CHAPTER III

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter determine the findings, analysis and interpretation of data gathered by the
researchers. This study aimed to determine the effects of augmented reality materials on the
motivation and academic performance of the student in anatomy course.

TABLE 1

EFFECTS OF AUGMENTED REALITY MATERIALS ON THE MOTIVATION OF

THE STUDENTS IN TERMS OF:

1.1) Attention – Relevance

1.2) Confidence – Satisfaction

STATISTICS

Statistics
attentionrelev
ance confidencesatisfaction
N Valid 24 24
Missing 0 0
Mean 3.7917 4.0000
Std. Deviation .41485 .29488
interpretation

Attention - Relevance
Frequency Percent
Valid neutral 5 20.8
agree 19 79.2
Total 24 100.0

The table above presented the mean value of the motivation in terms of Attention-
Relevance of first year student in Radtech students in DMMC Institute of Health Sciences.

As depicted in the table 79% or 19 of the respondents has motivation in terms of

Attention-Relevance.
 Confidence – Satisfaction
Frequency Percentage
Valid neutral 1 4.2
agree 22 91.7
strongly agree 1 4.2
Total 24 100.0

The table above presented the mean value of the Augmented Reality Materials on the
motivation of students in terms of Attention-Relevance and Confidence-Satisfaction of the
students in 1st year radtech students in DMMC Institute of Health Sciences.

As depicted in the table 92%, or 22 of the respondents has motivation in terms of

Confidence- Satisfaction .

TABLE 2

Academic Performance of the respondents in Anatomy course:

1.1 ) Before using AR

1.2 ) After using AR
2) Statistics
pretest posttest
N Valid 24 24
Missing 0 0
Mean 6.6667 17.1667
Std. Deviation 1.80980 .96309

The table above presented the mean of post test and pre test scores of the first
year radtech students in DMMC Institute of Health Sciences.
 Pre-test
Frequency Percent
Valid 1.00 1 4.2
3.00 1 4.2
5.00 1 4.2
6.00 7 29.2
7.00 5 20.8
8.00 7 29.2
9.00 2 8.3
Total 24 100.0

The first column presents the scores from lowest to highest while on the second
column presents the frequency of students who get the scores.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers greatfully acknowledge his/her gratitude and appreciation to the

following people who made the completion and accomplishment of this thesis possible:

Mr. Andres F. Laude, Jr., RRT,MSRT The researchers thesis adviser , for sharing his
support, knowledge , understanding , guidance , and inspiration that continually complete this
research study;

Mr. JKarlo Manalo for lending their busy hour and making an effort in helping the
researchers data gathering.

Post-test
Frequency Percent
Valid 16.00 9 37.5
17.00 2 8.3
18.00 13 54.2
Total 24 100.0

TABLE 3

SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TEST SCORES BEFORE

AND AFTER USE OF AR MATERIALS IN ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
 95% Confidence tailed)
Interval of the
Difference
Std. Std. Error
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper
Pair pretest - - 2.24577 .45842 -11.44831 -9.55169 - 23 .000
1 posttest 10.5000 22.905
0
there is a significant difference between the test scores before and after use of AR materials in
anatomy and physiology

TABLE 4

CORRELATION BETWEEN THE SUB FACTORS OF MOTIVATION AND THE TEST

SCORES OBTAINED BY THE STUDENTS IN ANATOMY COURSE

Correlations
pretest posttest
attentionrelevance Pearson Correlation -.212 -.018
Sig. (2-tailed) .319 .933
N 24 24
confidencesatisfactio Pearson Correlation -.244 .000
n Sig. (2-tailed) .250 1.000
N 24 24
there is NO correlation between the sub factors of motivation and the test scores
obtained by the students in anatomy course