Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michael Jarzabkowski
This is not a do-it-yourself article on church acoustics. After all, you would not
expect a how-to article for calculating the acceptable deflection of a pre-stressed
concrete slab at a particular superimposed loading. Likewise, acoustics is an
engineering science with results that can only be predicted through vigorous
mathematical computation and investigation. As a skill, it requires experience
and the development of reliable intuition of one of the most complex natural
sciences known to modern physics. Rather, I hope to foster an appreciation and
basic understanding of acoustics so that intelligent questions can be raised in the
early planning stages of your new sanctuary. These are the questions that ensure
the completed project is a success, not a poor compromise characterized by
remedial treatment.
Very few architects are equipped with the skills to undertake even basic acoustic
design, so it is usually overlooked until late in the project, or not addressed at all.
In some cases, the acoustic consultant is asked to look at the completed plans and
suggest some remedial modifications. An even worse and more common scenario
is to hold off on acoustic consultation until after the project is completed and its
design flaws have become all too evident. Ideally, an acoustic consultant should
be engaged at the same time as the architect, saving redesign time and therefore
money. Here are some basic acoustic parameters that need to be discussed during
the initial preliminary design stage.
Some of the most basic auditorium design parameters have a significant effect on
the acoustic environment, which is why they must be discussed in the earliest
design stage. The ratio of the length to width for a typical auditorium should be
between 1.2 and 1.7. Even more important is the ratio of auditorium height to
width, which should be between 0.4 and 0.7.
If the ceiling is too low, it restricts stage sound from reaching the people at the
rear of the room. If too high, sound reflected from the ceiling arrives much later
than the initial direct sound from the stage and affects intelligibility. Actual ratios
should be an acoustically informed decision based on required seating,
auditorium dimensions, shape, layout and internal angles.
Apart from dimensional ratios, the Plan shape of the room also needs to be
considered in the preliminary design stage. Numerous Plan shapes have been
used in auditorium design, from the traditional cruciform to rectangles, squares,
circles, fans, pentagons, hexagons, other polygons and various irregular shapes.
Of these, the most solid choices are fans, rectangles and modified polygons;
square is acceptable if the auditorium is large enough; while cruciform and round
shapes are the hardest to design for good acoustics. After all, the cruciform is
actually four rooms joined together in the form of a cross, so sound from each
4
section affects hearing in other sections. The problem with round or partially
round rooms is that the walls will reflect the sound waves to focus on a particular
point. This is similar to the way a semicircular reflector in a flashlight focuses
light rays into a narrow beam. At the beginning, the committee must resist the
temptation to depart from acoustically tried and tested shapes in search of
something unique that runs the risk of favoring form over function.
After dimension ratios and plan shape, the next most important acoustic
parameter to consider is the relationships between the auditorium's internal
angles or its internal geometry. The angles of the walls, floors, balconies and
ceilings greatly affect how sound from the stage or platform is reflected into
other areas that may be receiving less direct sound. The acoustically ideal room is
one in which all seats receive the same sound level and frequency spectrum. This
is never wholly possible due to the attenuation of sound with distance, but by
carefully modeling the internal angles of the auditorium, the reflected sound can
be "aimed" at those areas that need it and kept away from those that don't.
Reverberation Time
The physical characteristics of reflected sound bring us to another important
acoustic parameter: reverberation time. Reverberation time in an auditorium is
the length of time it takes for the reflections from an impulsive sound--like a
sharp handclap--to die away or decay a certain amount from its initial level. The
5
physical expression of this parameter is called RT60 which is the amount of time
required for the reflected sound to drop by 60dB from its initial level once the
source is shut off. Apart from being a measurable quantity in existing
auditoriums, RT60 can also be calculated with relative accuracy from various
empirical formulae and through 3-D computer modeling prior to construction.
When discussing optimum RT60s, most texts on church acoustics provide three
formulaic curves based on the following delineations: Roman Catholic, High
Church Protestants, and Low Church Protestants. This is an antiquated concept
carried over from an era when the liturgies of each particular denomination were
more uniform and predictable. Such generalizations are no longer true, which
means that new churches--especially evangelical churches that use contemporary
forms of musical worship--do not fit into any of the categories.
