendengar pembentangan penyelidikan pelajar.
Instructions:
1. Student is to complete Section I and submit (2) copies of the Individual Assessor form to the Main Supervisor.
2. The Main Supervisor submits the Individual Assessor form, the application form with student’s research report to the Head of Graduate Studies
Faculty.
3. The Panel of Assessors makes decision once student has presented his / her research report.

BAHAGIAN I : MAKLUMAT AM
SECTION I : General Information

Nama :
Name …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. K.P. Baru :


I.C No/Passport No. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

No. Kad Pelajar :


Student ID No …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Kod Program :
Programme Code …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Fakulti :
Faculty …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

:
Tajuk …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Penyelidikan
Title of Research …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Semester: SEPTEMBER MAC Tahun:
Semester September March Year

PENYELIA NAMA FAKULTI / INSTITUSI


SUPERVISOR NAME FACULTY / INSTITUTION

Penyelia Utama
Main Supervisor

Penyelia Bersama
Co-Supervisor

BAHAGIAN II (Diisi oleh Pengerusi Panel mengikut keputusan Panel Penilai)


SECTION II ( To be filled up by the Panel Chairperson following Panel’s decision)

(A) NO. ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT COMMENTS

1. Research Objectives ..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

2. Conceptual Framework (if applicable) ..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

..........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 1 of 2
IGS / RSCH / CONVERSION / PANEL / 2017(3)

NO. ASPECTS OF ASSESSMENT COMMENTS

3. Research Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

4. Expected Output ........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

5. Additional scope for the Doctoral ........................................................................................................................................................................


degree ........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

6. Other comments ........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................................................................

(B) Sila nyatakan kualiti penyelidikan pelajar (Bulatkan tahap yang sesuai)
Please indicate the quality of student’s research (Circle the appropriate rating)

1 2 3
Bawah Jangkaan Memenuhi Jangkaan Melebihi Jangkaan
Below Expectation Meet Expectation Exceed Expectation

BAHAGIAN III : KEPUTUSAN PANEL PENILAI


SECTION III: Outcome by Panel of Assessors

Cadangan permohonan naiktaraf pelajar adalah:


Application for conversion of student’s program is

DISOKONG TIDAK DISOKONG


Recommended Not Recommended

................................................................................... ................................................................................... ..................................................................................


Tandatangan Penilai Dalam Tandatangan Penilai Luar Tandatangan Pengerusi Panel Penilai
Signature of Internal Assessor Signature of External Assessor Signature of Chair Panel of Assessor

Nama Penilai Dalam : Nama Penilai Luar : Nama Pengerusi Panel Penilai :
Name of Internal Assessor Name of External Assessor Name of Chair Panel of Assessor

........................................................................................... ........................................................................................... ...........................................................................................

Tarikh: Tarikh: Tarikh:


Date ................................................................ Date ................................................................ Date ...............................................................

Institut Pengajian Siswazah (IPSis)


Institute of Graduate Studies (IGS)
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
Block 8, INTEKMA Convention Centre,
Persiaran Raja Muda, Section 7,
40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan,
Tel: 03-5522 5334 (Academic), 5338 (Admission), 5572 (Student Affairs),
5244 (Research), 5333 ( Coursework)
Faks (Fax): 03-5522 5335
Laman Web (Web Site): http://www.ipsis.uitm.edu.my

Page 2 of 2

You might also like