You are on page 1of 1

I.

that is conducted separately from the society in the performance in accomplishing who others
which we live. take the self to be.
1. In William James’ conceptualization, what are
the two elements of the self? 3. In what the authors describe as a more III.
critical approach to understanding the self, how
Mainstream psychological interest in the self 1. How does power create the self?
are individual and social action conceptualized?
stems in particular from the writings of William
For Foucault, the self is the direct consequence
James in his classic text The Principles of Adopting a critical approach allows us to see
of power and can only be appre- hended in
Psychology (James, 1890). James provided what how people construct themselves in everyday
terms of historically specific systems of
became a highly influential and enduring life and how the versions of self that they
discourse. So-called regimes of power do not
conceptualisation of the self as comprising two propose are oriented to accomplishing social
simply control a bounded, rational subject, but
separate but necessarily related aspects. outcomes. The selves that people make, and
rather they bring the self into existence by
how they are taken up by others, are ongoing
I - centre of introspection and reflection on imposing disciplinary practices on the body.
projects, to be developed, reworked, or
experience, the person who made sense of
otherwise dealt with as we live our lives as 2. If the self is produced by power, how can
past, present, and future encounters with the
social beings. change, resistance, and self-creation occur?
world in a form that rendered these encounters
coherent and thereby allowed for continuity of 4. Goffman’s work show how the self is Globalization (Global media culture and
being. performed through social interaction at the increasing rates of migration )
micro level. How is this understanding of the
Me - comprised the self as known through Religion
self different from William James’
his/her interactions with others, social self, or
conceptualization of the self?
more accurately for James, a collection of social 3. What is reflexivity and what is agency?
selves that were based in and known through …self was not a property of the individual but
The reflexive process refers to the uniquely
the person as a social being rather something that the individual performed
human capacity to become an object to one's
in interaction with others. According to his
2. What do the authors mean when they aver self, to be both subject and object. Reflexivity is
argument, people in interactions seek to
that James’ conceptualization lead to a dualist not a biological given but rather emerges from
present themselves in ways that will guide the
and essentialist understanding of the self? the social experience. According to Mead (1934,
impressions that others form of them. At the
p. 134), "It is by means of reflexiveness--the
That view, rooted in dualist and essentialist same time, those with whom an individual is
turning-back of the experience of the individual
assumptions, leads to an understanding of the interacting attempt to gain information about
upon himself-that the whole social process is
self that ultimately is internally inconsistent and form an impression of the individual. All
thus brought into the experience of the
and/or unsustainable. As we have seen, performances of the self therefore carry risks:
individuals involved in it."
however, the self is neither an enduring any individual might not bring off a
individual product nor an individual endeavour performance successfully or a performance
might be taken up in a way that was not
anticipated. Regardless, self is the outcome of

You might also like