Regardless of denomination, determining the optimum RT60 for any new church
requires a detailed study of that particular congregation's current and future
trends. At the preliminary design stage, the ministerial staff and building
committee must sit down with the acoustic consultant and clearly define their
ministry style and future objectives. Once this is done, the acoustic consultant
can provide design specifications that will best meet the church's needs. Areas to
be considered include liturgy, forms and varieties of congregational worship,
different media used in presentations--contemporary band, choir and orchestra
repertoire, drama, plays and musicals--and the use of multimedia technology
including audio-video recording and even broadcast.
Many other parameters affect the listening environment, like noise intrusion from
outside (roadways, airports and railways) and from other rooms within the
building, as well as noise from the mechanical equipment for HVAC. Even rain
on the roof can be one such intrusion, and persistent ventilation system noise is
one of the biggest problems in speech intelligibility. Still, surprisingly few
churches consult an acoustics expert to help solve their noise problems. An
acoustic consultant can devise planning concepts that minimize unwanted noise
and also provide design measures to stop noise intrusion wherever necessary.
Finally, we come to the sound reinforcement system itself. While not a part of
this article, the sound system is so closely linked to the acoustics of the
auditorium that its design should be handled by the acoustic consultant. It should
be noted that the installation of a sound system cannot fix inherent acoustic
8
problems in an auditorium. While the sound reinforcement system does not alter
the building acoustics, a good engineer will design the system taking building
acoustics into account. Sound system engineering formulae include a number of
acoustic parameters, but they affect the sound system design and not vice versa.
So often, churches are told that specialized acoustic design is unnecessary
because the sound system will "fix" any problems with the acoustics. This is
inaccurate--some churches go through three or four new sound systems before
they realize that the room acoustics are to blame instead. A clear orator in an
acoustically well-designed auditorium should be able to address 700 people
easily without the aid of any sound system. Installing a sound system does not
make the acoustics of an auditorium better or worse, but it can certainly amplify
any existing acoustic problems.
Needless to say, building committees should rely on expert acoustic advice in the
very beginning to avoid an acoustical monstrosity. It is usually during the
preliminary design stage when a project gets off-track. The final result: an
auditorium (if one dare use the word) in which the congregation has to strain to
hear the message--or worse, cover their ears in self-defense. Often the acoustic
consultant is contacted when construction is almost finished and then asked to
help fix the potential sound problems. By this stage, many of the controlling
parameters are set in stone (more literally concrete), and even the best treatments
will yield mediocre results.
9
Primary Sources
Re-Pitching The Tent: Reordering The Church Building For Worship And
Mission
Richard Giles. Norwich: Canterbury Press, rev. ed., 1999.
255 p. 25 cm. ISBN: 1-85311-245-3 DIVINITY Ministry Resource Center G55
An excellent book that gives a brief history of church architecture before attempting to pave a way to
the future. It has some checklists in the final chapter that would be useful during preliminary design.
Church Builders
Edwin Heathcote and Iona Spens. London: Academy Editions (Division of John
Wiley & Sons), 1997.
224 p. over 450 illustrations, ISBN 0-471-97755-1
"This book traces developments in church building through the momentous changes in architecture and
theology of the twentieth century." Great photograpy, plans, sections, etc. Similar to the book above,
which should help stimulate great ideas.
Church Business
Edited by RaeAnn Slaybaugh. Phoenix, Arizona: Virgo Publishing.
Serial, 12 per year ISSN: 1521-3536
This magazine is aimed at ministers, church committees, and other groups interested in the design
and construction of larger churches that make use of contemporary multi-media technology systems.
I have written a number of technical articles for them on acoustics and sound system design.
Some advertising but excellent technical articles and design checklists as well as case studies.
Thanks to
Bibliographies
Modern Church Architecture: A Guide to the Form and Spirit of 20th Century
Religious Buildings.
Albert Christ-Janer. New York: Dodge Book Dept., McGraw-Hill, 1962.